journal article·2024-02-23Open access

Comparative Study of Droplet Diameter Distribution: Insights from Experimental Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations

Kasimhussen Vhora, Gábor Janiga, Heike Lorenz, Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern, Maria F. Gutierrez, Peter Schulze

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

The interfacial area between two phases plays a crucial role in the mass transfer rate of gas–liquid processes such as absorption. In this context, the droplet size distribution within the flow field of a droplet-based absorber significantly affects the surface area, thereby influencing the absorption efficiency. This study focuses on developing a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to predict the size and distribution of water droplets free-falling in a transparent square tube. This model serves as a digital twin of our experimental setup, enabling a comparative analysis of experimental and computational results. For the accurate measurement of droplet size and distribution, specialized experimental equipment was developed, and a high-speed camera along with Fiji software was used for the capturing and processing of droplet images. At the point of injection and at two different heights, the sizes and distributions of falling droplets were measured using this setup. The interaction between the liquid water droplets and the gas phase within the square tube was modeled using the Eulerian–Lagrangian (E-L) framework in the STAR-CCM+ software. The E-L multiphase CFD model yielded approximations with errors ranging from 11 to 27% for various average mean diameters, including d10, d20, d30, and d32, of the liquid droplets at two distinct heights (200 mm and 400 mm) for both nozzle plates. This comprehensive approach provides valuable insights into the dynamics of droplet-based absorption processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physical and Chemical Foundations of Process Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany

Laboratory of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, University of Magdeburg “Otto von Guericke”, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany

Funding

BMBF

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Droplet size measurements for spray dryer scale-up10.1080/10837450701830957 ↗
2. Characterization of the spray droplets and spray pattern by means of innovative optical microscopy measurement method with the high-speed camera10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122412 ↗
3. In situ droplet microgoniometry using optical microscopy10.1021/acsnano.9b06687 ↗
4. Measurement of the size distribution of multimodal colloidal systems by laser diffraction10.1021/acsomega.1c00411 ↗
5. A review on applications of computational fluid dynamics
6. Evaporative cooling by water spray systems: CFD simulation, experimental validation and sensitivity analysis10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.022 ↗
7. Lagrangian and Eulerian models for simulating turbulent dispersion and coalescence of droplets within a spray10.1016/j.apm.2006.02.001 ↗
8. Development of an axisymmetric population balance model for spray drying and validation against experimental data and CFD simulations10.1016/j.cherd.2013.12.019 ↗
9. Chot-Plassot, P., Vignes, A., Murillo, C., Lacome, J.M., El-Zahlanieh, S., Bardin-monnier, N., and Dufaud, O. (2022, January 5–8). Combining CFD and Experimental Approaches to Optimize a Spray Release in a 20 L Sphere. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industry, Prague, Czech Republic.
10. Influence of the particle injection rate, droplet size distribution and volume flux angular distribution on the results and computational time of water spray CFD simulations10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.040 ↗
11. Frühhaber, J., Lieber, C., Mattes, D., Lauer, T., Koch, R., and Bauer, H.J. (2020). Modeling the Formation of Urea-Water Sprays from an Air-Assisted Nozzle. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165723 ↗
12. Mahmud, H.I., Thorpe, G., and Moinuddin, K.A. (2022). An Approach to Determine the Median Diameter of Droplets in a Water-Mist Spray. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12031073 ↗
13. Rossano, V., and De Stefano, G. (2022). Hybrid VOF–Lagrangian CFD Modeling of Droplet Aerobreakup. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12168302 ↗
14. Mass transfer and kinetics in spray-tower-loop absorbers and reactors10.1021/ie000137y ↗
15. Numerical investigation of particle spray size distribution in turbulent jet flow10.21608/erj.2022.242558 ↗
16. Bade, K., Kalata, W., and Schick, R. (2010, January 17–19). Experimental and computational study of a spray at multiple injection angles. Proceedings of the ILASS Americas, 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
17. Spray absorption of CO2 into monoethanolamine: Mass transfer coefficients, dropsize, and planar surface area10.1016/j.cherd.2015.08.012 ↗
18. Interfacial area measurements and surface area quantification for spray absorption10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.017 ↗
19. Novel spray tower for CO2 capture using uniform spray of monosized absorbent droplets10.1021/acs.iecr.7b05309 ↗
20. Experimental measurements of droplet size and velocity distributions at the outlet of a pressurized water reactor containment swirling spray nozzle10.1615/AtomizSpr.2012004171 ↗
21. Measuring bubble, drop and particle sizes in multiphase systems with ultrasound10.1002/aic.10203 ↗
22. Measurements of droplet size in shear-driven atomization using ultra-small angle X-ray scattering10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.03.005 ↗
23. High-speed monodisperse droplet generation by ultrasonically controlled micro-jet breakup10.1007/s00348-014-1716-6 ↗
24. Evaluation of droplets size distribution and velocity pattern using Computational Fluid Dynamics modelling10.1016/j.compag.2019.104886 ↗
25. Computational fluid dynamics simulation experimental verification and analysis of droplets deposition behaviour on vibrating pear leaves10.1186/s13007-022-00914-x ↗
26. Wirz, D., Friebel, A., Rave, K., Hermes, M., Skoda, R., von Harbou, E., and Bart, H.J. (2022). Experimental Investigation and Modelling of the Droplet Size in a DN300 Stirred Vessel at High Disperse Phase Content Using a Telecentric Shadowgraphic Probe. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12084069 ↗
27. Melnikova, V.G., Epikhin, A.S., and Kraposhin, M.V. (2021). The Eulerian–Lagrangian Approach for the Numerical Investigation of an Acoustic Field Generated by a High-Speed Gas-Droplet Flow. Fluids, 6.10.3390/fluids6080274 ↗
28. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
29. Liu, H. (1999). Science and Engineering of Droplets: Fundamentals and Applications, William Andrew.
30. Normal impact force of Rayleigh jets10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.113603 ↗
31. Rueden, C.T., Schindelin, J., Hiner, M.C., DeZonia, B.E., Walter, A.E., Arena, E.T., and Eliceiri, K.W. (2017). ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform., 18.10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
32. A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding10.1109/83.366472 ↗
33. Application of ImageJ program to the enumeration of Orientia tsutsugamushi organisms cultured in vitro10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.05.004 ↗
34. Sauter, J. (1926). Die Grössenbestimmung der im Gemischnebel von Verbrennungskraftmaschinen Vorhandenen Brennstoffteilchen (Mitteilg aus d. Laboratorium f. techn. Physik d. Techn. Hochschule München), VDI-Verlag. Forschungsarbeiten auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens.
35. Wilcox, D. (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries.
36. (STAR-CCM+, 2020). STAR-CCM+, Software Manual.
37. Understanding the liquid jet break-up in various regimes at elevated pressure using a compressible VOF-LPT coupled framework10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104303 ↗
38. O’Rourke, P.J. (1981). Collective Drop Effects on Vaporizing Liquid Sprays. [Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University].
39. Ferziger, J.H., and Perić, M. (2002). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2 ↗
40. Extended lognormal distribution: Properties and applications
41. Mesh size effect on CFD simulation of gas-fluidized Geldart A particles10.1016/j.powtec.2014.05.019 ↗
42. Li, D. (2008). Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-48998-8 ↗