journal article·2020-08-21Open access

Machine Learning in High-Alert Medication Treatment: A Study on the Cardiovascular Drug

Chun-Tien Tai, Kuen-Liang Sue, Ya-Han Hu

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 17

Abstract

The safety of high-alert medication treatment is still a challenge all over the world. Approximately one-half of adverse drug events (ADEs) are related to high-alert medications, which motivates us to improve the predicament faced in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to use machine-learning techniques to predict the risk of high-alert medication treatment. Taking the cardiovascular drug digoxin as an example, we collected the records of 513 patients who received the pertinent therapy during hospitalization at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Considering serum digoxin concentration (SDC) is the primary indicator for assessing the risk of digoxin therapy, patients with SDC being controlled at the recommended range before their discharge were defined as a low-risk population; otherwise, patients were defined as the high-risk population. Weka 3.9.4—an open source machine learning software—was adopted to develop binary classification models to predict the risk of digoxin therapy by a number of machine-learning techniques, including k-nearest neighbors (kNN), decision tree (C4.5), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression (LGR). The results showed that the performance of RF was the best, followed by C4.5 and ANN; the remaining classifiers performed poorly. This study confirmed that machine-learning techniques can yield favorable prediction effectiveness for high-alert medication treatment, thereby decreasing the risk of ADEs and improving medication safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Patient Safety and Medication Errors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Management and Institute of Healthcare Information Management, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 621, Taiwan

Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613, Taiwan

Department of Information Management, Shu Zen College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan

Department of Information Management, National Central University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan

