Show source-provided references
1. Research progress and the prospect of intelligent drilling and completion technologies
2. Petroleum geology features and research developments of hydrocarbon accumulation in deep petroliferous basins
10.1007/s12182-015-0014-0 ↗4. Holenka, J., Best, D., Evans, M., Kurkoski, P., and Sloan, W. (1995, January 12–15). Azimuthal porosity while drilling. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Paris, France.
5. Bornemann, E., Bourgeois, T., Bramlett, K., Hodenfield, K., and Maggs, D. (1998, January 26–29). The application and accuracy of geological information from a logging-while-drilling density tool. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Keystone, CO, USA.
6. Carpenter, W.W., Best, D., and Evans, M. (1997, January 15–18). Applications and interpretation of azimuthally sensitive density measurements acquired while drilling. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Houston, TX, USA.
7. A qualitative characteristic scheme and a fast distance prediction method of multi-probe azimuthal gamma-ray logging in geosteering
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108244 ↗8. A formation intelligent evaluation solution for geosteering
9. Datta, D., Singh, G., Routray, A., Mohanty, W.K., and Mahadik, R. (2021, January 13–16). Automatic Classification of Lithofacies with Highly Imbalanced Dataset Using Multistage SVM Classifier. Proceedings of the IECON 2021–47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Toronto, ON, Canada.
10.1109/IECON48115.2021.9589254 ↗10. Massive Spatial Well Clustering Based on Conventional Well Log Feature Extraction for Fast Formation Heterogeneity Characterization
10.2113/2022/7260254 ↗11. Machine learning approaches for petrographic classification of carbonate-siliciclastic rocks using well logs and textural information
10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.06.012 ↗12. Multi-layered ordovician paleokarst reservoir detection and spatial delineation: A case study in the Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin, Western China
10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.015 ↗13. Multiscale geological-geophysical characterization of the epigenic origin and deeply buried paleokarst system in Tahe Oilfield, Tarim Basin
10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.12.029 ↗14. Integrated geological-geophysical characterizations of deeply buried fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs in Ordovician strata, Tarim Basin
10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.028 ↗15. Xing, Y.H., Yang, H.T., and Yu, W. (2023). An Approach for the Classification of Rock Types Using Machine Learning of Core and Log Data. Sustainability, 15.
10.3390/su15118868 ↗16. Zhang, J.L., He, Y.B., Zhang, Y., Li, W.F., and Zhang, J.J. (2022). Well-Logging-Based Lithology Classification Using Machine Learning Methods for High-Quality Reservoir Identification: A Case Study of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Area of Junggar Basin, NW China. Energies, 15.
10.3390/en15103675 ↗17. Baudzis, S., Karłowska-Pik, J., and Puskarczyk, E. (2021). Electrofacies as a Tool for the Prediction of True Resistivity Using Advanced Statistical Methods—Case Study. Energies, 14.
10.3390/en14196228 ↗18. Electrofacies classification of deeply buried carbonate strata using machine learning methods: A case study on ordovician paleokarst reservoirs in Tarim Basin
10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104720 ↗19. Liu, J.Y., Tian, F., Zhao, A.S., Zheng, W.H., and Cao, W.J. (2024). Logging Lithology Discrimination with Enhanced Sampling Methods for Imbalance Sample Conditions. Appl. Sci., 14.
10.3390/app14156534 ↗20. Mcdonald, W.J., and Ward, C.E. (1976, January 9–12). Logging while drilling: A survey of methods and priorities. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, Denver, CO, USA.
21. A comparison of logging-while-drilling and wireline nuclear porosity logs in shales from wells in Brazil
22. Meador, R.A. (2009, January 15–19). Logging while drilling: A Story of Dreams, Accomplishments, And Bright Futures. Proceedings of the SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
23. Tollefsen, E., Weber, A., Kramer, A., Sirkin, G., Hartman, D., and Grant, L. (2007, January 27). Logging While Drilling Measurements: From Correlation to Evaluation. Proceedings of the SPE International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico.
