journal article·2025-06-22Open access

Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength in Cement-Treated Soils: A Machine Learning Approach

Iancu-Bogdan Teodoru, Zakaria Owusu-Yeboah, Mircea Aniculăesi, Andreea Vasilica Dascălu, Florian Hörtkorn, Alessia Amelio, Irina Lungu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 13

Abstract

This study integrates systematic laboratory testing with advanced machine learning techniques to predict the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cement-treated clayey silt from northwestern Iași, Romania. Laboratory experiments generated 185 UCS measurements, examining the effects of cement content, curing period, and compaction velocity on strength development. Fourteen regression algorithms were initially screened, with the top three performers subsequently evaluated using nested cross-validation and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization via the Optuna framework. Correlation analysis identified cement content as the primary factor, with curing period as moderately influential and compaction rate having minimal impact when target density was achieved. Random Forest emerged as the optimal algorithm, providing robust and accurate UCS predictions. Beyond standard predictions, a two-stage uncertainty quantification system was implemented, allowing for both central estimates and reliable confidence intervals. SHAP analysis confirmed the dominant roles of cement content and curing period and enabled mechanistic interpretation of parameter contributions. The complete predictive system is available as a public web application, enabling geotechnical engineers to obtain rapid UCS predictions with quantified uncertainty, supporting efficient ground improvement design and risk assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, Technical University Gheorghe Asachi of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania

Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Applied Sciences, 76012 Karlsruhe, Germany

Department InGeo, University “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, 65127 Pescara, Italy

