Trust Models in Wireless Sensor Networks for Defending Against Denial-of-Service Attacks: A Literature Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Denial-of-service (DoS) attacks pose a significant threat to wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and are an impediment to their mass deployment. Current research has identified trust models as a plausible defense against DoS attacks. However, most of the proposed solutions focus only on one or two specific DoS attack scenarios and provide very limited guidance to a WSN with regard to important practical aspects, such as setting up threshold configurations and weight allocation schemes. This study conducts a comparative analysis of relevant work to build a foundation for the development of robust trust models that can counter a range of different types of DoS attacks in WSNs. In particular, this study examines the required trust evidence, the methods for extracting trust evidence, and the trust evaluation techniques for developing effective trust models. This study identifies the challenges in the implementation of trust models, such as the need to determine feasible threshold limits and trust metric weightings and the need to manage the loss of trust information. In addition, this study explores link quality and node authentication as factors affecting trust evaluation and the integration of trust models with network routing protocols.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Security in Wireless Sensor Networks · Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Wireless sensor networks: A survey10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 ↗
2. An adaptive trust system for misbehavior detection in wireless sensor networks10.1007/s11276-024-03687-4 ↗
3. RTM: Realistic Weight-Based Reliable Trust Model for Large Scale WSNs10.1007/s11277-022-10165-7 ↗
4. ETMRM: An Energy-efficient Trust Management and Routing Mechanism for SDWSNs10.1016/j.comnet.2018.04.009 ↗
5. Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks10.1145/1362542.1362546 ↗
6. Denial of service in sensor networks10.1109/MC.2002.1039518 ↗
7. Usman, M., Asghar, M.R., Ansari, I.S., Granelli, F., and Qaraqe, M. (2019, January 20–24). Trust-Based DoS Mitigation Technique for Medical Implants in Wireless Body Area Networks. Proceedings of the ICC 2019—2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICC.2019.8761504 ↗
8. Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges, Design Principles, and Technical Approaches10.1109/TIE.2009.2015754 ↗
9. Wireless sensor network survey10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.002 ↗
10. Securing Software-Defined WSNs Communication via Trust Management10.1109/JIOT.2021.3102578 ↗
11. Trust computations and trust dynamics in mobile adhoc networks: A survey10.1109/SURV.2011.042711.00083 ↗
12. Communication and data trust for wireless sensor networks using D–S theory10.1109/JSEN.2017.2699561 ↗
13. Intrusion Detection System for Hybrid DoS Attacks using Energy Trust in Wireless Sensor Networks10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.297 ↗
14. BLTM: Beta and LQI Based Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905550 ↗
15. Trust management and evaluation for edge intelligence in the Internet of Things10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103756 ↗
16. A secure routing scheme to mitigate attack in wireless adhoc sensor network10.1016/j.cose.2021.102197 ↗
17. Link-based penalized trust management scheme for preemptive measures to secure the edge-based internet of things networks10.1007/s11276-022-02948-4 ↗
18. Su, Y., Mal, S., Jin, Z., Fu, X., Li, Y., and Liu, X. (2020, January 5–30). A Trust Model for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks Based on Fast Link Quality Assessment. Proceedings of the Global Oceans 2020: Singapore—U.S. Gulf Coast, Biloxi, MS, USA.10.1109/IEEECONF38699.2020.9389387 ↗
19. A Comprehensive Review on Secure Routing in Internet of Things: Mitigation Methods and Trust-Based Approaches10.1109/JIOT.2020.3031162 ↗
20. Trust Evaluation Model in IoT Environment: A Comprehensive Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3240990 ↗
21. A detailed study on trust management techniques for security and privacy in IoT: Challenges, trends, and research directions10.1016/j.hcc.2023.100127 ↗
22. Design Guidelines On Trust Management for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/COMST.2024.3389728 ↗
23. Chandrasekaran, S.K., and Rajasekaran, V.A. (2024). Trust evaluation model in IoT environment: A review. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–32.10.1007/s10668-024-05731-x ↗
24. Rahamathullah, U., and Karthikeyan, E. (2021). A lightweight trust-based system to ensure security on the Internet of Battlefield Things (IoBT) environment. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag.10.1007/s13198-021-01250-4 ↗