10.2118/108534-MS ↗24. A new-generation LWD tool with colocated sensors opens new opportunities for formation evaluation
10.2118/97224-PA ↗25. Akinsanmi, O.B., Aibangbe, O., and Kienitz, C. (2000, January 6). Application of azimuthal density while drilling images for dips, facies and reservoir characterization—Niger/delta experience. Proceedings of the SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, AB, Canada.
10.2523/65460-MS ↗26. Inversion-based petrophysical interpretation of logging-while-drilling nuclear and resistivity measurements
10.1190/geo2013-0175.1 ↗27. A method for applying the use of a smart 4 controller for the assessment of drill string bottom-part vibrations and shock loads
10.3390/vibration7030043 ↗28. Velychkovych, A., Mykhailiuk, V., and Andrusyak, A. (2025). Numerical Model for Studying the Properties of a New Friction Damper Developed Based on the Shell with a Helical Cut. Appl. Mech., 6.
10.3390/applmech6010001 ↗30. Vukadin, D., Čogelja, Z., Vidaček, R., and Brkić, V. (2023). Lithology and Porosity Distribution of High-Porosity Sandstone Reservoir in North Adriatic Using Machine Learning Synthetic Well Catalogue. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13137671 ↗32. Zheng, D., Liu, S., Chen, Y., and Gu, B. (2024). A Lithology Recognition Network Based on Attention and Feature Brownian Distance Covariance. Appl. Sci., 14.
10.3390/app14041501 ↗33. Using machine learning methods to identify coal pay zones from drilling and logging-while-drilling (LWD) data
10.2118/198288-PA ↗34. Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling—A win-win strategy based on machine learning
10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.006 ↗36. Mutrif Siddig, O., and Elkatatny, S. (2023, January 19–21). Utilizing Drilling Data and Machine Learning in Real-Time Prediction of Poisson’s Ratio. Proceedings of the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain.
10.2118/213694-MS ↗38. Evaluation and Development of a Predictive Model for Geophysical Well Log Data Analysis and Reservoir Characterization: Machine Learning Applications to Lithology Prediction
10.1007/s11053-022-10121-z ↗39. Unsupervised classification applications in enhancing lithological mapping and geological understanding: A case study from Northern Ireland
10.1144/jgs2022-136 ↗40. Application of unsupervised learning and deep learning for rock type prediction and petrophysical characterization using multi-scale data
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212241 ↗41. Yang, X., Chen, J.G., and Chen, Z.J. (2023). Classification of Alteration Zones Based on Drill Core Hyperspectral Data Using Semi-Supervised Adversarial Autoencoder: A Case Study in Pulang Porphyry Copper Deposit, China. Remote Sens., 15.
10.3390/rs15041059 ↗42. Automated Well-Log Processing and Lithology Classification by Identifying Optimal Features Through Unsupervised and Supervised Machine-Learning Algorithms
10.2118/202477-PA ↗44. Loriato Potratz, G., Canchumuni, S.W., Bermudez Castro, J.D., Potratz, J., and Pacheco, M.a.C. (2021). Automatic Lithofacies Classification with t-SNE and K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm. Anu. Inst. Geocienc., 44.
10.11137/1982-3908_2021_44_35024 ↗45. Temizel, C., Odi, U., Balaji, K., Aydin, H., and Santos, J.E. (2022). Classifying Facies in 3D Digital Rock Images Using Supervised and Unsupervised Approaches. Energies, 15.
10.3390/en15207660 ↗46. Hydrocarbon system analysis in a rift basin with mixed marine and nonmarine source rocks: The South Viking Graben, North Sea
47. Vector-acoustic reverse time migration of Volve ocean-bottom cable data set without up/down decomposed wavefields
10.1190/geo2014-0554.1 ↗48. Geomechanical model construction to resolve field stress profile and reservoir rock properties of Jurassic Hugin Formation, Volve field, North Sea
10.1007/s40948-022-00359-5 ↗50. Visualizing data using t-SNE
51. Mcinnes, L., Healy, J., and Melville, J. (2018). Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv.
10.21105/joss.00861 ↗53. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, The MIT Press.
54. Petrovic, S. (2006, January 19–20). A comparison between the silhouette index and the davies-bouldin index in labelling ids clusters. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Workshop of Secure IT Systems, Linköping, Sweden.