journal article·2025-03-14Open access

Psychological Foundations for Effective Human–Computer Interaction in Education

Elena Dell’Aquila, Michela Ponticorvo, Pierpaolo Limone

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

This paper investigates the integration of emotional, cognitive, and interactional processes in the design of educational technologies through the lens of Human–Computer Interaction (HCI). While previous studies have focused on cognitive and interactional engagement, emotional engagement remains underdeveloped in many tools, limiting learning effectiveness. To bridge this gap, this study proposes a theoretical holistic framework integrating usability, emotional intelligence, and adaptive interaction. Through a qualitative analysis, we examine educational platforms—including Duolingo, Khan Academy, and Google Classroom—alongside simulation-based systems such as EduTechRPGs. The study applies Cognitive Load Theory, Emotional Intelligence Theory, and Self-Determination Theory to assess their effectiveness. The findings highlight the importance of designing emotionally intelligent, scalable, and adaptive learning environments, and the proposed framework integrates psychological principles to boost engagement, motivation, and learning outcomes. This study contributes to a learner-centered HCI approach, ensuring that educational technologies support both cognitive and emotional development. Future research should validate the proposed framework empirically and explore interdisciplinary approaches to optimize educational technology. This study highlights the role of HCI in creating meaningful digital learning experiences by integrating psychology, cognitive science, and user experience design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Educational Innovations and Challenges · Foreign Language Teaching Methods · Innovative Educational Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Psicologia e Scienze della Salute, Università Telematica Pegaso, 80143 Naples, Italy

Natural and Artificial Cognition Laboratory Orazio Miglino, University of Naples Federico II, 80133 Naples, Italy

