Cropland Suitability Prediction Method Based on Biophysical Variables from Copernicus Data and Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The goal of this study was to propose and validate a method for predicting cropland suitability based on biophysical variables and machine learning according to an FAO land suitability standard using soybean (Glycine max L.) as a representative crop, aiming to provide an alternative to geographic information system (GIS)-based multicriteria analysis. The peak leaf area index (LAI) and the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) from PROBA-V/Sentinel-3 data were calculated according to ground-truth soybean agricultural parcels in continental Croatia during 2015–2021. Four machine learning regression algorithms, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), as well as their combination, were evaluated for predicting the peak LAI and FAPAR on the entire agricultural land in the study area, with RF producing the highest prediction accuracy with an R2 in the range of 0.250–0.590. The translation from K-means classes to the FAO land suitability standard was performed using a relative-based approach, ranking five resulting classes based on their relative mean sums of LAI and FAPAR values. The results of the proposed approach indicate that it is viable for major crops, while cropland suitability prediction for minor crops would require higher spatial resolution, such as vegetation indices from Sentinel-2 imagery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soil and Land Suitability Analysis · Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement · Remote Sensing in Agriculture
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 1, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Funding
European Space Agency (ESA)
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Fahad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., Alam, M., Ullah, H., Saeed, M., Ali Khan, I., and Adnan, M. (2020). Agricultural Land Degradation: Processes and Problems Undermining Future Food Security. Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3 ↗
2. Radočaj, D., and Jurišić, M. (2022). GIS-Based Cropland Suitability Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Novel Approach to Sustainable Agricultural Production. Agronomy, 12.10.3390/agronomy12092210 ↗
3. Recent Advances in Bioremediation of Heavy Metals and Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157961 ↗
4. FAO (2022, July 13). Chapter 1: The Nature and Principles of Land Evaluation. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/x5310e/x5310e02.htm#chapter%201:%20the%20nature%20and%20principles%20of%20land%20evaluation.
5. FAO (2022, July 13). Chapter 3: Land Suitability Classifications. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/x5310e/x5310e04.htm#chapter%203:%20land%20suitability%20classifications.
6. Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis: State-of-the-Art and Outlooks for Integration of Climate Change Analysis10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.013 ↗
7. Drought in Agriculture: Preservation, Adaptation, Migration10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100002 ↗
8. Chen, P., Li, C., Chen, S., Li, Z., Zhang, H., and Zhao, C. (2022). Tea Cultivation Suitability Evaluation and Driving Force Analysis Based on AHP and Geodetector Results: A Case Study of Yingde in Guangdong, China. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14102412 ↗
9. Ecological Vulnerability Assessment Based on AHP-PSR Method and Analysis of Its Single Parameter Sensitivity and Spatial Autocorrelation for Ecological Protection—A Case of Weifang City, China10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107464 ↗
10. Integrated GIS and AHP Techniques for Land Suitability Assessment of Cotton Crop in Perambalur District, South India10.1007/s13198-022-01705-2 ↗
11. Singha, C., Swain, K.C., and Swain, S.K. (2020). Best Crop Rotation Selection with GIS-AHP Technique Using Soil Nutrient Variability. Agriculture, 10.10.3390/agriculture10060213 ↗
12. Binte Mostafiz, R., Noguchi, R., and Ahamed, T. (2021). Agricultural Land Suitability Assessment Using Satellite Remote Sensing-Derived Soil-Vegetation Indices. Land, 10.10.3390/land10020223 ↗
13. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Nabiollahi, K., Rasoli, L., Kerry, R., and Scholten, T. (2020). Land Suitability Assessment and Agricultural Production Sustainability Using Machine Learning Models. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10040573 ↗
14. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Forestry Decision Making Based on an Integrated VIKOR and AHP Approach10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.003 ↗
15. Li, Z., Fan, Z., and Shen, S. (2018). Urban Green Space Suitability Evaluation Based on the AHP-CV Combined Weight Method: A Case Study of Fuping County, China. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10082656 ↗
16. Alamanos, A., Mylopoulos, N., Loukas, A., and Gaitanaros, D. (2018). An Integrated Multicriteria Analysis Tool for Evaluating Water Resource Management Strategies. Water, 10.10.3390/w10121795 ↗
17. Hengl, T., de Jesus, J.M., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Gonzalez, M.R., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M.N., Geng, X., and Bauer-Marschallinger, B. (2017). SoilGrids250m: Global Gridded Soil Information Based on Machine Learning. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 ↗
18. Evaluating the Capabilities of Sentinel-2 for Quantitative Estimation of Biophysical Variables in Vegetation10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.007 ↗
19. Habyarimana, E., Piccard, I., Catellani, M., De Franceschi, P., and Dall’Agata, M. (2019). Towards Predictive Modeling of Sorghum Biomass Yields Using Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation Derived from Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery and Supervised Machine Learning Techniques. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9040203 ↗
20. Characterizing and Mapping Cropping Patterns in a Complex Agro-Ecosystem: An Iterative Participatory Mapping Procedure Using Machine Learning Algorithms and MODIS Vegetation Indices10.1016/j.compag.2020.105595 ↗
21. Radocaj, D., Jurisic, M., Gasparovic, M., and Plascak, I. (2020). Optimal Soybean (Glycine max L.) Land Suitability Using GIS-Based Multicriteria Analysis and Sentinel-2 Multitemporal Images. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12091463 ↗
22. (2024, December 20). Croatian Bureau of Statistics: POLJ-2024-2-3 First Estimate of the Areas of Major Crops in 2024. Available online: https://podaci.dzs.hr/2024/hr/77184.
