journal article·2023-12-06Open access

Smart Public Transport: A Bi-Objective Model for Maximizing Synchronizations and Minimizing Costs in Bus Timetables

Claudio Risso, Sergio Nesmachnow, Diego Rossit

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 24

Abstract

Modern cities heavily rely on public transport systems to enhance citizen access to urban services and promote sustainability. To optimize public transport, intelligent computer-aided tools play a pivotal role in decision making. This article tackles the complex challenge of bus timetabling, specifically focusing on improving multi-leg trips or transfers. It introduces a novel multi-objective Mixed-Integer Programming Linear (MILP) model that concurrently maximizes passenger transfers and minimizes budgetary costs, while also adhering to the minimum required quality-of-service constraints for regular (non-multi-leg) trips, and an exact resolution approach based on the ε-constraint method to obtain a set of efficient solutions is used. The competitiveness of the model is validated via a computational experimentation performed over real-world scenarios from the public transportation system of Montevideo, Uruguay. The findings evinced that the MILP model was able to compute a set of Pareto efficient solutions that explore the tradeoff between the number of successful transfers and the cost of the system. Moreover, the best tradeoff solutions surpass the current city timetable, excelling in both the number of transfers and cost efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transportation Planning and Optimization · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Urban Transport and Accessibility

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 11300, Uruguay

INMABB, Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional del Sur-CONICET, Bahía Blanca B8000CPB, Argentina

