Impact of Metallic Implants on Dose Distribution in Radiotherapy with Electrons, Photons, Protons, and Very-High-Energy Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
Metallic implants in radiotherapy patients alter dose distributions due to their high density and unique composition, potentially compromising treatment precision. This study evaluates the effects of three metallic materials, Co-Cr-Mo alloy, titanium alloy, and stainless steel, on dose distribution across four radiotherapy modalities: 6 MV photons, 15 MeV electrons, 170 MeV protons, and very-high-energy electrons (100 and 150 MeV). Monte Carlo simulations in the TOol for PArticle Simulations Monte Carlo (TOPAS MC) generated percentage depth dose curves and dose profiles, with dosage data standardized to a reference point and uncertainties addressed via error propagation. Results revealed that the Co-Cr-Mo alloy produced the most significant alterations. For instance, at 100 MeV Very High Electron Energy (VHEE), the dose at a 15 cm depth was 34.57% lower than in water; 6 MV photons showed a 15.16% reduction, and the proton Bragg peak shifted 9.5 cm closer to the source. These pronounced changes along the central beam axis affected dose distributions anterior and posterior to the metal. A prostate cancer simulation further demonstrated considerable dose reduction with deeply embedded metallic implants. The findings underscore the critical impact of implant properties on radiotherapy dose distributions, emphasizing the need to integrate these factors into clinical protocols to improve dosimetric accuracy and treatment safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty Hospital with Polyclinic Zilina, Vojtecha Spanyola 43, 012 07 Zilina, Slovakia
Department of Electromagnetic and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. The effect of a metal hip prosthesis on the radiation dose in therapeutic photon beam irradiations10.1016/S0969-8043(02)00078-7 ↗
2. Effects of a metallic implant on radiotherapy planning treatment—Experience on a human cadaver10.21037/cco.2020.01.09 ↗
3. Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prosthesis undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 6310.1118/1.1565113 ↗
4. DesRosiers, C., Moskvin, V., Bielajew, A.F., and Papiez, L. (2000). 150–250 MeV electron beams in radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol., 45.10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/306 ↗
5. Influence of heterogeneous media on Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) dose penetration and a Monte Carlo-based comparison with existing radiotherapy modalities10.1016/j.nimb.2020.09.008 ↗
6. Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm10.1002/mp.15442 ↗
7. Role of different orthopedic biomaterials on wear of hip joint prosthesis: A review10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.468 ↗
8. Nouri, A., and Wen, C. (2021). 3—Stainless steel in orthopedics. Structural Biomaterials, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-818831-6.00008-2 ↗
9. Systematic review of preliminary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: The true risk of revision10.1177/1120700020916870 ↗
10. New insights into hard phases of Co-Cr-Mo metal-on-metal hip replacements10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.03.013 ↗
11. Dose uncertainties associated with a set density override of unknown hip prosthetic composition10.1002/acm2.12167 ↗
12. Gel and thermoluminescence dosimetry for dose verification of a real anatomy simulated prostate conformal radiation treatment in the presence of metallic femoral prostheses10.1002/acm2.13403 ↗
13. Biological Benefits of Ultra-high Dose Rate FLASH Radiotherapy: Sleeping Beauty Awoken10.1016/j.clon.2019.04.001 ↗
14. High-throughput, low-cost FLASH: Irradiation of Drosophila melanogaster with low-energy X-rays using time structures spanning conventional and ultrahigh dose-rates10.1093/jrr/rrae079 ↗
15. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans10.1118/1.4918923 ↗
16. Very high-energy electrons as radiotherapy opportunity10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05455-x ↗
17. Vanreusel, V., Vallet, H., Wijnen, J., Côté, B., Leblans, P., Sterckx, P., Vandenbroucke, D., Verellen, D., and de Freitas Nascimento, L. (2024). In-Vivo Dosimetry for Ultra-High Dose Rate (UHDR) Electron Beam FLASH Radiotherapy Using an Organic (Plastic), an Organic–Inorganic Hybrid and an Inorganic Point Scintillator System. Photonics, 11.10.3390/photonics11090865 ↗
18. Plastic scintillator dosimetry of ultrahigh dose-rate 200 MeV electrons at CLEAR10.1109/JSEN.2024.3353190 ↗
19. Filip, N., Radu, I., Veliceasa, B., Filip, C., Pertea, M., Clim, A., Pinzariu, A.C., Drochioi, I.C., Hilitanu, R.L., and Serban, I.L. (2022). Biomaterials in Orthopedic Devices: Current Issues and Future Perspectives. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12101544 ↗
20. TOPAS: An innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications10.1118/1.4758060 ↗
21. The TOPAS tool for particle simulation, a Monte Carlo simulation tool for physics, biology and clinical research10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.03.019 ↗
22. Radiotherapy treatment planning for patients fitted with prostheses10.1259/0007-1285-57-679-603 ↗
23. Effect of a femoral head prosthesis on megavoltage beam radiotherapy10.1016/0360-3016(88)90279-9 ↗
24. Radiotherapy dose calculations in the presence of hip prostheses10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00245-5 ↗
25. Paoanikolaou, N., and Mackie, R. (2000). An Optimized Convolution/Superposition-Based Algorithm for Dose Calculation with Photon Beams, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_82 ↗
26. Calculation of dose distributions in the vicinity of high-Z interfaces for photon beams10.1118/1.597433 ↗
27. Monte Carlo dose calculations for phantoms with hip prostheses10.1088/1742-6596/102/1/012001 ↗
28. Evaluation of VMAT Planning Strategies for Prostate Patients with Bilateral Hip Prosthesis10.1177/15330338211038490 ↗