Analysis of Driving Behavior of Micromobility Vehicle Users at Mini-Roundabouts
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid spread of micromobility vehicles such as bicycles and electric scooters poses new challenges to urban transportation systems, particularly in terms of road safety and infrastructure integration. This study investigates the driving behavior of micromobility users at a mini-roundabout, focusing on their speed profiles and their position within the lane during the entry, circulation, and exit phases. A structured recruitment process was used to select 20 participants with previous micromobility experience. Participants performed crossing maneuvers at a mini-roundabout in Gravina di Catania, Italy, which were monitored using drone footage and analyzed with tracking software to extract trajectories and speed data. The results show significant differences between e-scooter and bicycle users, with bicycles showing less speed variability, especially during the crossing and exit phases, while e-scooters showed greater variability, especially during the entry and exit phases. The results highlight the influence of vehicle stability and user posture on riding behavior and emphasize the need for infrastructure adaptations to increase safety. Mini-roundabouts designed for moderate speed are identified as a promising solution to improve the coexistence of micromobility and motor vehicles. This research identifies key differences in speed profiles and behavioral patterns between e-scooter and bicycle users, offering actionable insights and recommendations for safer and more efficient urban infrastructure. These contributions provide valuable guidance for urban planners and policymakers in promoting safer and more sustainable urban mobility.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Traffic and Road Safety · Transportation Systems and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering and Architectural, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria, 6, 95125 Catania, Italy
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Micromobility: Progress, benefits, challenges, policy and regulations, energy sources and storage, and its role in achieving sustainable development goals10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100292 ↗
2. An Analysis of the service coverage and regulation of e-scooter sharing in Rome (Italy)10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.057 ↗
3. Holm Møller, T., and Simlett, J. (2024, April 19). Micromobility: Moving Cities into a Sustainable Future. EY, Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/187K-TeFrxwMb2ATykzgoLD31-btl0xaU/view?pli=1.
4. Distefano, N., Leonardi, S., Kiec, M., and D’Agostino, C. (2024). Comparison of E-Scooter andBike Users’ Behavior in Mixed Traffic. Transp. Res. Rec.10.1177/03611981241263339 ↗
5. Safety of bicyclists in roundabouts with mixed traffic: Video analyses of behavioural and surrogate safety indicators10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.006 ↗
6. A review of history, development, design and research of electric bicycles10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114323 ↗
7. O’Hern, S., and Estgfaeller, N. (2020). A Scientometric Review of Powered Micromobility. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229505 ↗
8. Boglietti, S., Barabino, B., and Maternini, G. (2021). Survey on e-powered micro personal mobility vehicles: Exploring current issues towards future developments. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073692 ↗
9. The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734 ↗
10. Pazzini, M., Cameli, L., Lantieri, C., Vignali, V., Dondi, G., and Jonsson, T. (2022). New Micromobility Means of Transport: An Analysis of E-Scooter Users’ Behaviour in Trondheim. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19127374 ↗
11. Badia, H., and Jenelius, E. (2021). Shared e-Scooter Micromobility: A Review of Travel Behavior, Sustainability, Infrastructure, Safety and Policies. Sustainability, 13.
12. E-Scooter safety: The riding risk analysis based on mobile sensing data10.1016/j.aap.2020.105954 ↗
13. Differences in route choice behavior when riding shared e-scooters vs. bicycles—A field study10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.008 ↗
14. López-Molina, M., Llopis-Castelló, D., Pérez-Zuriaga, A.M., Alonso-Troyano, C., and García, A. (2023). Skid resistance Analysis of Urban Bike Lane Pavements for Safe Micromobility. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15010698 ↗
15. Assessing micromobility safety on horizontal curves of bike lanes: A video motion analysis methodology
16. How do different micro-mobility vehicles affect longitudinal control? Results from a field experiment10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.005 ↗
17. Arbel, S., Zrifin, E., Mahmoud, R., Mijiritsky, E., Groysman, L., Shuster, A., and Peleg, O. (2022). Maxillofacial injuries sustained by riders of electric-powered bikes and electric-powered scooters. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph192215183 ↗
18. Yannis, G., Petrak, V., and Crist, P. (2024). Safer Micromobility: Technical Background Report. Int. Transp. Forum., Available online: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/safer-micrombility-technical-report.pdf.
19. Modeling Driver Behavior at Roundabouts: Results from a Field Study
20. European Committee for Standardization (2020). Light Motorized Vehicles for the Transportation of Persons and Goods and Related Facilities and Not Subject to Type-Approval for On-Road Use—Personal Light Electric Vehicles—Safety Requirements and Test Methods (Standard No. EN 17128).
