journal article·2024-02-25Open access

Waferless Orthognathic Surgery with Customized Osteosynthesis and Surgical Guides: A Prospective Study

Marc Espino-Segura-Illa, Octavi Camps-Font, Ada Ferrer-Fuertes, Fran Cuesta-González, Ignacio Zubillaga-Rodríguez, Ramón Sieira-Gil

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to describe and to evaluate the accuracy of a protocol that involves CAD/CAM-generated cutting guides and customized titanium plates for waferless orthognathic surgery. Twenty-one patients consecutively treated between January 2021 and January 2023 were included. The preoperative virtual surgical plan (VSP) was compared with the final position determined from the postoperative CT scan and STL files. An alignment algorithm was employed to adjust the skull position in areas unaffected by the surgery. Absolute and signed deviations were calculated across all three dimensions for each maxilla, mandible and chin landmark. The accuracy analysis revealed an overall deviation of 0.93 mm (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.86 to 0.99), which was < 2 mm for all assessed landmarks (p < 0.05; one-sample t-test). The mandibular landmarks showed greater deviation than the maxillary ones (p < 0.001; independent-samples t-test). Considering the deviations along the three axes, statistically significant differences were identified (p < 0.001; one-way analysis of variance). The reported protocol provides evidence on the benefit of guided orthognathic surgery when performed using a defined VSP protocol, improving accuracy in the maxilla, mandible and chin position, considered both globally and as isolated variables.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Digital Imaging in Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facial Plastic and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery, SIES Maxillofacial, 08011 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL) Research Institute, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínic and Barnaclínic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, 28041 Madrid, Spain

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Three-dimensional treatment planning of orthognathic surgery in the era of virtual imaging10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.007 ↗
2. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing locating guides accompanied with prebent titanium plates in orthognathic surgery10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.017 ↗
3. Redefining precision and efficiency in orthognathic surgery through virtual surgical planning and 3D printing: A narrative review10.1186/s40902-023-00409-2 ↗
4. Accuracy of upper jaw positioning with intermediate splint fabrication after virtual planning in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829a80d9 ↗
5. Comparison of the accuracy of the three-dimensional virtual method and the conventional manual method for model surgery and intermediate wafer fabrication10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.002 ↗
6. Accuracy of orthognathic surgery using 3D computer-assisted surgical simulation
7. Accuracy of the Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation (CASS) System in the Treatment of Patients With Complex Craniomaxillofacial Deformity: A Pilot Study10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.005 ↗
8. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.040 ↗
9. Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery10.1016/j.cxom.2004.10.004 ↗
10. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.058 ↗
11. How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery?10.1016/j.ijom.2008.06.011 ↗
12. Accuracy evaluation of CAD/CAM generated splints in orthognathic surgery: A cadaveric study10.1186/s13005-015-0082-9 ↗
13. A new approach of splint-less orthognathic surgery using a personalized orthognathic surgical guide system: A preliminary study10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.025 ↗
14. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.028 ↗
15. Computer-aided Surgical Planning and Osteosynthesis Plates for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Study of 14 Consecutive Patients10.1097/GOX.0000000000004609 ↗
16. Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.027 ↗
17. Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates10.1016/j.ijom.2020.08.009 ↗
18. STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297 ↗
19. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9 ↗
20. Accuracy and cost effectiveness of a waferless osteotomy approach, using patient specific guides and plates in orthognathic surgery: A systematic review10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.005 ↗
21. The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.008 ↗
22. A paradigm shift in orthognathic surgery? A comparison of navigation, computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured splints, and “classic” intermaxillary splints to surgical transfer of virtual orthognathic planning10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.007 ↗
23. Accuracy of splint vs splintless technique for virtually planned orthognathic surgery: A voxel-based three-dimensional analysis10.1016/j.jcms.2020.11.008 ↗
24. Custom made cutting guides and osteosynthesis plates versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in positioning and fixation of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized study10.1016/j.jcms.2022.05.010 ↗
25. Splintless surgery using patient-specific osteosynthesis in Le Fort I osteotomies: A randomized controlled multi-centre trial10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.005 ↗
26. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillofacial virtual surgery10.1097/scs.0b013e318068434b ↗
27. Surgical accuracy in Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies10.1054/bjom.2000.0577 ↗
28. Accuracy of orthognathic surgery with customized titanium plates—Systematic review10.1016/j.jormas.2020.06.011 ↗
29. Psychological profiles in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery or rhinoplasty: A preoperative and preliminary comparison10.1007/s10006-019-00758-1 ↗
30. Psychodynamic Features Associated With Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparison Between Conventional Orthognathic Treatment and “Surgery-First” Approach10.1016/j.joms.2018.06.005 ↗
31. Biomechanical influence of plate configurations on mandible subcondylar fracture fixation: A finite element study10.1007/s11517-023-02854-7 ↗
32. Failure load and stress analysis of orthodontic miniscrews with different transmucosal collar diameter10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.032 ↗