Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: A review of recent advances
2. Pillia, M., Guda, T., and Appleford, M. (2013). Development of Composite Scaffolds for Load-Bearing Segmental Bone Defects. Biomed. Res. Int., 2013.
10.21236/ADA616641 ↗8. Significance and considerations of establishing standardized critical values for critical size defects in animal models of bone tissue regeneration
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33768 ↗9. Regeneration of Critical-Sized Mandibular Defects Using 3D-Printed Composite Scaffolds: A Quantitative Evaluation of New Bone Formation in In Vivo Studies
10.1002/adhm.202300128 ↗13. Busch, A., Jäger, M., Mayer, C., and Sowislok, A. (2021). Functionalization of Synthetic Bone Substitutes. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.
10.3390/ijms22094412 ↗16. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities
10.1111/jace.13700 ↗18. Baino, F., Novajra, G., and Vitale-Brovarone, C. (2015). Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 3.
10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202 ↗21. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗22. Kilkenny, C., Browne, W.J., Cuthill, I.C., Emerson, M., and Altman, D.G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol., 8.
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 ↗23. Quality assessment of reporting of animal studies on pathogenesis and treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. A systematic review using the ARRIVE guidelines
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01838.x ↗24. Induction, Treatment, and Prevention of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis-A Systematic Review of Comparative Animal Studies
10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.018 ↗25. Hooijmans, C.R., Rovers, M.M., de Vries, R.B., Leenaars, M., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., and Langendam, M.W. (2014). SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14.
10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 ↗27. Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Three-Dimensional-Osteoconductive Scaffold Regenerate Calvarial Bone in Critical Size Defects in Swine
10.1002/sctm.20-0534 ↗28. Macroscopical, Histological, and Morphometric Studies of Porous Bone-Replacement Materials in Minipigs 8 Months after Implantation
10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.10.034 ↗29. Bone Marrow-Derived Osteoblasts Seeded into Porous Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate to Repair Segmental Defect in Canine’s Mandibula
30. Reconstruction of Mandibular Bone Defects Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Mini-Swine: A Pilot In Vivo Study
10.1002/jbm.b.34299 ↗31. Poly(Trimethylene Carbonate)-Based Composite Materials for Reconstruction of Critical-Sized Cranial Bone Defects in Sheep
10.1016/j.jcms.2016.12.008 ↗32. Standardized and Axially Vascularized Calcium Phosphate-Based Implants for Segmental Mandibular Defects: A Promising Proof of Concept
10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.071 ↗33. A Novel Technique to Reconstruct a Boxlike Bone Defect in the Mandible and Support Dental Implants with In Vivo Tissue-Engineered Bone
10.1002/jbm.b.31459 ↗34. Scaffold Degradation During Bone Tissue Reconstruction in Macaca Nemestrina Mandible
36. Prefabrication technique by preserving a muscular pedicle from masseter muscle as an in vivo bioreactor for reconstruction of mandibular critical-sized bone defects in canine models
10.1002/jbm.b.35028 ↗37. Sillmann, Y.M., Eber, P., Orbeta, E., Wilde, F., Gross, A.J., and Guastaldi, F.P.S. (2025). Milestones in Mandibular Bone Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Review of Large Animal Models and Critical-Sized Defects. J. Clin. Med., 14.
10.3390/jcm14082717 ↗38. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials
40. Standardization of 3D printing parameters to control the size and shape of pores in polylactic acid scaffolds
41. Geometric and mechanical properties evaluation of scaffolds for bone tissue applications designing by a reaction-diffusion models and manufactured with a material jetting system
43. Hou, X., Zhang, L., Zhou, Z., Luo, X., Wang, T., Zhao, X., Lu, B., Chen, F., and Zheng, L. (2022). Calcium phosphate-based biomaterials for bone repair. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.
10.3390/jfb13040187 ↗44. Pires, L.C.A., da Silva, R.C., Poli, P.P., Ruas Esgalha, F., Hadad, H., Palin, L.P., Piquera Santos, A.F., Teixiera Colombo, L., Kawamata de Jesus, L., and Bassi, A.P.F. (2020). Evaluation of osteoconduction of a synthetic hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate block fixed in rabbit mandibles. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13214902 ↗45. Zhu, L., Liu, Y., Wang, A., Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Zhu, C., Che, Z., Mon, T., Liu, H., and Huang, L. (2022). Application of BMP in bone tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.
10.3389/fbioe.2022.810880 ↗46. Farjaminejad, R., Farjaminejad, S., Hasani, M., Garcia-Godoy, F., Sayahpour, B., Marya, A., and Jamilian, A. (2025). The Role of Tissue Engineering in Orthodontic and Orthognathic Treatment: A Narrative Review. Oral, 5.
10.3390/oral5010021 ↗