journal article·2024-05-15Open access

Application of the Drosophila melanogaster Research Model to Evaluate the Toxicity Levels between Lead and Copper

Sarac Ioan, Petrescu Irina, Onisan Emilian, Popescu Sorina, Petolescu Cerasela, Ciulca Adriana, Camen Dorin, Tenche-Constantinescu Alina-Maria, Lalescu Dacian, Stroia Ciprian, Morna Anamaria Aurelia, Vicas Laura-Gratiela, Ganea Mariana

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 10

Abstract

Applications of the Drosophila melanogaster (D.m.) research model have an important means both for genetic investigations and for the study of metal toxicity, because D.m. has physiological mechanisms comparable to those in human organisms. In this research, the toxic effect of lead (Pb2+) and copper (Cu2+) on four D.m. genotypes—the wild genotype (Oregon-R, used as control) and three mutant genotypes (white, brown, and white-vestigial)—was compared. Five replicates were made to observe the development progress of monitorized genotypes exposed to five different concentrations 0, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, and 2.00 mM of copper (CuSO4) and lead Pb(C2H3O2)2. Proliferation rates of larvae, pupae, and adults depend on genetic factors, metals used (copper or lead), and their concentrations. The white-vestigial mutant genotype showed the greatest sensitivity at IC50 concentration (inhibition of proliferation of more than 50% compared with the control sample) at doses of 1.00 mM for Cu2+ and 2.00 mM for Pb2+. In contrast, the control genotype (Oregon-R) showed only an inhibition IC50 concentration of 2.00 mM for Cu2+. The white-vestigial mutant genotype showed the greatest sensitivity at IC50 concentration (inhibition of proliferation of more than 50% compared with the control sample) at doses of 1.00 mM for Cu2+ and 2.00 mM for Pb2+. In contrast, the control genotype (Oregon-R) showed an inhibition at the IC50 concentration of 2.00 mM for Cu2+. The results conclude that (i) the dose influences the prolificacy rate in a directly proportional way, (ii) the comparative analyses between Cu2+ and Pb2+ revealed a more acute effect of Cu2+, and (iii) differentiated prolificacy values according to genotypes were recorded. Those reflect the importance of using D.m. as a research model in the comparative studies of the interactions between genetic factors and metal toxicity. Also, this study provides significant information on non-toxic maximum doses for organisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity · Heavy metals in environment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Technologies, King Michael I University of Life Sciences from Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Technologies, King Michael I University of Life Sciences from Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Engineering, King Michael I University of Life Sciences from Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania

Department of Plant Biology and Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, King Michael I University of Life Sciences from Timisoara, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timișoara, Romania

Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 26 Gen. Magheru Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, Strada 1 Decembrie, 410073 Oradea, Romania

Funding

Increasing the impact of excellence research on innovation and technology transfer capacity at USV Timisoara

