Research on Defect Detection Method for Composite Materials Based on Deep Learning Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Compared to traditional industrial materials, composites have higher durability and compressive strength. However, some components may have flaws due to the manufacturing process. Traditional defect detection methods have low accuracy and cannot adapt to complex shooting environments. Aiming to address the issues of high computational requirements in traditional detection models and the lack of lightweight detection capabilities, the Ghost module is used instead of convolutional arithmetic to construct a lightweight model. To reduce the computational complexity of the feature extraction module, we have incorporated an improved Efficient Channel Attention mechanism to improve the model’s feature extraction capabilities. A rapid defect classification method is implemented to determine whether there are defects in the image or not by comparing the performance and running speed of models such as AlexNet, VGGNet, and ResNet. And ablation experiments are conducted for each model. The results show that the Ghost module model, which incorporates the improved Efficient Channel Attention mechanism, has a significant optimization effect on the convolutional neural network model. It can achieve a high accuracy rate when constructing lightweight models. It improves the running speed of the model, making it more efficient to use and deploy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710016, China
School of Software, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
Funding
Shaanxi Province Key R&D Program General Project-Industrial Field · Aviation Science Foundation · Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. N-Point Hough transform for line detection10.1016/j.jvcir.2009.01.004 ↗
2. Comparative analysis of Edge Detection techniques for SAR images10.5721/EuJRS20164912 ↗
3. Automatic thresholding for defect detection10.1016/j.patrec.2006.03.009 ↗
4. Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming10.1242/jeb.02526 ↗
5. Edge detection method of remote sensing images based on mathematical morphology of multi-structure elements10.1007/s11769-003-0057-9 ↗
6. Najar, F., Bourouis, S., Bouguila, N., and Belghith, S. (2017–3, January 30). A Comparison Between Different Gaussian-Based Mixture Models. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACS 14th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), Hammamet, Tunisia.10.1109/AICCSA.2017.108 ↗
7. Probabilistic Fusion of Pixel-Level and Superpixel-Level Hyperspectral Image Classification10.1109/TGRS.2016.2603190 ↗
8. Time-Frequency Analysis of EEG Signals and GLCM Features for Depth of Anesthesia Monitoring10.1155/2021/8430565 ↗
9. Machine learning approach for automated visual inspection of machine components10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.012 ↗
10. A vision inspection system for the surface defects of strongly reflected metal based on multi-class SVM10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.030 ↗
11. Structural damage identification based on autoencoder neural networks and deep learning10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 ↗
12. Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
13. A brief survey on semantic segmentation with deep learning10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.118 ↗
14. A convolutional neural network-based method for workpiece surface defect detection10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109185 ↗
15. Detection of a casting defect tracked by deep convolution neural network10.1007/s00170-018-1894-0 ↗
16. A fast and robust convolutional neural network-based defect detection model in product quality control10.1007/s00170-017-0882-0 ↗
17. Autonomous Structural Visual Inspection Using Region-Based Deep Learning for Detecting Multiple Damage Types10.1111/mice.12334 ↗
18. A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Object Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939201 ↗
19. An Object Detection Method Combining Multi-Level Feature Fusion and Region Channel Attention10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3057086 ↗
20. Feedback-driven loss function for small object detection10.1016/j.imavis.2021.104197 ↗
21. Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372 ↗
22. Wang, Q., Wu, B., Zhu, P., Li, P., Zuo, W., and Hu, Q. (2020, January 13–19). ECA-Net: Efficient Channel Attention for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01155 ↗
23. Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J., and Kweon, I. (2018). European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.
24. Huang, Y., Qiu, C., Guo, Y., Wang, X., and Yuan, K. (2018, January 20–24). Surface Defect Saliency of Magnetic Tile. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Munich, Germany.10.1109/COASE.2018.8560423 ↗
25. DeepCrack: Learning Hierarchical Convolutional Features for Crack Detection10.1109/TIP.2018.2878966 ↗
26. Automatic crack detection for tunnel inspection using deep learning and heuristic image post-processing10.1007/s10489-018-01396-y ↗
27. Detecting Surface Defects of Wind Tubine Blades Using an Alexnet Deep Learning Algorithm10.1587/transfun.E102.A.1817 ↗
28. He, J., Li, S., Shen, J., Liu, Y., Wang, J., and Jin, P. (2018–2, January 30). Facial Expression Recognition Based on VGGNet Convolutional Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Xi’an, China.
29. Li, M., and Tang, C. (2022, January 23–25). A hybrid training method based on deep learning for medical images classification. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE), Dalian, China.10.1109/ICISCAE55891.2022.9927695 ↗
30. Yacouby, R., and Axman, D. Probabilistic extension of precision, recall, and f1 score for more thorough evaluation of classification models. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems.