journal article·2025-08-12Open access

Optimization of Machining Parameters for Improved Surface Integrity in Chromium–Nickel Alloy Steel Turning Using TOPSIS and GRA

Tanuj Namboodri, Csaba Felhő, István Sztankovics

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 16

Abstract

Interest in surface integrity has grown in the manufacturing industry; indeed, it has become an integral part of the industry. It can be studied by examining surface roughness parameters, hardness variations, and microstructure. However, evaluating all these parameters together can be a challenging task. To address this multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM), techniques such as Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) provide a suitable solution for optimizing the machining parameters that lead to improved product quality. This work investigated surface roughness parameters, including arithmetic average surface roughness (2D) (Ra), mean surface roughness depth (2D) (Rz), area arithmetic mean height (3D) (Sa), and maximum surface height (3D) (Sz), in conjunction with Vickers macrohardness (HV) and optical micrographs, to analyze machined surfaces during the turning of X5CrNi18-10 steel. The results suggest that machining with a spindle speed (N) of 2000 rpm or vc of 282.7 m/min, a feed rate (f) of 0.1 mm/rev, and a depth of cut of 0.5 mm yields the best surface, achieving an “A” class surface finish. These parameters can be applied in manufacturing industries that utilize chromium–nickel alloys. Additionally, the method used can be applied to rank the quality of the product.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Manufacturing Science, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, 3515 Miskolc, Hungary