23. (2025, January 01). PROBA-V Products User Manual v3.01. Available online: https://proba-v.vgt.vito.be/sites/probavvgt/files/Products_User_Manual.pdf.
24. (2024, August 17). R: Contributors. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/contributors.html.
25. Detection of Phenology Using an Improved Shape Model on Time-Series Vegetation Index in Wheat10.1016/j.compag.2020.105398 ↗
26. The Relationship of Environmental Factors and the Cropland Suitability Levels for Soybean Cultivation Determined by Machine Learning10.18047/poljo.28.1.8 ↗
27. An Evaluation of Different Training Sample Allocation Schemes for Discrete and Continuous Land Cover Classification Using Decision Tree-Based Algorithms10.3390/rs70809655 ↗
28. Yield Components, Dry Matter, LAI and LAD of Soybeans in Northeast China10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.005 ↗
29. Hengl, T., and MacMillan, R.A. (2019). Predictive Soil Mapping with R, OpenGeoHub Foundation.
30. Climatologies at High Resolution for the Earth’s Land Surface Areas10.1038/sdata.2017.122 ↗
31. SoilGrids 2.0: Producing Soil Information for the Globe with Quantified Spatial Uncertainty10.5194/soil-7-217-2021 ↗
32. SoilGrids 2.0: Producing Quality-Assessed Soil Information for the Globe
33. (2021, April 21). EU-DEM v1.1—Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1.1.
34. Breiman, L., Cutler, A., Liaw, A., and Wiener, M. (2022, October 23). randomForest: Breiman and Cutler’s Random Forests for Classification and Regression. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=randomForest.
35. Karatzoglou, A., Smola, A., Hornik, K., Maniscalco, M.A., and Teo, C.H. (2024, October 14). Kernlab: Kernel-Based Machine Learning Lab. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/kernlab/index.html.
36. Chen, T., He, T., Benesty, M., Khotilovich, V., Tang, Y., Cho, H., Chen, K., Mitchell, R., Cano, I., and Zhou, T. (2024, October 14). Xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/xgboost/index.html.
37. Determining Leaf Nutrient Concentrations in Citrus Trees Using UAV Imagery and Machine Learning10.1007/s11119-021-09864-1 ↗
38. Das, K., Twarakavi, N., Khiripet, N., Chattanrassamee, P., and Kijkullert, C. (2021, January 11–16). A Machine Learning Framework for Mapping Soil Nutrients with Multi-Source Data Fusion. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium.10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553305 ↗
39. Geospatial Prediction of Total Soil Carbon in European Agricultural Land Based on Deep Learning10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169647 ↗
40. Ensemble Deep Learning: A Review10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105151 ↗
41. Kovačić, Đ., Radočaj, D., and Jurišić, M. (2024). Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Manure and Thermally Pretreated Harvest Residues. Bioresour. Technol., 402.10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130793 ↗
42. Kuhn, M., Wing, J., Weston, S., Williams, A., Keefer, C., Engelhardt, A., Cooper, T., Mayer, Z., Kenkel, B., and Benesty, M. (2024, November 30). Caret: Classification and Regression Training. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret.
43. Bhullar, A., Nadeem, K., and Ali, R.A. (2023). Simultaneous Multi-Crop Land Suitability Prediction from Remote Sensing Data Using Semi-Supervised Learning. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-33840-6 ↗
44. Understanding the Rapid Summer Warming and Changes in Temperature Extremes since the Mid-1990s over Western Europe10.1007/s00382-016-3158-8 ↗
45. Zhang, C., and Ma, Y. (2012). Ensemble Learning. Ensemble Machine Learning: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7 ↗
46. Approximating XGBoost with an Interpretable Decision Tree10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.055 ↗
47. Casalicchio, G., Molnar, C., and Schratz, P. (2025, January 01). Iml: Interpretable Machine Learning. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/iml/vignettes/intro.html.
48. Møller, A.B., Mulder, V.L., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Jacobsen, N.M., and Greve, M.H. (2021). Can We Use Machine Learning for Agricultural Land Suitability Assessment?. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11040703 ↗
49. Radočaj, D., Jurišić, M., Gašparović, M., Plaščak, I., and Antonić, O. (2021). Cropland Suitability Assessment Using Satellite-Based Biophysical Vegetation Properties and Machine Learning. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11081620 ↗