journal article·2025-09-17Open access

Impact of Near-Fault Seismic Inputs on Building Performance: A Case Study Informed by the 2023 Maras Earthquakes

Mehdi Öztürk, Mehmet Ali Karan

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 18

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, focusing on the influence of near-fault ground motions caused by proximity to fault lines. Compared to ordinary or far-fault earthquakes, near-fault earthquakes may have diverse effects on the response of buildings resulting from directivity and intense velocity pulses, which significantly amplify seismic demands. For this purpose, nonlinear time history analyses were carried out on a seven-story RC residential building that was subjected to near-fault effects and sustained heavy damage during the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on 6 February 2023. The analyses used both near-fault and far-fault ground motion records, and four structural models were developed by gradually reducing the number of shear wall elements to assess the impact of diminishing lateral-load-resisting capacity. The results revealed that near-fault ground motions led to significant increases in base shear, inter-story drift ratios, and structural damage levels. Furthermore, a reduction in shear wall content resulted in a noticeable decline in seismic performance. These findings underscore the necessity of accounting for near-fault effects in seismic design and the critical role of lateral stiffness. The study emphasizes that considering near-fault characteristics is essential for ensuring the seismic resilience of RC buildings located in active seismic zones.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Arel University, Campus Tepekent, Türkoba Mahallesi, Erguvan Sokak, No. 26, 34537 Büyükçekmece, Turkey

Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Arel University, Campus Sefaköy Kemalpaşa Mahallesi, Halkalı Caddesi, No. 101, 34295 Küçükçekmece, Turkey

