Using Laser Profilometry to Investigation FDM Printing Parameters for Outer-Perimeter Analysis and Surface Quality Improvement
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the optimization of fused deposition modeling (FDM), a prominent 3D printing technology known for its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. The research aimed to identify and reduce errors associated with key printing parameters, specifically the layer height, printing temperature, and printing speed. Advanced tools such as a Keyence laser scanner and microscope were used to evaluate the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of various samples. The results indicate that the optimal settings for the layer height (0.16 mm), printing temperature (250 °C), and printing speed (350 mm/s) significantly minimize variation, resulting in more consistent and accurate prints. The results also showed that the samples printed with these optimized parameters had the lowest variability, underscoring the critical importance of precisely managing these factors. The findings highlight the critical role of fine-tuned FDM parameters in improving the quality and reliability of printed objects and provide valuable insights for further advances in 3D printing processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering and Informatics, Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, Technical University of Košice, Bayerova, 1, 08001 Prešov, Slovakia
Funding
Ministry of Education, Science, Research, and Sport of the Slovak Republic
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 ↗
2. Process Monitoring, Diagnosis and Control of Additive Manufacturing10.1109/TASE.2022.3215258 ↗
3. (Chunhui) Machine Condition Monitoring for Defect Detection in Fused Deposition Modelling Process: A Review10.1007/s00170-024-13630-8 ↗
4. Balog, M., Iakovets, A., and Hrehova, S. (2024, January 7–9). FDM Printing and Parameter Setting in the KISSlicer Program. Proceedings of the EAI International Conference on Automation and Control in Theory and Practice, Orechová Potôň, Slovakia.
5. Additive Manufacturing Methods: Techniques, Materials, and Closed-Loop Control Applications10.1007/s00170-020-05663-6 ↗
6. A Layer-by-Layer Quality Monitoring Framework for 3D Printing10.1016/j.cie.2021.107314 ↗
7. Przekop, R.E., Gabriel, E., Pakuła, D., and Sztorch, B. (2023). Liquid for Fused Deposition Modeling Technique (L-FDM)—A Revolution in Application Chemicals to 3D Printing Technology: Color and Elements. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13137393 ↗
8. An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089 ↗
9. 3D Printing of Polymer Composites: A Short Review
10. Ferretti, P., Leon-Cardenas, C., Santi, G.M., Sali, M., Ciotti, E., Frizziero, L., Donnici, G., and Liverani, A. (2021). Relationship between FDM 3D Printing Parameters Study: Parameter Optimization for Lower Defects. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13132190 ↗
11. Kim, C., Espalin, D., Cuaron, A., Perez, M.A., MacDonald, E., and Wicker, R.B. (2015, January 7–11). A Study to Detect a Material Deposition Status in Fused Deposition Modeling Technology. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Busan, Korea.10.1109/AIM.2015.7222632 ↗
12. A Review on Quality Control in Additive Manufacturing10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0048 ↗
13. Kumar, S., Kolekar, T., Patil, S., Bongale, A., Kotecha, K., and Zaguia, A. (2022). A Low-Cost Multi-Sensor Data Acquisition System for Fault Detection in Fused Deposition Modelling. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22020517 ↗
14. Mwema, F.M., and Akinlabi, E.T. (2020). Basics of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). Fused Deposition Modeling: Strategies for Quality Enhancement, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-48259-6 ↗
15. (2024, July 09). Fused Deposition Modeling, FDM. Available online: https://www.manufacturingguide.com/en/fused-deposition-modeling-fdm.
16. Importance of Quality Control Implementation in the Production Process of a Company10.26417/ejes.v10i1.p248-252 ↗
17. The Influence of Printing Parameters on Selected Mechanical Properties of FDM/FFF 3D-Printed Parts10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033 ↗
18. How to Measure Quality of Affordable 3D Printing: Cultivating Quantitative Index in the User Community
19. Gordeev, E.G., Galushko, A.S., and Ananikov, V.P. (2018). Improvement of Quality of 3D Printed Objects by Elimination of Microscopic Structural Defects in Fused Deposition Modeling. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0198370 ↗
20. Improving Printed Products Manufacturing Technology Using 3D Printing
21. Study on the Forming Quality of Double-Base Gun Propellants Based on Extrusion 3D Printing Technology10.1088/1742-6596/2478/3/032079 ↗
22. Nguyen, P., Stanislaus, I., McGahon, C., Pattabathula, K., Bryant, S., Pinto, N., Jenkins, J., and Meinert, C. (2023). Quality Assurance in 3D-Printing: A Dimensional Accuracy Study of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Vascular Anatomical Models. Front. Med. Technol., 5.10.3389/fmedt.2023.1097850 ↗
23. Three-Dimensional Printing Accuracy Analysis for Medical Applications across a Wide Variety of Printers10.1117/1.JMI.10.2.026501 ↗
24. Development and Evaluation of a Fast Fabrication Process-Based 3D Printed Strain Gauge Sensors10.1080/00150193.2023.2201778 ↗
25. Tauberova, R., Lazorik, P., Nazarejova, J., and Knapcikova, L. (2023, January 28–31). Monitoring of Printing Quality in Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on Measurement, Smolenice, Slovakia.10.23919/MEASUREMENT59122.2023.10164340 ↗
26. Sun, Y., Li, D., Shi, Y., Wang, Z., Okeke, S.I., Yang, L., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Shi, Y., and Xiao, L. (2023). Application of 3D Printing Technology in Sensor Development for Water Quality Monitoring. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23052366 ↗
27. Sampedro, G.A., Agron, D.J., Huyo-a, S.L., Abisado, M., Kim, D.-S., and Lee, J.-M. (2022, January 7–9). 3D Printer State Monitoring Mobile Application through a Deep Learning Approach. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Advanced Control of Industrial Processes (AdCONIP), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/AdCONIP55568.2022.9894151 ↗
