journal article·2024-01-27Open access

A Methodological Approach for Interpreting and Comparing the Viscoelastic Behaviors of Soft Biological Tissues and Hydrogels at the Cell-Length Scale

Marta Tosini, Torne Tänzer, Simona Villata, Désirée Baruffaldi, Valentina Monica, Barbara Peracino, Luca Primo, Francesca Frascella, Fabrizio Pirri, Alberto Audenino, Diana Massai, Gianpaolo Serino

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 3

Abstract

The behavior of a cell is strongly influenced by the physical properties and stimuli in its microenvironment. Furthermore, the activation and modulation of mechanotransduction pathways are involved in tissue development and homeostasis and even pathological processes. Thus, when developing materials aimed at mimicking the extracellular matrixes of healthy or pathological tissues, their mechanical features should be closely considered. In this context, nanoindentation represents a powerful technique for mechanically characterizing biological tissues and hydrogels at the cell-length scale. However, standardized experimental protocols and data analysis techniques are lacking. Here, we proposed a methodological approach based on the nanoindentation technique for quantitatively analyzing and comparing the time-dependent load relaxation responses of soft biological tissues and hydrogels. As this was an explanatory study, stress-relaxation nanoindentation tests were performed on samples of pig and human lung tissues and of a specific gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel to quantify and compare their viscoelastic properties. The proposed method allowed for identifying the characteristic parameters needed for describing the behavior of each sample, permitting us to quantitatively compare their mechanical behaviors. All samples showed load relaxation at a defined indentation depth because of their intrinsic viscoelastic behaviors, and the GelMA samples showed the highest relaxation capabilities. The distribution of the characterization parameters showed that the biological samples presented similar time-dependent responses, while differences were observed in the GelMA samples. Overall, the proposed methodological approach allows for providing key insights into the time-dependent behaviors of soft biological tissues and hydrogels at the cell-length scale in view of supporting tissue engineering and pathophysiological investigations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Tendon Structure and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (DIMEAS), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy

PolitoBIOMedLab, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy

Centro 3R: Interuniversity Center for the Promotion of the 3Rs Principles in Teaching and Research, Università di Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy

Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Department of Applied Sciences (DISAT), Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy

Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy

Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy

Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Tissue Stiffness Dictates Development, Homeostasis, and Disease Progression10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687 ↗
2. Cellular Mechanotransduction in Health and Diseases: From Molecular Mechanism to Therapeutic Targets10.1038/s41392-023-01501-9 ↗
3. Melica, M.E., La Regina, G.L., Parri, M., Peired, A.J., Romagnani, P., and Lasagni, L. (2019). Substrate Stiffness Modulates Renal Progenitor Cell Properties via a ROCK-Mediated Mechanotransduction Mechanism. Cells, 8.10.3390/cells8121561 ↗
4. Mechanotransduction in Tissue Engineering: Insights into the Interaction of Stem Cells with Biomechanical Cues10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113766 ↗
5. Material Stiffness Influences the Polarization State, Function and Migration Mode of Macrophages10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.048 ↗
6. Stiffness Sensing by Cells10.1152/physrev.00013.2019 ↗
7. Mechanotransduction in Cancer10.1016/j.coche.2016.01.011 ↗
8. Montagner, G., Barbazza, A., Lugas, A.T., Terzini, M., Serino, G., Bignardi, C., Cacciatore, M., Vida, V.L., Padalino, M.A., and Trojan, D. (2023). Decellularized Cryopreserved Human Pericardium: A Validation Study towards Tissue Bank Practice. Cell Tissue Bank.10.1007/s10561-023-10072-6 ↗
9. Belviso, I., Romano, V., Sacco, A.M., Ricci, G., Massai, D., Cammarota, M., Catizone, A., Schiraldi, C., Nurzynska, D., and Terzini, M. (2020). Decellularized Human Dermal Matrix as a Biological Scaffold for Cardiac Repair and Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00229 ↗
10. Hamon, M., Chen, Y., Srivastava, P., Chang, H.M., Gupta, V., Jin, L., Yanagawa, N., and Hauser, P.V. (2023). Matrix Stiffness Influences Tubular Formation in Renal Tissue Engineering. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13074510 ↗
11. Islam, M.R., Virag, J., and Oyen, M.L. (2020). Micromechanical Poroelastic and Viscoelastic Properties of Ex-Vivo Soft Tissues. J. Biomech., 113.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.110090 ↗
12. Engineering Hydrogel Viscoelasticity10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.031 ↗
13. The Plot Thickens: The Emerging Role of Matrix Viscosity in Cell Mechanotransduction10.1002/adhm.201901259 ↗
14. Effects of Extracellular Matrix Viscoelasticity on Cellular Behaviour10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
15. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, Q., Li, Q., Li, S., and Li, X. (2023). Dynamic Hydrogels with Viscoelasticity and Tunable Stiffness for the Regulation of Cell Behavior and Fate. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16145161 ↗
16. Li, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yao, B., Enhejirigala, B., Li, Z., Song, W., Wang, Y., Duan, X., and Yuan, X. (2021). Biophysical and Biochemical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Mesenchymal Stem Cell Behaviors. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 9.10.3389/fcell.2021.640388 ↗
17. Why the Impact of Mechanical Stimuli on Stem Cells Remains a Challenge10.1007/s00018-018-2830-z ↗
18. Puech, P.H., and Bongrand, P. (2021). Mechanotransduction as a Major Driver of Cell Behaviour: Mechanisms, and Relevance to Cell Organization and Future Research. Open Biol., 11.10.1098/rsob.210256 ↗
19. Method for the Direct Fabrication of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels with Controlled Stiffness in Polystyrene Multiwell Plates for Mechanobiology Assays10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00988 ↗
20. Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties
21. Ho, T.C., Chang, C.C., Chan, H.P., Chung, T.W., Shu, C.W., Chuang, K.P., Duh, T.H., Yang, M.H., and Tyan, Y.C. (2022). Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules, 27.10.3390/molecules27092902 ↗
22. Kocen, R., Gasik, M., Gantar, A., and Novak, S. (2017). Viscoelastic Behaviour of Hydrogel-Based Composites for Tissue Engineering under Mechanical Load. Biomed. Mater., 12.10.1088/1748-605X/aa5b00 ↗
23. Mierke, C.T. (2022). Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 10.10.3389/fcell.2022.789841 ↗
24. Characterizing and Engineering Biomimetic Materials for Viscoelastic Mechanotransduction Studies10.1089/ten.teb.2021.0151 ↗
25. Barthes, J., Özçelik, H., Hindié, M., Ndreu-Halili, A., Hasan, A., and Vrana, N.E. (2014). Cell Microenvironment Engineering and Monitoring for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: The Recent Advances. BioMed Res. Int., 2014.10.1155/2014/921905 ↗
26. Bilston, L.E. (2018). Soft Tissue Rheology and Its Implications for Elastography: Challenges and Opportunities. NMR Biomed., 31.10.1002/nbm.3832 ↗
27. Production of Acoustic Radiation Force Using Ultrasound: Methods and Applications10.1080/17434440.2018.1538782 ↗
28. Mechanics of Ultrasound Elastography
29. Breast Disease: Clinical Application of US Elastography for Diagnosis10.1148/radiol.2391041676 ↗
30. Jugé, L., Foley, P., Hatt, A., Yeung, J., and Bilston, L.E. (2023). Ex Vivo Bovine Liver Nonlinear Viscoelastic Properties: MR Elastography and Rheological Measurements. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 138.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105638 ↗
31. MR Elastography of Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781411 ↗
32. Larin, K.V., and Sampson, D.D. (2017). Optical Coherence Elastography–OCT at Work in Tissue Biomechanics [Invited]. Biomed. Opt. Express, 8.10.1364/BOE.8.001172 ↗
