journal article·2025-01-14Open access

A Proposal for a Zero-Trust-Based Multi-Level Security Model and Its Security Controls

Jun-Hyung Park, Sung-Chae Park, Heung-Youl Youm

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology and increasing data utilisation have underscored the need for new models to manage and secure big data effectively. However, the constraints of isolated network environments and the limitations of existing security frameworks hinder the adoption of cutting-edge technologies such as AI and cloud computing, as well as the safe utilisation of data. To address these challenges, this study proposes an enhanced security model that integrates the concepts of Multi-Level Security (MLS) and Zero Trust (ZT). The proposed model classifies data into the following three sensitivity levels: “Classified”, “Sensitive”, and “Open”. It applies tailored security requirements and dynamic controls to each level, enhancing both data security and usability. Furthermore, the model overcomes the static access control limitations of MLS by incorporating ZT’s automated dynamic access capabilities, significantly improving responsiveness to anomalous behaviours. This study contributes to the design and evaluation of a new security model that ensures secure data protection and utilisation, even in isolated network environments such as those of military and governmental organisations. It also provides a foundation for the future development of advanced security frameworks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cloud Data Security Solutions · Access Control and Trust · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Security Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea

Funding

Institute of Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (IITP) of Korea · Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Mehraj, S., and Banday, M.T. (2020, January 22–24). Establishing a zero trust strategy in cloud computing environment. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/ICCCI48352.2020.9104214 ↗
2. Malatji, M., and Tolah, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) cybersecurity dimensions: A comprehensive framework for understanding adversarial and offensive AI. AI Ethics, 1–28.10.1007/s43681-024-00427-4 ↗
3. National Information Society Agency (NIA) (2024). Public Data Sovereignty Cloud Application Direction for Super-Large AI Utilization in the Public Sector.
4. A Study on Operation for DevOps Using Zero Trust in Network Separation Environment
5. Rane, J., Kaya Ömer Mallick, S.K., and Rane, N.L. (2024). Influence of digitalization on business and management: A review on artificial intelligence, blockchain, big data analytics, cloud computing, and internet of things. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, Education, and Business, Deep Science Publishing.10.70593/978-81-981271-7-4_1 ↗
6. Experimental quantum secure network with digital signatures and encryption10.1093/nsr/nwac228 ↗
7. Experimental quantum e-commerce10.1126/sciadv.adk3258 ↗
8. Modern computing: Vision and challenges10.1016/j.teler.2024.100116 ↗
9. A multi-level influence model of COVID-19 themed cybercrime10.1080/0960085X.2020.1771222 ↗
10. United States Congress (2024, November 20). Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002 (FISMA), 44 U.S.C. § 3541-3549, Available online: https://www.govinfo.gov.
11. European Union (2024, September 21). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 9: Processing of Special Categories of Personal Data. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679.
12. European Union (2024, September 21). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 32: Security of Processing. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679.
13. Comprehensive review on cybersecurity: Modern threats and advanced defense strategies10.51594/csitrj.v5i2.758 ↗
14. National Intelligence Service (NIS) (2024, September 02). National Intelligence Service Announces Major Cybersecurity Policy Directions in “CSK 2024”, Available online: https://www.nis.go.kr/CM/1_4/view.do?seq=315.
15. Stafford, V. (2024, September 02). Zero Trust Architecture, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/specialpublications/NIST.SP.800-207.pdf.
16. Jabar, T., and Mahinderjit Singh, M. (2022). Exploration of mobile device behavior for mitigating advanced persistent threats (APT): A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22134662 ↗
17. A comprehensive study on APT attacks and countermeasures for future networks and communications: Challenges and solutions10.1007/s11227-016-1850-4 ↗
18. Force, J.T. (2024, September 12). Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations, Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r5.pdf.
19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024, September 18). Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems (FIPS 199), Available online: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.199.pdf.
