journal article·2025-04-08Open access

An Unsupervised Hybrid Approach for Detection of Damage with Autoencoder and One-Class Support Vector Machine

Burcu Gunes, Oguz Gunes

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

Progressive deterioration and accumulated damage due to overloading, extreme events, and fatigue necessitate the continuous monitoring of civil infrastructure to ensure serviceability and safety. With advances in sensor technology, data-driven structural health monitoring (SHM) strategies, particularly artificial neural networks (ANNs), have gained prominence for analyzing large datasets and identifying complex patterns. Among these, autoencoders (AEs), a specialized class of ANNs, are well-suited for unsupervised learning tasks, enabling dimensionality reduction and feature extraction. This study employs transmissibility functions (TFs) as training samples for the AE. TFs are directly derived from response measurements without the need to measure input and exhibit local sensitivity to changes in dynamic properties, making them an efficient feature for structural assessment. The reconstruction errors in TFs, quantifying the deviation between the original and AE-reconstructed data, are leveraged as damage-sensitive features for classification using a one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM). The proposed methodology is validated through numerical simulations with noise-contaminated data representing various damage scenarios in a shear-building model, as well as experimental tests on a masonry arch bridge model subjected to progressive damage. Numerical investigations demonstrate improved detection accuracy and robustness of the procedure through the incorporation of nonlinear encoding into the dimensionality reduction process, compared to the classical principal component analysis method.. Experimental results confirm the framework’s effectiveness in detecting and localizing damage using unlabeled field data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34467, Türkiye

MiTek Mitigation Technologies A.S., Istanbul 34467, Türkiye

Funding

Scientific Research Projects (BAP) of Istanbul Technical University · Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) · General Directorate of Highways (KGM)

