iVRPM: Conceptual Proposal of an Immersive Virtual Reality Pedagogical Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing attention to virtual reality (VR) suggests that immersive technologies will be widely applied across various contexts, including education. However, conceptual divergences and a lack of understanding regarding the learning process in immersive virtual environments reveal the nascent understanding of the use of immersive virtual reality (iVR) and its benefits in educational contexts. Against this backdrop, this article presents a proposed pedagogical framework aimed at aligning the affordances of iVR environments—such as immersion, interactivity, and embodiment—with educational objectives, thereby enhancing learning experiences. Developed through a design-based research (DBR) methodology, the framework integrates theoretical contributions from the CAMIL model and the XR ABC framework in conjunction with the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. The structure organizes immersive experiences into three levels—Absorb, Experience, and Explore—which are distinguished by the interactivity and complexity of the proposed tasks. Each level is mapped to the cognitive domains and dimensions of knowledge, promoting the progressive development of cognitive and psychomotor skills. It is posited that aligning the technological features of the environment with educational objectives and the level of active student engagement can facilitate learning in immersive environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Educational Games and Gamification · Augmented Reality Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UIDEF, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-013 Lisbon, Portugal
Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Education and Development, Lusofona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
Funding
National Funds through FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology · UIDEF—Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Front. Robot. AI, 5.10.3389/frobt.2018.00081 ↗
2. Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence10.17011/ht/urn.201611174652 ↗
3. Petersen, G.B., Petkakis, G., and Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Comput. Educ., 179.10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429 ↗
4. Cross-cultural learning in virtual reality environment: Facilitating cross-cultural understanding, trait emotional intelligence, and sense of presence10.1007/s11423-021-10044-1 ↗
5. The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A Theoretical Research-Based Model of Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2 ↗
6. Computers & Education Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students ’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033 ↗
7. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality using head-mounted displays on learning performance: A meta-analysis10.1111/bjet.13023 ↗
8. Bicalho, D.R., Piedade, J.M.N., and de Lacerda Matos, J.F. (2023, January 16–18). The Use of Immersive Virtual Reality in Educational Practices in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Computers in Education, SIIE 2023, Setúbal, Portugal. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10423711/.10.1109/SIIE59826.2023.10423711 ↗
9. Tori, R., Kirner, C., and Siscouto, R. (2006). Fundamentos e tecnologia de Realidade Virtual e Aumentada [Internet], Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC). Available online: https://pcs.usp.br/interlab/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2018/01/Fundamentos_e_Tecnologia_de_Realidade_Virtual_e_Aumentada-v22-11-06.pdf.
10. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778 ↗
11. Agbo, F.J., Sanusi, I.T., Oyelere, S.S., and Suhonen, J. (2021). Application of virtual reality in computer science education: A systemic review based on bibliometric and content analysis methods. Educ. Sci., 11.10.3390/educsci11030142 ↗
12. Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research10.1111/bjet.13030 ↗
13. Exploring the trends of educational virtual reality games: A systematic review of empirical studies10.1186/s40561-020-00142-7 ↗
14. Morgado, L., and Beck, D. (2020, January 21–25). Unifying Protocols for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews with Application to Immersive Learning Research. Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN), San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.10.23919/iLRN47897.2020.9155093 ↗
15. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., and Bloom, B.S. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman.
16. Defining Immersion: Literature Review and Implications for Research on Audiovisual Experiences10.17743/jaes.2020.0039 ↗
17. Diverse approaches to learning with immersive Virtual Reality identified from a systematic review10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104701 ↗
18. Exploring sensorimotor performance and user experience within a virtual reality golf putting simulator10.1007/s10055-020-00480-4 ↗
19. What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x ↗
20. Learning science in immersive virtual reality10.1037/edu0000241 ↗
21. How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence10.1080/15213269.2015.1015740 ↗
22. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire10.1162/105474698565686 ↗
23. Learning about history in immersive virtual reality: Does immersion facilitate learning?10.1007/s11423-021-09999-y ↗
24. Fern, N., Cristea, A.I., Nolan, S., and Stewart, C. (2024). Doctoral Colloquium—How Interactivity and Presence Affect Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Mixed Methods Study Design. Immersive Learning Research-Academic, ILRN.10.56198/U6C0WFYQB ↗
25. Emboldened by Embodiment: Six Precepts for Research on Embodied Learning and Mixed Reality10.3102/0013189X13511661 ↗
26. Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students’ interest and career aspirations in science?10.1111/bjet.12954 ↗
27. Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01024.x ↗
28. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0 ↗
29. Ambientes De Aprendizagem Imersivos10.18817/vjshr.v1i2.32 ↗
30. Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?10.3102/0013189X11428813 ↗
31. A systematic literature review of design-based research from 2004 to 201310.1007/s40692-015-0036-z ↗
32. Fraefel, U. (2014, January 23–25). Professionalization of pre-service teachers through university-school partnerships. Proceedings of the WERA Focal Meeting, Edinburgh, UK.
33. Lion-Bailey, C., Lubinsky, J., and Shippee, M. (2024, January 25). A Learning Framework for Augmented and Virtual Reality. Available online: https://www.teachthought.com/technology/augmented-virtual-reality/.
34. Johnson-Glenberg, M., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D.A., and Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Front. Psychol., 7.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819 ↗
35. Treinamento imersivo em realidade virtual: A percepção de experiência dos colaboradores numa indústria calçadista
36. Shippee, M., and Lubinsky, J. (2021, January 9–10). Training and Learning in Virtual Reality: Designing for Consistent, Replicable, and Scalable Solutions. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa.10.1109/ICECET52533.2021.9698487 ↗
37. Immersive Learning10.3390/encyclopedia3020026 ↗
38. Lochotinant, C., and Yanchinda, J. (February, January 30). Creativity Knowledge of Jewelry Design Measurement using Bloom’s Taxonomy:Psychomotor Domain. Proceedings of the 2019 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT-NCON), Nan, Thailand. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8692305/.10.1109/ECTI-NCON.2019.8692305 ↗
39. Simpson, E.J. (2023, January 10). Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain, Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED010368.pdf.
40. The factor structure of the Presence Questionnaire10.1162/105474605323384654 ↗