Funding

Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, UEFISCDI

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Geotechnical Challenges In Urban Expansion: Addressing Soft Soil, Groundwater, And Subsurface Infrastructure Risks In Mega Cities10.70937/itej.v1i01.20 ↗
2. Lu, N., and Mitchell, J.K. (2019). The Role of Geotechnics in Addressing New World Problems. Geotechnical Fundamentals for Addressing New World Challenges, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-06249-1 ↗
3. Ground Variation, Geotechnical Uncertainties and Reliability of Foundation Design for Sustainable Building Infrastructures with Case Histories
4. Geotechnical solutions for urban centers: Bridging engineering innovations with socio-economic development10.54517/ssd.v1i3.2314 ↗
5. Ground improvement using chemical methods: A review10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07678 ↗
6. A Review on Different Types Soil Stabilization Techniques10.11648/j.ijtet.20170302.12 ↗
7. Innovative ground improvement techniques for expansive soils10.1007/s41062-017-0079-2 ↗
8. Fundamentals of soil stabilization10.1186/s40703-017-0064-9 ↗
9. Shojamoghadam, S., Rajaee, A., and Abrishami, S. (2024). Impact of various additives and their combinations on the consolidation characteristics of clayey soil. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-83385-5 ↗
10. Cement Soil Stabilization as an Improvement Technique for Rail Track Subgrade, and Highway Subbase and Base Courses: A Review
11. Yang, Y., Li, S., Li, C., Wu, L., Yang, L., Zhang, P., and Huang, T. (2020). Comprehensive Laboratory Evaluations and a Proposed Mix Design Procedure for Cement-Stabilized Cohesive and Granular Soils. Front. Mater., 7.10.3389/fmats.2020.00239 ↗
12. Insights into the strength development in cement-treated soils: An explainable AI-based approach for optimized mix design10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107103 ↗
13. Kitazume, M., and Terashi, M. (2013). The Deep Mixing Method, CRC Press.10.1201/b13873 ↗
14. Effect of carbonation on strength development of cement-treated Toyoura silica sand10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.016 ↗
15. Strength Properties of Sandy Soil–Cement Admixtures10.1007/s10706-009-9267-y ↗
16. Patel, S., Solanki, C.H., Reddy, K.R., and Shukla, S.K. (2019, January 19–21). Long-term Durability of Ordinary Portland Cement and Polypropylene Fiber Stabilized Clay. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019, Surat, India.
17. Zabielska-Adamska, K., Wasil, M., and Dobrzycki, P. (2021). Resilient Response of Cement-Treated Coarse Post-Glacial Soil to Cyclic Load. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14216495 ↗
18. Liu, F., Qin, Y., and Yang, Y. (2024). Investigation on Cement-Stabilized Base with Recycled Aggregate and Desert Sand. Materials, 17.10.20944/preprints202403.1295.v1 ↗
19. Jongpradist, P., Krairan, K., Jamsawang, P., and Chen, X. (2022). Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Cement Fly Ash Gravel Mixtures for Application as Column-Supported Highway and Railway Embankments. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15113972 ↗
20. Analysis of cement-stabilized soil on road embankment employing finite element analysis—A case study10.1088/2631-8695/ad7d63 ↗
21. Kwiecień, S., Podgórska, A., Rybak, J., Štefánik, M., and Cheben, V. (2023). Cement Stabilization of Waste from Contaminated Soils in Terms of Its Installation into Engineered Landfill. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132011485 ↗
22. Key Parameters for Strength Control of Artificially Cemented Soils10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197) ↗
23. An Experimental Study on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Soil-Cement Mixtures with or without GGBFS in the Coastal Area of Vietnam10.1155/2020/7243704 ↗
24. Statistical and Predictive Analyses of the Strength Development of a Cement-Treated Clayey Soil10.3390/geotechnics3020026 ↗
25. Projecting future carbon emissions from cement production in developing countries10.1038/s41467-023-43660-x ↗
26. Regression-based models for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of artificially structured soil10.1007/s00366-017-0528-8 ↗
27. Strength evaluation of marine clay stabilized by cementitious binder10.1080/1064119X.2019.1615583 ↗
28. Empirical method for predicting time-dependent strength and resilient modulus of chemically treated soil10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100551 ↗
29. Modeling of unconfined compressive strength and Young’s modulus of lime and cement stabilized clayey subgrade soil using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR)
30. Backcasting and forecasting stabilized soil mechanical properties for mechanistic-empirical pavement design10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126645 ↗
31. Predictive strength model of cement-treated fine-grained soils using key parameters: Consideration of the total water/cement and soil/cement ratios
32. Results of Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Geo-Mechanical Properties of Stabilised Clays—A Review10.3390/geotechnics1010008 ↗
33. Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer stabilized clayey soil using Artificial Neural Network10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.021 ↗
34. Prediction of artificial soil’s unconfined compression strength test using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.06.008 ↗
35. Anysz, H., and Narloch, P. (2019). Designing the Composition of Cement Stabilized Rammed Earth Using Artificial Neural Networks. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12091396 ↗
36. Mustafa, Y.M.H., Zami, M.S., Al-Amoudi, O.S.B., Al-Osta, M.A., and Wudil, Y.S. (2022). Analysis of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rammed Earth Mixes Based on Artificial Neural Network and Statistical Analysis. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15249029 ↗
37. Ngo, H.T.T., Pham, T.A., Vu, H.L.T., and Giap, L.V. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence to Determined Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement-Stabilized Soil in Vietnam. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11041949 ↗
38. Empirical approach for strength prediction of geopolymer stabilized clayey soil using support vector machines10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.012 ↗
39. Onyelowe, K.C., Moghal, A.A.B., Ebid, A., Rehman, A.U., Hanandeh, S., and Priyan, V. (2024). Estimating the strength of soil stabilized with cement and lime at optimal compaction using ensemble-based multiple machine learning. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-66295-4 ↗
40. Advancing earth science in geotechnical engineering: A data-driven soft computing technique for unconfined compressive strength prediction in soft soil10.1007/s12040-024-02374-4 ↗
41. Chen, Q., Hu, G., and Wu, J. (2024). Prediction of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of a One-Part Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil Using Deep Learning Methods with Combined Real and Synthetic Data. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14092894 ↗
42. Novel hybrid machine learning models including support vector machine with meta-heuristic algorithms in predicting unconfined compressive strength of organic soils stabilised with cement and lime10.1080/10298436.2022.2136374 ↗
43. Prediction of unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized sandy soil in Vietnam using artificial neural networks (ANNs) model10.1080/19386362.2020.1862539 ↗
