Urban Underground Space Geological Suitability—A Theoretical Framework, Index System, and Evaluation Method
Source abstract
Abstract
With rapid urbanization, urban underground space (UUS) development has become crucial for sustainable urban growth. This paper systematically reviews geological suitability evaluation (GSE) methods for UUS, integrating theoretical frameworks, indicator systems, and assessment techniques. We establish a comprehensive evaluation framework based on environmental strategic assessment (ESA) principles, analyzing key geological factors, including rock/soil properties, hydrogeological conditions, geological hazards, and existing underground structures. The study compares weighting methods (AHP, EWM, CRITIC) and comprehensive evaluation models (FCE, TOPSIS, BNM), highlighting their advantages and application scenarios. A case study of Xiong’an New Area demonstrates how multi-layer UUS planning integrates geological constraints with sustainable development goals. The results show that combining 3D geological modeling with hybrid evaluation methods significantly improves decision-making accuracy. The review provides practical guidance for optimizing UUS utilization while addressing current challenges in indicator selection, weight rationalization, and heterogeneity management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Geological Modeling and Analysis · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
No. 2 Brigade of Hebei Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration, Tangshan 063000, China
Tianjin Center (North China Center for Geoscience Innovation), China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Coast Geological Processes and Environmental Safety, Tianjin 300170, China
Xiong’an Urban Geological Research Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China
Funding
Hebei Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: Towards an integrated framework10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133 ↗
2. Liu, H.W., Li, Z., and He, Q.C. (2023). Suitability Assessment of Multilayer Urban Underground Space Based on Entropy and CRITIC Combined Weighting Method: A Case Study in Xiong’an New Area, China. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810231 ↗
3. Zhang, Y.Q., Chen, Z.J., Cheng, Q.W., Zhou, C., Jiang, P.H., Li, M.C., and Chen, D. (2016). Quota Restrictions on Land Use for Decelerating Urban Sprawl of Mega City: A Case Study of Shanghai, China. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8100968 ↗
4. Liu, D.X., Wu, L.X., and Yang, Y. (2020). A Hybrid Weight Assignment Model for Urban Underground Space Resources Evaluation Integrated with the Weight of Time Dimension. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10155152 ↗
5. Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas10.1680/udap.10.00020 ↗
6. Urban Underground Space: A Growing Imperative Perspectives and Current Research in Planning and Design for Underground Space Use10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.022 ↗
7. Suitability evaluation of underground space based on finite interval cloud model and genetic algorithm combination weighting10.1016/j.tust.2020.103743 ↗
8. Factors in the development of urban underground space surrounding metro stations: A case study of Osaka, Japan10.1016/j.tust.2019.103009 ↗
9. Evaluation of urban underground space resources using a negative list method: Taking Xi’an city as an example in China10.31035/cg2020006 ↗
10. Planning urban underground space from urban emergency evacuation: A digital layout planning method10.1016/j.tust.2023.105271 ↗
11. Assessing quality of urban underground spaces by coupling 3D geological models: The case study of Foshan city, South China10.1016/j.cageo.2015.07.016 ↗
12. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003 ↗
13. Krzeminska, A., Zareba, A., Dzikowska, A., Kazmierczak, B., Kutylowska, M., Piekarska, K., Jouhara, H., and Danielewicz, J. (2017, January 2–5). Bioarchitecture—A new vision of energy sustainable cities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Energy Systems and Environmental Engineering (ASEE17), Wroclaw, Poland.
14. Accessibility and the choice of network investments in the London Underground
15. Special Issue on Comprehensive Disaster Prevention Measures for Underground Spaces (Underground Malls, etc.)10.20965/jdr.2016.p0273 ↗
16. Research on the Resilience Evaluation and Promotion Strategy of Urban Underground Space
17. Urban Underground Space Development and Utilization and Environmental Geological Effect in Wuhan
18. Urban geophysical exploration: Case study in Chengdu International Bio-City10.1093/jge/gxad049 ↗
19. Carmody, J., and Sterling, R. (1993). Underground Space Design: A Guide to Subsurface Utilization and Design for People in Underground Spaces, Van Nostrand Reinhold Press.
20. The future of the underground space10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00022-0 ↗
21. Pucker, J., Allouche, E.N., and Sterling, R.L. (2006, January 26–28). Social Costs Associated with Trenchless Projects: Case Histories in North American and Europe. Proceedings of the 2006 NASTT No-Dig Conference, Nashville, TN, USA. Paper C-4-04.
22. Underground spatial planning—Perspectives and current research in Germany10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.023 ↗
23. Godard, J.P. (2004, January 22–27). Urban underground space and benefits of going underground. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2004 and 30th ITA General Assembly, Singapore.