MOST AI Biomedical Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Patient safety incident reporting: A qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after ‘To Err is Human’10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004405 ↗
2. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care10.1056/NEJMsa1004404 ↗
3. Patient safety and the problem of many hands10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005232 ↗
4. World Health Organization (2017, August 20). WHO Launches Global Effort to Halve Medication-Related Errors in 5 Years. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/medication-related-errors/en/.
5. Medication without harm: WHO’s third global patient safety challenge10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31047-4 ↗
6. Serious Inadequacies in High Alert Medication-Related Knowledge Among Pakistani Nurses: Findings of a Large, Multicenter, Cross-sectional Survey10.3389/fphar.2020.01026 ↗
7. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (2018, August 23). ISMP List of High-Alert Medications in Acute Care Settings. Available online: https://www.ismp.org/recommendations/high-alert-medications-acute-list.
8. Impact of a clinical decision support system for high-alert medications on the prevention of prescription errors10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.006 ↗
9. Sharabiani, A., Bress, A., Douzali, E., and Darabi, H. (2015). Revisiting warfarin dosing using machine learning techniques. Comput. Math. Methods Med.10.1155/2015/560108 ↗
10. Ma, Z., Wang, P., Gao, Z., Wang, R., and Khalighi, K. (2018). Ensemble of machine learning algorithms using the stacked generalization approach to estimate the warfarin dose. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0205872 ↗
11. Cardiovascular disease as a leading cause of death: How are pharmacists getting involved?
12. GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 201310.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 ↗
13. Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions: A comparative study from Jerusalem and Berlin10.1007/BF00561673 ↗
14. Modeling liver-related adverse effects of drugs using k nearest neighbor quantitative structure-activity relationship method10.1021/tx900451r ↗
15. Zhang, W., Liu, F., Luo, L., and Zhang, J. (2015). Predicting drug side effects by multi-label learning and ensemble learning. BMC Bioinform., 16.10.1186/s12859-015-0774-y ↗
16. Personalized drug concentration predictions with machine learning: An exploratory study10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20202194 ↗
17. Detecting adverse drug events through data mining10.2146/ajhp090115 ↗
18. Usefulness of a decision tree model for the analysis of adverse drug reactions: Evaluation of a risk prediction model of vancomycin--associated nephrotoxicity constructed using a data mining procedure10.1111/jep.12767 ↗
19. Decision tree-based expert system for adverse drug reaction detection using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm10.19101/IJACR.2018.836007 ↗
20. An efficient and effective ensemble of support vector machines for anti-diabetic drug failure prediction10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.042 ↗
21. Kim, E., and Nam, H. (2017). Prediction models for drug-induced hepatotoxicity by using weighted molecular fingerprints. BMC Bioinform., 18.10.1186/s12859-017-1638-4 ↗
22. Prediction of drug-induced eosinophilia adverse effect by using SVM and naïve Bayesian approaches10.1007/s11517-015-1321-8 ↗
23. Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with machine learning techniques: Application to the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) study10.2147/IJNRD.S194727 ↗
24. Su, R., Li, Y., Zink, D., and Loo, L.H. (2014). Supervised prediction of drug-induced nephrotoxicity based on interleukin-6 and-8 expression levels. BMC Bioinform., 15.10.1186/1471-2105-15-S16-S16 ↗
25. Yao, S.H., Tsai, H.T., Lin, W.L., Chen, Y.C., Chou, C., and Lin, H.W. (2019). Predicting the serum digoxin concentrations of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit through an artificial neural network. BMC Pediatr., 19.10.1186/s12887-019-1895-7 ↗
26. Prediction of the serious adverse drug reactions using an artificial neural network model
27. Albert, A., Serrano, A.J., Soria, E., and Jiménez, N.V. (2010). Clinical decision support system to prevent toxicity in patients treated with digoxin. Intelligent Medical Technologies and Biomedical Engineering: Tools and Applications, IGI Global.
28. Five year two center retrospective analysis of patients with toxic digoxin serum concentration10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.114 ↗
29. Digoxin in the management of cardiovascular disorders10.1161/01.CIR.0000132482.95686.87 ↗
30. Thomson Reuters (2013). Thomson Micromedex Database, Thomson Reuters.
31. A method of determining the dose of digoxin for heart failure in the modern era10.1001/archinte.166.22.2539 ↗
32. Instance-based learning algorithms10.1007/BF00153759 ↗
33. Quinlan, J.R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning, Elsevier.
34. Comparative study of attribute selection using gain ratio and correlation based feature selection
35. Vapnik, V. (2013). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer Science & Business Media.
36. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
37. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
38. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
39. Tan, P.N., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V. (2016). Introduction to Data Mining, Pearson Education India.
40. Elevated blood urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio increased the risk of hospitalization and all-cause death in patients with chronic heart failure10.1007/s00392-009-0025-1 ↗
41. Studies with tritiated digoxin in anephric human subjects10.1161/01.CIR.35.2.298 ↗
42. Evaluation of digoxin concentration after loading dose in patients with renal dysfunction
43. Safety and efficacy of digoxin therapy—Where are we now?
44. Population pharmacokinetics of digoxin in elderly patients10.1007/s13318-012-0107-8 ↗
45. Assessing the accuracy of a computerized decision support system for digoxin dosing in primary care: An observational study10.1111/j.1365-2710.2005.00650.x ↗
46. Individual dosage of digoxin in patients with heart failure10.1093/qjmed/hcq196 ↗
47. Population-based investigation of relative clearance of digoxin in Japanese neonates and infants by multiple-trough screen analysis10.1007/s002280100274 ↗
48. Determination of Digoxin Clearance in Japanese Elderly Patients for Optimization of Drug Therapy10.2165/11594230-000000000-00000 ↗
49. Population pharmacokinetic model of digoxin in older Chinese patients and its application in clinical practice10.1038/aps.2010.51 ↗
50. Digoxin-associated mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature10.1093/eurheartj/ehv143 ↗
51. Hu, Y.H., Tai, C.T., Tsai, C.F., and Huang, M.W. Improvement of Adequate Digoxin Dosage: An Application of Machine Learning Approach. J. Healthcare Eng., 2018.10.1155/2018/3948245 ↗