journal article·2023-10-14Open access

Quantitative Analysis of Biodiesel Adulterants Using Raman Spectroscopy Combined with Synergy Interval Partial Least Squares (siPLS) Algorithms

Yuemei Su, Maogang Li, Chunhua Yan, Tianlong Zhang, Hongsheng Tang, Hua Li

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 20

Abstract

Biodiesel has emerged as an alternative to traditional fuels with the aim of reducing the impact on the environment. It is produced by the esterification of oleaginous seeds, animal fats, etc., with short-chain alcohols in an alkaline solution, which is one of the most commonly used methods. This increases the oxygen content (from the fatty acids) and promotes the fuel to burn faster and more efficiently. The accurate quantification of biodiesel is of paramount importance to the fuel market due to the possibility of adulteration, which can result in economic losses, engine performance issues and environmental concerns related to corrosion. In response to achieving this goal, in this work, synergy interval partial least squares (siPLS) algorithms in combination with Raman spectroscopy are used for the quantification of the biodiesel content. Different pretreatment methods are discussed to eliminate a large amount of redundant information of the original spectrum. The siPLS technique for extracting feature variables is then used to optimize the input variables after pretreatment, in order to enhance the predictive performance of the calibration model. Finally, the D1-MSC-siPLS calibration model is constructed based on the preprocessed spectra, the selected input variables and the optimized model parameters. Compared with the feature variable selection methods of interval partial least squares (iPLS) and backward interval partial least squares (biPLS), results elucidate that the D1-MSC-siPLS calibration model is superior to the D1-MSC-biPLS and the D1-MSC-iPLS in the quantitative analysis of adulterated biodiesel. The D1-MSC-siPLS calibration model demonstrates better predictive performance compared to the full spectrum PLS model, with the optimal determination coefficient of prediction (R2P) being 0.9899; the mean relative error of prediction (MREP) decreased from 9.51% to 6.31% and the root--mean-squared error of prediction (RMSEP) decreased from 0.1912% (v/v) to 0.1367% (v/v), respectively. The above results indicate that Raman spectroscopy combined with the D1-MSC-siPLS calibration model is a feasible method for the quantitative analysis of biodiesel in adulterated hybrid fuels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China

Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry & Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi · Shaanxi Provincial Education Department

