Monitoring Technologies for Truck Drivers: A Systematic Review of Safety and Driving Behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
Truck drivers are essential to global freight operations but face disproportionate safety risks due to fatigue, distraction, and demanding working conditions, all of which significantly elevate crash likelihood. This systematic review assesses how monitoring technologies have been used to improve safety among professional truck drivers, focusing on the types of technologies deployed, the variables monitored, and reported safety outcomes. Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, the review includes 40 peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2009 and 2024, identified through systematic searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a formal risk of bias assessment was not conducted. Most studies examined wearable devices, in-vehicle cameras, telematics systems, and AI-driven platforms. These technologies monitored variables such as fatigue, stress, distraction, speed, and environmental conditions. While the findings demonstrate considerable potential to enhance safety outcomes, persistent challenges include implementation costs, privacy concerns, and variability in effectiveness. The evidence is also geographically concentrated in high-income regions, limiting broader applicability. This review highlights the urgent need for harmonized evaluation frameworks, robust validation protocols, and context-sensitive strategies to support the effective adoption of monitoring technologies in the trucking sector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic and Road Safety · Vehicle emissions and performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Georesources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
CITTA—Research Centre for Territory, Transports and Environment, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023.
2. Jacobs, G., Aeron-Thomas, A., and Astrop, A. (2000). Estimating Global Road Fatalities, Transport Research Laboratory.
3. “I neither sleep well nor drive cautiously”: How does sleep quality relate to crash involvement directly and indirectly?10.1016/j.jth.2020.100907 ↗
4. Fatigue and individual differences in monotonous simulated driving10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00119-8 ↗
5. Schedule-induced hours-of-service and speed limit violations among tractor-trailer drivers10.1016/0001-4575(94)00042-K ↗
6. Fatigue and Beyond: Patterns of and Motivations for Illicit Drug Use Among Long-Haul Truck Drivers10.1080/15389580601186034 ↗
7. The Pattern of Road Traffic Crashes in South East Iran10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p149 ↗
8. Injury severities from heavy vehicle accidents: An exploratory empirical analysis
9. In-vehicle data recorders for monitoring and feedback on drivers’ behavior10.1016/j.trc.2008.01.001 ↗
10. Traffic accident reduction by monitoring driver behaviour with in-car data recorders10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00095-0 ↗
11. Knipling, R. (2009). Safety for the Long Haul: Large Truck Crash Risk, Causation, and Prevention, American Trucking Association.
12. On-board safety monitoring systems for driving: Review, knowledge gaps, and framework10.1016/j.jsr.2011.11.004 ↗
13. Safety assessment of trucks based on GPS and in-vehicle monitoring data10.1016/j.aap.2022.106619 ↗
14. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
15. Fonseca, T., and Ferreira, S. (2025, May 09). Monitoring Technologies for Truck Drivers: A Systematic Review of Safety and Driving Behavior. PROSPERO 2025, CRD420250644355. Available online: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420250644355.
16. Neurophysiological mental fatigue assessment for developing user-centered Artificial Intelligence as a solution for autonomous driving10.3389/fnbot.2023.1240933 ↗
17. Prediction of Future Collision Risk for Truck Drivers Using the Time-Series Autonomic Nerve Function10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3296314 ↗
18. Minusa, S., Mizuno, K., Ojiro, D., Tanaka, T., Kuriyama, H., Yamano, E., Kuratsune, H., and Watanabe, Y. (2021). Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0258892 ↗
19. Evaluation of an in-vehicle monitoring system (IVMS) to reduce risky driving behaviors in commercial drivers: Comparison of in-cab warning lights and supervisory coaching with videos of driving behavior10.1016/j.jsr.2016.12.008 ↗
20. Driving style identification and its association with risky driving behaviors among truck drivers based on GPS, load condition, and in-vehicle monitoring data
21. Hierarchical point process models for recurring safety critical events involving commercial truck drivers: A reliability framework for human performance modeling10.1080/00224065.2021.1939815 ↗
22. Analysis of hands activity for automatic driving risk detection10.1016/j.trc.2012.10.006 ↗