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of accelerograms—Parkfield earthquake10.1785/BSSA0570061193 ↗
2. Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3 ↗
3. Directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions—II: Estimation of pulse parameters10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.02.019 ↗
4. Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.08.006 ↗
5. Modeling directivity of heterogeneous earthquake ruptures10.1785/BSSA0860041149 ↗
6. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199 ↗
7. Quantitative evaluation of velocity pulse-like ground motions using spatial rotation technique10.1007/s10950-024-10191-x ↗
8. Xin, C., Zeng, L., Wang, Z., Feng, W., Yang, F., Hajirasouliha, I., and Yu, X. (2025). Characterizing Dynamic Responses of Rock Slopes to Near-Fault Pulse-Like Ground Motions: C. Xin et al. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 1–41.10.1007/s00603-025-04798-w ↗
9. Influence of velocity pulse effect on earthquake-induced track irregularities of high-speed railway track–bridge system under near-fault ground motions10.1007/s43452-024-00892-y ↗
10. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions10.1785/0120020100 ↗
11. Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1177) ↗
12. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis10.1785/0120060255 ↗
13. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 ↗
14. Identification of pulse periods in near-fault ground motions using the HHT method10.1785/0120190046 ↗
15. Automated parameterization of velocity pulses in near-fault ground motions10.1002/eqe.4053 ↗
16. Near source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings10.1193/1.1585828 ↗
17. Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1309::AID-EQE868>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
18. Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014 ↗
19. Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.09.013 ↗
20. Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H. (2001). Effects of Near Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures, Stanford University.
21. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709) ↗
22. Yaray, B. (2019). Sismik yalıtımlı binaların yakın fay etkisi altında davranışı. [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü].
23. Nonlinear dynamic response of R.C. framed structures subjected to near-fault ground motions10.1007/s10518-010-9180-z ↗
24. Large coseismic displacements and tall buildings10.1002/tal.739 ↗
25. Seismic response of RC buildings subjected to fling—Step in the near—Fault region10.1002/suco.201900028 ↗
26. On the accuracy of enhanced pushover procedures for seismic performance evaluation of code-conforming RC moment-resisting frame buildings subjected to pulse-like and non-pulse-like excitations10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.035 ↗
27. Quantitative identification of near—Fault pulse—Like ground motions based on energy10.1785/0120120320 ↗
28. Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.032 ↗
29. The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk10.1002/eqe.1188 ↗
30. Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199610)25:10<1109::AID-EQE604>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
31. Elnashai, A.S., and Di Sarno, L. (2015). Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering: From Source to Fragility, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.. [2nd ed.].
32. Mwafy, A., and Elnashai, A.S. (2006, January 12–13). Vulnerability of code-compliant RC buildings under multi-axial earthquake loading. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
33. Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical ground motion on RC frames designed for gravity loads with various geometric configurations10.1155/2018/4029142 ↗
34. Abrahamson, N.A. (2000, January 12–15). Effects of rupture directivity on probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
35. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures10.1002/eqe.696 ↗
36. NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra10.1193/062913EQS175M ↗
37. Near-source ground motion in the M7.8 Gaziantep (Turkey) earthquake10.1002/eqe.3939 ↗
38. Chen, G. (2023). Report on Pulse-Like Ground Motions in the Feb 2023 Turkey Earthquakes, Institute for Risk and Reliability Leibniz University.
39. Effects of near-fault pulse-like ground motions on seismically isolated buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104508 ↗
40. Analysis of near-fault pulse-like seismic signals through Variational Mode Decomposition technique10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.003 ↗
41. Assessment of building behavior under near-fault pulse-like ground motions through simplified models10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.009 ↗
42. Işık, E., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., Alkan, H., and Harirchian, E. (2024). Comparison of seismic and structural parameters of settlements in the east Anatolian fault zone in light of the 6 February Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Infrastructures, 9.10.3390/infrastructures9120219 ↗
43. Seismic modeling and performance evaluation of seismically isolated building considering large strain effects under near-fault earthquakes10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109339 ↗
44. Chen, X., Zhou, B., Liu, X., and Lu, J. (2024). An Investigation into the Effect of Near-Fault Ground Motion Duration Parameters on the Nonlinear Seismic Response of Intake Towers. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14030580 ↗
45. Upper crustal deformation characteristics in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent areas revealed by GNSS and anisotropy data10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.003 ↗
46. Duan, Y., Bo, J., Peng, D., Li, Q., Wan, W., and Qi, W. (2023). Analysis of Peak Ground Acceleration and Seismogenic Fault Characteristics of the Mw7.8 Earthquake in Turkey. Appl. Sci., 13.10.20944/preprints202309.0237.v1 ↗
47. Structural damage observed in reinforced concrete buildings in Adiyaman during the 2023 Türkiye Kahramanmaraş earthquakes10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105578 ↗
48. Importance of building inspection on the seismic response of a severely damaged RC structure during the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108410 ↗
49. Investigation of industrial structure performances in the Hatay and Gaziantep provinces during the Türkiye earthquakes on 6 February 202310.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108569 ↗
50. Investigating the structural damage in Hatay province after Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequences10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107857 ↗
51. Evaluation of vertical-to-horizontal spectral acceleration ratio for the 2023 Turkey–Syria seismic sequences10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108747 ↗
52. (1998). Turkish Earthquake Code, TEC-2007. Specifications for Buildings to be Built in Seismic Areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
53. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018), Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization.
54. Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
55. Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) (2007). Earthquake Database—Event Detail, Ministry of Interior.
56. Investigating the damage from the February 6, 2023 earthquakes in terms of building characteristics in the Antakya and Defne districts of Hatay province10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104783 ↗
57. Senel, S.M., Kayhan, A.H., Palanci, M., and Demir, A. (2024). Assessment of Damages in Precast Industrial Buildings in the Aftermath of Pazarcık and Elbistan Earthquakes. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–30.10.1080/13632469.2024.2336206 ↗
58. Analysis of impulsive ground motions from February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence10.1007/s10518-024-01897-x ↗
59. Ductility demands for stiffness—Degrading SDOF systems under pulse—Like ground motions of the 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) earthquake10.1007/s10518-024-01882-4 ↗
60. Pulse-like ground motion observed during the 6 February 2023 MW7.8 Pazarcık Earthquake (Kahramanmaraş, SE Türkiye)10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.005 ↗
61. Characteristics of strong ground motion from the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence10.1007/s10518-023-01844-2 ↗
62. Dynamics of episodic supershear in the 2023 M7.8 Kahramanmaraş/Pazarcık earthquake, revealed by near-field records and computational modeling10.1038/s43247-023-01131-7 ↗
63. Türkiye Mw 7.7 Pazarcık and Mw 7.6 Elbistan earthquakes of 6 February 2023: Contribution of valley effects on damage pattern10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108634 ↗
64. Examination of the severe impact of the 6 February 2023 earthquakes on Antakya district considering pulse-like ground motions, supershear rupture, and basin effects10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109608 ↗
65. The Investigation of Displacement Demands of Single Degree of Freedom Models Using Real Earthquake Records Compatible with TBEC-201810.5505/pajes.2020.47936 ↗
66. Response- and Probability-Based Evaluation of Spectrally Matched Ground Motion Selection Strategies for Bi-Directional Dynamic Analysis of Low- to Mid-Rise RC Buildings10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105533 ↗
67. Machine-Learning Based Tool for Seismic Response Assessment of Steel Structures In-cluding Masonry Infill Walls and Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107918 ↗
68. Evaluation the Effect of Amplitude Scaling of Real Ground Motions on Seismic Demands Accounting Different Structural Characteristics and Soil Classes10.1007/s10518-023-01780-1 ↗
69. Fragility based evaluation of different code based assessment approaches for the performance estimation of existing buildings10.1007/s10518-021-01292-w ↗