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Support vector regression approach to optimize the biodiesel composition for improved engine performance and lower exhaust emissions10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128604 ↗
2. Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination and quantification of fuel blends10.1002/jrs.5602 ↗
3. Impact of biodiesel production on a soybean biorefinery10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.064 ↗
4. Exploratory analysis of biodiesel/diesel blends by Kohonen neural networks and infrared spectroscopy10.1039/C4AY02995J ↗
5. Carlucci, C. (2022). An overview on the production of biodiesel enabled by continuous flow methodologies. Catalysts, 12.10.3390/catal12070717 ↗
6. Encinar, J.M., González, J.F., Martínez, G., and Nogio-Delgado, S. (2021). Use of NaNO3/SiAl as heterogeneous catalyst for fatty acid methyl Ester production from rapeseed oil. Catalysts, 11.10.3390/catal11111405 ↗
7. Nisar, S., Hanif, M.A., Rashid, U., Hanif, A., Akhtar, M.N., and Ngamcharussrivichai, C. (2021). Trends in widely used catalysts for fatty acid methyl esters (Fame) production: A review. Catalysts, 11.10.3390/catal11091085 ↗
8. Quantification and classification of cotton biodiesel content in diesel blends, using mid-infrared spectroscopy and chemometric methods10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.011 ↗
9. Biodiesel production from transesterified waste cooking oil by zinc-modified anthill catalyst: Parametric optimization and biodiesel properties improvement10.1016/j.jece.2020.104955 ↗
10. Trends of non-destructive analytical methods for identification of biodiesel feedstock in diesel-biodiesel blend according to European Commission Directive 2012/0288/EC and detecting diesel-biodiesel blend adulteration: A brief review10.1016/j.talanta.2017.12.057 ↗
11. Study on the emission characteristics of urban buses at different emission standards fueled with biodiesel blends10.1021/acsomega.1c06992 ↗
12. Nanocatalysts for biodiesel production10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104152 ↗
13. NMR in the time domain: A new methodology to detect adulteration of diesel oil with kerosene10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.078 ↗
14. Determination of biodiesel content when blended with mineral diesel fuel using infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration10.1016/j.microc.2006.01.019 ↗
15. MCR-ALS and PLS coupled to NIR/MIR spectroscopies for quantification and identification of adulterant in biodiesel-diesel blends10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.072 ↗
16. Determination of total phosphorus in biodiesel by ion chromatography10.1016/j.microc.2020.105875 ↗
17. Determination of the biodiesel content on biodiesel/diesel blends and their adulteration with vegetable oil by high-performance liquid chromatography10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03133 ↗
18. Analysis of biodiesel-diesel blends using ultrafast gas chromatography (UFGC) and chemometric methods: Extending ASTM D7798 to biodiesel10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.102 ↗
19. A piecewise mirror extension local mean decomposition method for denoising of near-infrared spectra with uneven noise10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104655 ↗
20. Detection of illegal additives in Brazilian S-10/common diesel B7/5 and quantification of Jatropha biodiesel blended with diesel according to EU 2015/1513 by MIR spectroscopy with DD-SIMCA and MCR-ALS under correlation constraint10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119159 ↗
21. Evaluation of molecular spectroscopy for predicting oxidative degradation of biodiesel and vegetable oil: Correlation analysis between acid value and UV–Vis absorbance and fluorescence10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.10.022 ↗
22. Spectroscopic performance and emission analysis of Glycine max biodiesel10.1007/s40032-020-00570-x ↗
23. Determination of residual oil in diesel oil by spectrofluorimetric and chemometric analysis10.1016/j.talanta.2008.03.003 ↗
24. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of biodiesel by NMR spectroscopic methods10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119114 ↗
25. Alternative method to quantify biodiesel and vegetable oil in diesel-biodiesel blends through 1H NMR spectroscopy10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.027 ↗
26. Evaluation of biodiesel–diesel blends quality using 1H NMR and chemometrics10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.026 ↗
27. Discriminant analysis of biodiesel fuel blends based on combined data from Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and stable carbon isotope analysis10.1016/j.chemolab.2016.12.004 ↗
28. Understanding the water structures by near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy10.1002/jrs.6399 ↗
29. Direct surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy of nucleic acids: From fundamental studies to real-life applications10.1039/C7CS00809K ↗
30. Non-destructive quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical ointment by transmission Raman spectroscopy10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106095 ↗
31. Line shape analysis of the Raman spectra from pure and mixed biofuels esters compounds10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.038 ↗
32. Detecting phytoplankton cell viability using NIR Raman spectroscopy and PCA10.1021/acsomega.1c06262 ↗
33. Detection of low numbers of bacterial cells in a pharmaceutical drug product using Raman spectroscopy and PLS-DA multivariate analysis10.1039/D2AN00683A ↗
34. Raman spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of Lornoxicam in solid dosage forms10.1002/jrs.6476 ↗
35. Raman spectroscopy in cell biology and microbiology10.1002/jrs.6204 ↗
36. Orlando, A., Franceschini, F., Muscas, C., Pidkova, S., Bartoli, M., Rovere, M., and Tagliaferro, A. (2021). A comprehensive review on Raman spectroscopy applications. Chemosensors, 9.10.3390/chemosensors9090262 ↗
37. Remote Raman spectroscopy of explosive precursors10.1117/1.OE.60.8.084108 ↗
38. Raman spectroscopy for chemical biology research10.1021/jacs.2c05359 ↗
39. Determination of octane numbers and Reid vapor pressure in commercial gasoline using dispersive fiber-optic Raman spectroscopy
40. Non-destructive and clean prediction of aviation fuel characteristics through Fourier transform-Raman spectroscopy and multivariate calibration10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00195-8 ↗
41. Determination of ethanol in fuel ethanol and beverages by Fourier transform (FT)-near infrared and FT-Raman spectrometries10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00870-5 ↗
42. MCR-ALS with correlation constraint and Raman spectroscopy for identification and quantification of biofuels and adulterants in petroleum diesel10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.04.002 ↗
43. Determination of API gravity and total and basic nitrogen content by mid-and near-infrared spectroscopy in crude oil with multivariate regression and variable selection tools10.1080/00032719.2019.1628246 ↗
44. Fast identification of soybean varieties using Raman spectroscopy10.1016/j.vibspec.2022.103447 ↗
45. iPCPA: Interval permutation combination population analysis for spectral wavelength selection10.1016/j.aca.2021.338635 ↗
46. Optical characterization of pure vegetable oils and their biodiesels using Raman spectroscopy10.1088/1054-660X/26/4/046001 ↗
47. Recursive wavelet peak detection of analytical signals10.1007/s10337-016-3155-4 ↗
48. Analysis of biodiesel-diesel blends: Does ultrafast gas chromatography provide for similar separation in a fraction of the time?10.1016/j.chroma.2022.462903 ↗