Development Models of Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Equilibrium for Predicting Gas Composition from Biomass Gasification: Correction Factors for Reaction Equilibrium Constants
Source abstract
Abstract
A complex thermochemical process during biomass gasification includes many chemical reactions. Therefore, a stoichiometric model can be applied to predict the composition of the producer gas during gasification. However, the prediction of methane and hydrogen gas is still limited by a significant margin using the present stoichiometric models. The purpose of this research was to develop novel stoichiometric models that account for the reaction equilibrium constant with correction factors. The new models would enable forecasting of the composition of CO, CO2, CH4, H2, N2, tar, lower heating value (LHV), and cold gasification efficiency (CGE). Model development consisted of two stages, whereas the development of the models and their validation adopted an artificial neural network (ANN) approach. The first stage was calculating new correction factors and defining the new equilibrium constants. The results were six stoichiometric models (M1–M6) with four sets of correction factors (A–D) that built up the new equilibrium constants. The second stage was validating the models and evaluating their accuracy. Validation was performed by the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), whereas accuracy was evaluated using a paired t-test. The developed models predicted the composition of the producer gas with an RMSE of less than 3.5% and ΔH-value of less than 0. The models did not only predict the composition of the producer gas, but they also predicted the tar concentration. The maximum tar concentration was predicted by M2C with 98.733 g/Nm3 at O/C 0.644, H/C 1.446, ER 0.331, and T 923 K. The composition of producer gases (CO, CO2, H2, and N2) was accurately predicted by models M1D, M2C, and M3C. This research introduces new models with variables N/C, O/C, H/C, ER, and T to simulate the composition of CO, CO2, CH4, H2, N2, and LHV-gas, with R2 > 0.9354, tar (C6H6)-R2 of 0.8638, and CGE-R2 of 0.8423. This research also introduces correction factors and a new empirical correlation for the reaction equilibrium constants in new stoichiometric models using steam reforming.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes · Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Doctoral Program in Agricultural Engineering, IPB University, Bogor P.O. Box 220, West Java, Indonesia
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institut Teknologi PLN, Menara PLN, Jalan Lingkar Luar Barat, West Jakarta 11750, Jakarta, Indonesia
Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, IPB University, Bogor P.O. Box 220, West Java, Indonesia
Funding
Institut Teknologi PLN Jakarta
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. Small-Scale Biomass Gasification Systems for Power Generation (<200 kW Class): A Review10.1016/j.rser.2019.109486 ↗
2. Biomass for Dual-Fuel Syngas Diesel Power Plants. Part I: The Effect of Preheating on Characteristics of the Syngas Gasification of Municipal Solid Waste and Wood Pellets
3. Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model Based on Stoichiometric Method for Biomass Gasification: A Review of Model Modifications10.1016/j.rser.2019.109305 ↗
4. Performance Characterization of Waste to Electric Prototype Uses a Dual Fuel Diesel Engine and a Multi-Stage Downdraft Gasification Reactor10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.964.80 ↗
5. Development of a Semi-Empirical Model for Woody Biomass Gasification Based on Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model10.1016/j.energy.2021.122894 ↗
6. Advances in Mathematical Modelling of Fluidized Bed Gasification10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.199 ↗
7. A Review of Biomass Gasification Modelling10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.003 ↗
8. Molino, A., Larocca, V., Chianese, S., and Musmarra, D. (2018). Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11040811 ↗
9. The Equivalence of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Methods for Modeling Gasification and Other Reaction Equilibria10.1016/j.rser.2020.109982 ↗
10. Gasification of Biowaste: A Critical Review and Outlooks10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.003 ↗
11. An Advanced, Comprehensive Thermochemical Equilibrium Model of a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.069 ↗
12. Thermodynamic Simulation of the Co-Gasification of Biomass and Plastic Waste for Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100771 ↗
13. Prediction and Estimation of Biomass Energy from Agricultural Residues Using Air Gasification Technology in Iran10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.109 ↗
14. Prediction and Optimisation of Syngas Production from Air Gasification of Napier Grass via Stoichiometric Equilibrium Model
15. Ayub, H.M.U., Park, S.J., and Binns, M. (2020). Biomass to Syngas: Modified Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models for Downdraft Biomass Gasification. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13205383 ↗
16. Modelling Approaches for Biomass Gasifiers: A Comprehensive Overview10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155243 ↗