24. Sustainable utility placement via multi-utility tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.001 ↗
25. Barriers to sustainable infrastructure in urban regeneration
26. Assessing the sustainability of underground space usage—A toolkit for testing possible urban futures10.1007/s11629-011-2093-8 ↗
27. Leveling vs. InSAR in urban underground construction monitoring: Pros and cons. Case of la sagrera railway station (Barcelona, Spain)10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.016 ↗
28. Integrated TEM and GPR data interpretation for high-resolution measurement of urban underground space
29. Viggiani, G. (2012). Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, CRC Press.10.1201/b12748 ↗
30. Evaluation of urban underground space resources using digitalization technologies10.1016/j.undsp.2016.08.002 ↗
31. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012 ↗
32. Identifying environmental impacts of underground construction10.1007/s10040-006-0037-0 ↗
33. Underground space planning in Helsinki10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.05.005 ↗
34. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate10.1038/nature01675 ↗
35. Wang, Y., and Peng, F.L. (2014). Evaluation of urban underground space based on the geological conditions: A feasibility study. New Front. Geotech. Eng., 187–197.10.1061/9780784413456.020 ↗
36. Nyimbili, P.H., and Erden, T. (2020). A Hybrid Approach Integrating Entropy-AHP and GIS for Suitability Assessment of Urban Emergency Facilities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9070419 ↗
37. 3D ground-use optimisation for sustainable urban development planning: A case-study from Earls Court, London, UK10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.025 ↗
38. Underground space in land-use planning10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00029-7 ↗
39. Why underground space should be included in urban planning policy–And how this will enhance an urban underground future10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.013 ↗
40. National Research Council (2013). Underground Engineering for Sustainable Urban Development, National Academies Press.
41. Therivel, R. (2012). Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action, Routledge.10.4324/9780203072561 ↗
42. Strategic environmental assessment: An overview10.1080/02688867.1992.9726853 ↗
43. Thérivel, R., and Partidário, M.R. (1996). The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan.
44. Fischer, T.B. (2007). The Theory and Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards a More Systematic Approach, Earthscan.
45. Influence of underground space development mode on the groundwater flow field in Xiong’an new area10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280007 ↗
46. New multi-resolution and multi-scale electromagnetic detection methods for urban underground spaces10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.09.034 ↗
47. Intelligent overall planning model of underground space based on digital twin10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108393 ↗
48. Grey relation analysis and multiple criteria decision analysis method model for suitability evaluation of underground space development10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107608 ↗
49. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (2021). The 14th Five Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China and the Long Range Objectives for 2035.
50. Quantitative research on the capacity of urban underground space—The case of Shanghai, China10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.008 ↗
51. 3D Quality Evaluation of Rock Mass in Urban Underground Space Based on Improved Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process10.1007/s12205-022-0045-1 ↗
52. 3D geological suitability evaluation for urban underground space development—A case study of Qianjiang Newtown in Hangzhou, Eastern China10.1016/j.tust.2021.104052 ↗
53. A detection method of urban underground geological anomalies in the United Kingdom based on feature fusion10.15446/esrj.v26n3.103605 ↗
54. Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011 ↗
55. A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 1 methodology10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.002 ↗
56. Evaluation of spatial performance and supply-demand ratios of urban underground space based on POI data: A case study of Shanghai10.1016/j.tust.2022.104775 ↗
57. Systems approaches to urban underground space planning and management—A review10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.003 ↗
58. A comparative study on urban underground space planning system between China and Japan10.1016/j.scs.2019.101541 ↗
59. Research on basic theory of urban geology
60. (2017). Soil Quality—Sustainable Remediation (Standard No. ISO 18504:2017).
61. (2001). Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment (Standard No. SEA Directive 2001/42/EC).
62. Zhao, P.D. (2024). Digital Geology, Science Press. [1st ed.].
63. Kieu, Q.L., and Tran, D.V. (2021). Application of Geospatial Technologies in Constructing a Flash Flood Warning Model in Northern Mountainous Regions of Vietnam: A Case Study at TrinhTuong Commune, Bat Xat District, LaoCai Province, Walter De Gruyter GmbH. Bulletin of Geography.10.2478/bgeo-2021-0003 ↗
64. Decision Support System to Urban Infrastructure Maintenance Management
65. Partidário, M.R. (2012). Strategic Environmental Assessment Better Practice Guide—Methodological Guidance for Strategic Thinking in SEA, Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente e Redes Energéticas Nacionais.
