journal article·2024-04-08Open access

Ride Comfort Prediction on Urban Road Using Discrete Pavement Roughness Index

Difei Wu

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 7

Abstract

The prediction of ride comfort holds significant potential for enhancing the driving experience of both human drivers and autonomous vehicles, as it is closely correlated with pavement roughness. However, in urban road scenarios, the presence of shorter road segments and local irregularities introduces added complexity to ride comfort prediction. To better capture and characterize the irregularities and short road sections’ unevenness, we adopt the discrete roughness index (DRI) instead of the commonly used international roughness index (IRI) for assessing road profile unevenness, which is more suitable for urban roads. Ride comfort prediction is developed through numerical simulations using an eight-degree-of-freedom full-car model. The maximum transient vibration value (MTVV) is adopted to assess ride comfort. Through comparing the correlations between the MTVV and pavement roughness indices, it is indicated that the fitting degree of MTVV-DRI outperforms that of MTVV-IRI on short sections. Then, a set of speed-related DRI thresholds to estimate ride comfort distribution on a given road section is proposed, with considerations of vehicle speed, time period, and wheel paths. A hyperbolic-tangent-based speed control strategy is also proposed to avoid abrupt speed and acceleration changes during deceleration. This prediction method can assist drivers or autonomous vehicles in generating driving control strategies and maintaining a high level of ride comfort.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Velocity Control Strategies to Improve Automated Vehicle Driving Comfort10.1109/MITS.2017.2776148 ↗
2. IRI Threshold Values Based on Riding Comfort10.1061/JPEODX.0000144 ↗
3. Development of Pavement Roughness Models Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)10.1080/10298436.2021.1968396 ↗
4. Žuraulis, V., Sivilevičius, H., Šabanovič, E., Ivanov, V., and Skrickij, V. (2021). Variability of Gravel Pavement Roughness: An Analysis of the Impact on Vehicle Dynamic Response and Driving Comfort. Appl. Sci., 11.10.20944/preprints202107.0370.v1 ↗
5. (1997). Mechanical Vibration and Shock-Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration-Part 1: General Requirements (Standard No. ISO 2631-1).
6. A Novel Evaluation Method for Pavement Distress Based on Impact of Ride Comfort10.1080/10298436.2020.1765241 ↗
7. Influence of Road Profile Obstacles on Road Unevenness Indicators10.1080/14680629.2013.811823 ↗
8. Fast Calibration for Vibration-Based Pavement Roughness Measurement Based on Model Updating of Vehicle Dynamics10.1080/10298436.2023.2287688 ↗
9. International Roughness Index Specifications around the World10.1080/14680629.2016.1197144 ↗
10. Correlations and Analyses of Longitudinal Roughness Indices10.1080/14680629.2009.9690202 ↗
11. Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Queiroz, C.A.V. (1986). World Bank Technical Paper, The World Bank.
12. Bus Ride Index—A Refined Approach to Evaluating Road Surface Irregularities10.1080/14680629.2019.1625806 ↗
13. Modeling the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Bicycle Ride Quality10.3141/2520-09 ↗
14. Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Airport Pavement Roughness10.1080/10298436.2017.1345554 ↗
15. Measurement of Pavement Unevenness and Evaluation through the IRI Parameter—An Overview10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112284 ↗
16. Road Roughness and Whole Body Vibration: Evaluation Tools and Comfort Limits10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000143 ↗
17. Travel Quality Assessment of Urban Roads Based on International Roughness Index Case Study in Colombia10.3141/2612-01 ↗
18. Evaluation of Whole-Body Vibration in Vehicles10.1006/jsvi.2001.4256 ↗
19. Road Roughness Limit Values Based on Measured Vehicle Vibration
20. Research on Probability Index of Road Driving Comfort Based on Driving Vibration Distribution10.1080/14680629.2023.2188089 ↗
21. Papagiannakis, A., Gharaibeh, N., Weissmann, J., and Wimsatt, A. (2009). Pavement Scores Synthesis, Texas Transportation Institute. Project FHWA 0-6386 Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-6386-1.
22. Development of a Discrete Roughness Index for Longitudinal Road Profiles10.1080/10298436.2016.1237180 ↗
23. A New Pneumatic Suspension System with Independent Stiffness and Ride Height Tuning Capabilities10.1080/00423114.2012.660167 ↗
24. Frequency-Based Modelling of a Vehicle Fitted with Roll-Plane Hydraulically Interconnected Suspension for Ride Comfort and Experimental Validation10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935260 ↗
25. Sayers, M.W. (1995). Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board.
26. Control Strategy of Vehicle Speed Change Operation Based on Hyperbolic Function
27. Huang, Q., and Wang, H. (2004). Sage Technical Papers, SAE International.
28. Hubbard, G.A., and Youcef-Toumi, K. (1997, January 6). System Level Control of a Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Drivetrain. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Albuquerque, NM, USA.10.1109/ACC.1997.611879 ↗