Interactive Airfoil Optimization Using Parsec Parametrization and Adjoint Method
Source abstract
Abstract
In the development of interactive aerodynamic optimization tools, the need to reduce the computational complexity of flow calculations has arisen. Computational complexity can be reduced by estimating the flow variables using machine learning, but that approach has a number of hindrances. Avoiding these hindrances through lowering the computational complexity by stating the assumptions of inviscid incompressible potential flow is the focus of this article. The assumptions used restrict the applicability of this approach to only specific cases, but in engineering practice, these cases are quite widespread. The assumptions allowed the coupling of the adjoint method with parsec parametrization and the panel method, yielding a highly computationally efficient and robust tool for optimizing an airfoil’s lift coefficient (Cy). The optimization of the NREL S809 airfoil was carried out, and the results were verified using the Xfoil 6.99 software. The Xfoil verification showed that by making minimal changes to the airfoil’s shape, the Cy and lift-to-drag ratios were significantly improved. The improvement magnitude was over 94% for a 0 deg angle of attack (AoA) and over 16% for 6.2 deg AoA. This indicates an improvement in performance that is similar to that of some genetic algorithms, but with computational costs that are many orders of magnitude lower.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 1902/4 Prague 6–Dejvice, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic
Funding
Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100849 ↗
2. Aerodynamic design optimization by using a continuous adjoint method10.1007/s11433-014-5479-0 ↗
3. Jameson, A. (2003). Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method, The von Kármán Institute. Available online: http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/Papers/jameson.vki03.pdf.
4. An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design10.1023/A:1011430410075 ↗
5. Monfaredi, M., Asouti, V., Trompoukis, X., Tsiakas, K., and Giannakoglou, K. (2023). Aeroacoustic and Aerodynamic Adjoint-Based Shape Optimization of an Axisymmetric Aero-Engine Intake. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10090743 ↗
6. Aerodynamic Optimization of Supersonic Transport Wing Using Unstructured Adjoint Method10.2514/2.1441 ↗
7. Study on adjoint-based optimization method for multi-stage turbomachinery10.1007/s11630-011-0487-0 ↗
8. Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory10.1007/BF01061285 ↗
9. Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations10.1007/s001620050060 ↗
10. Airfoil Parameterization Techniques: A Review10.12691/ajme-2-4-1 ↗
11. Geometric Comparison of Aerofoil Shape Parameterization Methods10.2514/1.J054943 ↗
12. Cantwell, B.J. (2023, October 10). The NACA Airfoil Series. STANFORD UNIVERSITY, Index of /~cantwell/AA200_Course_Material. Available online: https://web.stanford.edu/~cantwell/AA200_Course_Material/The%20NACA%20airfoil%20series.pdf.
13. Akram, M.T., and Kim, M.H. (2021). Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of NREL S809 Airfoil for Wind Turbine Blades Using Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes Model—Part II. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052211 ↗
14. Ziemkiewicz, D. (2016). Simple analytic equation for airfoil shape description. arXiv.
15. Parametric Airfoils and Wings
16. Khurana, M., Winarto, H., and Sinha, A. (2009, January 5–8). Airfoil Optimisation by Swarm Algorithm with Mutation and Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2009-1278 ↗
17. An airfoil shape optimization technique coupling PARSEC parameterization and evolutionary algorithm10.1016/j.ast.2013.11.006 ↗
18. Airfoil aerodynamics optimization under uncertain operating conditions10.1088/1742-6596/1446/1/012014 ↗
19. Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization10.1007/978-3-642-20859-1_10 ↗
20. Alonso, J.J. (2023, September 08). Hess-Smith Panel Method: AA200b—Applied Aerodynamics II—Lecture 3. 2005. Available online: http://aero-comlab.stanford.edu/aa200b/lect_notes/lect3-4.pdf.
21. Surrogate model based uncertainty quantification of CFD simulations of the viscous flow around a ship advancing in shallow water10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109206 ↗
22. Cravero, C., De Domenico, D., and Marsano, D. (2023). The Use of Uncertainty Quantification and Numerical Optimization to Support the Design and Operation Management of Air-Staging Gas Recirculation Strategies in Glass Furnaces. Fluids, 8.10.3390/fluids8020076 ↗
23. Broniszewski, J., and Piechna, J.R. (2022). Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Competitive Car during Brake-in-Turn Manoeuvre. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15082917 ↗
24. Collicott, S.H., Valentine, D.T., Houghton, E.L., and Carpenter, P.W. (2013). Aerodynamics for Engineering Students, Butterworth-Heinemann. [6th ed.].
25. Caldwell, A.L. (1949). Solutions of the Two-Dimensional, Subsonic Flow About an Airfoil. [Master’s Thesis, Oregon State College].
26. Ramsay, R.R., Hoffmann, M.J., and Gregorek, G.M. (1995). Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S809 Airfoil, The Ohio State University.10.2172/205563 ↗
27. Sommers, D.M. (1997). Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.10.2172/437668 ↗