A Critical Review of Human Jaw Biomechanical Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
The human jaw is a complex biomechanical system involving different anatomical components and an articulated muscular system devoted to its dynamical activation. The numerous actions exerted by the mandible, such as talking, eating or chewing, make its biomechanical comprehension absolutely indispensable. To date, even if research on this topic has achieved interesting outcomes using in vitro testing, thanks to the development of new apparatus and methods capable of performing more and more realistic experiments, theoretical modeling is still worthy of investigation. In light of this, nowadays, the Finite Element Method (FEM) approach constitutes certainly the most common tool adopted to investigate particular issues concerning stress–strain characterization of the human jaw. In addition, kinematics analyses, both direct and inverse, are also diffuse and reported in the literature. This manuscript aimed to propose a critical review of the most recurrent biomechanical models of the human mandible to give readers a comprehensive overview on the topic. In light of this, the numerical approaches, providing interesting outcomes, such as muscular activation profiles, condylar forces and stress–strain fields for the human oral cavity, are mainly differentiated between according to the joint degrees of freedom, the analytical descriptions of the muscular forces, the boundary conditions imposed, the kind of task and mandible anatomical structure modeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, nr. 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Picasso, B. (2012). Fondamenti di Meccanica e Biomeccanica, Springer.10.1007/978-88-470-2333-8 ↗
2. Ruggiero, A., De Stefano, M., and Rao, T.V.V. (2022). Industrial Tribology, CRC Press.
3. Biomechanics of knee joint—A review10.1007/s11465-014-0306-x ↗
4. Foot and ankle biomechanics in walking and running: A review
5. Experimental Investigation on the Bio-tribocorrosive behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy and 316 L stainless steel in two biological solutions10.1016/j.triboint.2023.109033 ↗
6. Ruggiero, A., and De Stefano, M. (2023). On the Biotribological Surfaces of Dental Implants: Investigation in the Framework of Osseointegration. Biotribology, 35–36.10.1016/j.biotri.2023.100254 ↗
7. De Stefano, M., Aliberti, S.M., and Ruggiero, A. (2022). (Bio)Tribocorrosion in Dental Implants: Principles and Techniques of Investigation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157421 ↗
8. Lanza, A., De Stefano, M., and Ruggiero, A. (2023). Investigating the optimal design of All-on-Four technique adopting finite element analysis: The aspect of framework material, kind and position of implants. Biomed. Eng. Adv., 6.10.1016/j.bea.2023.100110 ↗
9. De Stefano, M., Lanza, A., Faia, E., and Ruggiero, A. (2023). A novel ultrashort dental implant design for the reduction of the bone stress/strain: A comparative numerical investigation. Biomed. Eng. Adv., 5.10.1016/j.bea.2023.100077 ↗
10. Stress-strain and fatigue life numerical evaluation of two different dental implants considering isotropic and anisotropic human jaw10.1177/09544119231193879 ↗
11. Does the model reflect the system? When two-dimensional biomechanics is not ‘good enough’10.1098/rsif.2022.0536 ↗
12. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00244.x ↗
13. Anitua, E., Ibarra, N.L.S., and Rotaeche, L.S. (2023). Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible: Biomechanical Analysis of Different Implant Configurations via Finite Element Analysis. Dent. J., 11.10.3390/dj11010004 ↗
14. Mandibular stiffness in humans: Numerical predictions10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.022 ↗
15. Ansoms, P., Barzegari, M., Sloten, J.V., and Geris, L. (2023). Coupling biomechanical models of implants with biodegradation models: A case study for biodegradable mandibular bone fixation plates. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 147.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106120 ↗
16. A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible10.11607/jomi.3910 ↗
17. Systematic review and pooled analysis of survival rates, success, and outcomes of osseointegrated implants in a variety of composite free flaps10.1002/hed.26238 ↗
18. Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible10.1054/jcms.2000.0125 ↗
19. Ballistic Impact to the Forehead, Zygoma, and Mandible: Comparison of Human and Frangible Dummy Face Biomechanics10.1097/01.TA.0000064209.21216.4E ↗
20. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: A finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005 ↗
21. Biomechanical comparison of different plating techniques in repair of mandibular angle fractures10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.014 ↗
22. Temporomandibular Joint: Disorders, Treatments, and Biomechanics10.1007/s10439-009-9659-4 ↗
23. Zhong, S., Shi, Q., Sun, Y., Yang, S., Dessel, V.J., Gu, Y., Chen, X., Lübbers, H.-T., and Politis, C. (2021). Biomechanical comparison of locking and non-locking patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate using finite element analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 124.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104849 ↗
24. Do erupted third molars weaken the mandibular angle after trauma to the chin region? A 3D finite element study10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.009 ↗
25. Impact of the lower third molar presence and position on the fragility of mandibular angle and condyle: A Three-dimensional finite element study10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.025 ↗
