Development of a Hybrid Model for Risk Assessment and Management in Complex Road Infrastructure Projects
Source abstract
Abstract
During the execution of road infrastructure projects, project managers face significant challenges, including financial, technical, regulatory, and operational risks. More than 90% of infrastructure projects have incurred costs exceeding initial estimates, impacting both completion timelines and the operational efficiency of road infrastructure. Effectively assessing and managing these risks is crucial for improving project outcomes and ensuring the sustainability of infrastructure investments. To address these challenges, this study developed a hybrid model for risk assessment and management in road infrastructure projects. The model quantifies risks across seven key categories: Design, External, Resource, Employer, Contractor, Engineer, and Project, based on three primary input factors: Environment coefficient, Contractual coefficient, and Design coefficient. Initially, various machine learning models, including linear regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Stacking Models, and neural networks, were applied to assess risk predictions. However, due to the specific nature of the dataset, these models did not achieve satisfactory predictive accuracy. As a result, fuzzy logic systems (Mamdani and Sugeno) were employed, demonstrating superior performance in modeling risk occurrence probabilities. Comparative analysis between these two fuzzy logic approaches revealed that the Sugeno model provided the most accurate predictions. The findings highlight the benefits of applying fuzzy logic for risk assessment in complex infrastructure projects, providing a structured framework for enhancing decision-making processes. This study provides a structured methodology for accurately predicting risks and enhancing project safety, efficiency, and long-term sustainability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Construction Project Management and Performance · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Department of Mathematics SIMATS Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Mechanical and Technical Sciences, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Bian, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Guo, Y., and Yang, Y. (2024). Geological Disaster Susceptibility Evaluation Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of the Atal Tunnel in Tibetan Plateau. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16114604 ↗
2. Lee, J., Jung, D., Baek, C., Hu, Y.-C., Lin, M.-H., Tsai, J.-F., Nguyen, P.-H., Lu, M.-T., Lee, J., and Jung, D. (2023). An Analytical Study Predicting Future Conditions and Application Strategies of Concrete Bridge Pavement Based on Pavement Management System Database. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152416680 ↗
3. E-Scooter Regulation: The Micro-Politics of Market-Making for Micro-Mobility in Bergen10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.009 ↗
4. Risks Management of Infrastructure Line Services and Their Impact on the Financial Costs of Road Projects in Jordan10.1016/j.measen.2022.100647 ↗
5. Khatleli, N. (2020). Risk Management in Construction Projects, IntechOpen Limited.10.5772/intechopen.80628 ↗
6. Evaluating the Road Environment Through the Lens of Professional Drivers: A Traffic Safety Perspective
7. Simić, N., Ivanišević, N., Nedeljković, Ð., Senić, A., Stojadinović, Z., and Ivanović, M. (2023). Early Highway Construction Cost Estimation: Selection of Key Cost Drivers. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065584 ↗
8. Senić, A., Dobrodolac, M., and Stojadinović, Z. (2024). Predicting Extension of Time and Increasing Contract Price in Road Infrastructure Projects Using a Sugeno Fuzzy Logic Model. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12182852 ↗
9. The Effects of Roadway Characteristics on Farm Equipment Crashes: A Geographic Information Systems Approach10.1186/s40621-016-0096-1 ↗