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Human–computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design10.1006/ijhc.1996.0101 ↗
2. Norman, K.L. (2017). Cyberpsychology: An Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316212554 ↗
3. An HCI method to improve the human performance reduced by local-lag mechanism10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.009 ↗
4. Mayer, R.E. (2021). Multimedia Learning, Cambridge University Press. [3rd ed.].
5. Psychological foundations of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.011 ↗
6. Cognitive load during problem-solving: Effects on learning10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 ↗
7. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., and Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 ↗
8. Emotional intelligence. Why it can matter more than IQ
9. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985). Motivación Intrínseca y Autodeterminación en el Comportamiento Humano, Plenum.
10. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 ↗
11. Al-kfairy, M. (2024). Factors impacting the adoption and acceptance of ChatGPT in educational settings: A narrative review of empirical studies. Appl. Syst. Innov., 7.10.20944/preprints202409.0826.v1 ↗
12. MacDonald, C.M., Girouard, A., Granollers, T., Joshi, A., Kang, J., Kharrufa, A., and St-Cyr, O. (2023). Teaching and learning human–computer interaction (HCI): Current and emerging practices. Front. Comput. Sci., 5.10.3389/fcomp.2023.1188680 ↗
13. The evolution of active learning in response to the pandemic: The role of technology10.1007/978-3-031-61943-4_16 ↗
14. Antoninis, M., Alcott, B., Al Hadheri, S., April, D., Fouad Barakat, B., Barrios Rivera, M., and Weill, E. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms?. UNESCO.
15. Elhayany, M., and Meinel, C. (2024, January 12–14). An in-depth exploration of unit testing challenges in data-driven MOOCs. Proceedings of the TLIC 2024, New York, NY, USA.10.1007/978-3-031-73427-4_30 ↗
16. Moore, R.L., and Shin, J. (2024). Using learner engagement patterns for predictive modeling in a MicroMasters program. Distance Educ., 1–21.10.1080/01587919.2024.2441252 ↗
17. Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 202010.1080/09588221.2021.1933540 ↗
18. MOOCs lack interactivity and collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC platforms10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11886 ↗
19. Kasch, J., and Kalz, M. (2021). Educational scalability in MOOCs: Analysing instructional designs to find best practices. Comput. Educ., 174.
20. Dell’Aquila, E., Marocco, D., Ponticorvo, M., Di Ferdinando, A., Schembri, M., and Miglino, O. (2017). Educational games for soft-skills training in digital environments. Advances in Game-Based Learning, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-06311-9 ↗
21. Mayer, R.E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 36.10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1 ↗
22. On the application of motivation theory to human factors/ergonomics: Motivational design principles for human–technology interaction10.1177/0018720814553471 ↗
23. Using a chatbot to provide formative feedback: A longitudinal study of intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning performance10.1109/TLT.2024.3364015 ↗
24. Lin, Y.L., and Wang, W.T. (2025). Simulation games to explore the effects of instructional and technological support on students’ psychological needs, cognitive load, and learning achievement. J. Educ. Comput. Res.10.1177/07356331241313128 ↗
25. Hwang, G.J., and Chen, C.H. (2023). Decision-guided chatbots and cognitive styles in interdisciplinary learning. Comput. Educ., 194.
26. Sun, H., Ma, M., Tao, Y., Tang, X., and Li, W. (2025). Innovative dorm allocation: Integrating the theory of planned behavior to foster positive student interactions. Int. J. High-Perform. Comput. Appl., 2025.10.1142/S0129156425403018 ↗
27. Methods of user-centered design and evaluation for learning designers
28. Gray, C.M. (2025, March 10). Paradigms of knowledge production in human-computer interaction: Towards a framing for learner experience (LX) design. EdTech Learn. Des. Available online: https://edtechbooks.org/ux/paradigms_in_hci.
29. Laurillard, D. (2013). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, Routledge.
30. Díaz-Burgos, A., García-Sánchez, J.N., Álvarez-Fernández, M.L., and de Brito-Costa, S.M. (2023). Psychological and educational factors of digital competence optimization interventions pre-and post-COVID-19 lockdown: A systematic review. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16010051 ↗
31. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 ↗
32. Skinner, B.F. (1958). Reinforcement today. Am. Psychol., 13.10.1037/h0049039 ↗
33. “Higher” and “lower” needs10.1080/00223980.1948.9917386 ↗
34. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press.
35. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Some contributions of an experimental analysis of behavior to psychology as a whole. Am. Psychol., 8.10.1037/h0054118 ↗
36. Lave, J. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355 ↗
37. Ponticorvo, M., Rubinacci, F., Dell’Aquila, E., and Marocco, D. (2022). Coding and educational robotics with peers: The C0D1NC experience to foster inclusion. Front. Robot. AI, 9.10.3389/frobt.2022.825536 ↗
38. Ponticorvo, M., Dell’Aquila, E., and Di Fuccio, R. (2022). Hyper-Activity Books and Serious Games: How to promote experiential learning beyond distance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph191711132 ↗
39. Ponticorvo, M., Dell’Aquila, E., Marocco, D., and Miglino, O. (2019). Situated psychological agents: A methodology for educational games. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224887 ↗
40. Approaches to embed bio-inspired computational algorithms in educational and serious games
41. A tailored MOOC fostering intercultural conflict management in the educational context
42. Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books.
43. Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol., 61.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 ↗
44. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory, Prentice Hall.
45. An approach to evaluating the user experience of serious games10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.006 ↗
46. Dell’Aquila, E., Vallone, F., Zurlo, M.C., and Marocco, D. (2022). SG-ACCORD: Designing virtual agents for soft skills training in the school context. Educ. Sci., 12.10.3390/educsci12030174 ↗
47. Teachers’ multicultural personality traits and conflict resolution strategies in educational settings
48. Creating digital environments for interethnic conflict management
49. Supporting learners’ self-management for self-directed language learning: A study within Duolingo10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0093 ↗
50. Christanto, H.J., Sutresno, S.A., Denny, A.N., and Dewi, C.H. (2023). Usability analysis of human–computer interaction in Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., 101.
51. Freeman, C., Kittredge, A., Wilson, H., and Pajak, B. (2023). The Duolingo method for app-based teaching and learning. Duolingo Research Report, Amazon Web Services (AWS).
52. Moreno, J.L. (1987). The Essential Moreno: Writings on Psychodrama, Group Method, and Spontaneity, Springer Publishing.