journal article·2024-10-05Open access

Skilled Workers’ Perspectives on Utilizing a Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton in Construction

Bronson B. Du, Kumar G. Somasundram, Alex Johnston, Philip Bigelow, Mohammad Abdoli-Eramaki, Kenrick H. Jordan, Marcus Yung, Amin Yazdani

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

This field study explores construction workers’ perceptions of using a passive shoulder exoskeleton to better understand how to improve its adoption in construction. We provided forty-one construction workers with an exoskeleton to perform their regular work activities for two days. Workers’ feedback of the tool was collected at the end of each day. Two-thirds indicated they would likely or very likely use an exoskeleton if their employer provided it. Participants felt exoskeletons were helpful for specific overhead tasks, such as installing upper tracks, framing and drywalling bulkheads, taping and mudding ceilings, and installing light fixtures. To improve their adoption within the construction industry, exoskeletons should be designed to be compatible with harnesses and toolbelts, be close-fitting to allow working in tight spaces, be easily adjustable (for fit and level of support), be rugged and easy to clean, and should not encumber workers in performing their tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Ergonomics and Human Factors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Canadian Institute for Safety, Wellness, and Performance, Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Cambridge, ON N3E 1A9, Canada

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada

School of Occupational and Public Health, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 1Z5, Canada

School of Business, Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Kitchener, ON N2N 4M4, Canada

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) College and Community Social Innovation Fund (CCSIF)

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Biomechanical Analysis of Risk Factors for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders during Repetitive Lifting Task in Construction Workers10.1016/j.autcon.2017.07.007 ↗
2. Associations between Physical or Psychosocial Risk Factors and Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Workers Based on Literature in the Last 20 Years: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103113 ↗
3. Exploring Physical Exposures and Identifying High-Risk Work Tasks within the Floor Layer Trade10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.002 ↗
4. Factors Affecting the Risk of Developing Lower Back Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) in Experienced and Inexperienced Rodworkers10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.016 ↗
5. Health and Safety Executive (2022). Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Statistics in Great Britain, 2022, Health and Safety Executive.
6. Albattah, M.A., Goodrum, P.M., and Taylor, T.R.B. (2015, January 8). Demographic Influences on Construction Craft Shortages in the U. S. and Canada. Proceedings of the 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
7. (2022, October 01). Near-Term Rebound and Peak Retirements Create Labour Force Challenges for Construction. Available online: https://www.buildforce.ca/en/press-releases/near-term-rebound-and-peak-retirements-create-labour-force-challenges-construction.
8. Exoskeletons for Industrial Application and Their Potential Effects on Physical Work Load10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988 ↗
9. The Influence of Using Exoskeletons during Occupational Tasks on Acute Physical Stress and Strain Compared to No Exoskeleton—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103385 ↗
10. Fournier, D.E., Yung, M., Somasundram, K.G., Du, B.B., Rezvani, S., and Yazdani, A. (2023). Quality, Productivity, and Economic Implications of Exoskeletons for Occupational Use: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0287742 ↗
11. Effect of Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton Support during Working with Arms over Shoulder Level10.1017/wtc.2023.21 ↗
12. Assessing the Influence of a Passive, Upper Extremity Exoskeletal Vest for Tasks Requiring Arm Elevation: Part I—“Expected” Effects on Discomfort, Shoulder Muscle Activity, and Work Task Performance10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.025 ↗
13. Making Workers Safer and More Productive
14. Field Study on the Use and Acceptance of an Arm Support Exoskeleton in Plastering10.1080/00140139.2022.2159067 ↗
15. Exoskeleton Acceptance and Its Relationship to Self-Efficacy Enhancement, Perceived Usefulness, and Physical Relief: A Field Study among Logistics Workers10.1017/wtc.2021.10 ↗
16. Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Industrial Exoskeleton for Lower-Back Support: A Field Study in the Automotive Sector10.1080/24725838.2019.1573770 ↗
17. Effects of an Arm-Support Exoskeleton on Perceived Work Intensity and Musculoskeletal Discomfort: An 18-Month Field Study in Automotive Assembly10.1002/ajim.23282 ↗
18. Evolving Pipe Joining Methods and Their Association to Musculoskeletal Symptoms for Residential Plumbers10.3233/WOR-210454 ↗
19. Searching for Needles in a Haystack: Identifying Innovations to Prevent MSDs in the Construction Sector10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.003 ↗
20. Potential of Exoskeleton Technologies to Enhance Safety, Health, and Performance in Construction: Industry Perspectives and Future Research Directions10.1080/24725838.2018.1561557 ↗
21. Mahmud, D., Bennett, S.T., Zhu, Z., Adamczyk, P.G., Wehner, M., Veeramani, D., and Dai, F. (2022). Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22249987 ↗
22. Responsive Upper Limb and Cognitive Fatigue Measures during Light Precision Work: An 8-Hour Simulated Micro-Pipetting Study10.1080/00140139.2016.1242782 ↗
23. Variation of Force Amplitude and Its Effects on Local Fatigue10.1007/s00421-012-2375-z ↗
24. Detecting Within- and between-Day Manifestations of Neuromuscular Fatigue at Work: An Exploratory Study10.1080/00140139.2014.934299 ↗
25. Robinovitch, S., Rempel, D., Chueh, T., Arnold, A.-K., and Yung, M. (2010). An Intervention for Overhead Drilling into Concrete, WorkSafeBC.
26. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology10.1191/1478088706qp063oa ↗
27. Analysis of Human Whole-Body Joint Torques During Overhead Work With a Passive Exoskeleton10.1109/THMS.2021.3128892 ↗
28. Evaluation of PAEXO, a Novel Passive Exoskeleton for Overhead Work10.1080/10255842.2020.1714977 ↗
29. Schmalz, T., Schändlinger, J., Schuler, M., Bornmann, J., Schirrmeister, B., Kannenberg, A., and Ernst, M. (2019). Biomechanical and Metabolic Effectiveness of an Industrial Exoskeleton for Overhead Work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16234792 ↗
30. Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2945368 ↗
31. Influence of Different Passive Shoulder Exoskeletons on Shoulder and Torso Muscle Activation during Simulated Horizontal and Vertical Aircraft Squeeze Riveting Tasks10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103822 ↗
32. Howard, J., Murashov, V., Lowe, B.D., and Lu, J. (2022, July 16). Industrial Exoskeletons, Available online: https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2020/01/07/industrial-exoskeletons/.
33. Lindhard, S.M., Lassen, A.H., Cheng, Y., Musso, M., Wang, G., and Bai, S. (2023). The Potential of Exoskeletons in Construction: Barriers and Challenges. Constr. Innov., ahead-of-print.10.1108/CI-08-2022-0206 ↗