journal article·2019-06-16Open access

Adaptive Refinements of Pitch Tracking and HNR Estimation within a Vocoder for Statistical Parametric Speech Synthesis

Mohammed Salah Al-Radhi, Tamás Gábor Csapó, Géza Németh

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 12

Abstract

Recent studies in text-to-speech synthesis have shown the benefit of using a continuous pitch estimate; one that interpolates fundamental frequency (F0) even when voicing is not present. However, continuous F0 is still sensitive to additive noise in speech signals and suffers from short-term errors (when it changes rather quickly over time). To alleviate these issues, three adaptive techniques have been developed in this article for achieving a robust and accurate F0: (1) we weight the pitch estimates with state noise covariance using adaptive Kalman-filter framework, (2) we iteratively apply a time axis warping on the input frame signal, (3) we optimize all F0 candidates using an instantaneous-frequency-based approach. Additionally, the second goal of this study is to introduce an extension of a novel continuous-based speech synthesis system (i.e., in which all parameters are continuous). We propose adding a new excitation parameter named Harmonic-to-Noise Ratio (HNR) to the voiced and unvoiced components to indicate the degree of voicing in the excitation and to reduce the influence of buzziness caused by the vocoder. Results based on objective and perceptual tests demonstrate that the voice built with the proposed framework gives state-of-the-art speech synthesis performance while outperforming the previous baseline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Speech and Audio Processing · Music and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Telecommunications and Media Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1117 Budapest, Hungary

MTA-ELTE Lendület Lingual Articulation Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1088 Budapest, Hungary