33. Han, Z., Singh, M., Aglyamov, S.R., Liu, C.-H., Nair, A., Raghunathan, R., Wu, C., Li, J., and Larin, K.V. (2016). Quantifying Tissue Viscoelasticity Using Optical Coherence Elastography and the Rayleigh Wave Model. J. Biomed. Opt., 21.10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.090504 ↗
34. Model-Independent Quantification of Soft Tissue Viscoelasticity with Dynamic Optical Coherence Elastography10.1117/12.2251626 ↗
35. Poroviscoelastic Modeling of Liver Biomechanical Response in Unconfined Compression10.1007/s10439-010-9957-x ↗
36. Method of Testing Very Soft Biological Tissues in Compression10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.004 ↗
37. Modeling Viscoelasticity through Spring-Dashpot Models in Intermittent-Contact Atomic Force Microscopy10.3762/bjnano.5.224 ↗
38. Najera, J., Rosenberger, M.R., and Datta, M. (2023). Atomic Force Microscopy Methods to Measure Tumor Mechanical Properties. Cancers, 15.10.3390/cancers15133285 ↗
39. An Explicit Model to Extract Viscoelastic Properties of Cells from AFM Force-Indentation Curves10.1016/j.isci.2022.104016 ↗
40. Measuring Viscoelasticity of Soft Biological Samples Using Atomic Force Microscopy10.1039/C9SM01020C ↗
41. Qian, L., and Zhao, H. (2018). Nanoindentation of Soft Biological Materials. Micromachines, 9.10.3390/mi9120654 ↗
42. Size Effects in Indentation of Hydrated Biological Tissues10.1557/jmr.2011.322 ↗
43. Characterizing Viscoelastic Mechanical Properties of Highly Compliant Polymers and Biological Tissues Using Impact Indentation10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.017 ↗
44. Kazaili, A., Geraghty, B., and Akhtar, R. (2019). Microscale Assessment of Corneal Viscoelastic Properties under Physiological Pressures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 100.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103375 ↗
45. Huang, H., Tang, W., Yang, Y., Wu, B., and Yan, B. (2016). Determination of Viscoelastic Properties of the Periodontal Ligament Using Nanoindentation Testing and Numerical Modeling. J. Mech. Med. Biol., 16.10.1142/S0219519416500895 ↗
46. Viscoelastic Properties of Human Autopsy Brain Tissues as Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Diseases10.1109/TBME.2018.2878555 ↗
47. The Nano-Epsilon Dot Method for Strain Rate Viscoelastic Characterisation of Soft Biomaterials by Spherical Nano-Indentation10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.015 ↗
48. Micromechanical Properties of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels Measured by Spherical Nanoindentation10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.606.121 ↗
49. A Two-Step Method for Rate-Dependent Nano-Indentation of Hydrogels10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.017 ↗
50. Least Median Squares Curve Fitting Using a Genetic Algorithm10.1016/0952-1976(94)00064-T ↗
51. A Genetic Algorithm for a Fitting Problem10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00093-4 ↗
52. A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Curve Fitting10.1080/00207549508904789 ↗
53. Structural and Rheological Properties of Methacrylamide Modified Gelatin Hydrogels10.1021/bm990017d ↗
54. Spherical Indentation Load-Relaxation of Soft Biological Tissues10.1557/jmr.2006.0243 ↗
55. Estimating Material Elasticity by Spherical Indentation Load-Relaxation Tests on Viscoelastic Samples of Finite Thickness10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1961 ↗
56. Separating Poroviscoelastic Deformation Mechanisms in Hydrogels10.1063/1.4789368 ↗
57. On the Contact of Elastic Solids
58. Molecular Assembly and Mechanical Properties of the Extracellular Matrix: A Fibrous Protein Perspective10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.022 ↗
59. Viscoelasticity in Natural Tissues and Engineered Scaffolds for Tissue Reconstruction10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.013 ↗
60. On the Time and Indentation Depth Dependence of Hardness, Dissipation and Stiffness in Polydimethylsiloxane10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.07.013 ↗
61. Viscoelastic Properties of Living Embryonic Tissues: A Quantitative Study10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77932-9 ↗
62. Dwivedi, K.K., Lakhani, P., Kumar, S., and Kumar, N. (2020). The Effect of Strain Rate on the Stress Relaxation of the Pig Dermis: A Hyper-Viscoelastic Approach. J. Biomech. Eng., 142.10.1115/1.4046205 ↗
63. Emergent Behavior in Lung Structure and Function Lung Tissue Mechanics as an Emergent Phenomenon10.1152/japplphysiol.01244.2010 ↗
64. Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00085-3 ↗
65. Viscoelastic Properties of the Cervical Spinal Ligaments under Fast Strain-Rate Deformations10.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.003 ↗
66. Viscoelastic Effects during Loading Play an Integral Role in Soft Tissue Mechanics10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.035 ↗
67. High-Frequency Microrheology Reveals Cytoskeleton Dynamics in Living Cells10.1038/nphys4104 ↗
68. Nuclear Mechanics in Differentiation and Development10.1016/j.ceb.2011.10.001 ↗
69. Elastic Proteins: Biological Roles and Mechanical Properties10.1098/rstb.2001.1022 ↗
70. Comparative Biology of Decellularized Lung Matrix: Implications of Species Mismatch in Regenerative Medicine10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.025 ↗
71. The Instructive Extracellular Matrix of the Lung: Basic Composition and Alterations in Chronic Lung Disease10.1183/13993003.01805-2016 ↗
72. Multiscale Mechanics of Fibrin Polymer: Gel Stretching with Protein Unfolding and Loss of Water10.1126/science.1172484 ↗
73. Substrate Stress Relaxation Regulates Cell Spreading10.1038/ncomms7365 ↗