26. Huys, S.E.F., Keelson, B., Brucker, Y., Gompel, G.V., Mey, J., Sloten, J.V., and Buls, N. (2022). The use of dynamic CT imaging for tracking mandibular movements in a phantom. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express, 9.10.1088/2057-1976/aca336 ↗
27. Experimental occlusal interferences. Part I. A review10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01197.x ↗
28. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.002 ↗
29. The mandibular muscles and their importance in orthodontics: A contemporary review10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.023 ↗
30. Biomechanical evaluation of the human mandible after temporomandibular joint replacement under different biting conditions10.1038/s41598-021-93564-3 ↗
31. Development of a static simulator of the mandible10.1054/jcms.2000.0149 ↗
32. Biomechanics and functional distortion of the human mandible10.1111/jicd.12112 ↗
33. Modeling of jaw biomechanics in the reconstructed mandibulectomy patient10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70244-1 ↗
34. Muscular activity and chewing force: A polygraphic study of human mandibular movements10.1016/0003-9969(70)90053-1 ↗
35. EMG activities of two heads of the human lateral pterygoid muscle in relation to mandibular condyle movement and biting force10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2120 ↗
36. Occlusal load modelling significantly impacts the predicted tooth stress response during biting: A simulation study10.1080/10255842.2020.1711886 ↗
37. Shi, Q., Sun, Y., Yang, S., Dessel, J.V., Lübbers, H.T., Zhong, S., Gu, Y., Bila, M., and Politis, C. (2021). Preclinical study of additive manufactured plates with shortened lengths for complete mandible reconstruction: Design, biomechanics simulation, and fixation stability assessment. Comput. Biol. Med., 139.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105008 ↗
38. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible10.1002/ajpa.1330880107 ↗
39. Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching10.1177/00220345940730010801 ↗
40. Biomechanics of the human temporomandibular joint during chewing10.1177/154405910308200708 ↗
41. Biomechanics of the weakened mandible: Use of image correlation analysis10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.04.266 ↗
42. Prasadh, S., Suresh, S., Hong, K.L., Bhargav, A., Rosa, V., and Wong, R.C.W. (2020). Biomechanics of alloplastic mandible reconstruction using biomaterials: The effect of implant design on stress concentration influences choice of material. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 103.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103548 ↗
43. Numerical and Experimental Models of the Mandible10.1007/s11340-010-9403-x ↗
44. A mathematical model of an in vitro human mandible10.1016/0021-9290(77)90054-9 ↗
45. Mandibular biomechanics and development of the human chin10.1177/154405910608500711 ↗
46. Aftabi, H., Zaraska, K., Eghbal, A., McGregor, S., Prisman, E., Hodgson, A., and Fels, S. (2023). Computational models and their applications in biomechanical analysis of mandibular reconstruction surgery. Comput. Biol. Med., 169.10.21203/rs.3.rs-2939858/v1 ↗
47. Modelling of mandible bone properties in the numerical analysis of oral implant biomechanics10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.03.006 ↗
48. Biomechanical response of the human mandible to impacts of the chin10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.020 ↗
49. A jaw model for the study of the mandibular flexure taking into account the anisotropy of the bone10.1016/j.mcm.2008.12.029 ↗
50. A new way of evaluating the biomechanics of the mandible with freedom in three axes in space: Technical note10.1016/j.ajoms.2018.03.011 ↗
51. An experimental and theoretical composite model of the human mandible10.1007/s10856-005-4728-1 ↗
52. Biomechanics of mandibular reconstruction: A review10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.003 ↗
53. Treatment Planning the Edentulous Mandible. Review of Biomechanical and Clinical Considerations: An Update10.11607/jomi.7196 ↗
54. Biomechanics of the Mandible10.1177/10454411000110010101 ↗
55. The Temporomandibular Joint: A Critical Review of Life-Support Functions, Development, Articular Surfaces, Biomechanics and Degeneration10.1111/jopr.13203 ↗
56. Review of biomechanical models used in studying the biomechanics of reconstructed mandibles10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.023 ↗
57. Mathematical modeling and structural analysis of the mandible10.3109/10731197309118557 ↗
58. Dynamic modeling and jaw biomechanics10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.236.x ↗
59. The morphology of the human mandible: A computational modelling study10.1007/s10237-019-01133-5 ↗
60. Establishment of sequential software processing for a biomechanical model of mandibular reconstruction with custom-made plate10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.024 ↗
61. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.09.001 ↗
62. Differences between the chewing and non-chewing sides of the mandibular first molars and condyles in the closing phase during chewing in normal subjects10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.05.006 ↗
63. Impact of balancing-side tooth contact on clenching induced mandibular displacements in humans10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00705.x ↗
64. Kinematics of the human mandible for different head postures10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00518.x ↗
