Comparing the Performance of Pivotless Tracking and Fixed-Type Floating Solar Power Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Floating solar power has a higher power generation efficiency than existing solar power generation methods. It is easier to secure in an installation area as well as to connect to other renewable energy sources. Floating solar power is considered an essential component for achieving carbon neutrality because it compensates for the shortcomings of existing solar power systems and maximizes their advantages. In this study, a performance comparison was conducted between pivotless tracking-type and fixed-type solar power systems. These systems were installed at the Irwol Reservoir in Suwon, South Korea, and monitored for comparison between May 2019 and June 2020. The tracking-type system generated approximately 14% more energy than the fixed-type system; the performance was maximized in May, which showed 25.63% more output power, and the performance was minimized in winter, with 3% more generated power. Owing to its pivotless structure, this system can be used in the solar industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems · Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
INIworld Co., Ltd., Suwon 16417, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. The evolution of renewable energy and its impact on carbon reduction in China10.1016/j.energy.2021.121639 ↗
2. Governmental support and renewable energy production: A cross-country review10.1016/j.energy.2021.120903 ↗
3. Renewable energy and economic growth: New insight from country risks10.1016/j.energy.2021.122018 ↗
4. Optimal selection and management of hybrid renewable energy System: Neom city as a case study10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114434 ↗
5. Path to sustainable energy consumption: The possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy10.1016/j.energy.2021.120519 ↗
6. Exploring the nexus between agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions in BIMSTEC region: The role of renewable energy and human capital as moderators10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113316 ↗
7. Assessing the impact of transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy consumption on economic growth-environmental nexus from developing Asian economies10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111999 ↗
8. Greenhouse gases utilization: A review10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121017 ↗
9. Assessing energy resilience and its greenhouse effect: A global perspective10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105659 ↗
10. Energy saving strategies in sustainable greenhouse cultivation in the mediterranean climate–A case study10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116156 ↗
11. Review on the progress of building-applied/integrated photovoltaic system10.1007/s11356-021-15349-5 ↗
12. Performances of the adaptive conventional maximum power point tracking algorithms for solar photovoltaic system
13. Performance enhancement of solar photovoltaic system for roof top garden10.1007/s11356-021-14191-z ↗
14. Measured and satellite-derived albedo data for estimating bifacial photovoltaic system performance10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.050 ↗
15. Short-term solar power forecasting: Investigating the ability of deep learning models to capture low-level utility-scale Photovoltaic system behaviour10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116395 ↗
16. Effects of various parameters on PV-module power and efficiency10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.067 ↗
17. Performance analysis of 68W flexible solar PV
18. Energy and energy analysis of 36W solar photovoltaic module
19. Performance evaluation of 10 MW grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India10.1016/j.egyr.2015.10.001 ↗
20. Enhancing the performance of photovoltaic panels by stationary cooling
21. Comparative study of exergetic performance of amorphous and polycrystalline solar PV modules10.1504/IJEX.2015.071559 ↗
22. Effect of dust and methods of cleaning on the performance of solar PV module for different climate regions: Comprehensive review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154050 ↗
23. Agyekum, E.B., Praveen Kumar, S., Alwan, N.T., Velkin, V.I., Shcheklein, S.E., and Yaqoob, S.J. (2021). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of a Combination of Active and Passive Cooling Mechanism on the Thermal Characteristics and Efficiency of Solar PV Module. Inventions, 6.10.3390/inventions6040063 ↗
24. Cooling techniques of the PV module: A review10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.130 ↗
25. The construction of technology and place: Concentrating solar power conflicts in the United States10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.003 ↗
26. Exergetic and environmental life cycle assessment analysis of concentrated solar power plants10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.066 ↗
27. Optimum choice and placement of concentrating solar power technologies in integrated solar combined cycle systems10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.066 ↗
28. Comparative Economic Analysis of RE100 Implementation Methods in South Korea
29. Anticipating customer-centred zero-carbon energy business models10.1038/s41560-022-01003-y ↗
30. Assessing the capacity of renewable power production for green energy system: A way forward towards zero carbon electrification10.1007/s11356-021-15517-7 ↗
31. The booming of floating PV10.1016/j.solener.2020.09.057 ↗
32. The Deduction of Generation Efficiency Coefficient of the Floating PV systems with the Cooling Effect of Water Surface
33. Kwon, O., Jo, H., Cho, Y., Kwon, J., Kim, S., and Cha, H. (2019, January 2–4). Experimental Verification of the Efficiency Increase of Floating PV with Water Surface Reflection. Proceedings of the KIEE Summer Conference, Goseong-gun, Republic of Korea.
34. Effect on Power Generation of Floating Photovoltaic Power System Power by Water Level Change10.7836/kses.2022.42.2.013 ↗
35. Review on sun tracking technology in solar PV system10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.004 ↗
36. Thermal and electrical performance of solar floating PV system compared to on-ground PV system-an experimental investigation10.1016/j.solener.2022.05.062 ↗
37. Floating PV system as an alternative pathway to the amazon dam underproduction10.1016/j.rser.2020.110082 ↗
38. Design and construction of a test bench to investigate the potential of floating PV systems10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123917 ↗
39. (2022, December 07). Dass Tech. Available online: http://www.dasstech.com/products/solar-inverters/on-grid-residential/dass-3-0i-2/.
40. (2022, December 07). Davis. Available online: https://www.davisinstruments.com/pages/vantage-pro2.
41. (2022, December 07). Solaris. Available online: https://www.solaris-shop.com/hanwha-q-cells-q-peak-duo-blk-g5-310-310w-mono-solar-panel/.
42. Improving the performance of solar panels by the used of dual axis solar tracking system with mirror reflection10.1088/1742-6596/1432/1/012060 ↗
43. Fixed and tracking PV systems for Net Zero Energy Buildings: Comparison between yearly and monthly energy balance10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.046 ↗