Resilient Responses to Global Supply Chain Disruptions: Focusing on the Stock Price of Global Logistics Companies
Source abstract
Abstract
This study clarifies the impact of global supply chain risks on global logistics companies, with a focus on the potential implications for sustainable supply chain management. The study employs the vector auto-regression model to examine the relationship between the Global Supply Chain Pressure Index (GSCPI) and the stock prices of global logistics companies, yielding the following results. First, the GSCPI does not have a statistically significant effect on most global logistics firms, except for shipping companies, which tend to be negatively impacted by supply chain disruptions. The t-statistics of the GSCPI on air cargo, integrated logistics, and pipeline companies were below the threshold of 1.291, corresponding to a 90% confidence level, which indicates that these results were not statistically significant. Therefore, logistics companies should prioritize the development of resilient and sustainable supply chain strategies incorporating alternative energy sources, such as liquefied hydrogen, ammonia, green methanol, and liquefied natural gas, to enhance their ability to respond to unexpected situations. Second, contrary to other logistics sectors, shipping enterprises have been positively impacted by the GSCPI, suggesting that they may find new opportunities during periods of global instability. By adopting eco-friendly fuel alternatives and green technologies, shipping companies can capitalize on these opportunities and contribute to the global transition toward sustainable logistics practices. These findings suggest that global logistics companies, including pipeline, air cargo, and integrated logistics companies, should develop resilient global supply chain management strategies that incorporate supply chain platforms, nearshoring, and import diversification. This study offers important implications for entrepreneurs and policymakers, emphasizing the role of sustainable energy solutions in stabilizing global supply chains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Economic and Technological Innovation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Convergence Interdisciplinary Education of Maritime & Ocean Contents (Logistics System), National Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
Department of Logistics Systems Engineering, National Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
College of Maritime Sciences, National Korea Maritime and Ocean University, Busan 49112, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, K., He, M., Yang, J., and Hou, H. (2024). Supply chain sustainability: Influencing factors and empirical study from a Marxist political economy perspective. Systems, 12.10.3390/systems12090379 ↗
2. Wang, H., Han, Q., Ma, T., and Tan, N. (2024). The impact of digital technology innovation on the supply chain position: Micro evidence from the Chinese new energy vehicle companies. Systems, 12.10.3390/systems12080272 ↗
3. Kim, Y. (2024). Optimal timing strategies in the evolutionary dynamics of competitive supply chains. Systems, 12.10.3390/systems12040114 ↗
4. P Russia−Ukraine war and risks to global supply chains
5. Toygar, A., and Yildirim, U. (2023). Examining the effects of the Russia−Ukraine conflict on global supply chains. Handbook of Research on War Policies, Strategies, and Cyber Wars, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-6684-6741-1.ch010 ↗
6. Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: A review and research agenda10.1080/00207543.2019.1629670 ↗
7. Supply Chain Management in View of Climate Change: An Overview of Possible Impacts and the Road Ahead
8. Li, D., Jiao, J., Wang, S., and Zhou, G. (2023). Supply chain resilience from the maritime transportation perspective: A bibliometric analysis and research directions. Fundam. Res., in press.10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.003 ↗
9. Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8 ↗
10. COVID-19: Outcomes for global supply chains
11. Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective10.1093/oxrep/graa033 ↗
12. An exploratory study of changes in consumer dining out behavior before and during COVID-1910.1080/15378020.2022.2036569 ↗
13. Zhong, Y., Oh, S., and Moon, H.C. (2021). What can drive consumers’ dining-out behavior in China and Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic?. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041724 ↗
14. Key factors driving customers’ restaurant dining behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic10.1108/IJCHM-07-2021-0831 ↗
15. Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120447 ↗
16. Frieske, B., and Stieler, S. (2022). The “semiconductor crisis” as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and impacts on the automotive industry and its supply chains. World Electr. Veh. J., 13.10.3390/wevj13100189 ↗
17. COVID-19, over-the-top services, and the future of pay television: The case of South Korea10.1080/00036846.2023.2204214 ↗
18. Caged, helpless but not bored: Consumption values derived from over-the-top platforms during pandemic10.1108/ITP-11-2021-0837 ↗
19. Catalyst role of COVID 19 pandemic in increasing adoption of over-the-top (OTT) platforms−A study conducted amongst Gen Z of Guwahati City, Assam
20. Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain10.1080/00207543.2020.1792000 ↗
21. Bugarčić, F.Ž., and Stanišić, N. (2022). The impact of international logistics system on business environment in times of crisis. Researching Economic Development and Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies, Proceedings of the Present and Future Challenges in Regional Development in the Adriatic-Ionian Region, Ancona, Italy, 15–16 September 2022, University of Banja Luka.