Funding

PEDECIBA (Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas), Uruguay

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Grava, S. (2002). Urban Transportation Systems: Choices for Communities, McGraw-Hill.
2. From intelligent to smart cities10.1080/17508975.2011.586671 ↗
3. Transit oriented development analysis of Parque Rodó neighborhood, Montevideo, Uruguay10.1016/j.wds.2022.100017 ↗
4. Tolley, R. (2003). Sustainable Transport, Woodhead Publishing.
5. Analysis of sustainable public transportation and mobility recommendations for Montevideo and Parque Rodó neighborhood10.3390/smartcities3020026 ↗
6. The effect of transportation policies on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission from urban passenger transportation10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.013 ↗
7. Bıyık, C., Abareshi, A., Paz, A., Ruiz, R.A., Battarra, R., Rogers, C.D., and Lizarraga, C. (2021). Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7.10.3390/joitmc7020146 ↗
8. Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 ↗
9. Bus timetable design to ensure smooth transfers in areas with low-frequency public transportation services10.1287/trsc.2019.0918 ↗
10. Bus network design10.1016/0191-2615(86)90047-0 ↗
11. Methods for creating bus timetables10.1016/0191-2607(87)90024-0 ↗
12. En-Route Planning of Multi-Destination Public-Transport Trips Using Smartphones10.5038/2375-0901.18.4.3 ↗
13. Ceder, A., and Tal, O. (1999). Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer.
14. Single bus line timetable optimization with big data: A case study in Beijing10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.108 ↗
15. Integrated electric bus timetabling and scheduling problem10.1016/j.trc.2023.104057 ↗
16. Learning to optimize timetables for efficient transfers in public transportation systems10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108616 ↗
17. Nesmachnow, S., Muraña, J., Goñi, G., Massobrio, R., and Tchernykh, A. (2020). Communications in Computer and Information Science, Springer International Publishing.
18. Nesmachnow, S., and Risso, C. (2021). Exact and Evolutionary Algorithms for Synchronization of Public Transportation Timetables Considering Extended Transfer Zones. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11157138 ↗
19. Intendencia de Montevideo (2023, August 03). Sistema de Transporte Metropolitano. Available online: https://montevideo.gub.uy/areas-tematicas/sistema-de-transporte-metropolitano.
20. Intendencia de Montevideo (2023, August 03). Sistema de Información Geográfica. Available online: https://sig.montevideo.gub.uy/.
21. Massobrio, R., and Nesmachnow, S. (2020). Urban mobility data analysis for public transportation systems: A case study in Montevideo, Uruguay. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10165400 ↗
22. Intendencia de Montevideo (2023, August 03). Observatorio de Movilidad, Transporte Público. Available online: http://montevideo.gub.uy/observatorio-de-movilidad/transporte-publico[05/2023].
23. Modelling Public Transport Route Choice, with Multiple Access and Egress Modes10.1016/j.trpro.2014.07.003 ↗
24. Risso, C., and Nesmachnow, S. (2023). Optimized design of a backbone network for public transportation in Montevideo, Uruguay. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su152316402 ↗
25. Valid inequalities for the synchronization bus timetabling problem10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.006 ↗
26. Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.002 ↗
27. Choosing arrival process models for service systems: Tests of a nonhomogeneous Poisson process10.1002/nav.21568 ↗
28. Predictive modeling of inbound demand at major European airports with Poisson and Pre-Scheduled Random Arrivals10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.056 ↗
29. Intendencia de Montevideo (2023, August 03). Sistema de Transporte Metropolitano, Tarifas. Available online: https://montevideo.gub.uy/areas-tematicas/sistema-de-transporte-metropolitano/tarifas-del-transporte-colectivo-urbano.
30. Marquez, G. (2023, August 08). Informe Sobre Tarifas y Subsidios a Usuarios del Sistema de Transporte Público de Pasajeros de Montevideo. Available online: https://montevideo.gub.uy/sites/default/files/biblioteca/imsubsidiosaltransportedigital.pdf.
31. Assessing standard costs in local public bus transport: A hybrid cost model10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.011 ↗
32. Analytical models for comparing operational costs of regular bus and semi-flexible transit services10.1007/s12469-019-00222-z ↗
33. Assessment of delivery models for semi-flexible transit operation in low-demand conditions10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.004 ↗
34. Measuring cost variability in provision of transit service10.3141/1735-13 ↗
35. Application of a cost-allocation model to Swiss bus and train lines10.1177/0361198118772702 ↗
36. Peak-base cost allocation models
37. Cherwony, W., Gleichman, G., Porter, B., and Hamilton, B. (1981). Bus Route Costing Procedures: A Review.
38. Converting the 0-1 polynomial programming problem to a 0-1 linear program10.1287/opre.22.1.180 ↗
39. Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6 ↗
40. An improved MIP formulation for products of discrete and continuous variables
41. Multi-objective re-synchronizing of bus timetable: Model, complexity and solution10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.007 ↗
42. Synchronization of bus timetabling10.1016/j.trb.2012.01.006 ↗
43. Models and a solution algorithm for planning transfer synchronization of bus timetables10.1016/j.tre.2019.10.001 ↗
44. The bus synchronization timetabling problem with dwelling times10.1016/j.trb.2023.05.010 ↗
45. Elbaz, H., Alaoui, A., and Bencheikh, G. (2018, January 10–12). The synchronization bus timetabling problem, modeling and resolution by the multi-agent approach. Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Logistics Operations Management (GOL), Le Havre, France.10.1109/GOL.2018.8378098 ↗
46. User perspectives in public transport timetable optimisation10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.005 ↗
47. Ali, N., Nakayama, S., and Yamaguchi, H. (2021). Analysis of Bus Fare Structure to Observe Modal Shift, Operator Profit, and Land-Use Choices through Combined Unified Transport Model. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14010139 ↗
48. Integrated railway rapid transit network design and line planning problem with maximum profit10.1016/j.tre.2019.04.007 ↗
49. Nearly optimal parameters for a rail/feeder-bus system on a rectangular grid10.1016/0191-2607(80)90092-8 ↗
50. Feeder bus timetable design and vehicle size setting in peak hour demand conditions10.1177/0361198119846462 ↗
51. Deb, K., Sindhya, K., and Hakanen, J. (2016). Decision Sciences, CRC Press.
52. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: Fundamentals and evolutionary methods10.1007/s11047-018-9685-y ↗
53. On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization
54. Analyzing the trade-off between minimizing travel times and reducing monetary costs for users in the transit network design10.1016/j.trb.2023.04.009 ↗
55. Evaluation and optimization of urban public transportation networks10.1016/0377-2217(80)90126-5 ↗
56. Multi-objective optimization in dial-a-ride public transportation10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.009 ↗
57. Li, H., and Lim, A. (2001, January 7–9). A metaheuristic for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Proceedings of the Proceedings 13th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2001, Dallas, TX, USA.
58. Sustainable service design and revenue management for electric tour bus systems: Seoul city tour bus service and the eco-mileage program10.1080/09669582.2018.1560453 ↗
59. Exact and heuristic approaches for multi-objective garbage accumulation points location in real scenarios10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.016 ↗
60. IBM (2023, August 03). ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio User Manual. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/icos/20.1.0?topic=cplex-users-manual.
61. Nesmachnow, S., and Iturriaga, S. (2019). Communications in Computer and Information Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Supercomputing in Mexico, Monterrey, Mexico, 25–29 March 2019, Springer.
62. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6 ↗
63. Coello, C., Van Veldhuizen, D., and Lamont, G. (2002). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Kluwer Academic.