Post-Fracture Production Prediction with Production Segmentation and Well Logging: Harnessing Pipelines and Hyperparameter Tuning with GridSearchCV
Source abstract
Abstract
As the petroleum industry increasingly exploits unconventional reservoirs with low permeability and porosity, accurate predictions of post-fracture production are becoming critical for investment decisions, energy policy development, and environmental impact assessments. However, despite extensive research, accurately forecasting post-fracture production using well-log data continues to be a complex challenge. This study introduces a new method of data volume expansion, which is to subdivide the gas production of each well on the first day according to the depth of logging data, and to rely on the correlation model between petrophysical parameters and gas production to accurately combine the gas production data while matching the accuracy of the well-log data. Twelve pipelines were constructed utilizing a range of techniques to fit the regression relationship between logging parameters and post-fracture gas production These included data preprocessing methods (StandardScaler and RobustScaler), feature extraction approaches (PCA and PolynomialFeatures), and advanced machine learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest, and neural networks). Hyperparameter optimization was executed via GridSearchCV. To assess the efficacy of diverse models, metrics including the coefficient of determination (R2), standard deviation (SD), Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were invoked. Among the several pipelines explored, the PFS-NN exhibited excellent predictive capability in specific reservoir contexts. In essence, integrating machine learning with logging parameters can be used to effectively assess reservoir productivity at multi-meter formation scales. This strategy not only mitigates uncertainties endemic to reservoir exploration but also equips petroleum engineers with the ability to monitor reservoir dynamics, thereby facilitating reservoir development. Additionally, this approach provides reservoir engineers with an efficient means of reservoir performance oversight.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Oilfield Services Limited, Tianjin 300459, China
National Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploitation, Beijing 102209, China
State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
School of Ocean and Earth Science, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. China’s geopolitical economy of energy security: A theoretical and conceptual exploration10.1163/15692108-12341399 ↗
2. Optimization of Integrated Geological-engineering Design of Volume Fracturing with Fan-shaped Well Pattern10.1016/S1876-3804(23)60442-2 ↗
3. Investigation of Rupture and Slip Mechanisms of Hydraulic Fracture in Multiple-layered Formation10.2118/197054-PA ↗
4. A modeling study of the productivity of horizontal wells in hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs: Effects of fracturing interference10.1155/2021/2168622 ↗
5. Numerical study of fracture dynamics in different shale fabric facies by integrating machine learning and 3-D lattice method: A case from Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay basin, China10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110861 ↗
6. A new physics-informed method for the fracability evaluation of shale oil reservoirs
7. Data-driven prediction and evaluation on future impact of energy transition policies in smart regions10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120523 ↗
8. Robust and flexible hydrocarbon production forecasting considering the heterogeneity impact for hydraulically fractured wells10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00738 ↗
9. Noshi, C.I., Eissa, M.R., Abdalla, R.M., and Schubert, J.J. (2019, January 6–9). An intelligent data driven approach for production prediction. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.10.4043/29243-MS ↗
10. A physics-constrained long-term production prediction method for multiple fractured wells using deep learning10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110844 ↗
11. Production prediction at ultra-high water cut stage via Recurrent Neural Network10.1016/S1876-3804(20)60119-7 ↗
12. Method and practice of deep favorable shale reservoirs prediction based on machine learning10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60332-X ↗
13. Quantitative assessment of the sweet spot in marine shale oil and gas based on geology, engineering, and economics: A case study from the Eagle Ford Shale, USA10.1016/j.esr.2021.100713 ↗
14. A new ensemble machine-learning framework for searching sweet spots in shale reservoirs10.2118/204224-PA ↗
15. Niu, W., Lu, J., and Sun, Y. (2021). A production prediction method for shale gas wells based on multiple regression. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14051461 ↗
16. Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs based on deep neural networks10.46690/ager.2022.02.04 ↗
17. Han, D., Jung, J., and Kwon, S. (2020). Comparative study on supervised learning models for productivity forecasting of shale reservoirs based on a data-driven approach. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10041267 ↗
18. Wang, C., Zhao, L., Wu, S., and Song, X. (2020). Predicting the Surveillance Data in a Low-Permeability Carbonate Reservoir with the Machine-Learning Tree Boosting Method and the Time-Segmented Feature Extraction. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13236307 ↗
19. Zhang, Q., Wei, C., Wang, Y., Du, S., Zhou, Y., and Song, H. (2019). Potential for prediction of water saturation distribution in reservoirs utilizing machine learning methods. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12193597 ↗
20. Han, D., and Kwon, S. (2021). Application of machine learning method of data-driven deep learning model to predict well production rate in the shale gas reservoirs. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14123629 ↗
21. Ibrahim, N.M., Alharbi, A.A., Alzahrani, T.A., Abdulkarim, A.M., Alessa, I.A., Hameed, A.M., Albabtain, A.S., Alqahtani, D.A., Alsawwaf, M.K., and Almuqhim, A.A. (2022). Well Performance Classification and Prediction: Deep Learning and Machine Learning Long Term Regression Experiments on Oil, Gas, and Water Production. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22145326 ↗
22. A systematic machine learning method for reservoir identification and production prediction10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.002 ↗
23. Progress of the research on productivity prediction methods for stimulated reservoir volume (SRV)-fractured horizontal wells in unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs10.1007/s12517-019-4376-2 ↗
24. A comprehensive study on geometric, topological and fractal characterizations of pore systems in low-permeability reservoirs based on SEM, MICP, NMR, and X-ray CT experiments10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.02.003 ↗
25. Effects of pore-throat structure on gas permeability in the tight sandstone reservoirs of the Upper Triassic Yanchang formation in the Western Ordos Basin, China10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.076 ↗
26. Pimanov, V., Lukoshkin, V., Toktaliev, P., Iliev, O., Muravleva, E., Orlov, D., Krutko, V., Avdonin, A., Steiner, K., and Koroteev, D. (2022). On a workflow for efficient computation of the permeability of tight sandstones. arXiv.
27. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of shear stimulation of fractured reservoirs10.1029/2017JB015241 ↗
28. Core scale investigation of fluid flow in the heterogeneous porous media based on X-ray computed tomography images: Upscaling and history matching approaches10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211716 ↗
29. Investigation of pore geometry influence on fluid flow in heterogeneous porous media: A pore-scale study10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100222 ↗
30. Application of unsupervised learning and deep learning for rock type prediction and petrophysical characterization using multi-scale data10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212241 ↗
31. Shen, L., Cui, T., Liu, H., Zhu, Z., Zhong, H., Chen, Z., Yang, B., He, R., and Liu, H. (2019, January 14–16). Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in naturally fractured reservoirs using dual porosity method on parallel computers: Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in naturally fractured reservoirs. Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region, Guangzhou, China.10.1145/3293320.3293322 ↗
32. Multiporosity flow in fractured low-permeability rocks10.1002/2014WR016502 ↗
33. The parallel subdomain-levelset deflation method in reservoir simulation10.1016/j.jcp.2015.10.016 ↗
34. Numerical investigation of effects of subsequent parent-well injection on interwell fracturing interference using reservoir-geomechanics-fracturing modeling10.2118/195580-PA ↗
35. Investigation of production-induced stress changes for infill-well stimulation in Eagle Ford Shale10.2118/189974-PA ↗
36. Understanding the mechanism of interwell fracturing interference with reservoir/geomechanics/fracturing modeling in eagle ford shale10.2118/194493-PA ↗
37. Ramos-Carreño, C., Torrecilla, J.L., Carbajo-Berrocal, M., Marcos, P., and Suárez, A. (2022). scikit-fda: A Python package for functional data analysis. arXiv.
38. Yang, C., Brower-Sinning, R.A., Lewis, G.A., and Kästner, C. (2022, January 10–14). Data leakage in notebooks: Static detection and better processes. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, Rochester, MI, USA.10.1145/3551349.3556918 ↗
39. Schoenfeld, B., Giraud-Carrier, C., Poggemann, M., Christensen, J., and Seppi, K. (2018). Preprocessor selection for machine learning pipelines. arXiv.
40. Jamieson, K., and Talwalkar, A. (2016, January 9–11). Non-stochastic best arm identification and hyperparameter optimization. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Cadiz, Spain. PMLR, 2016.
41. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization
42. Hyperband: A novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization
43. Geomechanical Modeling of Cluster Wells in Shale Oil Reservoirs using GridSearchCV
44. Standardscaler, S.P. (2022, May 20). Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html.
45. Buitinck, L., Louppe, G., Blondel, M., Pedregosa, F., Mueller, A., Grisel, O., Niculae, V., Prettenhofer, P., Gramfort, A., and Grobler, J. (2024, February 01). RobustScaler: Scikit-Learn Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.RobustScaler.html.
46. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
47. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
48. Roubickova, A., Brown, N., and Brown, O. (2019, January 17). Using machine learning to reduce ensembles of geological models for oil and gas exploration. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Data Analysis and Reduction for Big Scientific Data (DRBSD-5), Denver, CO, USA.10.1109/DRBSD-549595.2019.00012 ↗
49. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
50. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
51. Werbos, P. (1974). Beyond Regression: New Tools for Prediction and Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. [Ph.D. Thesis, Committee on Applied Mathematics, Harvard University].
52. Di, H., Wang, Z., and AlRegib, G. (2018, January 14–19). Why using CNN for seismic interpretation? An investigation. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA. SEG-2018-2997155.10.1190/segam2018-2997155.1 ↗
53. Implementation of multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks to predict solution gas-oil ratio of crude oil systems10.1016/j.petlm.2018.12.002 ↗
54. Ranjan, G.S.K., Verma, A.K., and Radhika, S. (2019, January 29–31). K-nearest neighbors and grid search cv based real time fault monitoring system for industries. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Bombay, India.10.1109/I2CT45611.2019.9033691 ↗
55. A Note on Model Selection Based on the Percentage of Accuracy-Precision10.1115/1.4041844 ↗
56. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram10.1029/2000JD900719 ↗