Image-Guided Surgical and Pharmacotherapeutic Routines as Part of Diligent Medical Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
This contribution is part of the objective of diligent universal care that ensures the well-being of a patient. It aims to analyze and propose enriched image-guided procedures for surgical interventions and restricted delivery of implanted drugs in minimally invasive and non-ionizing circumstances. This analysis is supported by a literature review conducted in two ways. The first aims to illustrate the importance of recent research and applications involved in different topics of the subject; this is mainly the case for the introduction’s literature. The second concerns the literature dedicated to having more detailed information in context; this mainly concerns the citations in the different sections of the article. The universal goals of medical treatments are intended to involve the well-being of the patient and allow medical personnel to test new therapies and carry out therapeutic training without risk to the patient. First, the various functionalities involved in these procedures and the concerns of the magnetic resonance imaging technique (MRI) and ultrasound imaging technique (USI), recent contributions to the subject are reviewed. Second, the intervention procedures guided by the image and the implemented actions are analyzed. Third, the components of the fields involved in MRI are examined. Fourth, the MRI control of the treatments, its performance and its compliance are analyzed. Compatibility with MRI via electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) is conferred and demonstrated for an actuation example. Fifth, the extension of the concepts mentioned in the article, in the context of patient comfort and the training of medical staff is proposed. The main contribution of this article is the identification of the different strategic aids needed in healthcare related to image-assisted robotics, non-ionized, minimally invasive and locally restrictive means. Furthermore, it highlights the benefits of using phantoms based on real biological properties of the body, digital twins under human control, artificial intelligence tools and augmented reality-assisted robotics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Group of Electrical Engineering—Paris (GeePs), CNRS, University of Paris-Saclay and Sorbonne University, F91190 Gif sur Yvette, France
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Reiss, S., Wäscher, K., Caglar Özen, A., Lottner, T., Heidt, T., von Zur Mühlen, C., and Bock, M. (2023). Quantifying myocardial perfusion during MR-guided interventions without exogenous contrast agents: Intra-arterial spin labeling. Z. Med. Phys., in print.10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.01.002 ↗
2. MRI-guided robot intervention—Current state-of-the-art and new challenges10.1007/s44258-023-00003-1 ↗
3. An Artificial Intelligence-Aided Robotic Platform for Ultrasound-Guided Transcarotid Revascularization10.1109/LRA.2023.3251844 ↗
4. MR safety considerations for MRI-guided radiotherapy10.1016/B978-0-323-91689-9.00005-4 ↗
5. State of the art and future opportunities in MRI-guided robot-assisted surgery and interventions10.1109/JPROC.2022.3169146 ↗
6. Padhan, J., Tsekos, N., Al-Ansari, A., Abinahed, J., Deng, Z., and Navkar, N.V. (2022, January 7–9). Dynamic Guidance Virtual Fixtures for Guiding Robotic Interventions: Intraoperative MRI-guided Transapical Cardiac Intervention Paradigm. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Taichung, Taiwan.10.1109/BIBE55377.2022.00062 ↗
7. MR Imaging—Guided Intervention: Evaluation of MR Conditional Biopsy and Ablation Needle Tip Artifacts at 3T Using a Balanced Fast Field Echo Sequence10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.536 ↗
8. Kuah, T., Vellayappan, B.A., Makmur, A., Nair, S., Song, J., Tan, J.H., Kumar, N., and Quek, S.T. (2022). State-of-the-Art Imaging Techniques in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. Cancers, 14.10.3390/cancers14133289 ↗
9. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging sequences for pediatric body imaging10.1007/s00247-022-05528-y ↗
10. Technological Advances of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Today’s Health Care Environment10.1097/RLI.0000000000000678 ↗
11. MRI-based cephalometrics: A scoping review of current insights and future perspectives10.1259/dmfr.20230024 ↗
12. Chianca, V., Vincenzo, B., Cuocolo, R., Zappia, M., Guarino, S., Di Pietto, F., and Del Grande, F. (2023). MRI Quantitative Evaluation of Muscle Fatty Infiltration. Magnetochemistry, 9.10.3390/magnetochemistry9040111 ↗
13. Wang, X., Guo, S., Li, Z., Luo, Q., Dai, Y., Zhang, H., Ye, Y., Gong, Q., and Luo, K. (2021). Amphiphilic branched polymer-nitroxides conjugate as a nanoscale agent for potential magnetic resonance imaging of multiple objects in vivo. J. Nanobiotechnol., 19.10.1186/s12951-021-00951-z ↗
14. MRI safety for leave-on powdered hair thickeners under 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI: Measurement of deflection force, MRI artifact, and evaluation of preexamination screening10.1007/s13246-023-01267-y ↗
15. Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts10.1007/s13246-022-01183-7 ↗
16. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Around Metal at 1.5 Tesla: Techniques from Basic to Advanced and Clinical Impact10.1097/RLI.0000000000000798 ↗
17. Basic and Advanced Metal-Artifact Reduction Techniques at Ultra-High Field 7-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Phantom Study Investigating Feasibility and Efficacy10.1097/RLI.0000000000000850 ↗
18. Diagnostic Value of Advanced Metal Artifact Reduction Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Periprosthetic Joint Infection10.1097/RCT.0000000000001297 ↗
19. Haskell, M.W., Nielsen, J.F., and Noll, D.C. (2023). Off-resonance artifact correction for MRI: A review. NMR Biomed., 36.10.1002/nbm.4867 ↗
20. Development and evaluation of a numerical simulation approach to predict metal artifacts from passive implants in MRI10.1007/s10334-021-00966-5 ↗
21. Practical Safety Considerations for Integration of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy10.1016/j.prro.2020.07.008 ↗
22. Rapid safety assessment and mitigation of radiofrequency induced implant heating using small root mean square sensors and the sensor matrix Qs10.1002/mrm.28968 ↗
23. Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging10.1016/j.joto.2020.12.005 ↗
24. Metallic Implants in MRI—Hazards and Imaging Artifacts
25. Design and control of a novel magnetic resonance imaging-compatible breast intervention robot10.1177/1729881420927853 ↗
26. Reducing MRI susceptibility artefacts in implants using additively manufactured porous Ti-6Al-4V structures10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.038 ↗
27. New-Generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction: First In Vitro Experience at 0.55 T and Comparison with 1.5 T10.1097/RLI.0000000000000866 ↗
28. Improving MR image quality in patients with metallic implants10.1148/rg.2021200092 ↗
29. Manso Jimeno, M., Vaughan, J.T., and Geethanath, S. (2023). Superconducting magnet designs and MRI accessibility: A review. NMR Biomed., 36.10.1002/nbm.4921 ↗
30. Utilization of SEMAC-VAT MRI for Improved Visualization of Posterior Fossa Structures in Patients with Cochlear Implants10.1097/MAO.0000000000003016 ↗
31. Design and 3D printing of novel titanium spine rods with lower flexural modulus and stiffness profile with optimised imaging compatibility10.1007/s00586-023-07674-9 ↗
32. Cardiac MRI: State of the Art10.1148/radiol.223008 ↗
33. Basit, A., Inam, O., and Omer, H. (2023). Accelerating GRAPPA reconstruction using SoC design for real-time cardiac MRI. Comput. Biol. Med., 160.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107008 ↗
34. MRI Compatible Fiber Optic Multi Sensor Platform for Real Time Vital Monitoring10.1109/JLT.2021.3055252 ↗
35. Wang, F., Qi, H., De Goyeneche, A., Heckel, R., Lustig, M., and Shimron, E. (2023). K-band: Self-supervised MRI Reconstruction via Stochastic Gradient Descent over K-space Subsets. arXiv.