Funding

Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Field, M., and Kahles, J.F. (1964). The Surface Integrity of Machined and Ground High Strength Steels, DMIC.
2. Astakhov, V.P. (2010). Surface Integrity—Definition and Importance in Functional Performance. Surface Integrity in Machining, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-874-2_1 ↗
3. Xu, D., Ding, L., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., and Liao, Z. (2021). Investigation of the Influence of Tool Rake Angles on Machining of Inconel 718. J. Manuf. Mater. Process., 5.10.3390/jmmp5030100 ↗
4. Recent Progress in Surface Integrity Research and Development10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.005 ↗
5. Enhancing Surface Integrity and Quality through Roller Burnishing: A Comprehensive Review of Parameters Optimization, and Applications10.52783/cana.v31.563 ↗
6. Surface Integrity in Metal Machining—Part II: Functional Performance10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103718 ↗
7. Corrosion Resistance of Casings for Metal Detectors in Food Industry Made of Cr-Ni Stainless Steel10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.647.248 ↗
8. Assessment of the Cavitation Resistance of Stainless Steel X5crni18-10, Subjected to Thermal Sensitization Based on 6 Average Durability10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1157.52 ↗
9. França, P.H.P., Barbosa, L.M.Q., Fernandes, G.H.N., Machado, Á.R., Martins, P.S., and da Silva, M.B. (2024). Internally Cooled Tools: An Eco-Friendly Approach to Wear Reduction in AISI 304 Stainless Steel Machining. Wear, 554–555.10.1016/j.wear.2024.205490 ↗
10. Binali, R., Demirpolat, H., Kuntoğlu, M., and Salur, E. (2023). Different Aspects of Machinability in Turning of AISI 304 Stainless Steel: A Sustainable Approach with MQL Technology. Metals, 13.10.3390/met13061088 ↗
11. Touggui, Y., Uysal, A., Emiroglu, U., and Dzhemilov, E. (2021). An Experimental and Statistical Investigation on Cutting Forces in Turning of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Under Dry, MQL and Nanofluid MQL Conditions. Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing IV, Springer. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.10.1007/978-3-030-77719-7_51 ↗
12. Comparative Study on Machinability and Surface Integrity of γ-TiAl Alloy in Laser Assisted Milling10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.028 ↗
13. Effect of Cutting Parameters on the Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish in the Hard Turning of MDN250 Steel with Cubic Boron Nitride Tool, for Developing a Knowledged Base Expert System10.1186/s40712-018-0097-7 ↗
14. Influence of Reduced Cutting Speed Values on Operator Safety and Cutting Tool Life in the Processes of Manufacturing and Regeneration of Marine Machinery Parts10.2478/jok-2022-0021 ↗
15. Experimental Investigation into Machinability of Hardened AISI 4140 Steel Using TiN Coated Ceramic Tool10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.008 ↗
16. Possibility of Using the Hydrostatic Burnishing Process in Marine Conditions10.12913/22998624/191543 ↗
17. Hard Turning: Parametric Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm for Rough/Finish Machining and Study of Surface Morphology10.1007/s12206-014-0308-y ↗
18. Influence of Hard Turning Parameters on Cutting Forces of EN 353 Steel10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.425 ↗
19. Statistical Analysis of Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces Using Response Surface Methodology in Hard Turning of AISI 52100 Bearing Steel with CBN Tool10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2009.11.011 ↗
20. Optimization of Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.046 ↗
21. Kumar, N., and Kumar, K. (2019, January 26–28). Investigation on Effects of Various Process Parameters in Turning Operation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Computing in Science, Technology and Management (SUSCOM), Jaipur, India.10.2139/ssrn.3354437 ↗
22. Determination of Optimum Parameters for Multi-Performance Characteristics in Turning by Using Grey Relational Analysis10.1007/s00170-011-3857-6 ↗
23. Tool Vibration, Surface Roughness, Cutting Power, and Productivity Assessment Using RSM and GRA Approach during Machining of Inconel 718 with PVD-Coated Carbide Tool10.1007/s00170-022-09988-2 ↗
24. Tool Wear, 3D Surface Topography, and Comparative Analysis of GRA, MOORA, DEAR, and WASPAS Optimization Techniques in Turning of Cold Work Tool Steel10.1007/s00170-022-09326-6 ↗
25. (2025, March 01). Seco Tools. Available online: https://www.secotools.com/article.
26. Felhő, C., and Namboodri, T. (2024). Statistical Analysis of Cutting Force and Vibration in Turning X5CrNi18-10 Steel. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010054 ↗
27. Design Optimization for Minimum Technological Parameters When Dry Turning of AISI D3 Steel Using Taguchi Method10.1007/s00170-016-9162-7 ↗
28. Taguchi Based Screening Approach in the MQL Turning Process of X5CrNi18-10 Stainless Steel
29. Mehat, N.M., Mohd Kassim, S., and Kamaruddin, S. (2017, January 21–22). Investigation on the Effects of Processing Parameters on Shrinkage Behaviour and Tensile Properties of Injection Moulded Plastic Gear via the Taguchi Method. Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, International Conference on Applications and Design in Mechanical Engineering (ICADME 2017), Penang, Malaysia.10.1088/1742-6596/908/1/012049 ↗
30. (2025, March 01). HAAS CNC. Available online: https://www.haascnc.com/.
31. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 2: Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (Standard No. ISO 21920-2:2021). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/72226.html.
32. (2021). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile—Part 3: Specification Operators (Standard No. ISO 21920-3:2021). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/72228.html.
33. Comparison of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Surface Roughness Prediction with the Cutting Parameters in CNC Turning
34. Gao, H., Ma, B., Singh, R.P., and Yang, H. (2020). Areal Surface Roughness of AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Processed by Dry Face Turning: An Experimental Framework Combined with Regression Analysis. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13102303 ↗
35. Characterization of Turned Surfaces Using 3D Roughness Parameters10.1007/s40430-024-05019-1 ↗
36. Precise Optical Surface Profilometry Using Innovative Chromatic Differential Confocal Microscopy10.1364/OL.41.005660 ↗
37. (2021). Metallic Materials—Vickers Hardness Test—Part 1: Test Method (Standard No. ISO 6507-1:2023). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/83898.html.
38. Relative Contact Pressure—Dependence on Surface Roughness and Vickers Microhardness10.2514/3.60 ↗
39. Structural and Microhardness Changes After Turning of the AISI 1045 Steel for Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication10.1007/s11665-016-2450-4 ↗
40. Microhardness and Surface Integrity in Turning Process of Duplex Stainless Steel (DSS) for Different Cutting Conditions10.1007/s11665-013-0832-4 ↗
41. A Systematic Methodology for Design of Experiments
42. Vignesh, G., and Oyyaravelu, R. (2024). Enhancing Surface Integrity of Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 through Numerical Modeling of Hydrostatic Ball Burnishing Parameters Using TOPSIS and ANOVA. Eng. Res. Express, 6.10.1088/2631-8695/ad88d9 ↗
43. Optimising Subsurface Integrity and Surface Quality in Mild Steel Turning: A Multi-Objective Approach to Tool Wear and Machining Parameters10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.246 ↗