28. Concept Development of a Sensor Array for 3D Printer10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.041 ↗
29. Duparré, A., and Geyl, R. (2015). 3D Printed Freeform Optical Sensors for Metrology Application, SPIE.
30. Development of Bendable Strain Sensor with Embedded Microchannels Using 3D Printing10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.025 ↗
31. Knapcikova, L., Peraković, D., Perisa, M., and Balog, M. (2022). Monitoring the Energy Consumption of FDM Device Based on the Variation of Operating Parameters: A Study. Sustainable Management of Manufacturing Systems in Industry 4.0, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-90462-3 ↗
32. A Reverse CAD Approach for Estimating Geometric and Mechanical Behavior of FDM Printed Parts10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.217 ↗
33. Sampedro, G.A.R., Agron, D.J.S., Amaizu, G.C., Kim, D.-S., and Lee, J.-M. (2022). Design of an In-Process Quality Monitoring Strategy for FDM-Type 3D Printer Using Deep Learning. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178753 ↗
34. Stability and Deformations of Deposited Layers in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing
35. Research on the Flexible Support Platform for Fused Deposition Modeling10.1007/s00170-018-2046-2 ↗
36. A Review on the Various Processing Parameters in FDM10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484 ↗
37. IoT-Based Real-Time Online Monitoring System for Open Ware FDM Printers10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.210 ↗
38. Optimizing Quality Inspection and Control in Powder Bed Metal Additive Manufacturing: Challenges and Research Directions10.1109/JPROC.2021.3054628 ↗
39. Häußge, G. (2023, December 19). OctoPrint.Org. Available online: https://octoprint.org/.
40. Pavlenko, I., Piteľ, J., Ivanov, V., Berladir, K., Mižáková, J., Kolos, V., and Trojanowska, J. (2022). Using Regression Analysis for Automated Material Selection in Smart Manufacturing. Mathematics, 10.10.3390/math10111888 ↗
41. Kaščak, J., Gašpár, Š., Paško, J., Knapčíková, L., Husár, J., Baron, P., and Török, J. (2021). Design of an Atypical Construction of Equipment for Additive Manufacturing with a Conceptual Solution of a Printhead Intended for the Use of Recycled Plastic Materials. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11072928 ↗
42. Demčák, J., Židek, K., and Krenický, T. (2024). Digital Twin for Monitoring the Experimental Assembly Process Using RFID Technology. Processes, 12.10.3390/pr12071512 ↗
43. Behun, M., Kascak, P., Hrabcak, M., Behunova, A., Knapcikova, L., and Sofranko, M. (2020). Investigation of Sustainable Geopolymer Composite Using Automatic Identification Technology. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12166377 ↗
44. Validation of the serviceability of the manufacturing system using simulation
45. Adamczak, M., Kolinski, A., Trojanowska, J., and Husár, J. (2023). Digitalization Trend and Its Influence on the Development of the Operational Process in Production Companies. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031393 ↗
46. Duhančík, M., Židek, K., and Husár, J. (2024, January 22–24). The Automated Quality Control of 3D Printing using Technical SMART Device. Proceedings of the 2024 25th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Krynica Zdrój, Poland.10.1109/ICCC62069.2024.10569677 ↗
47. Lishchenko, N., Piteľ, J., and Larshin, V. (2022). Online Monitoring of Surface Quality for Diagnostic Features in 3D Printing. Machines, 10.10.3390/machines10070541 ↗
48. Coranic, T., and Mascenik, J. (2023). Experimental Measurement of Dynamic Characteristics of Structural Units. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11123333 ↗
49. Trojanowska, J., Żywicki, K., Varela, M.L.R., and Machado, J.M. (2015, January 17–20). Shortening changeover time—An industrial study. Proceedings of the 2015 10th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), Aveiro, Portugal.10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170373 ↗
50. Duhancik, M., Krenicky, T., and Coranic, T. (2024). Design and Testing of a Measurement Device for High-Speed Bearing Evaluation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020508 ↗
51. Vandzura, R., Simkulet, V., Gelatko, M., Hatala, M., and Mitalova, Z. (2023). Effect of Hardening Temperature on Maraging Steel Samples Prepared by Direct Metal Laser Sintering Process. Machines, 11.10.3390/machines11030351 ↗
52. Husar, J., Knapcikova, L., and Balog, M. (2019). Implementation of Material Flow Simulation as a Learning Tool. Design, Simulation, Manufacturing: The Innovation Exchange, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-93587-4_4 ↗
53. Methodology of Low Cost Rapid Manufacturing of Anatomical Models with Material Imitation of Soft Tissues10.12913/22998624/113426 ↗