17. Reduction of Tar Generated during Biomass Gasification: A Review10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.002 ↗
18. A Review of Recent Developments and Future Prospects in Gasification Systems and Their Modelling10.1016/j.rser.2020.110505 ↗
19. Purnomo Small-Scale Downdraft Gasifiers for Biomass Gasification: A Review10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.112 ↗
20. Development of a Semi-Empirical Equilibrium Model for Downdraft Gasification Systems10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.132 ↗
21. A Robust Numerical Model for Characterizing the Syngas Composition in a Downdraft Gasification Process10.1016/j.crci.2015.09.019 ↗
22. Basu, P. (2013). Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis, and Torrefacion. Practical Design and Theory, Academic Press. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-396488-5.00007-1 ↗
23. Hydrogen Production from Biomass Gasification; a Theoretical Comparison of Using Different Gasification Agents10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.096 ↗
24. Prediction of Performance of a Downdraft Gasifier Using Equilibrium Modeling for Different Biomass Materials10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00078-9 ↗
25. Eri, Q., Wu, W., and Zhao, X. (2017). Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model. Energies, 10.10.3390/en10122163 ↗
26. Thermodynamic Modelling Modification and Experimental Validation of Entrained-Flow Gasification of Biomass10.1016/j.joei.2022.06.006 ↗
27. A Semi-Empirical Approach towards Predicting Producer Gas Composition in Biomass Gasification10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.073 ↗
28. Prediction of Species Concentration in Syngas Produced through Gasification of Different Bamboo Biomasses: A Numerical Approach10.1007/s40095-022-00492-7 ↗
29. Energy Generation from Fluidized Bed Gasification of Rice Husk10.1063/1.4816496 ↗
30. Ferreira, S., Monteiro, E., Calado, L., Silva, V., Brito, P., and Vilarinho, C. (2019). Experimental and Modelling Analysis of Brewers’ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12234413 ↗
31. A Comparative Study of the Gasification of Solid Refuse Fuel in Downdraft Fixed Bed and Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactors10.1007/s12649-018-0431-6 ↗
32. Effect of Design and Operating Parameters on the Gasification Process of Biomass in a Downdraft Fixed Bed: An Experimental Study10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.130 ↗
33. Do Quasi-Equilibrium Thermodynamic Model with Empirical Equations for Air-Steam Biomass Gasification in Fluidized-Beds10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.07.017 ↗
34. Thermochemical Equilibrium Modelling of Biomass Downdraft Gasifier: Stoichiometric Models10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.022 ↗
35. Robustness Enhancement of Biomass Steam Gasification Thermodynamic Models for Biohydrogen Production: Introducing New Correction Factors10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128954 ↗
36. Development of a Modified Equilibrium Model for Biomass Pilot-Scale Fluidized Bed Gasifier Performance Predictions10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.079 ↗
37. Experimental and Predicted Approaches for Biomass Gasification with Enriched Air-Steam in a Fluidised Bed10.1177/0734242X14552555 ↗
38. Comparative Analysis of Wood and Solid Recovered Fuels Gasification in a Downdraft Fixed Bed Reactor10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.023 ↗
39. The Course and Effects of Syngas Production from Beechwood and RDF in Updraft Reactor in the Light of Experimental Tests and Numerical Calculations10.1016/j.tsep.2018.08.020 ↗
40. Improved Municipal Solid Waste Gasification Efficiency Using a Modified Downdraft Gasifier with Variations of Air Input and Preheated Air Temperature10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02486 ↗
41. Downdraft Gasification of Pellets Made of Wood, Palm-Oil Residues Respective Bagasse: Experimental Study10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.028 ↗
42. Syngas Production from Downdraft Gasification of Oil Palm Fronds10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.039 ↗
43. Study on Tar Generated from Downdraft Gasification of Oil Palm Fronds10.1155/2014/497830 ↗
44. Medium-Scale Gasification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch for Power Generation10.1007/s10163-016-0518-8 ↗
45. Fluidized Bed Gasification of Select Granular Biomaterials10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.022 ↗
46. Effects of Various Operational Parameters on Biomass Gasification Process; A Modified Equilibrium Model10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.007 ↗
47. Experimental Study on Sawdust Gasification in a Spout-Fluid Bed Reactor10.1002/er.1796 ↗
48. Performance Prediction of Fluidised Bed Gasification of Biomass Using Experimental Data-Based Simulation Models10.1007/s13399-013-0083-5 ↗
49. Gasification of Pelletized Biomass in a Pilot Scale Downdraft Gasifier10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.119 ↗
50. Results with a Bench Scale Downdraft Biomass Gasifier for Agricultural and Forestry Residues10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.028 ↗
51. A Semi-Empirical Approach to the Thermodynamic Analysis of Downdraft Gasification10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.066 ↗