44. Estimating unconfined compressive strength of unsaturated cemented soils using alternative evolutionary approaches10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100591 ↗
45. Triaxial shear behavior of a cement-treated sand–gravel mixture10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.07.006 ↗
46. Compaction and shear strength characteristics of colemanite ore waste modified active belite cement stabilized high plasticity soils10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.01.003 ↗
47. (1985). Teren de Fundare. Determinarea Granulozităţii (Standard No. STAS 1913/5-85).
48. (2018). Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Identification and Classification of Soil—Part 2: Principles for a Classification (Standard No. EN ISO 14688-2:2018).
49. (2018). Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Identification and Classification of Soil—Part 1: Identification and Description (Standard No. EN ISO 14688-1:2018).
50. (2011). Cement—Part 1: Composition, Specifications, and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements (Standard No. EN 197-1).
51. Taylor, H.F.W. (1997). Cement Chemistry, Thomas Telford.10.1680/cc.25929 ↗
52. Hydration mechanisms of ternary Portland cements containing limestone powder and fly ash10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.014 ↗
53. Shi, C., Pavel, K., and Roy, D.M. (2003). Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes, CRC Press.10.1201/9781482266900 ↗
54. A review: Alkali-activated cement and concrete production technologies available in the industry10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15718 ↗
55. Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002 ↗
56. Sherwood, P.T. (1993). Soil Stabilization with Cement and Lime, HMSO.
57. Mustafa, Y.M.H., Wudil, Y.S., Zami, M.S., and Al-Osta, M.A. (2025). Machine Learning Approach for Assessment of Compressive Strength of Soil for Use as Construction Materials. Eng, 6.10.3390/eng6050084 ↗
58. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley.
59. Aggarwal, C.C. (2017). Outlier Analysis, Springer International Publishing AG.10.1007/978-3-319-47578-3 ↗
60. A Review on Linear Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning10.38094/jastt1457 ↗
61. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
62. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
63. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
64. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C.J., and Olshen, R.A. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, CRC Press.
65. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
66. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
67. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
68. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., and Liu, T.Y. (2017, January 4–9). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting Decision Tree. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
69. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A.V., and Gulin, A. (2018, January 3–8). CatBoost: Unbiased boosting with categorical features. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montréal, QC, Canada.
70. Drucker, H., Burges, C.J., Kaufman, L., Smola, A.J., and Vapnik, V. (1997, January 1–6). Support vector regression machines. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, CO, USA.
71. Nearest neighbor pattern classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
72. Rasmussen, C.E., and Williams, C.K.I. (2006). Gaussian Processes Machine Learning, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
73. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
74. An extensive experimental survey of regression methods10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.010 ↗
75. Vabalas, A., Gowen, E., Poliakoff, E., and Casson, A.J. (2019). Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0224365 ↗
76. Small data machine learning in materials science10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z ↗
77. Toward Generalizable Machine Learning Models in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences: Estimating Sample Size and Reducing Overfitting10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00273 ↗
78. Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges10.1002/widm.1484 ↗
79. Varma, S., and Simon, R.M. (2006). Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinform., 7.10.1186/1471-2105-7-91 ↗
80. On Over-fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation
81. Likas, A., Blekas, K., and Kalles, D. (2014, January 15–17). Performance-Estimation Properties of Cross-Validation-Based Protocols with Simultaneous Hyper-Parameter Optimization. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Applications, Ioannina, Greece.10.1007/978-3-319-07064-3 ↗
82. Cross-Validation: What Does It Estimate and How Well Does It Do It?10.1080/01621459.2023.2197686 ↗
83. Cross-Validation Visualized: A Narrative Guide to Advanced Methods10.3390/make6020065 ↗
84. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T., and Koyama, M. (2019, January 4–8). Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD ’19, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
85. A New Typology Design of Performance Metrics to Measure Errors in Machine Learning Regression Algorithms
86. Plevris, V., Solorzano, G., Bakas, N., El, M., and Seghier, A.B. (August, January 31). Investigation of performance metrics in regression analysis and machine learning-based prediction models. Proceedings of the World Congress in Computational Mechanics and ECCOMAS Congress, Yokohama, Japan.
87. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation10.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
88. An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand10.1007/s00521-017-2990-z ↗
89. Uncertainty quantification in machine learning for engineering design and health prognostics: A tutorial10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110796 ↗
90. A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 ↗
91. Bagging Predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
92. Calibration after bootstrap for accurate uncertainty quantification in regression models10.1038/s41524-022-00794-8 ↗
93. Uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning: Methods, metrics, and comparisons10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111902 ↗
94. Evaluating the Potential and Challenges of an Uncertainty Quantification Method for Long Short-Term Memory Models for Soil Moisture Predictions10.1029/2020WR028095 ↗
95. User’s guide to correlation coefficients10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 ↗
96. Influence of Cement Treatment on Unconfined Compressive Strength and Compressibility of Lean Clay with Medium Plasticity10.1007/s13369-015-1579-z ↗
97. Distinguishing the effects of cementation versus density on the mechanical behavior of cement-based stabilized clays10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121571 ↗
98. Analysis of strength development in cement-stabilized silty clay from microstructural considerations10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.011 ↗
99. Prediction of undrained shear strength using extreme gradient boosting and random forest based on Bayesian optimization10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.007 ↗
100. Having Deep Investigation on Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength by Decision Tree in Hybrid and Individual Approaches