journal article·2024-08-04Open access

Meat Color, Marbling, and the Evaluation of Defects in Beef and Pork at the Point of Purchase

Sara Simunović, Igor Tomasevic, Vesna Ž. Djordjevic, Tatjana Baltić, Stefan Simunovic, Jelena Ćirić, Ilija Djekic

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 15

Abstract

Intentions to purchase meat and repeat purchasing patterns will depend on the consumer’s perception of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues. In order to discover consumers’ insights into the quality of pork and beef, the main objective of this study was to investigate meat color, marbling, and types of fresh meat defects. A total of 50 samples of meat were analyzed for three quality characteristics on different levels. This study applied a statistical calculation of a loss function invented by Taguchi. The results showed the values of variations in meat color and marbling that present the limits of consumers’ tolerance. Based on the obtained results, it was determined that the tolerable level of color variations of beef is 3.61, while for pork, this limit is 2.00. The most preferred marbling percentages were 21% and 5.74% for beef and pork, respectively. On the other hand, the negative effect of defects was the strongest for “dark cutting” for beef and “blood spotting” for pork loins.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Meat and Animal Product Quality

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Kaćanskog 13, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia

Department of Food Safety and Quality Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia

Department of Animal Source Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia

German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL), 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Katić, G., Pavlović, M., Bradarić, S., Stančić, K., Jotev, J., and Pavlović, M. (2022). Trendovi Q1, Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
2. OECD, and FAO (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030, OECD.
3. Use of Endemic Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) Seeds as an Insoluble Dietary Fiber: Effect on Turkey Meat Quality10.1155/2020/8889272 ↗
4. Consumers want pork with ‘adjectives’10.1071/AN17362 ↗
5. Consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for graded beef in Polokwane municipality, South Africa
6. Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063 ↗
7. Testa, M.L., Grigioni, G., Panea, B., and Pavan, E. (2021). Color and Marbling as Predictors of Meat Quality Perception of Argentinian Consumers. Foods, 10.10.3390/foods10071465 ↗
8. Effect of slaughter age on performance and meat quality of slow-growing broiler chickens10.2478/v10220-012-0052-0 ↗
9. Muscle Fibre Characteristics and Physico-Chemical Parameters of m. semimembranosusfrom Puławska, Polish Large White and Pietrain Pigs10.3409/fb64_3.197 ↗
10. The Effect of Sodium Alginate Coating Containing Citrus (Citrus aurantium) and Lemon (Citrus lemon) Extracts on Quality Properties of Chicken Meat10.1155/2022/6036113 ↗
11. Visual evaluation of beef tenderness by using surface structural observations and its relationship to meat colour10.4314/sajas.v45i3.4 ↗
12. Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108322 ↗
13. King, I. (2005). Handbook of Australian Meat 7th Edition (International Red Meat Manual), AUS-MEAT Ltd.
14. MLA (2023, August 18). Meat Standards Australia MSA07 Tips & Tools. Available online: https://www.mla.com.au/marketing-beef-and-lamb/meat-standards-australia/.
15. Scott, N. (2011). USDA Quality Grade and Yield Grade, University of Idaho.
16. Busboom, J.R., and Reeves, J.J. (2023). Japanese Meat Grading, Washington State University.
17. Burson, D.E. (2023). Meat Quality Defects, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. CDE Information for Lab practicum.
18. Hood, D.E., and Tarrant, P.V. (1981). Translucency and Colour Defects of Dark-Cutting Meat and their Detection. The Problem of Dark-Cutting in Beef: A Seminar in the EEC Programme of Coordination of Research on Animal Welfare, Organised by D.E. Hood and P.V. Tarrant, and Held in Brussels, October 7–8, 1980, Springer.10.1007/978-94-009-8322-9 ↗
19. Dark-cutting beef: A brief review and an integromics meta-analysis at the proteome level to decipher the underlying pathways10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108611 ↗
20. Maharjan, D. (2019). Impact of Winter Feeding and Vaccination Strategies on Carcass Outcomes in Beef Cattle, The University of Manitoba.
21. Proteomics analysis as an approach to understand the formation of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) pork10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108353 ↗
22. Lesiów, T., and Xiong, Y.L. (2024). Heat/Cold Stress and Methods to Mitigate Its Detrimental Impact on Pork and Poultry Meat: A Review. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13091333 ↗
23. Pork chain quality audit survey: Quantification of pork quality characteristics10.1111/j.1745-4573.1996.tb00585.x ↗
24. Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method10.1080/00224065.1985.11978964 ↗
