journal article·2023-05-22Open access

Decision-Refillable-Based Shared Feature-Guided Fuzzy Classification for Personal Thermal Comfort

Zhaofei Xu, Weidong Lu, Zhenyu Hu, Wei Yan, Wei Xue, Ta Zhou, Feifei Jiang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 10

Abstract

Different types of buildings in different climate zones have their own design specifications and specific user populations. Generally speaking, these populations have similar sensory feedbacks in their perception of environmental thermal comfort. Existing thermal comfort models do not incorporate personal thermal comfort models for specific populations. In terms of an algorithm, the existing work constructs machine learning models based on an established human thermal comfort database with variables such as indoor temperature, clothing insulation, et al., and has achieved satisfactory classification results. More importantly, such thermal comfort models often lack scientific interpretability. Therefore, this study selected a specific population as the research object, adopted the 0-order Takagi–Sugeno–Kang (TSK) fuzzy classifier as the base training unit, and constructed a shared feature-guided new TSK fuzzy classification algorithm with extra feature compensation (SFG-TFC) to explore the perception features of the population in the thermal environment of buildings and to improve the classification performance and interpretability of the model. First, the shared features of subdatasets collected in different time periods were extracted. Second, the extra features of each subdataset were independently trained, and the rule outputs corresponding to the key shared features were reprojected into the corresponding fuzzy classifiers. This strategy not only highlights the guiding role of shared features but also considers the important compensation effect of extra features; thereby, improving the classification performance of the entire classification model. Finally, the least learning machine (LLM) was used to solve the parameters of the “then” part of each basic training unit, and these output weights were integrated to enhance the generalization performance of the model. The experimental results demonstrate that SFG-TFC has better classification performance and interpretability than the classic nonfuzzy algorithms support vector machine (SVM) and deep belief network (DBN), the 0-order TSK, and the multilevel optimization and fuzzy approximation algorithm QI-TSK.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Urban Heat Island Mitigation · Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

Suzhou Institute of Technology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhangjiagang 215600, China

College of Architecture, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

School of Computer, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China

School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · national natural science foundation of Jiangsu, China · natural science foundation of Jiangsu Universities, China · Jiangsu Graduate Scientific Research Innovation Project · Suzhou Science and Technology Plan Project

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Integrating IAQ control strategies to reduce the risk of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in classrooms and open plan offifices10.1080/23744731.2020.1794499 ↗
2. Too cold or too warm? A winter thermal comfort study in different climate zones in China10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.050 ↗
3. Effects of moderate thermal environments on cognitive performance: A multidisciplinary review10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.005 ↗
4. A review of thermal comfort models and indicators for indoor environments10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.175 ↗
5. Review of adaptive thermal comfort models in built environmental regulatory documents10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.053 ↗
6. Dynamic characteristics and comfort assessment of airflflows in indoor environments: A review10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.032 ↗
7. Thermal comfort under radiant asymmetries of flfloor cooling system in 2 h and 8 h exposure durations10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.009 ↗
8. Human metabolic rate and thermal comfort in buildings: The problem and challenge10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.005 ↗
9. (2017). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (Standard No. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55).
10. (2015). Energy Performance of Buildings—Part 1: Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics—Module M1-6 (EN 16798-1). Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels: Technical Committee CEN/TC 156 (Standard No. European EN 15251).
11. Boerstra, A.C., Hoof, J., and Weele, A.M. (2014, January 10–13). A new hybrid thermal comfort guideline for the Netherlands. Proceedings of the 8th Windsor Conference, Windsor, UK.
12. (2012). Evaluation standard for indoor thermal environment in civil buildings (Standard No. GB/T50785).
13. Fanger, P.O. (1970). Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering, Danish Technical Press.
14. Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference
15. Chinese older people’s subjective and physiological responses to moderate cold and warm temperature steps10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.058 ↗
16. Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040 ↗
17. Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception—A review for holistic comfort models10.1080/23328940.2018.1534490 ↗
18. Inflfluence of short-term thermal experience on thermal comfort evaluations: A climate chamber experiment10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.021 ↗
19. Data-driven thermal comfort model via support vector machine algorithms: Insights from ASHRAE RP-884 database10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109795 ↗
20. Prediction of the thermal comfort indices using improved support vector machine classifiers and nonlinear kernel functions10.1177/1420326X14539693 ↗
21. Data-driven modeling and optimization of thermal comfort and energy consumption using type-2 fuzzy method10.1007/s00500-013-1117-4 ↗
22. Menyhárt, J., and Kalmár, F. (2019). Investigation of Thermal Comfort Responses with Fuzzy Logic. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12091792 ↗
23. Random Forest based thermal comfort prediction from gender-specific physiological parameters using wearable sensing technology10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.035 ↗
24. Machine learning algorithms applied to a prediction of personal overall thermal comfort using skin temperatures and occupants’ heating behavior10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103078 ↗
25. Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4 ↗
26. Adaptive behavior and different thermal experiences of real people: A Bayesian neural network approach to thermal preference prediction and classification10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107875 ↗
27. Data-driven simulation of a thermal comfort-based temperature set-point control with ASHRAE RP88410.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.010 ↗
28. Personalized human comfort in indoor building environments under diverse conditioning modes10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.004 ↗
29. Thermal comfort modeling when personalized comfort systems are in use: Comparison of sensing and learning methods10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107316 ↗
30. Comparison of models for predicting winter individual thermal comfort based on machine learning algorithms10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108970 ↗
31. Fuzzy broad learning system: A novel neuro-fuzzy model for regression and classification10.1109/TCYB.2018.2857815 ↗
32. Multitask TSK fuzzy system modeling by mining intertask common hidden structure10.1109/TCYB.2014.2330844 ↗
33. Cascaded centralized TSK fuzzy system: Universal approximator and high interpretation10.1016/j.asoc.2004.03.014 ↗
34. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399 ↗
35. Minimax probability TSK fuzzy system classifier: A more transparent and highly interpretable classification model10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2328014 ↗
36. Ramazan, B., Murat, G., Ersan, K., and Kaplan, O. (2011, January 18–21). An Intelligent Power Factor Correction Approach Based on Linear Regression and Ridge Regression Methods. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications and Workshops, Honolulu, HI, USA.
37. Horizontal progressive and longitudinal leapfrogging fuzzy classification with feature activity adjustment10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108511 ↗
38. Least learning machine and its experimental studies on regression capability10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.001 ↗
39. Feedforward kernel neural networks, generalized least learning machine, and its deep learning with application to image classifification10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.040 ↗
40. Russel, S., and Norvig, P. (2016). Artifificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson Education Limited.
41. A faster learning algorithm for deep belief nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
42. Quantitative-integration-based TSK fuzzy classification through improving the consistency of multi-hierarchical structure10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107350 ↗