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang, X., Acero, A., and Hon, H. (2001). Spoken Language Processing, Prentice Hall PTR.
2. Talkin, D. (1995). A robust algorithm for pitch tracking (RAPT). Speech Coding and Synthesis, Elsevier.
3. Continuous F0 modelling for HMM based statistical parametric speech synthesis10.1109/TASL.2010.2076805 ↗
4. Latorre, J., Gales, M.J.F., Buchholz, S., Knil, K., Tamura, M., Ohtani, Y., and Akamine, M. (2011, January 22–27). Continuous F0 in the source-excitation generation for HMM-based TTS: Do we need voiced/unvoiced classification?. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947410 ↗
5. Pitch pattern generation using multi-space probability distribution HMM
6. Multi-space probability distribution HMM
7. Freij, G.J., and Fallsid, F. (1988, January 11–14). Lexical stress recognition using hidden Markov modeld. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), New York, NY, USA.
8. Modelling intonation contours at the phrase level using continous density hidden Markov models10.1006/csla.1994.1013 ↗
9. A simple continuous pitch estimation algorithm10.1109/LSP.2012.2231675 ↗
10. Zhang, Q., Soong, F., Qian, Y., Yan, Z., Pan, J., and Yan, Y. (2010, January 15–19). Improved modeling for F0 generation and V/U decision in HMM-based TTS. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495561 ↗
11. Nielsen, J.K., Christensen, M.G., and Jensen, S.H. (2012, January 25–30). An approximate Bayesian fundamental frequency estimator. Proceedings of the IEEE Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288947 ↗
12. Tóth, B.P., and Csapó, T.G. (September, January 28). Continuous fundamental frequency prediction with deep neural networks. Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Budapest, Hungary.
13. Csapó, T.G., Németh, G., and Cernak, M. (2015, January 24–26). Residual-based excitation with continuous F0 modeling in HMM-based speech synthesis. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Statistical Language and Speech Processing (SLSP), Budapest, Hungary.10.1007/978-3-319-25789-1_4 ↗
14. Robust fundamental frequency estimation in sustained vowels: Detailed algorithmic comparisons and information fusion with adaptive Kalman filtering10.1121/1.4870484 ↗
15. Stoter, F.R., Werner, N., Bayer, S., and Edler, B. (September, January 31). Refining fundamental frequency estimates using time warping. Proceedings of the 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Nice, France.
16. High-quality text-to-speech synthesis: An overview
17. Kobayashi, K., Hayashi, T., Tamamori, A., and Toda, T. (2017, January 20–24). Statistical voice conversion with WaveNet-based waveform generation. Proceedings of the 18th International Speech Communication Association. Annual Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-986 ↗
18. Kenmochi, H. (2012, January 25–30). Singing synthesis as a new musical instrument. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6289138 ↗
19. Hu, Q., Richmond, K., Yamagishi, J., and Latorre, J. (September, January 31). An experimental comparison of multiple vocoder types. Proceedings of the 8th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop, Barcelona, Spain.
20. Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time–frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00085-5 ↗
21. A mixed excitation LPC vocoder model for low bit rate speech coding10.1109/89.397089 ↗
22. Stylianou, Y., Laroche, J., and Moulines, E. (1995, January 18–21). High-quality speech modification based on a harmonic + noise mode. Proceedings of the EuroSpeech, Madrid, Spain.10.21437/Eurospeech.1995-122 ↗
23. Harmonics plus noise model based vocoder for statistical parametric speech synthesis10.1109/JSTSP.2013.2283471 ↗
24. Tamamori, A., Hayashi, T., Kobayashi, K., Takeda, K., and Toda, T. (2017, January 20–24). Speaker-dependent WaveNet vocoder. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-314 ↗
25. Wang, Y., Ryan, R.J., Stanton, D., Wu, Y., Weiss, R.J., Jaitly, N., Yang, Z., Xiao, Y., Chen, Z., and Bengio, S. (2017, January 20–24). Tacotron: Towards end-to-end speech synthesis. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1452 ↗
26. Agiomyrgiannakis, Y. (2015, January 19–24). Vocaine the vocoder and applications in speech synthesis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brisbane, Australia.10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178768 ↗
27. Oord, A.V., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A.W., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). WaveNet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv.
28. Arik, S.O., Chrzanowski, M., Coates, A., Diamos, G., Gibiansky, A., Kang, Y., Li, X., Miller, J., Ng, A., and Raiman, J. (2017, January 6–11). Deep voice: Real-time neural text-to-speech. In Proceeding of the International conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Stockholm, Sweden.
29. Ping, W., Peng, K., and Chen, J. (2019, January 6–9). CLARINET: Parallel wave generation in end-to-end text-to-speech. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), New Orleans, LA, USA.
30. Maximum voiced frequency estimation: exploiting amplitude and phase spectra10.1109/LSP.2014.2332186 ↗
31. Al-Radhi, M.S., Csapó, T.G., and Németh, G. (2017, January 20–24). Time-domain envelope modulating the noise component of excitation in a continuous residual-based vocoder for statistical parametric speech synthesis. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-678 ↗
32. A log domain pulse model for parametric speech synthesis10.1109/TASLP.2017.2761546 ↗
33. McKenna, J., and Isard, S. (1999, January 5–9). Tailoring Kalman filtering towards speaker characterisation. Proceedings of the Eurospeech, Budapest, Hungary.10.21437/Eurospeech.1999-616 ↗
