Urban Signalized Intersection Traffic State Prediction: A Spatial–Temporal Graph Model Integrating the Cell Transmission Model and Transformer
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the Cell Transformer (CeT), which utilizes high-definition (HD) map data to predict future traffic states at signalized intersections, thereby aiding trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles. CeT employs discretized lane segments to emulate the cell transmission model, creating a cell space to forecast vehicle counts across all segments based on historical traffic data. CeT enhances prediction accuracy by distinguishing between different vehicle types by incorporating vehicle-type attributes into vehicle-state representations through multi-head attention. In this framework, cells are modeled as nodes in a directed graph, with dynamic connections representing variations in signal phases, thereby embedding spatial relationships and signal information within dynamic graphs. Temporal embeddings derived from time attributes are integrated with these graphs to generate comprehensive spatial–temporal representations. Utilizing an encoder–decoder architecture, CeT captures dependencies and correlations from past cell states to predict future traffic conditions. Validation using real traffic data from pNEUMA demonstrates that CeT significantly outperforms baseline models in two-phase signalized intersection scenarios, achieving reductions of 11.47% in Mean Absolute Error (MAE), 13.48% in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and an increase of 4.36% in Accuracy (ACC). In four-phase signalized intersection scenarios, CeT shows even greater effectiveness, with improvements of 13.36% in MAE, 12.93% in RMSE, and 4.78% in ACC. These results underscore CeT’s superior predictive capabilities and highlight the contributions of its core components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Traffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, 201 Old Main, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Funding
Key Science and Technology Projects in the Transportation Industry · Technology Transfer Project of Beijing Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey of architecture and key technologies of intelligent connected vehicle-road-cloud cooperation system
2. Mixed Cloud Control Testbed: Validating Vehicle-Road-Cloud Integration via Mixed Digital Twin10.1109/TIV.2023.3243096 ↗
3. Bao, Z., Hossain, S., Lang, H., and Lin, X. (2022). High-Definition Map Generation Technologies For Autonomous Driving. arXiv.10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106125 ↗
4. A Crowdsourcing Update Technology Route of HD Dynamic Map Basic Platform
5. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey10.1109/TITS.2021.3054625 ↗
6. The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R ↗
7. Meta Graph Transformer: A Novel Framework for Spatial–Temporal Traffic Prediction10.1016/j.neucom.2021.12.033 ↗
8. On the new era of urban traffic monitoring with massive drone data: The pNEUMA large-scale field experiment10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.023 ↗
9. Althoff, M., Koschi, M., and Manzinger, S. (2017, January 11–14). CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Los Angeles, CA, USA.10.1109/IVS.2017.7995802 ↗
10. On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads
11. Shock Waves on the Highway10.1287/opre.4.1.42 ↗
12. A macroscopic model with the advantages of microscopic model: A review of Cell Transmission Model’s extensions for urban traffic networks10.1016/j.simpat.2018.05.003 ↗
13. A modified Cell Transmission Model with realistic queue discharge features at signalized intersections10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.013 ↗
14. Macroscopic modelling of arterial traffic: An extension to the cell transmission model10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.033 ↗
15. An arterial signal optimization model for intersections experiencing queue spillback and lane blockage10.1016/j.trc.2010.04.005 ↗
16. Urban Traffic Flow Prediction with Variable Cell Transmission Model
17. A variable-length Cell Transmission Model for road traffic systems10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.023 ↗
18. Short-Term Prediction of Traffic Volume in Urban Arterials10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:3(249) ↗
19. Modeling and Forecasting Vehicular Traffic Flow as a Seasonal ARIMA Process: Theoretical Basis and Empirical Results10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(664) ↗
20. Estimation of Turning Ratio at Intersections Based on Detector Data using Kalman Filter10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.116 ↗
21. Traffic state estimation on a two-dimensional network by a state-space model10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.016 ↗
22. A general framework for combining traffic flow models and Bayesian network for traffic parameters estimation10.1016/j.trc.2022.103664 ↗
23. Traffic forecasting using least squares support vector machines10.1080/18128600902823216 ↗
24. A Hidden Markov Model for short term prediction of traffic conditions on freeways10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.007 ↗
25. Short-Term Traffic Speed Forecasting Based on Data Recorded at Irregular Intervals10.1109/TITS.2012.2203122 ↗
26. Deep learning for short-term traffic flow prediction10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.024 ↗
27. Azzouni, A., and Pujolle, G. (2017). A Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network Framework for Network Traffic Matrix Prediction. arXiv.
28. Pan, Y.A., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Li, S., and Li, W. (2022). Incorporating Traffic Flow Model into A Deep Learning Method for Traffic State Estimation: A Hybrid Stepwise Modeling Framework. J. Adv. Transp., 2022.10.1155/2022/5926663 ↗
29. A fundamental diagram based hybrid framework for traffic flow estimation and prediction by combining a Markovian model with deep learning10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122219 ↗
30. GPS-based citywide traffic congestion forecasting using CNN-RNN and C3D hybrid model
31. Adaptive Graph Fusion Convolutional Recurrent Network for Traffic Forecasting10.1109/JIOT.2023.3244182 ↗
32. Wu, Z., Pan, S., Long, G., Jiang, J., and Zhang, C. (2019). Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modeling. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2019/264 ↗
33. Are facilities to support alternative modes effective in reducing congestion?: Modeling the effect of heterogeneous traffic conditions on vehicle delay at intersections10.1016/j.multra.2022.100050 ↗
34. Gated ensemble of spatio-temporal mixture of experts for multi-task learning in ride-hailing system10.1016/j.multra.2024.100166 ↗
35. TraViA: A Traffic data Visualization and Annotation tool in Python10.21105/joss.03607 ↗
36. Liu, M., Zhang, W., Orabona, F., and Yang, T. (2020). Adam+: A Stochastic Method with Adaptive Variance Reduction. arXiv.
37. Mozer, M., Jordan, M., and Petsche, T. (1996). Support Vector Regression Machines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.
38. Generalized random forests10.1214/18-AOS1709 ↗