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Vibration-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077 ↗
2. A Novel Unsupervised Deep Learning Model for Global and Local Health Condition Assessment of Structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.070 ↗
3. Data-Driven Damage Diagnosis under Environmental and Operational Variability by Novel Statistical Pattern Recognition Methods10.1177/1475921718800306 ↗
4. Eliminating Temperature Effects in Damage Detection for Civil Infrastructure Using Time Series Analysis and Autoassociative Neural Networks10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000987 ↗
5. A Novel Anomaly Detection Method Based on Adaptive Mahalanobis-Squared Distance and One-Class kNN Rule for Structural Health Monitoring under Environmental Effects10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106495 ↗
6. Unsupervised Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Structural Damage Detection: A Comparative Study10.1002/eng2.12551 ↗
7. Output-Only Entropy-Based Damage Detection Using Transmissibility Function10.1007/s13349-021-00535-3 ↗
8. Data-Driven Identification of Structural Damage under Unknown Seismic Excitations Using the Energy Integrals of Strain Signals Transformed from Transmissibility Functions10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117490 ↗
9. Bank, D., Koenigstein, N., and Giryes, R. (2023). Autoencoders. Machine Learning for Data Science Handbook: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-24628-9_16 ↗
10. AEs and Their Applications in Machine Learning: A Survey10.1007/s10462-023-10662-6 ↗
11. Structural Damage Identification Based on AE Neural Networks and Deep Learning10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 ↗
12. Anaissi, A., and Zandavi, S.M. (2019, January 14–19). Multi-Objective AE for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Higher-Order Data. Proceedings of the 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852305 ↗
13. A Novelty Detection Approach for Tendons of Prestressed Concrete Bridges Based on a Convolutional AE and Acceleration Data10.3390/s19071633 ↗
14. Structural Damage Identification Based on Unsupervised Feature-Extraction via Variational AE10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107811 ↗
15. Health Condition Identification for Rolling Bearing Using a Multi-Domain Indicator-Based Optimized Stacked Denoising AE10.1177/1475921719893594 ↗
16. Unsupervised Structural Damage Detection Technique Based on a Deep Convolutional AE10.1155/2021/6658575 ↗
17. Unsupervised Deep Learning Approach Using a Deep AE with a One-Class Support Vector Machine to Detect Damage10.1177/1475921720934051 ↗
18. Field Experiment on a PSC-I Bridge for Convolutional AE-Based Damage Detection10.1177/1475921720926267 ↗
19. A Decentralized Unsupervised Structural Condition Diagnosis Approach Using Deep AEs10.1111/mice.12641 ↗
20. Damage-sensitive feature extraction with stacked AEs for unsupervised damage detection10.1002/stc.2714 ↗
21. Vibration-based damage detection for bridges by deep convolutional denoising AE10.1177/1475921720942836 ↗
22. Zhang, Y., Xie, X., Li, H., and Zhou, B. (2022). An unsupervised tunnel damage identification method based on convolutional variational auto-encoder and wavelet packet analysis. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22062412 ↗
23. Structural Damage Identification Using AEs: A Comparative Study10.3390/buildings14072014 ↗
24. On using AEs with non-standardized time series data for damage localization10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117570 ↗
25. Real-time drive-by bridge damage detection using deep auto-encoder10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.094 ↗
26. Structural damage assessment through a new generalized AE with features in the quefrency domain10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109713 ↗
27. Structural damage detection based on the correlation of variational AE neural networks using limited sensors10.3390/s24082616 ↗
28. Intelligent framework for unsupervised damage detection in bridges using deep convolutional AE with wavelet transmissibility pattern spectra10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111653 ↗
29. Resende, L.V., Finotti, R.P., Barbosa, F.S., and Cury, A.A. (2022, January 21–25). Structural damage detection with autoencoding neural networks. Proceedings of the XLIII Ibero-Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
30. Nicoletti, V., Quarchioni, S., Amico, L., and Gara, F. (2024). Assessment of different optimal sensor placement methods for dynamic monitoring of civil structures and infrastructures. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 1–16.10.1080/15732479.2024.2383299 ↗
31. Sensor placement with optimal damage detectability for statistical damage detection10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108767 ↗
32. Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Yao, Y., and Ou, J. (2023). Advancements in Optimal Sensor Placement for Enhanced Structural Health Monitoring: Current Insights and Future Prospects. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13123129 ↗
33. Sun, Z., Mahmoodian, M., Sidiq, A., Jayasinghe, S., Shahrivar, F., and Setunge, S. (2025). Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 14.10.3390/jsan14020022 ↗
34. Damage localization using transmissibility functions: A critical review10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.01.020 ↗
35. Structural damage identification with power spectral density transmissibility: Numerical and experimental studies10.12989/sss.2015.15.1.015 ↗
36. A local excitation and measurement approach for decentralized damage detection using transmissibility functions10.1002/stc.1781 ↗
37. Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure10.1177/1077546316674544 ↗
38. Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health monitoring: Fundamentals, approaches, and applications10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.06.053 ↗
39. Liu, T., Xu, H., Ragulskis, M., Cao, M., and Ostachowicz, W. (2020). A data-driven damage identification framework based on transmissibility function datasets and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks: Verification on a structural health monitoring benchmark structure. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20041059 ↗
40. Detecting structural damage under unknown seismic excitation by deep convolutional neural network with wavelet-based transmissibility data10.1177/1475921720923081 ↗
41. A novel data-driven method for structural health monitoring under ambient vibration and high-dimensional features by robust multidimensional scaling10.1177/1475921720973953 ↗
42. Machine learning-based novelty detection using modal analysis10.1111/mice.12511 ↗
43. Allemang, R., De Clerck, J., Niezrecki, C., and Blough, J. (2012). An overview of the transmissibility concept and its application to structural damage detection. Topics in Modal Analysis I, Volume 5, Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2419-2 ↗
44. One-class support vector machines approach to anomaly detection10.1080/08839514.2013.785791 ↗
45. Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R.C., Smola, A., Shawe-Taylor, J., and Platt, J. (2000). Support vector method for novelty detection. Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
46. Experimental collapse investigation and nonlinear modeling of a single-span stone masonry arch bridge10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107520 ↗