journal article·2023-12-30Open access

Local Stiffness Assessment of Geogrid-Stabilized Unbound Aggregates in a Large-Scale Testbed

Mingu Kang, Han Wang, Issam I. A. Qamhia, Erol Tutumluer, Jeb S. Tingle

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper integrates and extends an earlier article presented at the 20th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. The generation of a stiffened zone in the proximity of a geogrid is one of the primary mechanisms of mechanical stabilization of pavement unbound aggregate layers using geogrids. This paper focuses on the quantification of the stiffened zone through a local stiffness assessment using bender element (BE) sensors. Unbound aggregate base layers were constructed in a large-scale laboratory testbed. Geogrid-stabilized layers had geogrids with different-sized triangular apertures contributing to the geogrid-stiffened zone. Shear wave velocities were measured at three different heights using BE sensors, and the vertical stiffness profiles of the mechanically stabilized aggregate layers were evaluated. In addition, the conversion method between small-strain stiffness and large-strain stiffness was established from the repeated load triaxial tests with BE pairs to transform the vertical stiffness profile into that of the resilient modulus. Furthermore, dynamic cone penetration (DCP) and light-weight deflectometer (LWD) tests were performed at multiple locations into the stabilized and unstabilized unbound aggregates. From the large-scale experimental study, the local stiffness improvement owing to the geogrid enhancement was up to 16.2% in the vicinity of the geogrid location, and the extent of the local stiffened zone evaluated through various test methods was between 15.2 cm (6 in.) and 25.4 cm (10 in.) above the geogrid.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, University of St. Thomas, 2115 Summit Ave., St. Paul, MN 55105, USA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801, USA

