A Practical Approach to Using Energy Integration in the Simulation of Biomass Thermochemical Processes: Application to Supercritical Water Gasification
Source abstract
Abstract
Solid biomass is usually simulated by decomposing it into a solid phase (carbon, ash, and sulfur) and a gas phase (water and diatomic molecules of H2, N2, O2, and Cl2) from the proximate and ultimate analysis before entering a reactor operating under chemical equilibrium when using Aspen Plus. However, this method prevents the use of energy integration for the feed stream from the system inlet to the reactor. This paper proposes an approach to solving this issue, considering biomass with both known and unknown chemical compositions; the latter involves the decomposition of biomass into complex molecular compounds. Different process arrangements were assessed to achieve a realistic simulation, and a sensitivity analysis was carried out to examine the effect of the concentration and heating upstream of the reactor, focused on supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of orange peel. This process is very energy-intensive, so the approach is useful for a better calculation of the energy requirement and exergy losses in a plant; these are usually and mainly related to the train of heat exchangers. In addition to this application to SCWG, this approach can be used for any other thermochemical process, such as gasification, pyrolysis, or combustion, and for any real biomass. Upon a base case study using a wet biomass of 10,000 kg/h with 90 wt.% water where the SCWG reaction takes place at 240 bar and 800 °C, if the temperature at the SCWG reactor inlet increases from 350 °C to 400 °C, the heat exchange increases by 57% from 4 MW and by 34% if the water content decreases to 70 wt.%, although more heat relative to the solid is saved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes · Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Catalysts for Methane Reforming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, E.T.S. de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Seville, Spain
Funding
Consejería de Economía y Conocimiento (Junta de Andalucía)
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Review of Gasification of Organic Compounds in Continuous-Flow, Supercritical Water Reactors10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00068 ↗
2. Hydrogen production through biomass gasification in supercritical water: A review from exergy aspect10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.151 ↗
3. Biofuel production from supercritical water gasification of sustainable biomass
4. The use of process simulation in supercritical fluids applications10.1039/C9RE00465C ↗
5. (2024, February 01). Aspen Plus. Available online: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus.
6. Haydary, J. (2019). Aspen Plus Aspen HYSYS Applications, JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.
7. Khumalo, N.L. (2021). Process Simulation of the Co-Gasification of Biomass and Polyethylene. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Africa].
8. Wooley, R.J., and Putsche, V. (1996). Development of an ASPEN PLUS. Physical Property Database for Biofuels Components.10.2172/257362 ↗
9. Aspen Plus simulation of biomass integrated gasification combined cycle systems at corn ethanol plants10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.032 ↗
10. Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on ASPEN PLUS10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.159 ↗
11. Detailed modelling of biomass steam gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier with temperature variation10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.022 ↗
12. Investigation of hydrogen production via waste plastic gasification in a fluidized bed reactor using Aspen Plus10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.038 ↗
13. Thermodynamic modelling of supercritical water gasification: Investigating the effect of biomass composition to aid in the selection of appropriate feedstock material10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.129 ↗
14. Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge for power generation– thermodynamic study on auto-thermal operation using Aspen Plus10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112458 ↗
15. Performance comparison of black liquor gasification and oxidation in supercritical water from thermodynamic, environmental, and techno-economic perspectives10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126787 ↗
16. On the green hydrogen production through gasification processes: A techno-economic approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135476 ↗
17. Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of integrated supercritical water gasification of coal for power and hydrogen production10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111927 ↗
18. Okolie, J.A., Nanda, S., Dalai, A.K., and Kozinski, J.A. (2021). Techno-economic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of a conceptual design for supercritical water gasification of soybean straw to produce hydrogen. Bioresour. Technol., 331.10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125005 ↗
19. Thermodynamic study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.095 ↗
20. Hydrothermal gasification of soybean straw and flax straw for hydrogen-rich syngas production: Experimental and thermodynamic modeling10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112545 ↗
21. Improvement of biohydrogen production from biomass using supercritical water gasification and CaO adsorption10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130724 ↗
22. Pyrolysis of orange waste: A thermo-kinetic study10.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.016 ↗
23. Ortiz-Sanchez, M., Solarte-Toro, J.C., González-Aguirre, J.A., Peltonen, K.E., Richard, P., and Cardona Alzate, C.A. (2020). Pre-feasibility analysis of the production of mucic acid from orange peel waste under the biorefinery concept. Biochem. Eng. J., 161.10.1016/j.bej.2020.107680 ↗
