journal article·2024-12-02Open access

Impact of Gait-Synchronized Vibrotactile Sensory Feedback on Gait in Lower Limb Amputees

Magnus N. Kalff, Victor Hoursch, Lara Jopp, Viktoria Witowski, Meike Wilke, Alexander Gardetto, Kyle R. Eberlin, Stephan Sehmisch, Jennifer Ernst

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

Background: Research on sensory feedback systems for prosthetic devices aims to enhance sensory capabilities to better meet user needs. Feedback systems for lower limb amputees (LLA) have been shown to reduce cognitive efforts, metabolic cost and phantom limb pain. This study evaluated the effect of a non-invasive, gait-synchronized, vibrotactile feedback system (VTFS) on the gait parameters of LLA. Methods: Four stimulators applied vibrotactile stimulation to the thigh of LLA during walking, corresponding to four pressure sensors located at the fore- and hindfoot embedded in a sock worn on the prosthetic foot. Standardized gait tests, such as the Timed “Up and Go” Test (TUG), the Four Square Step Test (FSST), the 10 Meter Walk Test (10 MWT) and the 2 Minute Walk Test (2 MWT), were performed to assess the risk of falling, coordination, walking speed and endurance before and after intervention. Results: After an average of 61.5 days using the VTFS, gait stability (TUG) improved significantly. Coordination (FSST) improved in 36% of subjects, while 45% showed a clinically relevant increase in gait speed (10 MWT). Conclusions: The results suggest an improved gait performance in the cohort. Though FSST lacked statistical significance, a p-value near 0.05 indicates a trend toward meaningful improvement. Notably, the participant with Targeted Sensory Reinnervation demonstrated the most favorable outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hannover Medical School, Department of Trauma Surgery, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany

Faculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Ulmenliet 20, 21033 Hamburg, Germany

Competence Center for Bionic Prosthetics, Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery with Hand Surgery, Brixsana Private Clinic, 39042 Bressanone, Italy

