Show source-provided references
1. Enhancing Functional Rehabilitation Through Orthotic Interventions for Foot and Ankle Conditions: A Narrative Review
2. Current concepts review: Orthotics in post-operative foot and ankle surgery
3. Surmen, H.K., Akalan, N.E., and Arslan, Y.Z. (2019). Design, manufacture, and selection of ankle-foot-orthoses. Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, and Human-Computer Interaction, IGI Global.
10.4018/978-1-5225-7368-5.ch020 ↗8. Dabnichki, P., and Pang, T.Y. (2025). User-Centered Design Framework for Personalized Ankle–Foot Orthoses. Prosthesis, 7.
10.3390/prosthesis7010011 ↗9. Objectively assessed long-term wearing patterns and predictors of wearing orthopaedic footwear in people with diabetes at moderate-to-high risk of foot ulceration: A 12 months observational study
10.1186/s13047-023-00656-6 ↗10. Finco, M.G., Cay, G., Lee, M., Garcia, J., Salazar, E., Tan, T.W., Armstrong, D.G., and Najafi, B. (2023). Taking a Load Off: User Perceptions of Smart Offloading Walkers for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sensors, 23.
10.3390/s23052768 ↗11. Mageshkumar, G., Prasanna, G., Sakthi Priya, G., and Samkilbart, A. (2024, January 14–15). Design of IoT-Based Orthotic Footwear for Lower Limb Correction and Alignment. Proceedings of the 2024 10th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India.
10.1109/ICACCS60874.2024.10716926 ↗12. Imbesi, S., and Scataglini, S. (2021). A User Centered Methodology for the Design of Smart Apparel for Older Users. Sensors, 21.
10.3390/s21082804 ↗14. A user-centered qualitative study on experiences with ankle-foot orthoses and suggestions for improved design
10.1177/0309364616683981 ↗15. Adhikari, M.S., Verma, Y.K., Sindhwani, M., and Sachdeva, S. (2025). Generative AI Tools for Product Design and Engineering. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Finance: Large Language Models, Interfaces, and Industry Use Cases to Transform Accounting and Finance Processes, Wiley.
10.1002/9781394271078.ch16 ↗16. Suessmuth, J., Fick, F., and Van Der Vossen, S. (2023). Generative AI for Concept Creation in Footwear Design. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Talks, Association for Computing Machinery.
10.1145/3587421.3595416 ↗17. DALL·E 3 (2025, January 10). OpenAI. Available online: https://openai.com/index/dall-e-3/.
18. Alam, M.F., Lentsch, A., Yu, N., Barmack, S., Kim, S., Acemoglu, D., Hart, J., Johnson, S., and Ahmed, F. (2025, February 10). From Automation to Augmentation: Redefining Engineering Design and Manufacturing in the Age of NextGen-AI. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI. Available online: https://mit-genai.pubpub.org/pub/9s6690gd.
10.21428/e4baedd9.e39b392d ↗19. Sketch2Prototype: Rapid Conceptual Design Exploration and Prototyping with Generative AI
10.1017/pds.2024.201 ↗20. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17), Red Hook, NY, USA.
22. White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, A., Spencer-Smith, J., and Schmidt, D.C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv.
23. Liu, V., and Chilton, L.B. (May, January 29). Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), New Orleans, LA, USA.
10.1145/3491102.3501825 ↗25. Chiou, L.Y., Hung, P.K., Liang, R.H., and Wang, C.T. (2023, January 10–14). Designing with AI: An Exploration of Co-Ideation with Image Generators. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’23), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
10.1145/3563657.3596001 ↗27. Mori, H., and Asahi, Y. The Impact of AI Text-to-Image Generator on Product Styling Design. Proceedings of the Human Interface and the Management of Information.
28. Cai, A., Rick, S.R., Heyman, J.L., Zhang, Y., Filipowicz, A., Hong, M., Klenk, M., and Malone, T. (2023, January 6–9). DesignAID: Using Generative AI and Semantic Diversity for Design Inspiration. Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (CI ’23), Delft, The Netherlands.
10.1145/3582269.3615596 ↗30. Exploring the use of ChatGPT and Dall-E for the preliminary design of 3D-printed wrist-hand orthoses
31. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Product Design Education: Navigating Concerns of Originality and Ethics
32. Dunne, L.E., Profita, H., Zeagler, C., Clawson, J., Gilliland, S., Do, E.Y.L., and Budd, J. (2014, January 26–30). The social comfort of wearable technology and gestural interaction. Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, USA.
10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944540 ↗33. Sazonov, E., and Neuman, M.R. (2014). Chapter 1.2—Social Aspects of Wearability and Interaction. Wearable Sensors, Academic Press.
35. Profita, H., Albaghli, R., Findlater, L., Jaeger, P., and Kane, S.K. (2016, January 7–12). The AT Effect: How Disability Affects the Perceived Social Acceptability of Head-Mounted Display Use. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), San Jose, CA, USA.
10.1145/2858036.2858130 ↗36. The wearer, the device, and its use: Advances in understanding the social acceptability of wearables
10.1177/1541931218621237 ↗40. Revealing insights of users’ perception: An approach to evaluate wearable products based on emotions
10.1017/dsj.2020.7 ↗43. Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J., Glick, P., and Xu, J. (2018). A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition, Routledge.
10.4324/9781315187280-7 ↗44. All the world’s a stage: What makes a wearable socially acceptable
10.1145/3137093 ↗46. Kelly, N., and Gilbert, S. (2016, January 7–12). The WEAR Scale: Developing a Measure of the Social Acceptability of a Wearable Device. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA.
10.1145/2851581.2892331 ↗47. Cuddy, A.J., Fiske, S.T., and Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map, Association for Computing Machinery.
10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0 ↗48. Schwind, V., Deierlein, N., Poguntke, R., and Henze, N. (2019, January 4–9). Understanding the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices using the Stereotype Content Model. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK.
10.1145/3290605.3300591 ↗50. Sehrt, J., Braams, B., Henze, N., and Schwind, V. (2022). Social Acceptability in Context: Stereotypical Perception of Shape, Body Location, and Usage of Wearable Devices. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 6.
10.3390/bdcc6040100 ↗51. Profita, H.P., Clawson, J., Gilliland, S., Zeagler, C., Starner, T., Budd, J., and Do, E.Y.L. (2013, January 8–12). Don’t mind me touching my wrist: A case study of interacting with on-body technology in public. Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Zurich, Switzerland.
10.1145/2493988.2494331 ↗52. Harrison, C., Lim, B.Y., Shick, A., and Hudson, S.E. (2009). Where to locate wearable displays?: Reaction time performance of visual alerts from tip to toe. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery.
10.1145/1518701.1518845 ↗53. Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M., and Martin, R. (1998, January 19–20). Design for Wearability. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’98), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
54. (2025, January 10). GPT-4 Is OpenAI’s Most Advanced System, Producing Safer and More Useful Responses. Available online: https://openai.com/index/gpt-4/.
55. OPED-AG (2025, January 10). VACOpedes—Orthese Mit Optimaler Druckentlastung: Für Mittel- und Vorfuß. Available online: https://oped.ch/vacopedes.
56. Enovis (2025, January 10). AIRCAST® AIRSELECT™ Short Walker. Available online: https://www.enovis-medtech.de/AIRCAST-AIRSELECT-Short-Walker.
57. OPED-Medical-Inc. (2025, January 10). VACOcast Diabetic Boot. Available online: https://opedmedical.com/products/vacocast-diabetic/.
58. Enovis (2025, January 10). AIRCAST® AIRSELECT™ Achilles Walker. Available online: https://www.enovis-medtech.de/AIRCAST-AIRSELECT-Achilles-Walker.
59. Berglingstyle (2025, January 10). FastProtect Malleo: Der Sicherheitsgurt für Dein Sprunggelenk. Available online: https://www.berglingstyle.com/products/fastprotect-malleo-5.
60. Betterguards-Technology (2025, January 10). The BetterGuard 1.0: Best Ankle Brace. Available online: https://betterguards.de/en/products/the-betterguard-1.
61. Otto-Bock-HealthCare (2025, January 10). WalkOn Reaction Lateral. Available online: https://www.ottobock.com/en-us/product/28U34.
62. Vitego (2025, January 10). ofa Push Ortho Fußheberorthese AFO. Available online: https://www.vitego-shop.de/bandagen-fuss-ofa-push-ortho-fussheberorthese-afo.
63. Pillai, M. (2025, January 10). Revolutionizing Healing: The Era of 3D-Printed Orthotics. Available online: https://amchronicle.com/case-studies/revolutionizing-healing-the-era-of-3d-printed-orthotics/.
64. HfG Schwäbisch Gmünd (2025, January 10). exoJack—Eine Smarte Orthese für Sprunggelenksbrüche. Available online: https://ausstellung.hfg-gmuend.de/w-2021/projekte/exojack-eine-smarte-orthese-fuer-sprunggelenksbrueche.
65. Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkzeugmaschinen und Umformtechnik IWU (2025, January 10). SensO-FeeT—Sensorisch Aktive Sprunggelenk-Orthese Mit Taktiler Feedback-Technologie. Available online: https://www.iwu.fraunhofer.de/de/projekte/senso-feet-sensorisch-aktive-sprunggelenk-orthese-mit-taktiler-feedback-technologie.html.
66. Taylor, T. (2025, January 10). Sensoria’s Smart Socks Measure Your Running Patterns, Improving Gait. Available online: https://www.si.com/edge/2015/03/06/sensoria-smart-socks-measure-running-patterns.
67. Orthotics, X.P. (2025, January 10). Ankle & Foot. Available online: https://xtremity.ae/ankle-and-foot/.
68. Free3D (2025, January 10). 3D-Gedruckter Orthopädischer Gipsverband am Bein 3D-Modell. Available online: https://free3d.com/de/3d-model/3d-printed-orthopedic-cast-on-leg-7449.html.
70. Kassambara, A. (2025, January 10). rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. Available online: https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/rstatix/.
71. Schwind, V., and Henze, N. (2020, January 25–29). Anticipated User Stereotypes Systematically Affect the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences (NordiCHI ’20), Tallinn, Estonia.
10.1145/3419249.3420113 ↗72. Minaoglou, P., Tzotzis, A., Efkolidis, N., and Kyratsis, P. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Shoe Design Process. Eng. Proc., 72.
10.3390/engproc2024072007 ↗73. The ethical implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and challenges