34. Quillen, C. (2010, January 15–19). Kalman filter based speech synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Dallas, TX, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495547 ↗
35. Vepa, J., and King, S. (2003, January 1–4). Kalman-filter based join cost for unit-selection speech synthesis. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Geneva, Switzerland.10.21437/Eurospeech.2003-122 ↗
36. Simon, D. (2006). Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches, Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/0470045345 ↗
37. Robust heart rate estimation from multiple asynchronous noisy sources using signal quality indices and a Kalman filter10.1088/0967-3334/29/1/002 ↗
38. Data fusion for improved respiration rate estimation10.1155/2010/926305 ↗
39. Kumaresan, R., and Ramalingam, C.S. (1993, January 1–3). On separating voiced-speech into its components. Proceedings of the 27th Asilomar Conferance Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.
40. Kawahara, H., Katayose, H., Cheveigne, A.D., and Patterson, R.D. (1999, January 5–9). Fixed point analysis of frequency to instantaneous frequency mapping for accurate estimation of f0 and periodicity. Proceedings of the EuroSpeech, Budapest, Hungary.10.21437/Eurospeech.1999-613 ↗
41. Malyska, N., and Quatieri, T.F. (2011, January 22–27). A time-warping framework for speech turbulence-noise component estimation during aperiodic phonation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947580 ↗
42. Abe, T., Kobayashi, T., and Imai, S. (1997, January 2–4). The IF spectrogram: A new spectral representation. Proceedings of the ASVA, Tokyo, Japan.
43. Stone, S., Steiner, P., and Birkholz, P. (2017, January 20–24). A time-warping pitch tracking algorithm considering fast f0 changes. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-382 ↗
44. Some windows with very good sidelobe behavior10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163506 ↗
46. WORLD: A vocoder based high-quality speech synthesis system for real-time applications10.1587/transinf.2015EDP7457 ↗
47. Rapid f0 estimation for high-snr speech based on fundamental component extraction
48. The deterministic plus stochastic model of the residual signal and its applications10.1109/TASL.2011.2169787 ↗
49. Tokuda, K., Kobayashi, T., Masuko, T., and Imai, S. (1994, January 18–22). Mel-generalized cepstral analysis—A unified approach to speech spectral estimation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Yokohama, Japan.10.21437/ICSLP.1994-275 ↗
50. Mel Log Spectrum Approximation (MLSA) filter for speech synthesis10.1002/ecja.4400660203 ↗
51. Griffin, D.W. (1987). Multi-Band Excitation Vocoder. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)].
52. Hoene, C., Wiethölter, S., and Wolisz, A. (2005, January 21–23). Calculation of speech quality by aggregating the impacts of individual frame losses. Proceedings of the IWQoS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Passau, Germany.10.1007/11499169_12 ↗
53. Severin, F., Bozkurt, B., and Dutoit, T. (2005, January 4–8). HNR extraction in voiced speech, oriented towards voice quality analysis. Proceedings of the EUSIPCO, Antalya, Turkey.
54. Boersma, P. (1993). Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam.
55. Applying the harmonic plus noise model in concatenative speech synthesis10.1109/89.890068 ↗
56. Rodet, X. (1997, January 27–29). Musical sound signals analysis/synthesis: Sinusoidal + residual and elementary waveform models. Proceedings of the IEEE Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Workshop (TFTS), Coventry, UK.
57. Kominek, J., and Black, A.W. (2003). CMU ARCTIC Databases for Speech Synthesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
58. Robust and accurate fundamental frequency estimation basedon dominant harmonic components10.1121/1.1787522 ↗
59. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer
60. Kawahara, H., Agiomyrgiannakis, Y., and Zen, H. (2016, January 13–15). Using instantaneous frequency and aperiodicity detection to estimate f0 for high-quality speech synthesis. Proceedings of the ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.10.21437/SSW.2016-36 ↗
61. Hua, K. (2017, January 20–24). Improving YANGsaf F0 estimator with adaptive Kalman filter. Proceedings of the Interspeech, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-21 ↗
62. Technical foundations of TANDEM-STRAIGHT, a speech analysis, modification and synthesis framework10.1007/s12046-011-0043-3 ↗
63. SAFE: A Statistical Approach to F0 Estimation Under Clean and Noisy Conditions10.1109/TASL.2011.2168518 ↗
64. A comparative performance study of several pitch detection algorithms10.1109/TASSP.1976.1162846 ↗
65. Quackenbush, S., Barnwell, T., and Clements, M. (1988). Objective Measures of Speech Quality, Prentice-Hall.
66. Evaluation of objective quality measures for speech enhancement10.1109/TASL.2007.911054 ↗
67. Klatt, D. (1982, January 3–5). Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical band spectra: A first step. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Paris, France.
68. Tribolet, J., Noll, P., McDermott, B., and Crochiere, R.E. (1978, January 10–12). A study of complexity and quality of speech waveform coders. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Tulsa, OK, USA.
69. An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers10.1109/TASLP.2016.2585878 ↗
70. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions10.1121/1.3097493 ↗
71. A uniform phase representation for the harmonic model in speech synthesis applications
72. Fisher, N.I. (1995). Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, Cambridge University.
73. International Telecommunications Union (2001). Method for the Subjective Assessment of Intermediate Audio Quality, International Telecommunications Union. ITU-R Recommendation BS.1534.