journal article·2024-04-22Open access

Optimization of Well Placement in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Bayesian Optimization Framework under Permutation Invariance

Sofianos Panagiotis Fotias, Ismail Ismail, Vassilis Gaganis

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) stands as a pivotal technological stride toward a sustainable future, with the practice of injecting supercritical CO2 into subsurface formations being already an established practice for enhanced oil recovery operations. The overarching objective of CCS is to protract the operational viability and sustainability of platforms and oilfields, thereby facilitating a seamless transition towards sustainable practices. This study introduces a comprehensive framework for optimizing well placement in CCS operations, employing a derivative-free method known as Bayesian Optimization. The development plan is tailored for scenarios featuring aquifers devoid of flow boundaries, incorporating production wells tasked with controlling pressure buildup and injection wells dedicated to CO2 sequestration. Notably, the wells operate under group control, signifying predefined injection and production targets and constraints that must be adhered to throughout the project’s lifespan. As a result, the objective function remains invariant under specific permutations of the well locations. Our investigation delves into the efficacy of Bayesian Optimization under the introduced permutation invariance. The results reveal that it demonstrates critical efficiency in handling the optimization task extremely fast. In essence, this study advocates for the efficacy of Bayesian Optimization in the context of optimizing well placement for CCS operations, emphasizing its potential as a preferred methodology for enhancing sustainability in the energy sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15773 Athens, Greece

Institute of Geoenergy, Foundation for Research and Technology, 73100 Chania, Greece

Funding

National Technical University of Athens (N.T.U.A.)

