Show source-provided references
3. Melica, M.E., La Regina, G.L., Parri, M., Peired, A.J., Romagnani, P., and Lasagni, L. (2019). Substrate Stiffness Modulates Renal Progenitor Cell Properties via a ROCK-Mediated Mechanotransduction Mechanism. Cells, 8.
10.3390/cells8121561 ↗8. Montagner, G., Barbazza, A., Lugas, A.T., Terzini, M., Serino, G., Bignardi, C., Cacciatore, M., Vida, V.L., Padalino, M.A., and Trojan, D. (2023). Decellularized Cryopreserved Human Pericardium: A Validation Study towards Tissue Bank Practice. Cell Tissue Bank.
10.1007/s10561-023-10072-6 ↗9. Belviso, I., Romano, V., Sacco, A.M., Ricci, G., Massai, D., Cammarota, M., Catizone, A., Schiraldi, C., Nurzynska, D., and Terzini, M. (2020). Decellularized Human Dermal Matrix as a Biological Scaffold for Cardiac Repair and Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00229 ↗10. Hamon, M., Chen, Y., Srivastava, P., Chang, H.M., Gupta, V., Jin, L., Yanagawa, N., and Hauser, P.V. (2023). Matrix Stiffness Influences Tubular Formation in Renal Tissue Engineering. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13074510 ↗11. Islam, M.R., Virag, J., and Oyen, M.L. (2020). Micromechanical Poroelastic and Viscoelastic Properties of Ex-Vivo Soft Tissues. J. Biomech., 113.
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110090 ↗15. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, Q., Li, Q., Li, S., and Li, X. (2023). Dynamic Hydrogels with Viscoelasticity and Tunable Stiffness for the Regulation of Cell Behavior and Fate. Materials, 16.
10.3390/ma16145161 ↗16. Li, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yao, B., Enhejirigala, B., Li, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Duan, X., and Yuan, X. (2021). Biophysical and Biochemical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Mesenchymal Stem Cell Behaviors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 9.
10.3389/fcell.2021.640388 ↗18. Puech, P.H., and Bongrand, P. (2021). Mechanotransduction as a Major Driver of Cell Behaviour: Mechanisms, and Relevance to Cell Organization and Future Research. Open Biol., 11.
10.1098/rsob.210256 ↗19. Method for the Direct Fabrication of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels with Controlled Stiffness in Polystyrene Multiwell Plates for Mechanobiology Assays
10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00988 ↗20. Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties
21. Ho, T.C., Chang, C.C., Chan, H.P., Chung, T.W., Shu, C.W., Chuang, K.P., Duh, T.H., Yang, M.H., and Tyan, Y.C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules, 27.
10.3390/molecules27092902 ↗22. Kocen, R., Gasik, M., Gantar, A., and Novak, S. (2017). Viscoelastic Behaviour of Hydrogel-Based Composites for Tissue Engineering under Mechanical Load. Biomed. Mater., 12.
10.1088/1748-605X/aa5b00 ↗23. Mierke, C.T. (2022). Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 10.
10.3389/fcell.2022.789841 ↗25. Barthes, J., Özçelik, H., Hindié, M., Ndreu-Halili, A., Hasan, A., and Vrana, N.E. (2014). Cell Microenvironment Engineering and Monitoring for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: The Recent Advances. BioMed Res. Int., 2014.
10.1155/2014/921905 ↗26. Bilston, L.E. (2018). Soft Tissue Rheology and Its Implications for Elastography: Challenges and Opportunities. NMR Biomed., 31.
10.1002/nbm.3832 ↗28. Mechanics of Ultrasound Elastography
30. Jugé, L., Foley, P., Hatt, A., Yeung, J., and Bilston, L.E. (2023). Ex Vivo Bovine Liver Nonlinear Viscoelastic Properties: MR Elastography and Rheological Measurements. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 138.
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105638 ↗32. Larin, K.V., and Sampson, D.D. (2017). Optical Coherence Elastography–OCT at Work in Tissue Biomechanics [Invited]. Biomed. Opt. Express, 8.
10.1364/BOE.8.001172 ↗33. Han, Z., Singh, M., Aglyamov, S.R., Liu, C.-H., Nair, A., Raghunathan, R., Wu, C., Li, J., and Larin, K.V. (2016). Quantifying Tissue Viscoelasticity Using Optical Coherence Elastography and the Rayleigh Wave Model. J. Biomed. Opt., 21.
10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.090504 ↗34. Model-Independent Quantification of Soft Tissue Viscoelasticity with Dynamic Optical Coherence Elastography
10.1117/12.2251626 ↗37. Modeling Viscoelasticity through Spring-Dashpot Models in Intermittent-Contact Atomic Force Microscopy
10.3762/bjnano.5.224 ↗38. Najera, J., Rosenberger, M.R., and Datta, M. (2023). Atomic Force Microscopy Methods to Measure Tumor Mechanical Properties. Cancers, 15.
10.3390/cancers15133285 ↗40. Measuring Viscoelasticity of Soft Biological Samples Using Atomic Force Microscopy
10.1039/C9SM01020C ↗41. Qian, L., and Zhao, H. (2018). Nanoindentation of Soft Biological Materials. Micromachines, 9.
10.3390/mi9120654 ↗43. Characterizing Viscoelastic Mechanical Properties of Highly Compliant Polymers and Biological Tissues Using Impact Indentation
10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.017 ↗44. Kazaili, A., Geraghty, B., and Akhtar, R. (2019). Microscale Assessment of Corneal Viscoelastic Properties under Physiological Pressures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 100.
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103375 ↗45. Huang, H., Tang, W., Yang, Y., Wu, B., and Yan, B. (2016). Determination of Viscoelastic Properties of the Periodontal Ligament Using Nanoindentation Testing and Numerical Modeling. J. Mech. Med. Biol., 16.
10.1142/S0219519416500895 ↗47. The Nano-Epsilon Dot Method for Strain Rate Viscoelastic Characterisation of Soft Biomaterials by Spherical Nano-Indentation
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.015 ↗53. Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels
10.1021/bm990017d ↗55. Estimating Material Elasticity by Spherical Indentation Load-Relaxation Tests on Viscoelastic Samples of Finite Thickness
10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1961 ↗57. On the Contact of Elastic Solids
62. Dwivedi, K.K., Lakhani, P., Kumar, S., and Kumar, N. (2020). The Effect of Strain Rate on the Stress Relaxation of the Pig Dermis: A Hyper-Viscoelastic Approach. J. Biomech. Eng., 142.
10.1115/1.4046205 ↗67. High-Frequency Microrheology Reveals Cytoskeleton Dynamics in Living Cells
10.1038/nphys4104 ↗