22. The impact of the COVID-19 prevention and economic interventions on express delivery industry: Evidence from China
23. Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness?
24. Sourcing decisions with capacity reservations under supply disruptions
25. Converting passenger aircraft into cargo planes under volatile market demand10.1016/j.tra.2024.104013 ↗
26. A SWOT analysis of China’s air cargo sector in the context of COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101875 ↗
27. Bartle, J.R., Lutte, R.K., and Leuenberger, D.Z. (2021). Sustainability and air freight transportation: Lessons from the global pandemic. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073738 ↗
28. COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for recovery of the global aviation industry10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102022 ↗
29. Xiao, G., and Xu, L. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of maritime transport in the post-epidemic era. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12091685 ↗
30. Xu, B., Liu, W., and Li, J. (2023). Resilience Regulation Strategy for Container Port Supply Chain under Disruptive Events. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11040732 ↗
31. Ports, maritime transport, and industry: The immediate impact of COVID-19 and the way forward10.33175/mtr.2022.250092 ↗
32. Millefiori, L.M., Braca, P., Zissis, D., Spiliopoulos, G., Marano, S., Willett, P.K., and Carniel, S. (2021). COVID-19 impact on global maritime mobility. Sci. Rep., 11.10.1038/s41598-021-97461-7 ↗
33. Wang, S., Yin, J., and Khan, R.U. (2023). Dynamic safety assessment and enhancement of port operational infrastructure systems during the COVID-19 era. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 11.10.3390/jmse11051008 ↗
34. The reallocation effects of COVID-19: Evidence from venture capital investments around the world10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106443 ↗
35. Greenwood, R., Iverson, B., and Thesmar, D. (2020). Sizing Up Corporate Restructuring in the COVID Crisis (No. w28104), National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w28104 ↗
36. Efthimiou, S.G. (2023). The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on foreign direct investment. International Conference Economies of The Balkan And Eastern European Countries, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-58437-4_6 ↗
37. What can we learn about reshoring after COVID-19?10.1007/s12063-020-00160-1 ↗
38. The reshoring decision under uncertainty in the post-COVID-19 era10.1108/JBIM-01-2021-0066 ↗
39. From deindustrialization to a reinforced process of reshoring in Europe. Another effect of the COVID-19 pandemic?10.3390/land11122109 ↗
40. The COVID-19 pandemic and the internationalization of production: A review of the literature10.1111/dpr.12560 ↗
41. Does the import diversity of inputs mitigate the negative impact of COVID-19 on global value chains?10.1080/09638199.2021.1968473 ↗
42. New global supply chain pressures index. an analysis of the inflationary changes brought about by global supply chains10.2478/kbo-2024-0041 ↗
43. Global supply chain inflationary pressures and monetary policy in Mexico10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101089 ↗
44. Global supply chain pressures, inflation, and implications for monetary policy10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103029 ↗
45. Global supply chain disruptions, commodity price shocks and inflation in Japan
46. Leverage and the global supply chain10.1016/j.frl.2022.103269 ↗
47. Neacsu, A., Neacsu, A., and Bichir, A. (2023). A comparative analysis of the global supply chain bottlenecks during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Conference on Economics and Social Sciences, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-58967-6_9 ↗
48. Global drivers of inflation: The role of supply chain disruptions and commodity price shocks10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106860 ↗
49. The impact of supply chain disruptions on business expectations during the pandemic10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106951 ↗
50. Finck, D., and Tillmann, P. (2022). The Macroeconomic Effects of Global Supply Chain Disruptions, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).10.2139/ssrn.4366429 ↗
51. Platitas, R.J.C., and Ocampo, J.C.G. (2024). From bottlenecks to inflation: Impact of global supply chain disruptions on inflation in select Asian economies. Latin Amer J. Cent. Bank., 100141.10.1016/j.latcb.2024.100141 ↗