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691 ↗
2. Ali, M.M., Hossain, D., Al-Imran, A., Khan, M.S., Begum, M., and Osman, M.H. (2021). Heavy Metals—Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation, IntechOpen.
3. Heavy metal characterization of land-based waste dumped at three ocean dumping sites in the Republic of Korea10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115205 ↗
4. Microbial strategies for copper pollution remediation: Mechanistic insights and recent advances10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123588 ↗
5. Half of US population exposed to adverse lead levels in early childhood10.1073/pnas.2118631119 ↗
6. Evaluation of Trace Element and Heavy Metal Levels of Some Ethnobotanically Important Medicinal Plants Used as Remedies in Southern Turkey in Terms of Human Health Risk10.1007/s12011-022-03299-z ↗
7. Harmonisation, P.T. (2024, April 02). Derivation Methods of Soil Screening Values in Europe. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=1315ea61e2c6e168e151175735cb6253ddef33d7.
8. Genetic Isolation by Environment or Distance: Which Pattern of Gene Flow is Most Common?10.1111/evo.12258 ↗
9. Air Pollution, Genetic Factors, and the Risk of Lung Cancer A Prospective Study in the UK Biobank10.1164/rccm.202011-4063OC ↗
10. Ambient Air Pollution: Health Hazards to Children10.1542/peds.2021-051484 ↗
11. A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132369 ↗
12. Bhat, V.S., Kudva, A.K., Naik, H.V., Raghu, S.V., De Padova, P., and Hegde, G. (2022). Toxicological Profiling of Onion-Peel-Derived Mesoporous Carbon Nanospheres Using In Vivo Drosophila melanogaster Model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031528 ↗
13. Curcio, R., Lunetti, P., Zara, V., Ferramosca, A., Marra, F., Fiermonte, G., Cappello, A.R., De Leonardis, F., Capobianco, L., and Dolce, V. (2020). Drosophila melanogaster Mitochondrial Carriers: Similarities and Differences with the Human Carriers. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21176052 ↗
14. The genetic basis of adaptation to copper pollution in Drosophila melanogaster10.3389/fgene.2023.1144221 ↗
15. Copper oxide nanoparticles and copper sulphate act as antigenotoxic agents in drosophila melanogaster10.1002/em.22068 ↗
16. Differential sexual survival of Drosophila melanogaster on copper sulfate10.1007/s10709-017-9951-4 ↗
17. Copper: Toxicological relevance and mechanisms10.1007/s00204-014-1355-y ↗
18. Serum Copper and Zinc Concentrations of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis from Kayseri_Turkey
19. Prooxidant iron and copper, with ferroxidase and xanthine oxidase activities in human atherosclerotic material10.1016/0014-5793(95)00726-P ↗
20. Ribonuclease activity of Glycine max and Glycine soja sprouts as a marker adaptation to copper sulphate and zinc sulphate toxicity10.1016/j.bse.2019.01.007 ↗
21. Age-related changes in catalase, glutathione reductase activities, the amount of glutathione in total body of oregon and vestigial Drosophila melanogaster10.1016/S0167-4943(05)80052-4 ↗
22. Innovative lead discovery strategies for tropical diseases10.1038/nrd2144 ↗
23. Determinants of Blood Lead Levels in Saudi Arabian Schoolgirls10.1179/oeh.1999.5.2.107 ↗
24. Cadmium and Lead Accumulation and Distribution in the Organs of Nine Crops: Implications for Phytoremediation
25. How does hepatic lipid accumulation lead to lipotoxicity in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?10.1007/s12072-020-10121-2 ↗
26. Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences10.1002/jcb.26234 ↗
27. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates10.2478/v10102-012-0009-2 ↗
28. The processes of lipid peroxidation in the cells of Chlorobium limicola IMV K-8 under the influence of copper (II) sulphate10.15421/011608 ↗
29. Adverse effect of tannery waste leachates in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster: Role of ROS in modulation of Hsp70, oxidative stress and apoptosis10.1002/jat.1332 ↗
30. Singh, M.P., Himalian, R., Shabir, S., Obaid, A.A., Alamri, A.S., Galanakis, C.M., Singh, S.K., and Vamanu, E. (2022). Protection of Phytoextracts against Rotenone-Induced Organismal Toxicities in Drosophila melanogaster via the Attenuation of ROS Generation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199822 ↗
31. Mackay, T.F.C., and Huang, W. (2018). Charting the genotype-phenotype map: Lessons from the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Dev. Biol., 7.10.1002/wdev.289 ↗
32. Genotype—Environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster10.1098/rspb.1994.0166 ↗
33. Genetic and Molecular Ecotoxicology: A Research Framework10.1289/ehp.94102s123 ↗
34. Wipf, I.J. (2021). Investigating the Role of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters in Drosophila melanogaster Testis Stem Cells. [Master’s Thesis, University of Northern Colorado].
35. ATP binding cassette systems: Structures, mechanisms, and functions
36. Plant ABC Transporters10.1199/tab.0153 ↗
37. The white gene controls copulation success in Drosophila melanogaster10.1038/s41598-017-08155-y ↗