10. Pešić, A., Stephens, A.N., Newnam, S., Čičević, S., Pešić, D., and Trifunović, A. (2022). Youth Perceptions and Attitudes towards Road Safety in Serbia. Systems, 10.10.3390/systems10050191 ↗
11. Marković, N., Ivanišević, T., Čičević, S., and Trifunović, A. (2024). Fuzzy Logic Model for Assessing Accident Proneness Based on Passenger Vehicle Speed in Real and Virtual Traffic Conditions. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12030421 ↗
12. Tools for Road Infrastructure Safety Management—Polish Experiences10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.052 ↗
13. Makarova, I., Yakupova, G., Buyvol, P., Abashev, A., and Mukhametdinov, E. (2022). Risk Management Methodology for Transport Infrastructure Security. Infrastructures, 7.10.3390/infrastructures7060081 ↗
14. Buffarini, G., Clemente, P., Giovinazzi, S., Ormando, C., Pollino, M., and Rosato, V. (2022). Preventing and Managing Risks Induced by Natural Hazards to Critical Infrastructures. Infrastructures, 7.10.3390/infrastructures7060076 ↗
15. A New Method Based on Field Strength for Road Infrastructure Risk Assessment10.1155/2018/6379146 ↗
16. Risk Analysis of Time on Road Infrastructure Development (Case Study: Construction Industry in Papua)10.1088/1755-1315/235/1/012077 ↗
17. Senić, A., Dobrodolac, M., and Stojadinović, Z. (2024). Development of Risk Quantification Models in Road Infrastructure Projects. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16177694 ↗
18. Exploring Risk Associated to Public Road Infrastructure Construction Projects10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012030 ↗
19. Critical Infrastructure Renewal: A Framework for Fuzzy Logic Based Risk Assessment and Microscopic Traffic Simulation Modelling10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.164 ↗
20. Proposing a New Methodology Based on Fuzzy Logic for Tunnelling Risk Assessment10.3846/13923730.2013.843583 ↗
21. Risk Analysis in Highway Construction Projects Using Failure Mode & Effect Analysis10.22214/ijraset.2019.6054 ↗
22. Risk Assessment of Highway Construction Projects Using Fuzzy Logic and Multiple Regression Analysis
23. Fuzzy-Logic Expert System to Estimate the Risks of High-Speed Railways Projects
24. Risk Management in Highway Project Using Fuzzy Logic
25. A Review of Artificial Intelligence Based Risk Assessment Methods for Capturing Complexity-Risk Interdependencies: Cost Overrun in Construction Projects10.1108/IJMPB-02-2019-0047 ↗
26. Cost Estimation and Prediction in Construction Projects: A Systematic Review on Machine Learning Techniques10.1007/s42452-020-03497-1 ↗
27. Machine Learning Algorithms for Construction Projects Delay Risk Prediction10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001736 ↗
28. Machine Learning-Aided Engineering Services’ Cost Overruns Prediction in High-Rise Residential Building Projects: Application of Random Forest Regression10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104102 ↗
29. Bridge Infrastructure Asset Management System: Comparative Computational Machine Learning Approach for Evaluating and Predicting Deck Deterioration Conditions10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000572 ↗
30. Bae, J., Yum, S.-G., Kim, J.-M., Rodríguez-Rivero, R., and Ortiz-Marcos, I. (2021). Harnessing Machine Learning for Classifying Economic Damage Trends in Transportation Infrastructure Projects. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13116376 ↗
31. Papadimitriou, E., Filtness, A., Ziakopoulos, A., Theofilatos, A., and Yannis, G. (2017, January 17–19). Comparative Assessment and Ranking of Infrastructure Related Crash Risk Factors. Proceedings of the Road Safety & Simulation International Conference 2017, The Hague, The Netherland.
32. Appleton, I. (2009). Road Safety Data: Collection and Analysis for Target Setting and Monitoring Performances and Progress Road Infrastructure Safety Assessment.
