journal article·2024-03-31Open access

Introducing an Artificial Neural Network for Virtually Increasing the Sample Size of Bioequivalence Studies

Dimitris Papadopoulos, Vangelis D. Karalis

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 7

Abstract

Sample size is a key factor in bioequivalence and clinical trials. An appropriately large sample is necessary to gain valuable insights into a designated population. However, large sample sizes lead to increased human exposure, costs, and a longer time for completion. In a previous study, we introduced the idea of using variational autoencoders (VAEs), a type of artificial neural network, to synthetically create in clinical studies. In this work, we further elaborate on this idea and expand it in the field of bioequivalence (BE) studies. A computational methodology was developed, combining Monte Carlo simulations of 2 × 2 crossover BE trials with deep learning algorithms, specifically VAEs. Various scenarios, including variability levels, the actual sample size, the VAE-generated sample size, and the difference in performance between the two pharmaceutical products under comparison, were explored. All simulations showed that incorporating AI generative algorithms for creating virtual populations in BE trials has many advantages, as less actual human data can be used to achieve similar, and even better, results. Overall, this work shows how the application of generative AI algorithms, like VAEs, in clinical/bioequivalence studies can be a modern tool to significantly reduce human exposure, costs, and trial completion time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece

Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Basic Concepts for Sample Size Calculation: Critical Step for Any Clinical Trials10.4103/1658-354X.174918 ↗
2. Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Trial10.4103/2229-3485.71856 ↗
3. Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Research: From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational Studies10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.010 ↗
4. European Medicines Agency, and Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2010). Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-investigation-bioequivalence-rev1_en.pdf.
5. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2024, January 23). Guidance for Industry. Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Submitted in NDAs or INDs—General Considerations. Draft Guidance. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). December 2013, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bioavailability-and-bioequivalence-studies-submitted-ndas-or-inds-general-considerations.
6. Karalis, V. (2016). Modeling in Biopharmaceutics, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Approaches, Springer International Publishing. [2nd ed.].
7. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Clinical Trials: Opportunities and Challenges10.1007/s12553-023-00738-2 ↗
8. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Trial Design10.1016/j.tips.2019.05.005 ↗
9. How to Design AI-Driven Clinical Trials in Nuclear Medicine. Semin
10. Papadopoulos, D., and Karalis, V.D. (2023). Variational Autoencoders for Data Augmentation in Clinical Studies. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158793 ↗
11. Considerations for Crossover Design in Clinical Study10.4097/kja.21165 ↗
12. Deep Learning for in Vitro Prediction of Pharmaceutical Formulations10.1016/j.apsb.2018.09.010 ↗
13. Chollet, F. (2021). Deep Learning with Python, Simon and Schuster. [2nd ed.]. Manning.
14. Atienza, R. (2018). Advanced Deep Learning with Keras: Apply Deep Learning Techniques, Autoencoders, GANs, Variational Autoencoders, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Policy Gradients, and More, Packt Publishing.
15. An Introduction to Variational Autoencoders10.1561/2200000056 ↗
16. Bioequivalence for Highly Variable Drugs: Regulatory Agreements, Disagreements, and Harmonization10.1007/s10928-019-09623-w ↗
17. Karalis, V.D. (2022). Machine Learning in Bioequivalence: Towards Identifying an Appropriate Measure of Absorption Rate. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010418 ↗
18. Karalis, V.D. (2023). On the Interplay between Machine Learning, Population Pharmacokinetics, and Bioequivalence to Introduce Average Slope as a New Measure for Absorption Rate. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042257 ↗
19. Galić, I., and Habijan, M. (2023, January 11–13). Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis for Personalized Medicine. Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia.10.1109/ELMAR59410.2023.10253934 ↗
20. A Deep Learning-Based Recognition for Dangerous Objects Imaged in X-Ray Security Inspection Device
21. Deep Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Gastric Neoplasms in Real-Time Endoscopy: Development and Validation Study10.1055/a-2031-0691 ↗
22. Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Integration into Dermatology Clinical Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study10.36849/JDD.6398 ↗
23. The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice10.3390/applbiosci3010002 ↗