25. Kitchenham, B., and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Keele University and University of Durham.
26. Architectural Design, Improvement, and Challenges of Distributed Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks10.1007/s11277-021-09000-2 ↗
27. Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 ↗
28. A recommendation management defense mechanism based on trust model in underwater acoustic sensor networks10.1016/j.future.2023.03.043 ↗
29. Security Provision by Using Detection and Prevention Methods to Ensure Trust in Edge-Based Smart City Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3338550 ↗
30. Ye, J., and Jiang, W. (2024). Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Based on a Trust Model and Void-Avoided Algorithm. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s24237614 ↗
31. Singh, J., Dhurandher, S.K., Woungang, I., and Chao, H.-C. (2024). Context-Aware Trust and Reputation Routing Protocol for Opportunistic IoT Networks. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24237650 ↗
32. Trust-aware and improved density peaks clustering algorithm for fast and secure models in wireless sensor networks10.1016/j.pmcj.2024.101993 ↗
33. Almutairi, A., Carpent, X., and Furnell, S. (2024, January 26). Towards a Mobility-Aware Trust Model for the Internet of Underwater Things. Proceedings of the ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection, Edinburgh, UK.10.1007/978-3-031-65175-5_1 ↗
34. Trust Based DoS Attack Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks for Reliable Data Transmission10.1007/s11277-021-08855-9 ↗
35. BTEM: Belief based trust evaluation mechanism for Wireless Sensor Networks10.1016/j.future.2019.02.004 ↗
36. Cao, Z., Zhou, X., Xu, M., Chen, Z., Hu, J., and Tang, L. (2006, January 22–24). Enhancing Base Station Security Against DoS Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Wuhan, China.10.1109/WiCOM.2006.248 ↗
37. Detection and Prevention of Selective Forwarding-Based Denial-of-Service Attacks in WSNs10.1155/2013/205920 ↗
38. Ganeriwal, S., and Srivastava, M.B. (2004, January 25). Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Security of Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Washington, DC, USA.10.1145/1029102.1029115 ↗
39. Gautam, A.K., and Kumar, R. (2018, January 2–4). A Robust Trust Model for Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 5th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON), Gorakhpur, India.10.1109/UPCON.2018.8597072 ↗
40. A proposed security scheme against Denial of Service attacks in cluster-based wireless sensor networks10.1002/sec.373 ↗
41. Selective Authentication Based Geographic Opportunistic Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks for Internet of Things Against DoS Attacks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902843 ↗
42. Rani, P., and Gupta, N.K. (2021, January 19–20). Composite Trust for Secure Routing Strategy through Energy based Clustering in WSN. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), Bhilai, India.10.1109/ICAECT49130.2021.9392453 ↗
43. Novel DoS Attack Detection Based on Trust Mode Authentication for IoT10.32604/iasc.2022.022151 ↗
44. Miyazaki, T., Yamaguchi, S., Kobayashi, K., Kitamichi, J., Song, G., Tsukahara, T., and Hayashi, T. (2014, January 3–6). A software defined wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/ICCNC.2014.6785448 ↗
45. Bin-Yahya, M., and Shen, X. (2019, January 9–13). HTM: Hierarchical Trust Management for Software-Defined WSNs. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/GCWkshps45667.2019.9024635 ↗
46. Isong, B., Manuel, M., Dladlu, N., and Abu-Mahfouz, A. (2023, January 16–17). Trust Management Framework for Securing Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa.10.1109/ICECET58911.2023.10389484 ↗
47. An efficient intrusion detection framework for mitigating blackhole and sinkhole attacks in healthcare wireless sensor networks10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108964 ↗