25. Redzic, S. (1999). Taguchi’s loss function and inverted probability loss function as tools for advancement of the quality.
26. Robust Quality
27. Taguchi’s off line method and Multivariate loss function approach for quality management and optimization of process parameters—A review10.1063/1.3516353 ↗
28. The role of marbling as an intrinsic characteristic at the point of meat purchase–the Taguchi approach10.1088/1755-1315/854/1/012078 ↗
29. Comparison of a computer vision system vs. traditional colorimeter for color evaluation of meat products with various physical properties10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.09.015 ↗
30. Giaretta, E., Mordenti, A.L., Canestrari, G., Brogna, N., Palmonari, A., and Formigoni, A. (2018). Assessment of muscle Longissimus thoracis et lumborum marbling by image analysis and relationships between meat quality parameters. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0202535 ↗
31. NPPC (2023, May 01). Pork Quality Standards. Available online: https://nppc.org/.
32. Computer Vision System: A better tool for assessing pork and beef colour than a standard colourimeter10.18485/meattech.2020.61.2.5 ↗
33. Estimation of fat content in fermented sausages by means of Computer Vision System (CVS)10.18485/meattech.2021.62.1.3 ↗
34. Punter, P.H. (2018). Free Choice Profiling. Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781118991657.ch13 ↗
35. Varela, P., and Ares, G. (2014). Free-Choice Profile Combined with Repertory Grid Method. Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/b16853 ↗
36. Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.004 ↗
37. What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.05.001 ↗
38. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Pork choice10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.08.005 ↗
39. Total quality index of Agaricus bisporus mushrooms packed in modified atmosphere10.1002/jsfa.8142 ↗
40. Grading meat quality by image processing10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00035-7 ↗
41. Buy, eat or discard? A case study with apples to explore fruit quality perception and food waste10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.05.004 ↗
42. Multiobjective Design Optimization of an IPMSM for EVs Based on Fuzzy Method and Sequential Taguchi Method10.1109/TIE.2020.3031534 ↗
43. Shojaei, S., Shojaei, S., Band, S.S., Farizhandi, A.A.K., Ghoroqi, M., and Mosavi, A. (2021). Application of Taguchi method and response surface methodology into the removal of malachite green and auramine-O by NaX nanozeolites. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-95649-5 ↗
44. Robust Design Optimization of a Five-Phase PM Hub Motor for Fault-Tolerant Operation Based on Taguchi Method10.1109/TEC.2020.2989438 ↗
45. A new approach in the economic design of acceptance sampling plans based on process yield index and Taguchi loss function10.1016/j.cie.2021.107155 ↗
46. Wang, M., Yang, F., Zhang, B., and Chen, Z. (2023). Sustainable Quality Management Based on Metrological Sampling Scheme Design: A Case Study of Food Processor. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065283 ↗
47. Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., and Peñabaena-Niebles, R. (2019, January 23–26). Multi-Objective Approximation for the Optimal Design of Control Charts with Variable Parameters using the Taguchi Loss Function. Proceedings of the 2019 6th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), Paris, France.10.1109/CoDIT.2019.8820392 ↗
48. Optimization of Gluten Free Spaghetti Products from Local Food with the Taguchi Method Approach10.1088/1755-1315/251/1/012031 ↗
49. Application of Taguchi method to improve the sous vide processed large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) fillet product quality during cold storage10.1111/jfpp.15565 ↗
50. Dynamic markdown decisions based on a quality loss function in on-site direct-sale supply chains for perishable food10.1080/01605682.2019.1705192 ↗
51. Quality management model for perishable food in a fishing industry10.1111/jfpe.13171 ↗
52. Turk, S. (2022). Taguchi Loss Function in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets along with Personal Perceptions for the Sustainable Supplier Selection Problem. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14106178 ↗
53. The color of fresh pork: Consumers expectations, underlying farm-to-fork factors, myoglobin chemistry and contribution of proteomics to decipher the biochemical mechanisms10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109340 ↗
54. Consumer perception of marbling and beef quality during purchase and consumer preferences for degree of doneness10.5713/ab.23.0003 ↗
55. Yancey, E.J. (2002). Determination of Factors Causing Livery Flavor in Steaks from the Beef Loin and Chuck. [Ph.D. Thesis, Kansas State University].10.4148/2378-5977.1643 ↗
56. Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: Consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00065-1 ↗
57. Intramuscular fat content has little influence on the eating quality of fresh pork loin chops10.2527/jas.2007-0490 ↗