36. MR Safe Robotic Manipulator for MRI-Guided Intracardiac Catheterization10.1109/TMECH.2018.2801787 ↗
37. A Decade of MRI Compatible Robots: Systematic Review10.1109/TRO.2022.3212626 ↗
38. An MRI-compatible endonasal surgical robotic system: Kinematic analysis and performance evaluation10.1016/j.mechatronics.2023.103029 ↗
39. Robotic Instruments Inside the MRI Bore: Key Concepts and Evolving Paradigms in Imaging-enhanced Cranial Neurosurgery10.1016/j.wneu.2023.01.025 ↗
40. Lin, M.T., Furlong, C., and Hwang, C.H. (2021). Advancement of Optical Methods & Digital Image Correlation in Experimental Mechanics. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-59773-3 ↗
41. Lin, M.T., Furlong, C., and Hwang, C.H. (2020). Advancement of Optical Methods & Digital Image Correlation in Experimental Mechanics. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-59773-3 ↗
42. Dual-Mode 1-D Linear Ultrasound Array for Image-Guided Drug Delivery Enhancement without Ultrasound Contrast Agents10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3268603 ↗
43. Microbubble-mediated ultrasound drug-delivery and therapeutic monitoring10.1080/17425247.2017.1266328 ↗
44. Making waves: How ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches10.1039/D1MA01197A ↗
45. Application of microneedle patches for drug delivery; doorstep to novel therapies10.1177/20417314221085390 ↗
46. Enhanced drug delivery to cancer cells through a pH-sensitive polycarbonate platform10.1039/D2BM01626E ↗
47. Spatial, temporal, and dose control of drug delivery using noninvasive magnetic stimulation
48. Huang, J., and Xiao, K. (2022). Nanoparticles-based strategies to improve the delivery of therapeutic small interfering RNA in precision oncology. Pharmaceutics, 14.10.3390/pharmaceutics14081586 ↗
49. Jia, M., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., and Li, C. (2021). Nanoparticle-based delivery systems modulate the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer for enhanced therapy. J. Nanobiotechnol., 19.10.1186/s12951-021-01134-6 ↗
50. Nano-drug delivery system for pancreatic cancer: A visualization and bibliometric analysis10.3389/fphar.2022.1025618 ↗
51. Evaluating metallic artefact of biodegradable magnesium-based implants in magnetic resonance imaging
52. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction10.1016/j.fcl.2023.05.012 ↗
53. MRI of Implantation Sites Using Parallel Transmission of an Optimized Radiofrequency Excitation Vector10.3390/tomography9020049 ↗
54. The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: A preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system10.1007/s00405-021-07005-y ↗
55. Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Adverse Local Tissue Reactions near Metal Implants after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Report10.4055/cios20228 ↗
56. Fierens, G., Walraevens, J., Peeters, R., Glorieux, C., and Verhaert, N. (2023). Metal artefact reduction sequences for a piezoelectric bone conduction implant using a realistic head phantom in MRI. arXiv.
57. Image Quality and Artifact Reduction of a Cochlear Implant with Rotatable Magnets10.1097/MAO.0000000000003840 ↗
58. Vuorinen, A.-M. (2023). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Safety and Image Quality. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki]. Available online: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/352340/Vuorinen_Aino-Maija_dissertation2023.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
59. Recent advances in managing MRI artifacts caused by auditory implants: The effect of Metal Artifact Reduction Sequences
60. In Vivo Evaluation of Biodegradability and Biocompatibility of Fe30Mn Alloy10.3415/VCOT-17-06-0080 ↗
61. Wang, Y., Venezuela, J., and Dargusch, M. (2021). Biodegradable shape memory alloys: Progress and prospects. Biomaterials, 279.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121215 ↗
62. Nutrient alloying elements in biodegradable metals: A review10.1039/D1TB01962G ↗
63. Progress in manufacturing and processing of degradable Fe-based implants: A review10.1007/s40204-022-00189-4 ↗
64. Effect of silver additions on the microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of biodegradable Fe-30Mn-6Si10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102689 ↗
65. Tai, C.-C., Lo, H.-L., Liaw, C.-K., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-H., Yang, K.-Y., Huang, C.-C., Huang, S.-I., Shen, H.-H., and Lin, T.-H. (2021). Biocompatibility and Biological Performance Evaluation of Additive-Manufactured Bioabsorbable Iron-Based Porous Suture Anchor in a Rabbit Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22147368 ↗
66. Characterization and biological properties of nanostructured clinoenstatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123969 ↗
67. Laser-modified fe–30 mn surfaces with promoted biodegradability and biocompatibility toward biological applications10.1007/s10853-021-06139-y ↗
68. Saliba, L., Sammut, K., Tonna, C., and Pavli, F. (2023, November 01). FeMn and FeMnag Biodegradable Alloys: An In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4325636.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15671 ↗
69. Hao, S., Yang, T., Zhang, A., Wang, P., Jiang, H., Shen, D., Guo, L., and Ye, M. (2023). Evaluation of Biodegradable Alloy Fe30Mn0.6N in Rabbit Femur and Cartilage through Detecting Osteogenesis and Autophagy. Biomed Res. Int., 18.10.1155/2023/3626776 ↗
70. Ultrashort Laser Texturing for Tuning Surface Morphology and Degradation Behavior of the Biodegradable Fe–20Mn Alloy for Temporary Implants10.1002/adem.202101496 ↗
71. Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffolds10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.042 ↗
72. Jia, X., Zhang, Y., Du, H., and Yu, Y. (2021). Experimental Study of Double Cable-Conduit Driving Device for Mri Compatible Biopsy Robots. J. Mech. Med. Biol., 21.10.1142/S0219519421400145 ↗
73. Automatic needle tracking using Mask R-CNN for MRI-guided percutaneous interventions10.1007/s11548-020-02226-8 ↗
74. A Navigation Strategy for Patient-Specific Needle Deflection in Transperineal MRI-Guided Prostate Interventions10.1016/j.brachy.2011.02.120 ↗
75. Real-time Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Biopsy Using SmartFrame® Stereotaxis in the Setting of a Conventional Diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Suite10.1093/ons/opw035 ↗
76. Wartenberg, M., Schornak, J., Carvalho, P., Patel, N., Iordachita, I., Tempany, C., Hata, N., Tokuda, J., and Fischer, G.S. (2017). The Hamlyn Symposium, Imperial College.