38. Dosage compensation of the Drosophila white gene requires both the X chromosome environment and multiple intragenic elements10.1093/genetics/139.2.733 ↗
39. Position Effects at the Brown Locus in Drosophila Melanogaster10.1093/genetics/40.1.5 ↗
40. The ABCs of Eye Color in Tribolium castaneum: Orthologs of the Drosophila white, scarlet, and brown Genes10.1534/genetics.114.173971 ↗
41. The yeast guanine nucleotide exchange factor Sec7 is a bottleneck in spatial protein quality control and detoxifies neurological disease proteins10.1038/s41598-023-41188-0 ↗
42. The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding Switch in Three Dimensions10.1126/science.1062023 ↗
43. [109] Use of ultraviolet absorbance-temperature profile for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA10.1016/0076-6879(67)12133-2 ↗
44. Mammalian Vestigial-like 2, a Cofactor of TEF-1 and MEF2 Transcription Factors That Promotes Skeletal Muscle Differentiation10.1074/jbc.M206858200 ↗
45. TONDU (TDU), a novel human protein related to the product of vestigial (vg) gene of Drosophila melanogaster interacts with vertebrate TEF factors and substitutes for Vg function in wing formation10.1242/dev.126.21.4807 ↗
46. Biochemical CuSO4 Toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster depends on sex and developmental stage of exposure10.1007/s12011-018-1475-y ↗
47. Unexplained variations in life span of the Oregon-R strain of Drosophila melanogaster over a four-year period10.1016/0531-5565(89)90017-X ↗
48. Toxic potential of copper-doped ZnO nanoparticles in Drosophila melanogaster (Oregon R)10.3109/15376516.2015.1045653 ↗
49. Genetic duplication in the white-split interval of the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster10.1007/BF00336795 ↗
50. 2010: A Century of Drosophila Genetics Through the Prism of the white Gene10.1534/genetics.109.110015 ↗
51. A trans-acting regulatory gene that inversely affects the expression of the white, brown and scarlet loci in Drosophila10.1093/genetics/129.2.463 ↗
52. Volatile general anesthetics reveal a neurobiological role for the white and brown genes of Drosophila melanogaster10.1002/neu.10009 ↗
53. Evolution of Hominin Detoxification: Neanderthal and Modern Human Ah Receptor Respond Similarly to TCDD10.1093/molbev/msaa287 ↗
54. The circadian PAR-domain basic leucine zipper transcription factors DBP, TEF, and HLF modulate basal and inducible xenobiotic detoxification10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.015 ↗
55. Fecundity of inbred fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster on different solid culture media: An analysis
56. Peumus boldus attenuates copper-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.130 ↗
57. wonder animal model for genetic studies-Drosophila melanogaster-its life cycle and breeding methods-a review
58. Toxicity of Dithiothreitol (DTT) to Drosophila melanogaster10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.014 ↗
59. Molecular physiology of copper in Drosophila melanogaster10.1016/j.cois.2022.100892 ↗
60. Copper and Zinc Homeostasis: Lessons from Drosophila melanogaster10.3389/fgene.2017.00223 ↗
61. Redox Reactions of Copper Complexes Formed with Different β-Amyloid Peptides and Their Neuropathalogical Relevance10.1021/bi700508n ↗
62. Copper homoeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells10.1042/BJ20040745 ↗
63. Copper and its role in the human body-the importance of establishing copper concentrations in the body
64. Drosophila: A promising model for evaluating the toxicity of environmental pollutants
65. Assessment of comparative toxicities of lead and copper using plant assay10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.044 ↗
66. Komarnicka, U.K., Lesiów, M.K., Witwicki, M., and Bieńko, A. (2022). The Bright and Dark Sides of Reactive Oxygen Species Generated by Copper–Peptide Complexes. Separations, 9.10.3390/separations9030073 ↗
67. Defining roles of specific reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell biology and physiology10.1038/s41580-022-00456-z ↗
68. ABA-triggered ROS burst in rice developing anthers is critical for tapetal programmed cell death induction and heat stress-induced pollen abortion10.1111/pce.14551 ↗
69. Emilian, O., Ioan, S., Irina, P., Raul, P., Adriana, C., Dorin, C., and Ciprian, S. (2023). Cytological Applications of the Vacuolization Phenomenon as a Means of Determining Saline Cytotoxicity. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148461 ↗
70. Do glutathione and copper interact to modify Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis?10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.025 ↗
71. Babak, M.V., and Ahn, D. (2021). Modulation of intracellular copper levels as the mechanism of action of anticancer copper complexes: Clinical relevance. Biomedicines, 9.10.3390/biomedicines9080852 ↗
72. Adaptive epigenetic response of glutathione (GSH)-related genes against lead (Pb)-induced toxicity, in individuals chronically exposed to the metal10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128758 ↗