A Narrative Review of Systematic Reviews on the Applications of Social and Assistive Support Robots in the Health Domain
Source abstract
Abstract
As the interest in social and assistive support robots (SASRs) grows, a review of 17 systematic reviews was conducted to assess their use in healthcare, emotional well-being, and therapy for diverse populations, including older adults, children, and individuals with autism and dementia. SASRs have demonstrated potential in alleviating depression, loneliness, anxiety, and stress, while also improving sleep and cognitive function. Despite these promising outcomes, challenges remain in identifying the most effective interventions, refining robot designs, and evaluating long-term impacts. User acceptance hinges on trustworthiness and empathy-driven design. Compared to earlier review studies, recent research emphasizes the ongoing significance of emotional engagement, the refinement of robot functionalities, and the need to address ethical issues such as privacy and autonomy through robust cybersecurity and data privacy measures. The field is gradually shifting towards a user-centered design approach, focusing on robots as tools to augment, rather than replace, human care. While SASRs offer substantial benefits for emotional well-being and therapeutic support, further research is crucial to enhance their effectiveness and address concerns about replacing human care. Algorethics (AI ethics), interdisciplinary collaboration, and standardization and training emerge as key priorities to ensure the responsible and sustainable deployment of SASRs in healthcare settings, reinforcing the importance of rigorous methodologies and ethical safeguards.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Emotion and Mood Recognition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centro TISP, ISS Via Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
Department of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
CREA, Via Ardeatina, 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Giansanti, D. (2021). The social robot in Rehabilitation and Assistance: What Is the Future?. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9030244 ↗
2. Deusdad, B. (2024). Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with de-mentia. Front. Psychiatry, 15.10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273 ↗
3. Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background, motivation and challenges10.1075/pc.12.1.03dau ↗
4. How social robots will help our children grow
5. Living with seal robots: Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on elderly people in a care house10.1109/TRO.2007.906261 ↗
6. Liaison, safeguard, and well-being: Analyzing the role of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101993 ↗
7. Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics]10.1109/MRA.2007.339605 ↗
8. Feil-Seifer, D., and Mataric, M.J. (2005, January 18–22). Defining socially assistive robotics. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain.
9. Cruces, A., Jerez, A., Bandera, J.P., and Bandera, A. (2024). Socially Assistive Robots in Smart Environments to Attend Elderly People—A Survey. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14125287 ↗
10. Simeoni, R., Colonnelli, F., Eutizi, V., Marchetti, M., Paolini, E., Papalini, V., Punturo, A., Salvò, A., Scipinotti, N., and Serpente, C. (2021). The Social Robot and the Digital Physiotherapist: Are We Ready for the Team Play?. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9111454 ↗
11. The Effect of Social Robots on Depression and Loneliness for Older Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.017 ↗
12. The effect of robot interventions on sleep in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis10.5664/jcsm.10022 ↗
13. Park, S., and Whang, M. (2022). Empathy in Human-Robot Interaction: Designing for Social Robots. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19031889 ↗
14. Are social robots ready yet to be used in care and therapy of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.009 ↗
15. Reducing negative emotions in children using social robots: Systematic review10.1136/archdischild-2020-320721 ↗
16. Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting10.3233/JAD-200347 ↗
17. Song, Y., and Luximon, Y. (2020). Trust in AI Agent: A Systematic Review of Facial Anthropomorphic Trustworthiness for Social Robot Design. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20185087 ↗
18. Effects of non-facilitated meaningful activities for people with dementia in long-term care facilities: A systematic review10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.06.001 ↗
19. Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials10.2196/13203 ↗
20. Social robots to support children’s well-being under medical treatment: A systematic state-of-the-art review10.1177/1367493518803031 ↗
21. Social Robots for Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review10.1111/jnu.12423 ↗
22. The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies10.1093/geront/gny046 ↗
23. Kling, M., Haeussl, A., Dalkner, N., Fellendorf, F.T., Lenger, M., Finner, A., Ilic, J., Smolak, I.S., Stojec, L., and Zwigl, I. (2025). Social robots in adult psychiatry: A summary of utilisation and impact. Front. Psychiatry, 16.10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1506776 ↗
24. The Effect of Cognitive Function Health Care Using Artificial Intelligence Robots for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.2196/38896 ↗
25. Non-pharmacological interventions for pain in people with dementia: A systematic review10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104082 ↗
26. Effectiveness of Companion Robot Care for Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1093/geroni/igab013 ↗