21. Elvik, R., Christensen, P., and Amundsen, A.H. (2004). Speed and road accidents: An evaluation of the Power Model. Transp. Econ. Inst. (TØI)., Available online: https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/549465373/Speed_and_road_accidents_PhD.pdf.
22. E-bike safety: Individual-level factors and incident characteristics10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.001 ↗
23. Users’ attitudes on electric scooter riding speed on shared footpaths: A virtual reality study10.1080/15568318.2020.1718252 ↗
24. Experimental analysis of pedestrians’ discomfort zone for personal mobility devices on the footpath
25. Statistical Test for 85th and 15th Percentile Speeds with Asymptotic Distribution of Sample Quantiles10.3141/2279-06 ↗
26. Overtaking Disturbance on a Moped-Bicycle-Shared Bicycle Path and Corresponding New Bicycle Path Design Principles10.1061/JTEPBS.0000172 ↗
27. Improved percentile estimation for the two-parameter Weibull distribution10.1016/0026-2714(94)00168-N ↗
28. Modeling of speed distribution for mixed bicycle traffic flow10.1177/1687814015616918 ↗
29. Accident Prediction on E-Bikes Using Computer Vision
30. Burt, N., and Ahmed, Z. (2023). E-Scooter Attitudes and Risk-Taking Behaviours: An International Systematic Literature Review and Survey Responses in the West Midlands, United Kingdom. Front. Public Health, 11.10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277378 ↗
31. Sabbaghian, M.H., Llopis-Castelló, D., and García, A. (2023). A Safe Infrastructure for Micromobility: The Current State of Knowledge. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310140 ↗
32. Micromobility Evolution and Expansion: Understanding How Docked and Dockless Bikesharing Models Complement and Compete10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102620 ↗
33. Li, R., Liang, G., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., and Wang, B. (2023). Analysis of Conflict Distribution Characteristics between Motor Vehicles and E-Bikes at Roundabouts. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063475 ↗
34. Examining two-wheelers’ overtaking behavior and lateral distance choices at a shared roadway facility
35. Gulino, M., Zonfrillo, G., Damaziak, K., and Vangi, D. (2021). Exploring Performances of Electric Micro-Mobility Vehicles and Behavioural Patterns of Riders for In-Depth Accident Analysis. Designs, 5.10.3390/designs5040066 ↗
36. Safety of Users of Electric Scooters in the Area of the City of Obrenovac
37. Fonseca-Cabrera, A.S., Llopis-Castelló, D., Pérez-Zuriaga, A., Alonso-Troyano, C., and García, A. (2021). Micromobility Users’ Behaviour and Perceived Risk during Meeting Manoeuvres. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182312465 ↗
38. Pérez-Zuriaga, A., Llopis-Castelló, D., Just-Martínez, V., Fonseca-Cabrera, A.S., Alonso-Troyano, C., and García, A. (2022). Implementation of a Low-Cost Data Acquisition System on an E-Scooter for Micromobility Research. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218215 ↗
39. Tang, X., Song, H., Wang, W., and Yang, Y. (2020). Vehicle Spatial Distribution and 3D Trajectory Extraction Algorithm in a Cross-Camera Traffic Scene. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20226517 ↗
40. LSTM-based trajectory prediction model for cyclist utilizing multiple interactions with environment10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107800 ↗
41. Trajectory Forecasting Based on Prior-Aware Directed Graph Convolutional Neural Network10.1109/TITS.2022.3142248 ↗
42. Trajectory prediction of cyclist based on dynamic Bayesian network and long short-term memory model at unsignalized intersections10.1007/s11432-020-3071-8 ↗
43. Deep-Learning Based Decentralized Frame-to-Frame Trajectory Prediction Over Binary Range-Angle Maps for Automotive Radars10.1109/TVT.2021.3082213 ↗
44. MMH-STA: A Macro-Micro-Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Attention Method for Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction in Unsignalized Roundabouts10.1109/TVT.2023.3268373 ↗
45. Design speeds and acceleration characteristics of bicycle traffic for use in planning, design and appraisal10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.03.001 ↗
46. On the stability and control of the bicycle10.1115/1.2983014 ↗
47. The influence of speed, cyclists’ age, pedaling frequency, and observer age on observers’ time to arrival judgments of approaching bicycles and e-bikes10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.020 ↗
48. Speed choice and mental workload of elderly cyclists on e-bikes in simple and complex traffic situations: A field experiment10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.018 ↗