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Technologies and infrastructures underpinning future CO2 value chains: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis10.1016/j.rser.2018.01.007 ↗
2. The role of carbon capture and utilization, carbon capture and storage, and biomass to enable a net-zero-CO2 emissions chemical industry10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06579 ↗
3. Bui, M., Puxty, G.D., Gazzani, M., Soltani, S.M., and Pozo, C. (2021). The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies in a Net-Zero Carbon Future, Frontiers Media.10.3389/978-2-88971-585-5 ↗
4. Rackley, S., and Rackley, S. (2017). Carbon Capture and Storage, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-812041-5.00002-7 ↗
5. Tomić, L., Maričić, V.K., Danilović, D., and Crnogorac, M. (2018). Criteria for CO2 storage in geological formations. Podzemn. Rad., 61–74.10.5937/PodRad1832061T ↗
6. Ji, X., and Zhu, C. (2015). Novel Materials for Carbon Dioxide Mitigation Technology, Elsevier.
7. Review of CO2 storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 ↗
8. Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.011 ↗
9. CO2 storage in depleted or depleting oil and gas fields: What can we learn from existing projects?10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1707 ↗
10. Mohammadian, E., Jan, B.M., Azdarpour, A., Hamidi, H., Othman, N.H.B., Dollah, A., Hussein, S.N.B.C.M., and Sazali, R.A.B. (2019). Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes-New Technologies, IntechOpen.
11. CO2 sequestration in depleted oil and gas reservoirs—Caprock characterization and storage capacity10.1016/j.enconman.2005.08.023 ↗
12. Ismail, I., and Gaganis, V. (2023). Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Saline Aquifers: Subsurface Policies, Development Plans, Well Control Strategies and Optimization Approaches—A Review. Clean Technol., 5.10.3390/cleantechnol5020031 ↗
13. Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO210.1016/j.energy.2004.03.077 ↗
14. A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations: Summary and discussion of the results10.1007/s10596-009-9146-x ↗
15. Flow in porous media I: A theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law10.1007/BF01036523 ↗
16. The open porous media flow reservoir simulator10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.014 ↗
17. Mathematical structure of the black-oil model for petroleum reservoir simulation10.1137/0149044 ↗
18. Islam, M.R., Hossain, M.E., Mousavizadegan, S.H., Mustafiz, S., and Abou-Kassem, J.H. (2016). Advanced Petroleum Reservoir Simulation: Towards Developing Reservoir Emulators, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119038573 ↗
19. Jamal, H., Islam, M.R., and Farouq Ali, S.M. (2006). Petroleum Reservoir Simulation: A Basic Approach, Elsevier.
20. A multiscale two-point flux-approximation method10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.003 ↗
21. Finite volume methods
22. Samnioti, A., and Gaganis, V. (2023). Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part I. Energies, 16.10.20944/preprints202307.0630.v1 ↗
23. Samnioti, A., and Gaganis, V. (2023). Applications of Machine Learning in Subsurface Reservoir Simulation—A Review—Part II. Energies, 16.10.20944/preprints202307.0630.v1 ↗
24. Effect of capillary pressure and salinity on CO2 solubility in brine aquifers10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.12.012 ↗
25. Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO2 sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025 ↗
26. Optimization of well placement, CO2 injection rates, and brine cycling for geological carbon sequestration10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.003 ↗
27. CO2 storage in geological media: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001 ↗
28. The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors: Part 1. Scientific, technical and economic dimensions10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.07.009 ↗
29. Mirjalili, S., and Mirjalili, S. (2019). Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks: Theory and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-93025-1 ↗
30. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
31. Optimization of well placement in a Gulf of Mexico waterflooding project10.2118/78266-PA ↗
32. Hybrid Genetic Algorithms: A Review
33. Badru, O., and Kabir, C. (2003, January 16–18). Well placement optimization in field development. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.2523/84191-MS ↗
34. Emerick, A.A., Silva, E., Messer, B., Almeida, L.F., Szwarcman, D., Pacheco, M.A.C., and Vellasco, M.M. (2009, January 19–21). Well placement optimization using a genetic algorithm with nonlinear constraints. Proceedings of the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.10.2118/118808-MS ↗
35. Michalewicz, Z., and Nazhiyath, G. (December, January 29). Genocop III: A co-evolutionary algorithm for numerical optimization problems with nonlinear constraints. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Perth, WA, Australia.
36. Optimization of well placement and control to maximize CO2 trapping during geologic sequestration10.7494/drill.2016.33.1.93 ↗
37. Global optimization of injection well placement toward higher safety of CO2 geological storage10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.366 ↗
38. On Latin hypercube sampling10.1214/aos/1069362310 ↗
39. A holistic review on artificial intelligence techniques for well placement optimization problem10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102767 ↗
40. Frazier, P.I. (2018). A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv.10.1287/educ.2018.0188 ↗
41. Optimal Wells Placement to Maximize the Field Coverage Using Derivative-Free Optimization10.1016/j.procs.2020.11.008 ↗
42. Bordas, R., Heritage, J., Javed, M., Peacock, G., Taha, T., Ward, P., Vernon, I., and Hammersley, R. (2020, January 14–17). A Bayesian Optimisation Workflow for Field Development Planning Under Geological Uncertainty. Proceedings of the ECMOR XVII. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Online.10.3997/2214-4609.202035121 ↗
43. Kumar, A. (2022, January 6–9). Search space partitioning, MCTS and trust-region Bayesian optimization for joint optimization of well placement and control. Proceedings of the 83rd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Madrid, Spain.10.3997/2214-4609.202210145 ↗
44. Kumar, A. (2023, January 5–8). High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization using Sparse-Axis Aligned Subspaces for Joint Optimization of Well Control and Placement. Proceedings of the 84th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Vienna, Austria.10.3997/2214-4609.202310860 ↗
45. Eriksson, D., Pearce, M., Gardner, J., Turner, R.D., and Poloczek, M. (2019). Scalable global optimization via local Bayesian optimization. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 32.
46. Eriksson, D., and Jankowiak, M. (2021, January 27–30). High-dimensional Bayesian optimization with sparse axis-aligned subspaces. Proceedings of the Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, Online.
47. Bayesian Optimization for Field-Scale Geological Carbon Storage10.1016/j.eng.2022.06.011 ↗
48. Javed, M.A. (2020). Bayesian Optimization of Deviated Well Trajectories under Geological Uncertainty. [Master’s Thesis, Heriot-Watt University].
49. Wang, S., and Chen, S. (2017, January 8–10). A Novel Bayesian Optimization Framework for Computationally Expensive Optimization Problem in Tight Oil Reservoirs. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.2118/187284-MS ↗
50. Application of a particle swarm optimization algorithm for determining optimum well location and type10.1007/s10596-009-9142-1 ↗
51. Williams, C.K., and Rasmussen, C.E. (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
52. Dou, Z. (2015). Bayesian Global Optimization Approach to the Oil Well Placement Problem with Quantified Uncertainties. [Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University].
53. Exploring bayesian optimization10.23915/distill.00026 ↗
54. A visual exploration of gaussian processes
55. Do, C.B. (2008). Section Notes, Lecture on Machine Learning, CS, Stanford University.
56. Classes of kernels for machine learning: A statistics perspective
57. Olver, F.W., and Maximon, L.C. (2010). NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press.
58. Artin, E. (2015). The Gamma Function, Courier Dover Publications.
59. Radial basis functions10.1017/S0962492900000015 ↗
60. Minh, H.Q., Niyogi, P., and Yao, Y. (2006, January 22–25). Mercer’s theorem, feature maps, and smoothing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.1007/11776420_14 ↗
61. Lawrence, D.B. (2012). The Economic Value of Information, Springer Science & Business Media.
62. A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces10.1023/A:1012771025575 ↗
63. Convergence properties of the expected improvement algorithm with fixed mean and covariance functions10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.018 ↗
64. Peaceman, D.W. (2000). Fundamentals of Numerical Reservoir Simulation, Elsevier.
65. Nogueira, F. (2024, April 17). Bayesian Optimization: Open Source Constrained Global Optimization Tool for Python. Available online: https://github.com/bayesian-optimization/BayesianOptimization.
66. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem10.1002/nav.3800020109 ↗
67. Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems10.1137/0105003 ↗
68. The Quest CCS project: 1st year review post start of injection10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1654 ↗
69. Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.541 ↗