24. Biorefinery of waste orange peel10.3109/07388550903425201 ↗
25. Submerged citric acid fermentation on orange peel autohydrolysate10.1021/jf073388r ↗
26. Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts10.1039/c3gc40136g ↗
27. Stark, N.M., Yelle, D.J., and Agarwal, U.P. (2016). Lignin in Polymer Composites, Elsevier Inc.
28. Karthäuser, J., Biziks, V., Mai, C., and Militz, H. (2021). Lignin and lignin-derived compounds for wood applications—A review. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26092533 ↗
29. Kinetics of Cellulose Conversion at 25 MPa in Sub- and Supercritical Water10.1002/aic.10018 ↗
30. Fruit peel waste: Characterization and its potential uses10.18520/cs/v113/i03/444-454 ↗
31. Mahato, N., Sinha, M., Sharma, K., Koteswararao, R., and Cho, M.H. (2019). Modern extraction and purification techniques for obtaining high purity food-grade bioactive compounds and value-added co-products from citrus wastes. Foods, 8.10.3390/foods8110523 ↗
32. Biotransformation of Citrus By-Products into Value Added Products10.1007/s12649-013-9250-y ↗
33. Brown, W.H., and Poon, T. (2016). Introduction to Organic Chemistry, Wiley. [6th ed.].
34. Process simulation, economic analysis and synthesis of biodiesel from waste vegetable oil using supercritical methanol10.1016/j.cherd.2011.05.011 ↗
35. Kick, C., Kline, A., Hladky, H., and Aller, B. (2024, January 15). Using AspenPlus Resources to Model Biodiesel Production Applicable for a Senior Capstone Design Project. ASEE North-Central Section Conference. Available online: https://asee-ncs.org/proceedings/2013/papers/51.pdf.
36. Gasification of fruit wastes and agro-food residues in supercritical water10.1016/j.enconman.2015.11.060 ↗
37. High-yield hydrogen production by supercritical water gasification of various feedstocks: Alcohols, glucose, glycerol and long-chain alkanes10.1016/j.cherd.2014.01.003 ↗
38. High-Efficiency Gasification of Wheat Straw Black Liquor in Supercritical Water at High Temperatures for Hydrogen Production10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03002 ↗
39. Hydrogen production from supercritical water reforming of glycerol over nickel catalysts10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.046 ↗
40. Hydrogen production from supercritical water reforming of acetic acid, acetol, 1-butanol and glucose over Ni-based catalyst10.1016/j.supflu.2018.04.023 ↗
41. Biomass gasification in supercritical water10.1021/ie0003436 ↗
42. Performance analysis of a biomass supercritical water gasification process under energy self-sufficient condition10.1016/B978-0-444-63455-9.50118-5 ↗
43. Reynolds, W.C. (2024, January 15). The Element Potential Method for Chemical Analysis. Available online: https://web.stanford.edu/~cantwell/AA283_Course_Material/AA283_Resources/STANJAN_write-up_by_Bill_Reynolds.pdf.
44. Calculation of simultaneous chemical and phase equilibrium by the method of Lagrange multipliers10.1016/j.ces.2017.08.033 ↗
45. Calculations of complex chemical reaction equilibria using stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric approaches in combination with arc-length continuation10.1002/eng2.12506 ↗