journal article·2024-02-21Open access

Optimizing Logistics and Transportation Locations in the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor: A Strategic Risk Assessment

Muhammad Ilyas, Zhihong Jin, Irfan Ullah

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

Logistics centers (LCs) have become a critical component of supply chain networks, playing an essential role in the development and implementation of logistics and supply chain management strategies. Recognizing the importance of LCs, Pakistan and China have initiated an extensive plan to establish and expand an LC system as part of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) initiative. However, the implementation of this plan has faced challenges due to the inadequate prioritization of factors used to identify LCs. This research proposes a structured framework for selecting LC locations, employing a combination of fuzzy logic and the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS). These widely used methods address various challenges encountered in location selection. The findings highlight crucial logistics hubs in China and Pakistan, emphasizing factors such as port accessibility, freight demand, and transportation costs. The prioritization of criteria for LC selection is determined through the evaluation of variables and alternatives. The proposed framework enhances decision-making based on multiple criteria by addressing uncertainty and subjective assessments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Belt and Road Initiative · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Transportation Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Department of Business and Administration, ILMA University, Karachi 75190, Pakistan

Funding

Belt and Road Program of China Association for Science and Technology · Joint Program of Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · Leading Talents Support Program of Dalian Municipal Government · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China · European Commission Horizon 2020 · Leading Talents Support Program of Dalian · Liaoning Provincial Education Department 2021 Scientific Research Funding Program

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Heterogeneity of logistics facilities: An issue for a better understanding and planning of the location of logistics facilities10.1186/s12544-018-0341-5 ↗
2. Hu, F., Qiu, L., Wei, S., Zhou, H., Bathuure, I.A., and Hu, H. (2023). The spatiotemporal evolution of global innovation networks and the changing position of China: A social network analysis based on cooperative patents. RD Manag.10.1111/radm.12662 ↗
3. CPEC Official Website (2017, January 01). China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Available online: http://cpec.gov.pk/.
4. Burki, S.J. (2018). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Regional Cooperation and Socio-Economic Development, Springer.
5. Zafar, S. (2019). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative: Concept, Context and Assessment, Routledge.
6. Logistics centers in the new industrial era: A proposed framework for logistics center 4.010.1016/j.tre.2020.101864 ↗
7. Decision analysis of warehouse productivity performance indicators to enhance logistics operational efficiency10.1108/IJPPM-06-2021-0373 ↗
8. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229 ↗
9. Accelerated green patent examination and innovation benefits: An analysis of private economic value and public environmental benefits10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123105 ↗
10. Livolsi, L., and Camman, C. (2023). Maritime Ports, Supply Chains and Logistics Corridors, Routledge.
11. Luo, J., Zhuo, W., and Xu, B. (2023). The bigger, the better? Optimal NGO size of human resources and governance quality of entrepreneurship in circular economy. Manag. Decis.10.1108/MD-03-2023-0325 ↗
12. Agility and Resilience in Logistics Management: Supply chain optimization
13. Changes in Corporate Social Responsibility Efficiency in Chinese Food Industry Brought by COVID-19 Pandemic—A Study with the Super-Efficiency DEA-Malmquist-Tobit Model10.3389/fpubh.2022.875030 ↗
14. A review on different pipeline fault detection methods10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.010 ↗
15. An innovative decision-making framework for evaluating transportation service providers based on sustainable criteria10.1080/00207543.2019.1652779 ↗
16. The Emerging Dimensions of China–Pakistan Economic Cooperation and CPEC: Significance and Challenges10.1007/s40647-022-00354-w ↗
17. Ho, T.-C., and Lee, H.-S. (2022). Application of Fuzzy Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS for Selecting an International Crew Change Center in Taiwan. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10101538 ↗
18. Dong, F., Jin, B., Chen, Z., and Zhang, C. (2023, January 2–4). Logistics Center Location Based on AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM 2023), Nanchang, China.10.2991/978-94-6463-256-9_110 ↗
19. Analysis of the barriers to implementing horizontal collaborative transport using a hybrid fuzzy Delphi-AHP approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128943 ↗
20. Location selection for logistics center with fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo methods10.3233/JIFS-191400 ↗
21. Logistics performances of Gulf Cooperation Council’s countries in global supply chains10.31181/dmame2104174s ↗
22. Baghestani, A., Abbasi, M., Rastegar, S., Mamdoohi, A.R., Afaghpoor, A., and Saffarzadeh, M. (2023). Logistics Village Location with Capacity Planning Problem, an MILP Model Approach. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15054633 ↗
23. A hybrid model for distribution center location selection10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.10.003 ↗
24. A game theoretical approach to emergency logistics planning in natural disasters10.1007/s10479-021-04099-9 ↗
25. Path analysis for proposed framework of SCM excellence in Indian manufacturing in-dustry10.1108/JMTM-08-2015-0059 ↗
26. Flexible sensing enabled packaging performance optimization system (FS-PPOS) for lamb loss reduction control in E-commerce supply chain10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109394 ↗
27. Matthiessen, P. (2017). Individuals, Institutions, and Ideals. Life in the Himalaya: An Ecosystem at Risk, Harvard University Press.
28. The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.011 ↗
29. Fernie, J., and Leigh, S. (2018). Logistics and Retail Management: Emerging Issues and New Challenges in the Retail Supply Chain, Kogan Page Publishers.
30. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning10.1016/0305-9006(88)90012-8 ↗
31. An agent-based approach for energy-efficient sensor networks in logistics10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107198 ↗
32. Applications Of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Supply Chain Management: A Com-prehensive Review
33. Johnson, D., and Emmanouil, C. (2021, January 16–17). Innovative last mile delivery concepts: Evaluating last mile delivery using a traffic simulator. Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), Heraklion, Greece.10.1109/MT-ITS49943.2021.9529279 ↗
34. An integrated information fusion and grey multi-criteria decision-making framework for sustainable supplier selection
35. Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104559 ↗
36. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304 ↗
37. Ghiani, G., Laporte, G., and Musmanno, R. (2004). Introduction to Logistics Systems Planning and Control, Wiley.10.1002/0470014040 ↗
38. A GIS-LP integrated approach for the logistics hub location problem10.1016/j.cie.2020.106488 ↗
39. Robust multi-criteria decision making methodology for real life logistics center location problem10.1007/s10462-019-09763-y ↗
40. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system10.1007/s11269-010-9713-x ↗
41. Evaluation of logistics centers in terms of sustainability via MCDM methods10.1108/JAMR-04-2022-0087 ↗
42. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7 ↗
43. Saffie, N.A.M., Shukor, N.M., and Rasmani, K.A. (2016, January 24–27). Fuzzy delphi method: Issues and challenges. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), Sydney, Australia.10.1109/LISS.2016.7854490 ↗
44. The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and ap-plications10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002 ↗
45. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus
46. An approach to generalization of fuzzy TOPSIS method10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.049 ↗
47. An integrated fuzzy topsis method for ranking alternatives and its application10.51400/2709-6998.2174 ↗
48. Fuzzy logic approach in mode choice modelling for education trips: A case study of indian metropolitan city10.3846/16484142.2015.1081279 ↗
49. Perceptual maps to aggregate assessments from different rating profiles: A hesitant fuzzy linguistic approach10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110803 ↗