33. Lozano-Ramírez, N.E., Sánchez, O., Carrasco-Beltrán, D., Vidal-Méndez, S., and Castañeda, K. (2023). Digitalization and Sustainability in Linear Projects Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152215962 ↗
34. Zakarka, M., Skuodis, Š., and Dirgėlienė, N. (2023). Triaxial Test of Coarse-Grained Soils Reinforced with One Layer of Geogrid. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132212480 ↗
35. Kapatsa, C., Kavishe, N., Maro, G., and Zulu, S. (2023). The Identification of Sustainability Assessment Indicators for Road Infrastructure Projects in Tanzania. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152014840 ↗
36. Canesi, R., and Gallo, B. (2023). Risk Assessment in Sustainable Infrastructure Development Projects: A Tool for Mitigating Cost Overruns. Land, 13.10.3390/land13010041 ↗
37. Fayaz, M., Ullah, I., and Kim, D.H. (2018). Underground Risk Index Assessment and Prediction Using a Simplified Hierarchical Fuzzy Logic Model and Kalman Filter. Processes, 6.10.3390/pr6080103 ↗
38. A Proposal for Construction Project Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy Logic10.1080/01446190050024905 ↗
39. Ivanović, M.Z., Nedeljković, Đ., Stojadinović, Z., Marinković, D., Ivanišević, N., and Simić, N. (2022). Detection and In-Depth Analysis of Causes of Delay in Construction Projects: Synergy between Machine Learning and Expert Knowledge. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142214927 ↗
40. Senić, A., Ivanović, M., Dobrodolac, M., and Stojadinović, Z. (2025). Prioritization of Preventive Measures: A Multi-Criteria Approach to Risk Mitigation in Road Infrastructure Projects. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13020278 ↗
41. Generating Fuzzy Rules by Learning from Examples10.1109/21.199466 ↗
42. Modelling Driver Propensity for Traffic Accidents: A Comparison of Multiple Regression Analysis and Fuzzy Approach10.1080/17457300.2019.1690002 ↗
43. Tabakov, M., Chlopowiec, A.B., and Chlopowiec, A.R. (2023). A Novel Classification Method Using the Takagi–Sugeno Model and a Type-2 Fuzzy Rule Induction Approach. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095279 ↗
44. Benzaouia, A., and El Hajjaji, A. (2014). Advanced Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Systems, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-319-05639-5 ↗
45. Stability Analysis and Nonlinear Observer Design Using Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Models10.1007/978-3-642-16776-8_1 ↗
46. Baghdadi, A., Babovic, N., and Kloft, H. (2023). Fuzzy Logic, Neural Network, and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System in Delegation of Standard Concrete Beam Calculations. Building, 14.10.20944/preprints202311.0469.v1 ↗
47. Saralegui, R., Sanchez, A., and de Castro, A. (2023). Efficient Hardware-in-the-Loop Models Using Automatic Code Generation with MATLAB/Simulink. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12132786 ↗
48. Čubranić-Dobrodolac, M., Jovčić, S., Bošković, S., and Babić, D. (2023). A Decision-Making Model for Professional Drivers Selection: A Hybridized Fuzzy–AROMAN–Fuller Approach. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11132831 ↗
49. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual, McGraw-Hill Open University Press. [3rd ed.].
50. Landau, S., and Everitt, B.S. (2003). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SPSS|Enhanced Reader, Chapman and Hall/CRC.10.1201/9780203009765 ↗
51. Chadli, M., Chadli, M., and Borne, P. (2012). Multiple Models Approach in Automation. Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Systems, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118577325 ↗
52. Lin, C. (2007). LMI Approach to Analysis and Control of Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Systems with Time Delay, Springer.
53. Audacity of Huge: Overcoming Challenges of Data Scarcity and Data Quality for Machine Learning in Computational Materials Discovery10.1016/j.coche.2021.100778 ↗
54. Hakami, A. (2024). Strategies for Overcoming Data Scarcity, Imbalance, and Feature Selection Challenges in Machine Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-59958-9 ↗
55. A Systematic Review on Data Scarcity Problem in Deep Learning: Solution and Applications10.1145/3502287 ↗
56. Data Scarcity, Robustness and Extreme Multi-Label Classification10.1007/s10994-019-05791-5 ↗
57. Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Reasoning about Scientific Evidence When There Is a Lack of Data10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.09.008 ↗
58. Ponzio, F., Urgese, G., Ficarra, E., and Di Cataldo, S. (2019). Dealing with Lack of Training Data for Convolutional Neural Networks: The Case of Digital Pathology. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8030256 ↗
59. Seresht, N.G., Lourenzutti, R., Salah, A., and Fayek, A.R. (2018). Overview of Fuzzy Hybrid Techniques in Construction Engineering and Management. Fuzzy Hybrid Computing in Construction Engineering and Management, Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/978-1-78743-868-220181002 ↗
60. Comparing Mamdani Sugeno Fuzzy Logic and RBF ANN Network for PV Fault Detection10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.066 ↗
61. Polap, D. (2022, January 18–23). Automatic Fuzzy Parameter Tuning for Neural Network Models. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Padua, Italy.10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE55066.2022.9882543 ↗
62. A Review on the Effectiveness of Street Sweeping, Washing and Dust Suppressants as Urban PM Control Methods10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.025 ↗