66. Practice and application of multi-factor urban geological survey in Xiong’an New Area
67. 3D geological suitability evaluation for underground space based on the AHP-cloud model10.1016/j.undsp.2022.03.006 ↗
68. The hidden side of cities—Towards three-dimensional land planning10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.026 ↗
69. Three-dimensional high-precision assessment of mountainous urban underground space resources: A case study in Chongqing, China10.1016/j.tust.2022.104439 ↗
70. Quantitative assessment of engineering geological suitability for multilayer Urban Underground Space10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.003 ↗
71. (2018). Guidelines for Site Characterization Standards for Engineering Design and Construction Purposes (Standard No. ASTM D420-18).
72. (2018). Sustainable Development of Communities—Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life (Standard No. ISO 37120).
73. (2018). Organization and Digitization of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)—Information Management Using Building Information Modelling (Standard No. ISO 19650).
74. 3D suitability evaluation of urban underground space using a variable weight method and considering ground restrictions10.1016/j.undsp.2023.12.004 ↗
75. Innovative solutions for layout planning and implementation of a metro station and its accessory structures in mountainous cities, China10.1016/j.tust.2022.104670 ↗
76. One-dimensional constrained inversion study of TEM and application in coal goafs’ detection10.1515/geo-2020-0148 ↗
77. Application of the high-density resistivity method in detailed exploration of superficial paleochannels in Xiong’an New Area
78. Development of urban underground space in coastal cities in China: A review10.1002/dug2.12034 ↗
79. Study on the geological origin of groundwater and soil corrosivity in Xiong’an New Area
80. Statistical models for estimating the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of rocks from different hardness test methods10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06891 ↗
81. The potential influence of building optimization and passive design strategies on natural venti-lation systems in underground buildings: The state of the art10.1016/j.tust.2019.103065 ↗
82. Multiple resources and their sustainable development in Urban Underground Space10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.003 ↗
83. The Urban Underground Space beneath the Karst Basin of Guilin, China, Revealed by Ambient Seismic Noise Tomography10.1785/0220220057 ↗
84. Nonlinear dynamic failure process of tunnel-fault system in response to strong seismic event10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.12.006 ↗
85. Wrench-related folding: A case study of Bohai Sea basin, China10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.08.004 ↗
86. Isotopes in groundwater (2H, 18O, 14C) revealed the climate and groundwater recharge in the Northern China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.245 ↗
87. Interaction regimes of surface water and groundwater in a hyper-arid endorheic watershed on Tibetan Plateau: Insights from multi-proxy data10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132020 ↗
88. Heo, O., Yoon, Y., and Do, J. (2021). Comparative Study of the Field Performances of Pressure-Grouted Micropiles Using Gravity and Packers. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11156736 ↗
89. Unraveling the petrological enigma of the durability and corrosion resistance of ancient Roman concrete
90. Hydrogeochemical characteristics and evolution of formation water in the continental sedimentary basin: A case study in the Qaidam Basin, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177672 ↗
91. Cl, Br, B, Li, and noble gases isotopes to study the origin and evolution of deep groundwater in sedimentary basins, a review10.1007/s10311-021-01371-z ↗
92. Comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen contamination in water ecosystems of the Miyun reservoir watershed, northern China: Distribution, source apportionment and risk assessment10.1007/s10653-024-02059-3 ↗
93. Xia, Y.B., Wang, B., Yang, Y.S., Du, X.Q., and Yang, M.X. (2023). Quantitative assessment of organic mass fluxes and natural attenuation processes in a petroleum-contaminated subsurface environment. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312782 ↗
94. Xia, Y.B., Chen, G.F., Liu, F.T., Zhang, J., and Ning, H. (2024). Hydrogeochemical characteristics and health risk assessment of groundwater in grassland watersheds of cold and arid regions in Xilinhot, China. Water, 16.10.3390/w16172488 ↗
95. Distribution, source investigation, and risk assessment of topsoil heavy metals in areas with intensive anthropogenic activities using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model coupled with self-organizing map (SOM)10.1007/s10653-023-01587-8 ↗
96. Hua, J.X., and Zheng, J.G. (2018). Engineering Geology Handbook, China Architecture & Building Press. [5th ed.].
97. National Land and Resources Standardization Technical Committee (SAC-TC93TC93) (2015). Specification for Survey and Monitoring of Land Subsidence.
98. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (2019). Standard for Urban Underground Space Planning (GB/T 51358-2019).
99. Najafi, M., and Kim, K.O. (2004). Life-cycle-cost comparison of trenchless and conventional open-cut pipeline construction projects. Pipeline Engineering and Construction: What’s on the Horizon?, American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/40745(146)61 ↗
100. Bidding strategies for conventional and trenchless technologies considering social costs10.1139/l97-036 ↗