52. Kashyap, P.V., Pulla, R.H., Sharma, A.K., and Sharma, P.K. (2019). Development of a Non-Stoichiometric Equilibrium Model of Downdraft Gasifier. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., 1–19.10.1080/15567036.2019.1689316 ↗
53. Air Gasification of Wood Chips, Wood Pellets and Grass Pellets in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor10.1016/j.energy.2021.121149 ↗
54. Gasification Characteristics of Steam Exploded Biomass in an Updraft Pilot Scale Gasifier10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.100 ↗
55. Gasification of Wastes in a Pilot Fluidized Bed Gasifier10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.12.019 ↗
56. Biomass Gasification in a Downdraft Gasifier with a Two-Stage Air Supply: Effect of Operating Conditions on Gas Quality10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.017 ↗
57. Comparative Studies and Analysis on Gasification of Coconut Shells and Corn Cobs in a Perforated Fixed Bed Downdraft Reactor by Admitting Air through Equally Spaced Conduits10.1007/s13399-020-00872-1 ↗
58. A Comparative Study on Gaseous Fuel Generation Capability of Biomass Materials by Thermo-Chemical Gasification Using Stoichiometric Quasi-Steady-State Model10.1007/s40095-015-0182-0 ↗
59. Energy and Exergy Analysis of Syngas Production from Different Biomasses through Air-Steam Gasification10.1007/s11708-016-0439-1 ↗
60. Modeling Biomass Gasification Using Thermodynamic Equilibrium Approach10.1007/s12010-008-8483-x ↗
61. Empirical and Chemical Equilibrium Modelling for Prediction of Biomass Gasification Products in Bubbling Fluidized Beds10.1016/j.energy.2020.117654 ↗
62. Performance Correlations for Biomass Gasifiers Using Semi-Equilibrium Non-Stoichiometric Thermodynamic Models10.1002/er.1818 ↗
63. Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production from Municipal Solid Waste Gasification through the Application of Central Composite Design: An Optimization Study10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.118 ↗
64. A Review on Biomass Gasification: Effect of Main Parameters on Char Generation and Reaction10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02900 ↗
65. Numerical Approaches and Comprehensive Models for Gasification Process: A Review10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.048 ↗
66. A Critical Review on the Influence of Process Parameters in Catalytic Co-Gasification: Current Performance and Challenges for a Future Prospectus10.1016/j.rser.2020.110382 ↗
67. Study of the Effects of Operating Factors on the Resulting Producer Gas of Oil Palm Fronds Gasification with a Single Throat Downdraft Gasifier10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.022 ↗
68. Stoichiometric Equilibrium Modelling of Corn Cob Gasification and Validation Using Experimental Analysis10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01634 ↗
69. Parametric Gasification Process of Sugarcane Bagasse for Syngas Production10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.127 ↗
70. Purnomo Design and Experimental Study of Pilot Scale Throat-Less Downdraft Gasifier Fed by Rice Husk and Wood Sawdust10.1080/14786451.2017.1383992 ↗
71. Experimental Investigation of Tar Formation and Producer Gas Composition in Biomass Steam Gasification in a 100 kW Dual Fluidised Bed Gasifier10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.144 ↗
72. A Theoretical Equation Preseting Slope in Van Krevelen Diagram for Biomass Pyrolysis
73. Experimental Study on Non-Woody Biomass Gasification in a Downdraft Gasifier10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.031 ↗
74. Downdraft Gasifier Structure and Process Improvement for High Quality and Quantity Producer Gas Production10.1016/j.joei.2017.07.005 ↗
75. Parametric Analysis of a Steady State Equilibrium-Based Biomass Gasification Model for Syngas and Biochar Production and Heat Generation10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111954 ↗
76. Indrawan, N., Kumar, A., and Kumar, S. (2018). Recent Advances in Power Generation Through Biomass and Municipal Solid Waste Gasification. Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-10-7335-9_15 ↗
77. Study on Gasification Characteristics of Pine Sawdust Using Olivine as in-Bed Material for Combustible Gas Production10.1016/j.joei.2021.03.014 ↗
78. Syngas Production from Municipal Solid Waste with a Reduced Tar Yield by Three-Stages of Air Inlet to a Downdraft Gasifier10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116509 ↗
79. Experimental Study on Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Production via Gasification of Pine Cone Particles and Wood Pellets in a Fixed Bed Downdraft Gasifier10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.175 ↗
80. Experimental Investigation of Downdraft Gasifier at Various Conditions10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.321 ↗
81. Modeling Performance of High-Temperature Biomass Gasification Process10.5402/2012/437186 ↗
82. Performance of Oil Palm Kernel Shell Gasification Using a Medium-Scale Downdraft Gasifier10.1080/15435075.2014.966266 ↗
83. Zaman, S.A., Roy, D., and Ghosh, S. (2020). Process Modelling and Optimization for Biomass Steam-Gasification Employing Response Surface Methodology. Biomass Bioenergy, 143.10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105847 ↗