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA

Funding

US Army Corps of Engineers

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Giroud, J.P. (2009, January 8). An Assessment of the Use of Geogrids in Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Areas. Proceedings of the Jubilee Symposium on Polymer Geogrid Reinforcement, London, UK.
2. The Use of Geosynthetics in Roads10.1680/jgein.21.00046 ↗
3. Geosynthetic-Reinforced Embankments over Soft Foundations10.1680/gein.2005.12.1.50 ↗
4. Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes at Failure10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:8(670) ↗
5. Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported Embankments: State of the Art10.1680/jgein.20.00005 ↗
6. Barker, W.R. (1987). Open-Graded Bases for Airfield Pavements, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station.
7. Webster, S.L. (1992). Geogrid Reinforced Base Courses for Flexible Pavements for Light Aircraft: Test Section Construction, Behavior under Traffic, Laboratory Tests, and Design Criteria, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
8. Full-Scale Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Aggregate Roads10.3141/2116-13 ↗
9. Performance Evaluation of Full-Scale Geosynthetic Reinforced Flexible Pavement10.1680/jgein.17.00031 ↗
10. Norwood, G.J. (2019). Cyclic Plate Testing for Reinforced Airport Pavements—Phase I: Geogrid, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
11. Geosynthetic Subgrade Stabilization—Field Testing and Design Method Calibration10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.10.002 ↗
12. Geogrid Base Reinforcement with Aggregate Interlock and Modeling of Associated Stiffness Enhancement in Mechanistic Pavement Analysis10.3141/2116-12 ↗
13. Pullout Behavior of Geogrid by Test and Numerical Analysis10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(361) ↗
14. Factors Affecting the Pullout Behaviour of Extruded Geogrids Embedded in a Compacted Granular Soil10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.03.001 ↗
15. Evaluation of Load Transfer in Geogrids for Base Stabilization Using Transparent Soil10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.049 ↗
16. Pullout Resistance of Individual Longitudinal and Transverse Geogrid Ribs10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:1(37) ↗
17. Experimental Behavior of Polymeric Geogrids in Pullout10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:4(661) ↗
18. Stiffness of Soil-Geosynthetic Composite under Small Displacements. II: Experimental Evaluation10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001769 ↗
19. Stiffness of Soil–Geosynthetic Composite under Small Displacements: I. Model Development10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001768 ↗
20. Using Geogrids for Base Reinforcement as Measured by Falling Weight Deflectometer in Full-Scale Laboratory Study10.3141/1611-09 ↗
21. Resilient and Permanent Deformation Characteristics of Unbound Pavement Layers Modified by Geogrids10.3141/2369-01 ↗
22. Konietzky, H., te Kamp, L., Groeger, T., and Jenner, C. (2004). Numerical Modeling in Micromechanics via Particle Methods, Taylor & Francis Group.
23. Discrete Element Modelling of Geogrid-Reinforced Aggregates10.1680/geng.2006.159.1.35 ↗
24. Micro-Mechanism of the Interaction between Sand and Geogrid Transverse Ribs10.1680/gein.12.00028 ↗
25. Investigating Geogrid-Reinforced Ballast: Experimental Pull-out Tests and Discrete Element Modelling10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.001 ↗
26. A Mechanistic–Empirical Model for Base-Reinforced Flexible Pavements10.1080/10298430802009646 ↗
27. Bender Elements: Performance and Signal Interpretation10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063) ↗
28. Horizontal Stiffness Evaluation of Geogrid-Stabilized Aggregate Using Shear Wave Transducers10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.015 ↗
29. Geogrid Stabilization of Unbound Aggregates Evaluated Through Bender Element Shear Wave Measurement in Repeated Load Triaxial Testing10.1177/0361198120908230 ↗
30. Bender Element Field Sensor for the Measurement of Pavement Base and Subbase Stiffness Characteristics10.1177/0361198121998350 ↗
31. Airport Pavement Stiffness Monitoring and Assessment of Mechanical Stabilization Using Bender Element Field Sensor10.1177/03611981221084685 ↗
32. (2020). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) (Standard No. ASTM D2487-17).
33. (1995). Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes (Standard No. M145-91-UL).
34. (2020). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Standard No. ASTM C136-06).
35. Illinois Department of Transportation (2022). Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Authority of the State of Illinois.
36. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (Standard No. ASTM D1557-12(2021)).
37. Jewell, R.A., Milligan, G., Sarsby, R.W., and Dubois, D. (1985). Interaction between Soil and Geogrids. Polymer Grid Reinforcement: Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by the Science and Engineering Research Council and Netlon Ltd. and Held in London 22–23 March 1984, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
38. Laboratory Determination of Anisotropic Aggregate Resilient Moduli Using an Innovative Test Device10.3141/1687-02 ↗
39. Stiffness at Small Strain: Research and Practice10.1680/geot.2011.61.1.5 ↗
40. Objective Criteria for Determining Gmax from Bender Element Tests10.1680/geot.1996.46.2.357 ↗
41. Interpretation of Bender Element Tests10.1680/geot.1995.45.1.149 ↗
42. Behaviour of EPS Geofoam as Flexible Pavement Subgrade Material in Model Tests10.1680/gein.7.0163 ↗
43. Response of Pavement Foundations Incorporating Both Geocells and Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Geofoam10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103499 ↗
44. Yoder, E.J., and Witczak, M.W. (1991). Principles of Pavement Design, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
45. (1999). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials (Standard No. AASHTO T 307-99).
46. Hula, A., Maguire, A., Bunker, A., Rojeck, T., and Harrison, S. (2021). The 2020 EPA Automotive Trends Report: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Fuel Economy, and Technology Since 1975, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA).
47. Factors Influencing the Resilient Response of Granular Materials
48. Santamarina, J.C. (2001). Soils and Waves: [Particulate Materials Behavior, Characterization and Process Monitoring], J. Wiley & Sons.
49. Yokota, K., and Konno, M. (1980, January 8–13). Dynamic Poisson’s Ratio of Soil. Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
50. On Dynamic Shear Moduli and Poisson’s Ratios of Soil Deposits10.3208/sandf1972.13.4_61 ↗
51. Effect of Gradation and Particle Shape on Small-Strain Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio of Sands10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000811 ↗
52. Elastic Dynamic Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio of Sand–Silt Mixtures10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002991 ↗
53. A Study of Wave Velocities and Poisson Ratio of Recycled Concrete Aggregate10.1016/j.sandf.2016.07.002 ↗
54. Repeated Triaxial Characterization of Granular Bases
55. Identifying the Key Parameters That Influence Geogrid Reinforcement of Railway Ballast10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.003 ↗
56. Mulabdic, M., Minažek, K., and Kaluđer, J. (2018, January 17–19). Geogrids—What Is Important. Proceedings of the International Conference on Road and Rail Infrastructure CETRA, Zadar, Croatia.10.5592/CO/CETRA.2018.934 ↗
57. Holtz, R.D., Christopher, B.R., and Berg, R.R. (1998). Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines. Participant Notebook. NHI Course No. 13213 (Revised April 1998), National Highway Institute.
58. Scale Effect on the Behaviour of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil under Repeated Loads10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.002 ↗
59. Kang, M., Wang, H., Qamhia, I.I.A., Erol, T., and Wayne, M.H. (2023, January 5–8). Local Stiffness Enhancement by Multi-Axial Geogrid Stabilization Evaluated through Shear Wave Measurement. Proceedings of the Geosynthetics Conference 2023, Kansas City, MO, USA.
60. Gradation Effects Influencing Mechanical Properties of Aggregate Base–Granular Subbase Materials in Minnesota10.3141/2267-02 ↗
61. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2001). UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria) Airfield Pavement Design, US Dept. of Defense.
62. Analysis of Lightweight Deflectometer Test Based on In Situ Stress and Strain Response10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:2(199) ↗
63. Characterization of Two-Layer Soil System Using a Lightweight Deflectometer with Radial Sensors10.3141/2186-03 ↗