23. The influence of driving anger on truck drivers’ speeding behavior in Serbia: The evidence from naturalistic global positioning system driving data10.1080/15389588.2020.1800658 ↗
24. Mizuno, K., Ojiro, D., Tanaka, T., Minusa, S., Kuriyama, H., Yamano, E., Kuratsune, H., and Watanabe, Y. (2020). Relationship between truck driver fatigue and rear-end collision risk. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0238738 ↗
25. Driving performances assessment based on speed variation using dedicated route truck GPS data10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909572 ↗
26. Field Demonstration of Heavy Vehicle Camera/Video Imaging Systems10.4271/2011-01-2245 ↗
27. Environmental and Work Factors That Drive Fatigue of Individual Haul Truck Drivers10.3390/mining2030029 ↗
28. Fatigue at the wheel: A non-visual approach to truck driver fatigue detection by multi-feature fusion10.1016/j.aap.2024.107511 ↗
29. Using real-life alert-based data to analyse drowsiness and distraction of commercial drivers10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.003 ↗
30. Analysis of HAZMAT truck driver fatigue and distracted driving with warning-based data and association rules mining
31. Human-Centered Design for an In-Vehicle Truck Driver Fatigue and Distraction Warning System10.1109/TITS.2021.3053096 ↗
32. Optimization of Forward Collision Warning Algorithm Considering Truck Driver Response Behavior Characteristics10.1016/j.aap.2023.107450 ↗
33. Impacts of advanced driver assistance systems on commercial truck driver behaviour performance using naturalistic data10.1049/itr2.12242 ↗
34. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study10.1177/0018720820928622 ↗
35. Does the riskier driving of drivers with ADHD generalise to professional drivers that are monitored by their supervisors?10.1080/0144929X.2023.2277394 ↗
36. Evaluating the Effects of Connected Vehicle Weather and Work Zone Warnings on Truck Drivers’ Workload and Distraction using Eye Glance Behavior10.1177/0361198120910743 ↗
37. Predicting unsafe driving risk among commercial truck drivers using machine learning: Lessons learned from the surveillance of 20 million driving miles10.1016/j.aap.2021.106285 ↗
38. Truck drivers’ behavior in encounters with vulnerable road users at intersections: Results from a test-track experiment10.1016/j.aap.2021.106289 ↗
39. Impact of electronic logging devices on fatigue and work environment in Canadian long-haul truck drivers10.1016/j.jth.2021.101295 ↗
40. An observational study of the safety benefits of electronic logging devices using carrier-collected data10.1080/15389588.2016.1201201 ↗
41. de Oliveira, L.P., Alonso, F.J., da Silva, M.A.V., de Gomes Garcia, B.T., and Lopes, D.M.M. (2020). Analysis of the influence of training and feedback based on event data recorder information to improve safety, operational and economic performance of road freight transport in Brazil. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12198139 ↗
42. Unintended responses to IT-enabled monitoring: The case of the electronic logging device mandate10.1002/joom.1110 ↗
43. Development and Assessment of a Connected Vehicle Training Program for Truck Drivers10.1177/0361198119827904 ↗
44. Fank, J., Knies, C., and Diermeyer, F. (2021). Analysis of a human-machine interface for cooperative truck overtaking maneuvers on freeways: Increase success rate and assess driving behavior during system failures. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 5.10.3390/mti5110069 ↗
45. Bayesian extreme value analysis of kinematic-based surrogate measure of safety to detect crash-prone conditions in connected vehicles environment: A driving simulator experiment10.1016/j.trc.2021.103539 ↗
46. Impact of Variable Speed Limit in a Connected Vehicle Environment on Truck Driver Behavior under Adverse Weather Conditions: Driving Simulator Study10.1177/0361198119842111 ↗
47. Development of sleepiness in professional truck drivers: Real-road testing for driver drowsiness and attention warning (DDAW) system evaluation
48. Driver Situation Awareness and Perceived Sleepiness during Truck Platoon Driving–Insights from Eye-tracking Data10.1080/10447318.2021.1894800 ↗
49. GPS and Google Earth based 3D assisted driving system for trucks in surface mines
50. A synthetic approach to compare the large truck crash causation study and naturalistic driving data10.1016/j.aap.2017.12.006 ↗
51. FAST DASH: Program overview and key findings from initial technology evaluations10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.014 ↗
52. Assessing the impact of sleep time on truck driver performance using a recurrent event model10.1002/sim.8287 ↗
53. Effect of drowsiness on driving performance variables of commercial vehicle drivers10.1007/s12239-009-0045-x ↗
54. Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings—A naturalistic driving study10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.013 ↗