Optimizing Breeding Strategies for Pekin Ducks Using Genomic Selection: Genetic Parameter Evaluation and Selection Progress Analysis in Reproductive Traits
Source abstract
Abstract
Reproductive performance is an important trait in poultry production. Traditional methods of improving reproductive traits can only use recorded information from females, making it difficult to effectively assess the reproductive potential of males. Although genomic selection is thought to remedy this shortcoming, most studies now use simulated data or one or two generations of data to assess its effects. Also, the effectiveness of genomic selection for use in the improvement of reproductive traits in ducks has hardly been reported. In this study, data from four consecutive generations of Pekin duck populations were used to assess the effect of genomic selection on reproductive trait improvement. Whole-genome resequencing was performed for genotyping, and pedigree and SNP genetic parameters were evaluated. Using the BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), GBLUP (Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), and ssGBLUP (Single-step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) models, we assessed selection progress for body weight at 6 weeks, age at first egg, and egg number from 25 to 44 weeks over multiple generations. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the genomic prediction performance. The results indicated that the heritability of growth traits decreased after routine selection, while reproductive and egg quality traits maintained moderate heritability (0.2–0.4). Selection progress showed a one-day advancement in age at first egg and an increase of one egg per generation from the 13th to 15th generations. The GBLUP model performance significantly outperformed BLUP, but ssGBLUP showed minimal improvement due to comprehensive genotyping. In conclusion, this study provides crucial insights for optimizing breeding strategies and improving economic efficiency in Pekin duck breeding.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock · Genetic diversity and population structure · Silkworms and Sericulture Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of the Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Beijing Nankou Duck Breeding Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102202, China
Cherry Valley Breeding Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. The study of candidate genes in the improvement of egg production in ducks—A review10.1016/j.psj.2022.101850 ↗
2. Yin, L., Zhang, H., Zhou, X., Yuan, X., Zhao, S., Li, X., and Liu, X. (2020). KAML: Improving genomic prediction accuracy of complex traits using machine learning determined parameters. Genome Biol., 21.10.1186/s13059-020-02052-w ↗
3. Results from rapid-cycle recurrent genomic selection in spring bread wheat10.1093/g3journal/jkad025 ↗
4. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 ↗
5. Sabadin, F., DoVale, J.C., Platten, J.D., and Fritsche-Neto, R. (2022). Optimizing self-pollinated crop breeding employing genomic selection: From schemes to updating training sets. Front. Plant Sci., 13.10.3389/fpls.2022.935885 ↗
6. Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population10.1111/eva.13638 ↗
7. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes10.1186/1297-9686-44-4 ↗
8. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model10.1186/1297-9686-43-5 ↗
9. D’Ambrosio, J., Morvezen, R., Brard-Fudulea, S., Bestin, A., Acin Perez, A., Guéméné, D., Poncet, C., Haffray, P., Dupont-Nivet, M., and Phocas, F. (2020). Genetic architecture and genomic selection of female reproduction traits in rainbow trout. BMC Genom., 21.10.1186/s12864-020-06955-7 ↗
10. Genomic prediction of reproduction traits for Merino sheep10.1111/age.12541 ↗
11. Genomic merit for reproductive traits. I: Estrous characteristics and fertility in Holstein heifers10.3168/jds.2018-15205 ↗
12. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x ↗
13. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes10.1038/nrg2575 ↗
14. Genomic selection for meat quality traits in Pekin duck10.1111/age.13157 ↗
15. Cai, W., Hu, J., Fan, W., Xu, Y., Tang, J., Xie, M., Zhang, Y., Guo, Z., Zhou, Z., and Hou, S. (2023). Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an F(2) population. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 14.10.1186/s40104-023-00875-8 ↗
16. Three chromosome-level duck genome assemblies provide insights into genomic variation during domestication10.1038/s41467-021-26272-1 ↗
17. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 ↗
18. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data10.1101/gr.107524.110 ↗
19. The variant call format and VCFtools10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 ↗
20. Rapid genotype imputation from sequence without reference panels10.1038/ng.3594 ↗
21. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509 ↗
22. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses10.1086/519795 ↗
23. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model10.2307/2529430 ↗
24. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions10.3168/jds.2007-0980 ↗
25. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information10.3168/jds.2009-2061 ↗
26. Influence of heritability on occlusal traits: A systematic review of studies in twins10.1186/s40510-020-00330-8 ↗
27. Biostatistics primer: Part 210.1177/011542650802300176 ↗
28. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls10.3168/jds.2008-1514 ↗
29. Butler, D.G., Cullis, B.R., Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.G., and Thompson, R. (2023). ASReml-R Reference Manual, v. 4.2, VSN International Ltd.