52. The use of information systems for logistics and supply chain management in South East Europe: Current status and future direction10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.010 ↗
53. Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.014 ↗
54. Kamara, A., and Koirala, N.P. (2023). The Dynamic Impacts of Monetary Policy Uncertainty Shocks. Economies, 11.10.3390/economies11010017 ↗
55. Sims and Vector Autoregressions10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01737.x ↗
56. Moments, shocks and spillovers in Markov-switching VAR models10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105474 ↗
57. Ding, X., and Choi, Y.-J. (2023). Macroeconomic Effects of Maritime Transport Costs Shocks: Evidence from the South Korean Economy. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11173668 ↗
58. Global supply chain pressure and commodity markets: Evidence from multiple wavelet and quantile connectedness analyses10.1016/j.frl.2023.103791 ↗
59. Causes of food inflation in North America: COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine war
60. The asymmetric effect of supply chain pressure on inflation10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111540 ↗
61. Chen, K., and Kim, J. (2024). Effects of supply chain bottlenecks and fiscal stimulus on inflation dynamics in the COVID-19 pandemic era: A case of South Korea. Appl. Econ., 1–14.10.1080/00036846.2024.2385750 ↗
62. Dynamic causality between global supply chain pressures and China’s resource industries: A time-varying Granger analysis10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103377 ↗
63. Jo, J., Kim, U., Lee, E., Lee, J., and Kim, S. (2023). A supply chain-oriented model to predict crude oil import prices in South Korea based on the hybrid approach. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152416725 ↗
64. Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983 ↗
65. Benigno, G., Di Giovanni, J., Groen, J.J., and Noble, A.I. (2022). The GSCPI: A new barometer of global supply chain pressures. FRB New York Staff. Rep.10.2139/ssrn.4114973 ↗
66. Correlation analysis between ethnic diversity and success rate on a massive repository of movies data set and the board of directors of Fortune 500 in terms of net sales and gross profit
67. Discursive strategies in the branding of Fortune Global 500 Chinese manufacturing companies10.1057/s41599-023-01849-x ↗
68. Gender diversity on boards: Determinants that underlie the proposals for female directors10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122417 ↗
69. Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting by Fortune Global 500 companies: A call for embeddedness10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0666 ↗
70. Corporate responses to the COVID-19 pandemic by Fortune 500 companies10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102285 ↗
71. How does world economic policy uncertainty influence the carbon dioxide emission reporting and performance? Study of Fortune Global 500 firms10.1007/s11356-024-32643-0 ↗
72. Akkaya, M. (2021). Vector autoregressive model and analysis. Handbook of Research on Emerging Theories, Models, and Applications of Financial Econometrics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-54108-8_8 ↗
73. Vector autoregressions10.1257/jep.15.4.101 ↗
74. Stock market movement forecast: A systematic review10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113464 ↗
75. Fusion in stock market prediction: A decade survey on the necessity, recent developments, and potential future directions10.1016/j.inffus.2020.08.019 ↗
76. Handoyo (2019). The Multiple Time Series Modelling with Autoregressive Distributed Lag, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences, Brawijaya University.
77. Kuziboev, B., Saidmamatov, O., Khodjaniyazov, E., Ibragimov, J., Marty, P., Ruzmetov, D., Matyakubov, U., Lyulina, E., and Ibadullaev, D. (2024). CO2 Emissions, remittances, energy intensity and economic development: Evidence from Central Asia. Economies, 12.10.3390/economies12040095 ↗
78. Emam, M.A., Leibrecht, M., and Chen, T. (2023). The impact of a “National Green Export Review” on Competitiveness: Empirical evidence for Ecuador’s fish exports. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13010062 ↗
79. Pollution haven hypothesis revisited: A comparison of the BRICS and MINT countries based on VECM approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.206 ↗