journal article·2025-05-15Open access

Real-Time Intelligent Recognition and Precise Drilling in Strongly Heterogeneous Formations Based on Multi-Parameter Logging While Drilling and Drilling Engineering

Aosai Zhao, Yang Yu, Bin Wang, Yewen Liu, Jingyue Liu, Xubiao Fu, Wenhao Zheng, Fei Tian

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

Facing engineering challenges of real-time and high-precision recognition of strongly heterogeneous formations during directional drilling, it is crucial to address the issues of sparse lithology geological labels and multi-source lithology identification from LWD data. This paper proposes a real-time intelligent recognition method for strongly heterogeneous formations based on multi-parameter logging while drilling and drilling engineering, which can effectively guide directional drilling operations. Traditional supervised learning methods rely heavily on extensive lithology labels and rich wireline logging data. However, in LWD applications, challenges such as limited sample sizes and stringent real-time requirements make it difficult to achieve the accuracy needed for effective geosteering in strongly heterogeneous reservoirs, thereby impacting the reservoir penetration rate. In this study, we comprehensively utilize LWD parameters (six types, including natural gamma and electrical resistivity, etc.) and drilling engineering parameters (four types, including drilling rate and weight on bit, etc.) from offset wells. The UMAP algorithm is employed for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, which not only integrates the dynamic response characteristics of drilling parameters but also preserves the sensitivity of logging data to lithological variations. The K-means clustering algorithm is employed to extract the deep geo-engineering characteristics from multi-source LWD data, thereby constructing a lithology label library and categorizing the training and testing datasets. The optimized CatBoost machine learning model is subsequently utilized for lithology classification, enabling real-time and high-precision geological evaluation during directional drilling. In the Hugin Formation of the Volve field in the Norwegian North Sea, the application of UMAP demonstrates superior data separability compared with PCA and t-SNE, effectively distinguishing thin reservoirs with strong heterogeneity. The CatBoost model achieves a balanced accuracy of 92.7% and an F1-score of 89.3% in six lithology classifications. This approach delivers high-precision geo-engineering decision support for the real-time control of horizontal well trajectories, which holds significant implications for the precision drilling of strongly heterogeneous reservoirs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CAS Engineering Laboratory for Deep Resources Equipment and Technology, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Beijing 100029, China

Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Sinopec Shengli Petroleum Engineering Corporation, Dongying 257000, China

Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BP, UK

Funding

Chinese National key research and development Program · Youth Innovation Promotion Association Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Research progress and the prospect of intelligent drilling and completion technologies
2. Petroleum geology features and research developments of hydrocarbon accumulation in deep petroliferous basins10.1007/s12182-015-0014-0 ↗
3. Development characteristics and orientation of tight oil and gas in China10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60264-8 ↗
4. Holenka, J., Best, D., Evans, M., Kurkoski, P., and Sloan, W. (1995, January 12–15). Azimuthal porosity while drilling. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Paris, France.
5. Bornemann, E., Bourgeois, T., Bramlett, K., Hodenfield, K., and Maggs, D. (1998, January 26–29). The application and accuracy of geological information from a logging-while-drilling density tool. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Keystone, CO, USA.
6. Carpenter, W.W., Best, D., and Evans, M. (1997, January 15–18). Applications and interpretation of azimuthally sensitive density measurements acquired while drilling. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Houston, TX, USA.
7. A qualitative characteristic scheme and a fast distance prediction method of multi-probe azimuthal gamma-ray logging in geosteering10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108244 ↗
8. A formation intelligent evaluation solution for geosteering
9. Datta, D., Singh, G., Routray, A., Mohanty, W.K., and Mahadik, R. (2021, January 13–16). Automatic Classification of Lithofacies with Highly Imbalanced Dataset Using Multistage SVM Classifier. Proceedings of the IECON 2021–47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589254 ↗
10. Massive Spatial Well Clustering Based on Conventional Well Log Feature Extraction for Fast Formation Heterogeneity Characterization10.2113/2022/7260254 ↗
11. Machine learning approaches for petrographic classification of carbonate-siliciclastic rocks using well logs and textural information10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.06.012 ↗
12. Multi-layered ordovician paleokarst reservoir detection and spatial delineation: A case study in the Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin, Western China10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.015 ↗
13. Multiscale geological-geophysical characterization of the epigenic origin and deeply buried paleokarst system in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.12.029 ↗
14. Integrated geological-geophysical characterizations of deeply buried fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Ordovician strata, Tarim Basin10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.028 ↗
15. Xing, Y.H., Yang, H.T., and Yu, W. (2023). An Approach for the Classification of Rock Types Using Machine Learning of Core and Log Data. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15118868 ↗
16. Zhang, J.L., He, Y.B., Zhang, Y., Li, W.F., and Zhang, J.J. (2022). Well-Logging-Based Lithology Classification Using Machine Learning Methods for High-Quality Reservoir Identification: A Case Study of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15103675 ↗
17. Baudzis, S., Karłowska-Pik, J., and Puskarczyk, E. (2021). Electrofacies as a Tool for the Prediction of True Resistivity Using Advanced Statistical Methods—Case Study. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14196228 ↗
18. Electrofacies classification of deeply buried carbonate strata using machine learning methods: A case study on ordovician paleokarst reservoirs in Tarim Basin10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104720 ↗
19. Liu, J.Y., Tian, F., Zhao, A.S., Zheng, W.H., and Cao, W.J. (2024). Logging Lithology Discrimination with Enhanced Sampling Methods for Imbalance Sample Conditions. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14156534 ↗
20. Mcdonald, W.J., and Ward, C.E. (1976, January 9–12). Logging while drilling: A survey of methods and priorities. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Denver, CO, USA.
21. A comparison of logging-while-drilling and wireline nuclear porosity logs in shales from wells in Brazil
22. Meador, R.A. (2009, January 15–19). Logging while drilling: A Story of Dreams, Accomplishments, And Bright Futures. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
23. Tollefsen, E., Weber, A., Kramer, A., Sirkin, G., Hartman, D., and Grant, L. (2007, January 27). Logging While Drilling Measurements: From Correlation to Evaluation. Proceedings of the SPE International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico.10.2118/108534-MS ↗
24. A new-generation LWD tool with colocated sensors opens new opportunities for formation evaluation10.2118/97224-PA ↗
25. Akinsanmi, O.B., Aibangbe, O., and Kienitz, C. (2000, January 6). Application of azimuthal density while drilling images for dips, facies and reservoir characterization—Niger/delta experience. Proceedings of the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.2523/65460-MS ↗
26. Inversion-based petrophysical interpretation of logging-while-drilling nuclear and resistivity measurements10.1190/geo2013-0175.1 ↗
27. A method for applying the use of a smart 4 controller for the assessment of drill string bottom-part vibrations and shock loads10.3390/vibration7030043 ↗
28. Velychkovych, A., Mykhailiuk, V., and Andrusyak, A. (2025). Numerical Model for Studying the Properties of a New Friction Damper Developed Based on the Shell with a Helical Cut. Appl. Mech., 6.10.3390/applmech6010001 ↗
29. Slotted shell resilient elements for drilling shock absorbers10.2516/ogst/2018043 ↗
30. Vukadin, D., Čogelja, Z., Vidaček, R., and Brkić, V. (2023). Lithology and Porosity Distribution of High-Porosity Sandstone Reservoir in North Adriatic Using Machine Learning Synthetic Well Catalogue. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137671 ↗
31. A novel hybrid method of lithology identification based on k-means++ algorithm and fuzzy decision tree10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109681 ↗
32. Zheng, D., Liu, S., Chen, Y., and Gu, B. (2024). A Lithology Recognition Network Based on Attention and Feature Brownian Distance Covariance. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14041501 ↗
33. Using machine learning methods to identify coal pay zones from drilling and logging-while-drilling (LWD) data10.2118/198288-PA ↗
34. Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling—A win-win strategy based on machine learning10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.006 ↗
35. Domain generalization using contrastive domain discrepancy optimization for interpretation-while-drilling10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104685 ↗
36. Mutrif Siddig, O., and Elkatatny, S. (2023, January 19–21). Utilizing Drilling Data and Machine Learning in Real-Time Prediction of Poisson’s Ratio. Proceedings of the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain.10.2118/213694-MS ↗
37. Application of specific energy for lithology identification10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106402 ↗
38. Evaluation and Development of a Predictive Model for Geophysical Well Log Data Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: Machine Learning Applications to Lithology Prediction10.1007/s11053-022-10121-z ↗
39. Unsupervised classification applications in enhancing lithological mapping and geological understanding: A case study from Northern Ireland10.1144/jgs2022-136 ↗
40. Application of unsupervised learning and deep learning for rock type prediction and petrophysical characterization using multi-scale data10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212241 ↗
41. Yang, X., Chen, J.G., and Chen, Z.J. (2023). Classification of Alteration Zones Based on Drill Core Hyperspectral Data Using Semi-Supervised Adversarial Autoencoder: A Case Study in Pulang Porphyry Copper Deposit, China. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15041059 ↗
42. Automated Well-Log Processing and Lithology Classification by Identifying Optimal Features Through Unsupervised and Supervised Machine-Learning Algorithms10.2118/202477-PA ↗
43. Lithology identification using principal component analysis and particle swarm optimization fuzzy decision tree10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111233 ↗
44. Loriato Potratz, G., Canchumuni, S.W., Bermudez Castro, J.D., Potratz, J., and Pacheco, M.a.C. (2021). Automatic Lithofacies Classification with t-SNE and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm. Anu. Inst. Geocienc., 44.10.11137/1982-3908_2021_44_35024 ↗
45. Temizel, C., Odi, U., Balaji, K., Aydin, H., and Santos, J.E. (2022). Classifying Facies in 3D Digital Rock Images Using Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15207660 ↗
46. Hydrocarbon system analysis in a rift basin with mixed marine and nonmarine source rocks: The South Viking Graben, North Sea
47. Vector-acoustic reverse time migration of Volve ocean-bottom cable data set without up/down decomposed wavefields10.1190/geo2014-0554.1 ↗
48. Geomechanical model construction to resolve field stress profile and reservoir rock properties of Jurassic Hugin Formation, Volve field, North Sea10.1007/s40948-022-00359-5 ↗
49. Principal components analysis (PCA)10.1016/0098-3004(93)90090-R ↗
50. Visualizing data using t-SNE
51. Mcinnes, L., Healy, J., and Melville, J. (2018). Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv.10.21105/joss.00861 ↗
52. The global k-means clustering algorithm10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2 ↗
53. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, The MIT Press.
54. Petrovic, S. (2006, January 19–20). A comparison between the silhouette index and the davies-bouldin index in labelling ids clusters. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Workshop of Secure IT Systems, Linköping, Sweden.