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA

Funding

Hannover Medical School and University Medicine Goettingen

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Falling and Fear of Falling among Lower Extremity Amputees10.1053/apmr.2001.24295 ↗
2. Fuchs, K., Krauskopf, T., Lauck, T.B., Klein, L., Mueller, M., Herget, G.W., Von Tscharner, V., Stutzig, N., Stieglitz, T., and Pasluosta, C. (2021). Influence of Augmented Visual Feedback on Balance Control in Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees. Front. Neurosci., 15.10.3389/fnins.2021.727527 ↗
3. Adjustments in Gait Symmetry with Walking Speed in Trans-Femoral and Trans-Tibial Amputees10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00066-8 ↗
4. Energy Cost of Walking of Amputees: The Influence of Level of Amputation10.2106/00004623-197658010-00007 ↗
5. Makin, T.R., De Vignemont, F., and Faisal, A.A. (2017). Neurocognitive Barriers to the Embodiment of Technology. Nat. Biomed. Eng., 1.10.1038/s41551-016-0014 ↗
6. Social and Psychological Factors in Adjustment to Limb Amputation
7. Six-Month Assessment of a Hand Prosthesis with Intraneural Tactile Feedback10.1002/ana.25384 ↗
8. Multisensory Brain Mechanisms of Bodily Self-Consciousness10.1038/nrn3292 ↗
9. A Pilot Study Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Walking for Transfemoral Amputees Using the Intelligent Prosthesis with That Using Conventionally Damped Knees10.1191/0269215500cr345oa ↗
10. Consumer Design Priorities for Upper Limb Prosthetics10.1080/17483100701714733 ↗
11. Sensory Feedback Restoration in Leg Amputees Improves Walking Speed, Metabolic Cost and Phantom Pain10.1038/s41591-019-0567-3 ↗
12. Phantom Limb Pain: A Case of Maladaptive CNS Plasticity?10.1038/nrn1991 ↗
13. Dietrich, C., Nehrdich, S., Seifert, S., Blume, K.R., Miltner, W.H.R., Hofmann, G.O., and Weiss, T. (2018). Leg Prosthesis with Somatosensory Feedback Reduces Phantom Limb Pain and Increases Functionality. Front. Neurol., 9.10.3389/fneur.2018.00270 ↗
14. Can Vibratory Feedback Be Used to Improve Postural Stability in Persons with Transtibial Limb Loss?10.1682/JRRD.2011.05.0088 ↗
15. Sensinger, J.W., and Dosen, S. (2020). A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses from the Perspective of Human Motor Control. Front. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnins.2020.00345 ↗
16. Cordella, F., Ciancio, A.L., Sacchetti, R., Davalli, A., Cutti, A.G., Guglielmelli, E., and Zollo, L. (2016). Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users. Front. Neurosci., 10.10.3389/fnins.2016.00209 ↗
17. Sensory Feedback for Limb Prostheses in Amputees10.1038/s41563-021-00966-9 ↗
18. A Review of User Needs to Drive the Development of Lower Limb Prostheses10.1186/s12984-022-01097-1 ↗
19. Robotic Touch Shifts Perception of Embodiment to a Prosthesis in Targeted Reinnervation Amputees10.1093/brain/awq361 ↗
20. Artificial Redirection of Sensation from Prosthetic Fingers to the Phantom Hand Map on Transradial Amputees: Vibrotactile versus Mechanotactile Sensory Feedback10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2217989 ↗
21. Novel Targeted Sensory Reinnervation Technique to Restore Functional Hand Sensation after Transhumeral Amputation10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2294907 ↗
22. Tactile Feedback Is an Effective Instrument for the Training of Grasping with a Prosthesis at Low- and Medium-Force Levels10.1007/s00221-017-4991-7 ↗
23. Schofield, J.S., Shell, C.E., Beckler, D.T., Thumser, Z.C., and Marasco, P.D. (2020). Long-Term Home-Use of Sensory-Motor-Integrated Bidirectional Bionic Prosthetic Arms Promotes Functional, Perceptual, and Cognitive Changes. Front. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnins.2020.00120 ↗
24. Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution for Electromyographic Control of Object Manipulation10.1109/TBME.2013.2252174 ↗
25. Humans Can Integrate Feedback of Discrete Events in Their Sensorimotor Control of a Robotic Hand10.1007/s00221-014-4024-8 ↗
26. Stiffness Feedback for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses Using Vibrotactile Stimulation10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2267394 ↗
27. Vibro- and Electrotactile User Feedback on Hand Opening for Myoelectric Forearm Prostheses10.1109/TBME.2012.2200678 ↗
28. Illusory Movement Perception Improves Motor Control for Prosthetic Hands10.1126/scitranslmed.aao6990 ↗
29. Peternell, G., Penasso, H., Luttenberger, H., Ronacher, H., Schlintner, R., Ashcraft, K., Gardetto, A., Ernst, J., and Kropiunig, U. (2023). Vibrotactile Feedback for a Person with Transradial Amputation and Visual Loss: A Case Report. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59101710 ↗
30. Gardetto, A., Baur, E.M., Prahm, C., Smekal, V., Jeschke, J., Peternell, G., Pedrini, M.T., and Kolbenschlag, J. (2021). Reduction of Phantom Limb Pain and Improved Proprioception through a TSR-Based Surgical Technique: A Case Series of Four Patients with Lower Limb Amputation. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10174029 ↗
31. The Impact of the Stimulation Frequency on Closed-Loop Control with Electrotactile Feedback10.1186/s12984-015-0022-8 ↗
32. Time-Division Multiplexing for Myoelectric Closed-Loop Control Using Electrotactile Feedback10.1186/1743-0003-11-138 ↗
33. Clinical Identification of Multiple Fall Risk Early after Unilateral Transtibial Amputation10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.015 ↗
34. Measuring Gait Speed in the Out-Patient Clinic: Methodology and Feasibility10.4187/respcare.02688 ↗
35. The Utility of the 2-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Mobility in People with Lower Limb Amputation10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.007 ↗
36. The Timed “up and Go” Test: Reliability and Validity in Persons with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90234-4 ↗
37. The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x ↗
38. Reliability of Outcome Measures for People with Lower-Limb Amputations: Distinguishing True Change from Statistical Error10.2522/ptj.20100287 ↗
39. Interrater and Test-Retest Reliability of Performance-Based Clinical Tests Administered to Established Users of Lower Limb Prostheses10.1093/ptj/pzaa063 ↗
40. Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Walking Velocity, Gait Profile Score and Two Minute Walk Test for Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.001 ↗
41. The 2-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Functional Improvement in Persons with Lower Limb Amputation10.1053/apmr.2001.25153 ↗
42. Gait Speed as an Indicator of Prosthetic Walking Potential Following Lower Limb Amputation10.1177/0309364618792723 ↗
43. Agreement in Walking Speed Measured Using Four Different Outcome Measures: 6-Meter Walk Test, 10-Meter Walk Test, 2-Minute Walk Test, and 6-Minute Walk Test
44. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Novel Approach to Postamputation Neuroma Pain10.1007/s11999-014-3528-7 ↗
45. Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015 ↗
46. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Pain Prophylaxis and Treatment: A Systematic Review10.1002/pmrj.12972 ↗
47. Transfemoral Amputations: Is There an Effect of Residual Limb Length and Orientation on Energy Expenditure?10.1007/s11999-014-3630-x ↗
48. Variables That Influence Basic Prosthetic Mobility in People with Non-Vascular Lower Limb Amputation10.1002/pmrj.12223 ↗
49. General Estimates of the Energy Cost of Walking in People with Different Levels and Causes of Lower-Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1097/PXR.0000000000000035 ↗
50. Effect of Amputation Level on Energy Expenditure during Overground Walking by Children with an Amputation10.2106/JBJS.I.01557 ↗
51. Energy Expenditure of Walking with Prostheses: Comparison of Three Amputation Levels10.3109/03093640903433928 ↗
52. van Schaik, L., Geertzen, J.H.B., Dijkstra, P.U., and Dekker, R. (2019). Metabolic Costs of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with a Lower Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0213256 ↗