30. Prolificacy and Its Relationship with Age, Body Weight, Parity, Previous Litter Size and Body Linear Type Traits in Meat-type Goats10.5713/ajas.2013.13658 ↗
31. Genetic parameters estimation in an Italian horse native breed to support the conversion from agricultural uses to riding purposes10.1111/jbg.12425 ↗
32. Kanlisi, R.A., Amuzu-Aweh, E.N., Naazie, A., Otsyina, H.R., Kelly, T.R., Gallardo, R.A., Lamont, S.J., Zhou, H., Dekkers, J., and Kayang, B.B. (2024). Genetic architecture of body weight, carcass, and internal organs traits of Ghanaian local chickens. Front. Genet., 15.10.3389/fgene.2024.1297034 ↗
33. Walugembe, M., Amuzu-Aweh, E.N., Botchway, P.K., Naazie, A., Aning, G., Wang, Y., Saelao, P., Kelly, T., Gallardo, R.A., and Zhou, H. (2020). Genetic Basis of Response of Ghanaian Local Chickens to Infection With a Lentogenic Newcastle Disease Virus. Front. Genet., 11.10.3389/fgene.2020.00739 ↗
34. Zhou, J., Yu, J.Z., Zhu, M.Y., Yang, F.X., Hao, J.P., He, Y., Zhu, X.L., Hou, Z.C., and Zhu, F. (2024). Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Genetic Parameters for Egg Production Traits in Peking Ducks. Animals, 14.10.3390/ani14131891 ↗
35. Zhang, J., Gao, X., Zheng, W., Wang, P., Duan, Z., and Xu, G. (2023). Dynamic Changes in Egg Quality, Heritability and Correlation of These Traits and Yolk Nutrient throughout the Entire Laying Cycle. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12244472 ↗
36. Yuan, J., Sun, C., Dou, T., Yi, G., Qu, L., Qu, L., Wang, K., and Yang, N. (2015). Identification of Promising Mutants Associated with Egg Production Traits Revealed by Genome-Wide Association Study. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0140615 ↗
37. Xu, W., Wang, Z., Qu, Y., Li, Q., Tian, Y., Chen, L., Tang, J., Li, C., Li, G., and Shen, J. (2022). Genome-Wide Association Studies and Haplotype-Sharing Analysis Targeting the Egg Production Traits in Shaoxing Duck. Front. Genet., 13.10.3389/fgene.2022.828884 ↗
38. Genetic parameters, reciprocal cross differences, and age-related heterosis of egg-laying performance in chickens10.1186/s12711-023-00862-7 ↗
39. Relationship among egg quality traits in Japanese quails and prediction of egg weight and color using data mining algorithms10.1007/s11250-021-02811-2 ↗
40. Effect of age at first egg on reproduction performance and characterization of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in chickens10.1016/j.psj.2021.101325 ↗
41. Genome-wide variation study and inter-tissue communication analysis unveil regulatory mechanisms of egg-laying performance in chickens10.1038/s41467-024-50809-9 ↗
42. Estimates of genetic parameters, and cluster and principal components analyses of breeding values related to egg production traits in a White Leghorn population10.3382/ps.2011-01474 ↗
43. Characterization of clutch traits and egg production in six chicken breeds10.5713/ab.22.0369 ↗
44. Liu, Z., Yang, N., Yan, Y., Li, G., Liu, A., Wu, G., and Sun, C. (2019). Genome-wide association analysis of egg production performance in chickens across the whole laying period. BMC Genet., 20.10.1186/s12863-019-0771-7 ↗
45. Chomchuen, K., Tuntiyasawasdikul, V., Chankitisakul, V., and Boonkum, W. (2022). Genetic Evaluation of Body Weights and Egg Production Traits Using a Multi-Trait Animal Model and Selection Index in Thai Native Synthetic Chickens (Kaimook e-san2). Animals, 12.10.3390/ani12030335 ↗
46. Selection response and genetic parameter estimation of feeding behavior traits in Pekin ducks10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.013 ↗
47. da Silva, É.D.B., Xavier, A., and Faria, M.V. (2021). Impact of Genomic Prediction Model, Selection Intensity, and Breeding Strategy on the Long-Term Genetic Gain and Genetic Erosion in Soybean Breeding. Front. Genet., 12.10.3389/fgene.2021.637133 ↗
48. Genomics and breeding innovations for enhancing genetic gain for climate resilience and nutrition traits10.1007/s00122-021-03847-6 ↗
49. Mehrban, H., Naserkheil, M., Lee, D., and Ibáñez-Escriche, N. (2021). Multi-Trait Single-Step GBLUP Improves Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Carcass Traits Using Yearling Weight and Ultrasound Traits in Hanwoo. Front. Genet., 12.10.3389/fgene.2021.692356 ↗
50. Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction for growth traits in yellow-plumage chicken using genotyping-by-sequencing10.1186/s12711-021-00672-9 ↗