20. National Cyber Security Center (2024, December 16). Guidelines for National Information Security; Republic of Korea. Revised on 31 January 2023, Available online: https://www.ncsc.go.kr:4018/main/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=InstructionGuide_main&nttId=18588&pageIndex=1#LINK.
21. National Cyber Security Center (2024, December 16). Guidelines for National Cloud Computing Security, Available online: https://www.ncsc.go.kr:4018/main/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=InstructionGuide_main&nttId=18590&pageIndex=1#LINK.
22. United States Congress (2024, December 16). E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-347), Available online: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-bill/803.
23. Ross, R. (2018). Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations: A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy, Special Publication (NIST SP).
24. National Cyber Security Center (2024, December 19). Trends in the Promotion of National Cybersecurity Policy. NCSC, Available online: https://www.ncsc.go.kr:4018/main/cop/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=Notification_main&nttId=174371&menuNo=010000&subMenuNo=010300&thirdMenuNo=#LINK.
25. Jericho Forum (2024, September 28). Jericho Forum Looks to Bring Network Walls Tumbling Down. Available online: https://www.csoonline.com/article/515503/data-protection-jericho-forum-looks-to-bring-network-walls-tumbling-down.html.
26. Kindervag, J. (2010). Build Security into Your Network’s DNA: The Zero Trust Network Architecture, Forrester Research Inc.. Available online: https://www.actiac.org/system/files/Forrester_zero_trust_DNA.pdf.
27. (2020). Zero Trust Architecture (Standard No. NIST SP 800-207).
28. (2024). Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture (Standard No. NIST SP 800-35 (Initial Public Draft)).
29. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2024, December 09). Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture, Available online: https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/1800/35/ipd.
30. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Version 1.1.
31. Pascoe, C.E. (2024). The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0.10.6028/NIST.SP.1304.ipd ↗
32. National Cyber Security Center (2024, October 20). The Direction of ROK’s Cybersecurity Policy, Available online: https://cybersummit.kr/eng/p2/c2/?d=2&tab=5&i=22.
33. From zero to one hundred: Demystifying zero trust and its implications on enterprise people, process, and technology10.1145/3561799 ↗
34. A Review on Zero Trust—Balancing Security and Usability Needs
35. Endpoint security reinforcement via integrated zero-trust systems: A collaborative approach10.1016/j.cose.2023.103537 ↗
36. Daah, C., Qureshi, A., Awan, I., and Konur, S. (2024). Enhancing zero trust models in the financial industry through blockchain integration: A proposed framework. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13050865 ↗
37. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA), and Korea Zero Trust Forum (KZTF) (2024, December 09). Zero Trust Security Guidelines 2.0, Available online: https://www.kisa.or.kr/2060204/form?postSeq=18&page=1#fnPostAttachDownload.
38. (2024). Security and Resilience—Protective Security—Guidelines for an Enterprise Protective Security Architecture and Framework (Standard No. ISO 22340:2024). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/85607.html.
39. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) (2024, October 24). Zero Trust Maturity Model, Available online: https://www.cisa.gov/zero-trust-maturity-model.
40. Bell, D.E. (2005, January 5–9). Looking back at the Bell-La Padula model. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC’05), Tucson, AZ, USA.
41. (2022). Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection—Information Security Controls (Standard No. ISO/IEC 27002:2022). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html.
42. A study of effect of Information Security Management System [ISMS] certification on organization performance
43. The Study on Corporate Information Security Governance Model for CEO
44. Lakbabi, A., Orhanou, G., and Hajji, S.E. (2013). Network Access Control Technology-Proposition to contain new security challenges. arXiv.10.4236/ijcns.2012.58061 ↗
45. Korean National Police Agency (2024, September 01). Defense Industry Hacking Attacks Revealed, Available online: https://www.police.go.kr/component/file/ND_fileDownload.do?q_fileSn=157251&q_fileId=785128b4-1d02-43e4-a4ef-a6639437650e.
46. National Security Agency (NSA) (2024, September 12). Embracing a Zero Trust Security Model, Available online: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Feb/25/2002588479/-1/-1/0/CSI_EMBRACING_ZT_SECURITY_MODEL_UOO115131-21.pdf.
47. F5 Labs (2023). 2023 Identity Threat Report: The Unpatchables, F5 Labs. Available online: https://www.f5.com/content/dam/f5-labs-v2/article/pdfs/F5-LABS-2023-Identity-Report-01NOV23.pdf.10.1093/mictod/qaad078 ↗