24. Galić, I., Habijan, M., Leventić, H., and Romić, K. (2023). Machine Learning Empowering Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Medical Image Analysis Methods. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12214411 ↗
25. Screening for Cardiac Contractile Dysfunction Using an Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Electrocardiogram10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2 ↗
26. Perioperative Care of the Obese Patient10.1002/bjs.11447 ↗
27. Use of Machine Learning to Develop and Evaluate Models Using Preoperative and Intraoperative Data to Identify Risks of Postoperative Complications10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2240 ↗
28. Artificial Intelligence Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Real-Time Detection of Early Esophageal Neoplasia in Barrett’s Esophagus (with Video)10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.049 ↗
29. 3D Deep Learning from CT Scans Predicts Tumor Invasiveness of Subcentimeter Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0696 ↗
30. Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life after Lobectomy via Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery or Anterolateral Thoracotomy for Early Stage Lung Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X ↗
31. Artificial Intelligence Can Predict GFR Decline during the Course of ADPKD10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.051 ↗
32. An Update on Prostate Biopsy in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03048-5 ↗
33. Algorithm Based Smartphone Apps to Assess Risk of Skin Cancer in Adults: Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies10.1136/bmj.m127 ↗
34. Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas10.3174/ajnr.A5667 ↗
35. Intelligent Algorithm-Based Analysis on Ultrasound Image Characteristics of Patients with Lower Extremity Arteriosclerosis Occlusion and Its Correlation with Diabetic Mellitus Foot10.1155/2021/7758206 ↗
36. DeepSeeNet: A Deep Learning Model for Automated Classification of Patient-Based Age-Related Macular Degeneration Severity from Color Fundus Photographs10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.015 ↗
37. Attallah, O., Sharkas, M.A., and Gadelkarim, H. (2019). Fetal Brain Abnormality Classification from MRI Images of Different Gestational Age. Brain Sci., 9.10.3390/brainsci9090231 ↗
38. A Decision-Tree Approach for the Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Lymphoid Leukemias and Peripheral B-Cell Lymphomas10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.014 ↗
39. Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460 ↗
40. The Alan Turing Institute (2024, January 23). Statistical Machine Learning for Randomised Clinical Trials (MRC CTU). Available online: https://www.turing.ac.uk/research/research-projects/statistical-machine-learning-randomised-clinical-trials-mrc-ctu.
41. Factors Associated with Clinical Trials That Fail and Opportunities for Improving the Likelihood of Success: A Review10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001 ↗
42. Foster, D. (2023). Generative Deep Learning: Teaching Machines to Paint, Write, Compose, and Play, Oreilly & Associates Inc.. [2nd ed.]. Karl Friston (Foreword).
43. On the Reproducibility and Replicability of Deep Learning in Software Engineering. ACM Trans
44. Chien, J.-T. (2019). Source Separation and Machine Learning, Elsevier.
45. Verma, S., Tran, K., Ali, Y., and Min, G. (2023). Reducing LLM Hallucinations Using Epistemic Neural Networks. arXiv.
46. Reporting Guidelines for Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses10.1007/s10928-015-9417-1 ↗
47. FDA (2024, March 24). Population Pharmacokinetics Guidance for Industry, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/128793/download.
48. EMA (2024, March 24). Guideline on Reporting the Results of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/reporting-results-population-pharmacokinetic-analyses-scientific-guideline.
49. Klinger, C. (2010). Bootstrapping Reality from the Limitations of Logic: Developing the Foundations of “Process Physics”, a Radical Information-Theoretic Modelling of Reality Paperback—22, VDM Publishing.
50. Eckardt, J.-N., Hahn, W., Röllig, C., Stasik, S., Platzbecker, U., Müller-Tidow, C., Serve, H., Baldus, C.D., Schliemann, C., and Schäfer-Eckart, K. (2024, March 24). Mimicking Clinical Trials with Synthetic Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Using Generative Artificial Intelligence. Available online: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.08.23298247v1.10.1101/2023.11.08.23298247 ↗
51. Harnessing the Power of Synthetic Data in Healthcare: Innovation, Application, and Privacy10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3 ↗
52. Lee, P., Submitter, R.P.S., and Davis, U.C. (2024, March 24). Synthetic Data and the Future of AI. 110 Cornell Law Review. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4722162.
53. Nikolenko, S.I. (2022). Synthetic Data for Deep Learning, Springer Nature. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-030-75178-4 ↗
54. Assefa, S.A., Dervovic, D., Mahfouz, M., Tillman, R.E., Reddy, P., and Veloso, M. (2020, January 15–16). Generating Synthetic Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls. Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3383455.3422554 ↗