77. Wartenberg, M., Patel, N., Li, G., Gregory, S., and Fischer, G.S. (2016, January 16–20). Towards synergistic control of hands-on needle insertion with automated needle steering for MRI-guided prostate interventions. Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591878 ↗
78. Wu, D., Li, G., Patel, N., Yan, J., Hu Kim, G., Monfaredi, R., Cleary, K., and Iordachita, I. (2019, January 23–27). Remotely Actuated Needle Driving Device for MRI-Guided Percutaneous Interventions: Force and Accuracy Evaluation. Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857260 ↗
79. Pons-Faudoa, F.P., Ballerini, A., Sakamoto, J., and Grattoni, A. (2019). Advanced implantable drug delivery technologies: Transforming the clinical landscape of therapeutics for chronic diseases. Biomed. Microdevices, 21.10.1007/s10544-019-0389-6 ↗
80. Sinko, P.J. (2006). Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
81. Stewart, S.A., Dominguez-Robles, J., Donnelly, R.F., and Larraneta, E. (2018). Implantable polymeric drug delivery devices: Classification, manufacture, materials, and clinical applications. Polymers, 10.10.3390/polym10121379 ↗
82. Drug-releasing implants: Current progress, challenges and perspectives10.1039/C4TB00548A ↗
83. Controlled drug delivery systems: Past forward and future back10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.054 ↗
84. Recent progress in drug delivery10.1016/j.apsb.2019.08.003 ↗
85. Evolution of implantable and insertable drug delivery systems10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.02.006 ↗
86. Reservoir-based polymer drug delivery systems10.1177/2211068211428189 ↗
87. Grumezescu, A.M. (2018). Nanostructures for the Engineering of Cells, Tissues and Organs, William Andrew Applied Science Publishers.
88. Damiati, S., Kompella, U.B., Damiati, S.A., and Kodzius, R. (2018). Microfluidic Devices for Drug Delivery Systems and Drug Screening. Genes, 9.10.3390/genes9020103 ↗
89. Drug delivery systems for programmed and on-demand release10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.002 ↗
90. MEMS devices for drug delivery10.1016/j.addr.2017.11.003 ↗
91. Beg, S., Rahman, M., Jain, A., Saini, S., Hasnain, M.S., Swain, S., Imam, S., Kazmi, I., and Akhter, S. (2018). Fullerens, Graphenes and Nanotubes, Elsevier.
92. Impact of drug loading in mesoporous silica-amorphous formulations on the physical stability of drugs with high recrystallization tendency
93. Sequential release of immunomodulatory cytokines binding on nano-hydroxyapatite coated titanium surface for regulating macrophage polarization and bone regeneration10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110241 ↗
94. Biodegradable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: The need for a new nomenclature to classify drug-eluting stent technology10.1093/eurheartj/ehz330 ↗
95. Towards an image-guided restricted drug release in friendly implanted therapeutics10.1051/epjap/2018180201 ↗
96. Assessment of Supervised Drug Release in Cordial Embedded Therapeutics
97. Thermal effects of electromagnetic origin from heating processes to biological disturbances due to field exposure—A review10.24294/tse.v6i1.1950 ↗
98. Human Exposure Assessment in Dynamic Inductive Power Transfer for Automotive Applications10.1109/TMAG.2017.2658955 ↗
99. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (2010). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields for low frequencies (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Phys., 99, 818–836.10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86 ↗
100. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys., 118, 483–524.10.1097/HP.0000000000001210 ↗