65. Ambrósio, J.A.C., and Kecskeméthy, A. (2007). Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, Springer.
66. Winters, J.M. (1990). Multiple Muscle Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4613-9030-5 ↗
67. Nonlinearities make a difference: Comparison of two common Hill-type models with real muscle10.1007/s00422-007-0197-6 ↗
68. Sensitivity of subject-specific models to Hill muscle–tendon model parameters in simulations of gait10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.04.008 ↗
69. Computational cardiology: A modified Hill model to describe the electro-visco-elasticity of the myocardium10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.009 ↗
70. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle
71. The mechanics of active muscle
72. A numerical model of passive and active behavior of skeletal muscles10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00162-X ↗
73. Rapid identification of muscle activation profiles via optimization and smooth profile patches
74. A finite element model of skeletal muscles10.1080/17452750601040626 ↗
75. The biomechanics of the human tongue10.1002/cnm.2531 ↗
76. Modeling elastic properties in finite-element analysis: How much precision is needed to produce an accurate model?10.1002/ar.a.20172 ↗
77. Establishment of a three-dimensional finite element model for gunshot wounds to the human mandible10.1016/S1000-1948(12)60010-0 ↗
78. The adaptive response of jaw muscles to varying functional demands10.1093/ejo/cjp093 ↗
79. Establishing the biomechanical properties of the pelvic soft tissues through an inverse finite element analysis using magnetic resonance imaging10.1177/0954411916630571 ↗
80. Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics10.1002/ajpa.1330800404 ↗
81. Hamma, A., Boisson, J., Serantoni, V., and Dallard, J. (2022). Identification of a visco-hyperelastic model for mandibular periosteum. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 133.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105323 ↗
82. A transversely isotropic visco-hyperelastic constitutive model for soft tissues
83. A transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic material: Application to the modeling of biological soft connective tissues10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.057 ↗
84. An anisotropic hyperelastic model with an application to soft tissues10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103845 ↗
85. Role of anisotropic invariants in numerically modeling soft biological tissues as transversely isotropic hyperelastic materials: A comparative study10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.103833 ↗
86. A robust anisotropic hyperelastic formulation for the modelling of soft tissue10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.016 ↗
87. A general framework for the numerical implementation of anisotropic hyperelastic material models including non-local damage10.1007/s10237-017-0875-9 ↗
88. Realistic kinetic loading of the jaw system during single chewing cycles: A finite element study10.1111/joor.12501 ↗
89. Three-dimensional finite element modelling of muscle forces during mastication10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.011 ↗
90. Stress Analysis of Temporomandibular Joint Disc During Maintained Clenching Using a Viscohyperelastic Finite Element Model10.1016/j.joms.2013.11.031 ↗
91. Effect of bilateral asymmetric tooth clenching on load distribution at the mandibular condyles10.1016/0022-3913(90)90154-5 ↗
92. Biomechanical model of the human mandible in unilateral clench: Distribution of temporomandibular joint reaction forces between working and balancing sides10.1016/0022-3913(94)90076-0 ↗
93. Dynamics of the human masticatory muscles during a jaw open-close movement10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00047-X ↗
94. The role of passive muscle tensions in a three-dimensional dynamic model of the human jaw10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00034-5 ↗
95. Dynamic simulation of muscle and articular properties during human wide jaw opening10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00071-6 ↗
96. Biomechanical calculation of human TM joint loading with jaw opening10.1111/j.1365-2842.2000.00582.x ↗
97. Combined finite-element and rigid-body analysis of human jaw joint dynamics10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.014 ↗
98. Three-dimensional modelling and finite element analysis of the human mandible during clenching10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00084.x ↗
99. A dynamic model of jaw and hyoid biomechanics during chewing10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.001 ↗
100. Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge Finite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.03.004 ↗