27. A Systematic Review on Existing Measures for the Subjective Assessment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Robot Devices10.1155/2016/1048964 ↗
28. Giansanti, D., and Gulino, R.A. (2021). The Cybersecurity and the Care Robots: A Viewpoint on the Open Problems and the Perspectives. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9121653 ↗
29. Monoscalco, L., Simeoni, R., Maccioni, G., and Giansanti, D. (2022). Information Security in Medical Robotics: A Survey on the Level of Training, Awareness and Use of the Physiotherapist. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10010159 ↗
30. Lastrucci, A., Pirrera, A., Lepri, G., and Giansanti, D. (2024). Algorethics in Healthcare: Balancing Innovation and Integrity in AI Development. Algorithms, 17.10.3390/a17100432 ↗
31. Maccioni, G., Ruscitto, S., Gulino, R.A., and Giansanti, D. (2021). Opportunities and Problems of the Consensus Conferences in the Care Robotics. Healthcare, 9.10.3390/healthcare9121624 ↗
32. Robotics for cognitive stimulation and social skills: A preliminary study10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104375 ↗
33. Baxter, P. (2025). Multi-Modal Social Robot Behavioural Alignment and Learning Outcomes in Mediated Child-Robot Interactions. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10010050 ↗
34. Paluch, R., Carros, F., Volkova, G., Obaid, M., and Müller, C. (2025). Editorial: Creative approaches to appropriation and design: Novel robotic systems for heterogeneous contexts. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1531132 ↗
35. User Acceptance of a Home Robotic Assistant for Individuals With Physical Disabilities: Explorative Qualitative Study10.2196/63641 ↗
36. Early case series with placement of NeuroOne Evo stereoelectroencephalography depth electrodes and review of other FDA-approved products10.25259/SNI_277_2024 ↗
37. Salem, A., and Sumi, K. (2024). Deception detection in educational AI: Challenges for Japanese middle school students in interacting with generative AI robots. Front. Artif. Intell., 7.10.3389/frai.2024.1493348 ↗
38. Tozadore, D.C., and Romero, R.A.F. (2024). Multiuser design of an architecture for social robots in education: Teachers, students, and researchers perspectives. Front. Robot. AI., 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1409671 ↗
39. Elgarf, M., Salam, H., and Peters, C. (2024). Fostering children’s creativity through LLM-driven storytelling with a social robot. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1457429 ↗
40. García-Martínez, J., Gamboa-Montero, J.J., Castillo, J.C., and Castro-González, Á. (2024). Analyzing the Impact of Responding to Joint Attention on the User Perception of the Robot in Human-Robot Interaction. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9120769 ↗
41. Mizuho, T., Okafuji, Y., Baba, J., and Narumi, T. (2024). Multiple-agent promotion in a grocery store: Effects of modality and variability of agents on customer memory. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1397230 ↗
42. Ambiguous animals, ambivalent carers and arbitrary care collectives: Re-theorizing resistance to social robots in healthcare10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117587 ↗
43. Perceptions and experiences of Korean American older adults with companion robots through long-term use: A comparative analysis of robot retention vs10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424123 ↗
44. How do older adults react to social robots’ offspring-like voices10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117545 ↗
45. A digitally supported multimodal lifestyle program to promote brain health among older adults (the LETHE randomized controlled feasibility trial): Study design, progress, and first results10.1186/s13195-024-01615-4 ↗
46. Pilot study protocol evaluating the impact of telerobotics interactions with autistic children during a Denver intervention on communication skills using single-case experimental design10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084110 ↗
47. The JIBO Kids Corpus: A speech dataset of child-robot interactions in a classroom environment10.1121/10.0034195 ↗
48. Haresamudram, K., Torre, I., Behling, M., Wagner, C., and Larsson, S. (2024). Talking body: The effect of body and voice anthropomorphism on perception of social agents. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1456613 ↗
49. Human-Robot Interaction and Social Robot: The Emerging Field of Healthcare Robotics and Current and Future Perspectives for Spinal Care10.14245/ns.2448432.216 ↗
50. Rosero, A., Dula, E., Kelly, H., Malle, B.F., and Phillips, E.K. (2024). Human perceptions of social robot deception behaviors: An exploratory analysis. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1409712 ↗
51. Social robot for at-home cognitive monitoring10.1126/scirobotics.adt0930 ↗
52. Maroto-Gómez, M., Burguete-Alventosa, J., Álvarez-Arias, S., Malfaz, M., and Salichs, M.Á. (2024). A Bio-Inspired Dopamine Model for Robots with Autonomous Decision-Making. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9080504 ↗
53. Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study10.2196/56669 ↗
54. Lym, H.J., Son, H.I., Kim, D.Y., Kim, J., Kim, M.G., and Chung, J.H. (2024). Child-centered home service design for a family robot companion. Front. Robot. AI, 11.10.3389/frobt.2024.1346257 ↗
55. Kok, C.L., Ho, C.K., Teo, T.H., Kato, K., and Koh, Y.Y. (2024). A Novel Implementation of a Social Robot for Sustainable Human Engagement in Homecare Services for Ageing Populations. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24144466 ↗
56. The acceptance of the potential use of social robots for children with autism spectrum disorder by Indonesian occupational therapists: A mixed methods study10.1080/17483107.2024.2378946 ↗