journal article·2023-09-27Open access

Uncertainty Quantification for Thermodynamic Simulations with High-Dimensional Input Spaces Using Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion: Retrofit of a Large Thermal Power Plant

Roeland De Meulenaere, Diederik Coppitters, Ale Sikkema, Tim Maertens, Julien Blondeau

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 19

Abstract

The assessment of the future thermodynamics performance of a retrofitted heat and power production unit is prone to many uncertainties due to the large number of parameters involved in the modeling of all its components. To carry out uncertainty quantification analysis, alternatives to the traditional Monte Carlo method must be used due to the large stochastic dimension of the problem. In this paper, sparse polynomial chaos expansion (SPCE) is applied to the retrofit of a large coal-fired power plant into a biomass-fired combined heat and power unit to quantify the main drivers and the overall uncertainty on the plant’s performance. The thermodynamic model encompasses over 180 components and 1500 parameters. A methodology combining the use of SPCE and expert judgment is proposed to narrow down the sources of uncertainty and deliver reliable probability distributions for the main key performance indicators (KPIs). The impact of the uncertainties on each input parameter vary with the considered KPI and its assessment through the computation of Sobol’ indices. For both coal and biomass operations, the most impactful input parameters are the composition of the fuel and its heating value. The uncertainty on the performance and steam quality parameters is not much affected by the retrofit. Key furnace parameters exhibit a skewed probability distribution with large uncertainties, which is a strong attention point in terms of boiler operation and maintenance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Thermo and Fluid Dynamics (FLOW), Faculty of Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Brussels Institute for Thermal-Fluid Systems and Clean Energy (BRITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Institute of Mechanics, Materials and Civil Engineering (iMMC), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Place du Levant, 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Onyx Power, Missouriweg 69, 3199 LB Maasvlakte, The Netherlands

Funding

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program · Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions10.1016/j.esr.2022.100939 ↗
2. A critical overview of upstream cultivation and downstream processing of algae-based biofuels: Opportunity, technological barriers and future perspective10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.03.015 ↗
3. An Overview of Biofuel as a Renewable Energy Source: Development and Challenges10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.087 ↗
4. Geothermal resource and reserve assessment methodology: Overview, analysis and future directions10.1016/j.rser.2019.109515 ↗
5. Overview of energy storage in renewable energy systems10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.243 ↗
6. Energy storage systems towards 205010.1016/j.energy.2020.119634 ↗
7. Property impacts on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) processes: A review10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.079 ↗
8. Advances in Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and CO2 Mitigation Potential Analysis10.3390/cleantechnol4040073 ↗
9. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.O.H.O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P.R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Pidcock, R., and Connors, S. (2018). Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, IPCC. Technical Report.
10. Halkos, G.E., and Gkampoura, E.C. (2020). Reviewing Usage, Potentials, and Limitations of Renewable Energy Sources. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13112906 ↗
11. Constraints of fossil fuels depletion on global warming projections10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.011 ↗
12. Global Energy Monitor (2023, March 22). Global Coal Plant Tracker. Available online: www.globalenergymonitor.org.
13. Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development?10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.109 ↗
14. Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.003 ↗
15. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004 ↗
16. Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.002 ↗
17. Variny, M., Varga, A., Rimár, M., Janošovský, J., Kizek, J., Lukáč, L., Jablonský, G., and Mierka, O. (2021). Advances in Biomass Co-Combustion with Fossil Fuels in the European Context: A Review. Processes, 9.10.3390/pr9010100 ↗
18. Xu, Y., Yang, K., Zhou, J., and Zhao, G. (2020). Coal-Biomass Co-Firing Power Generation Technology: Current Status, Challenges and Policy Implications. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12093692 ↗
19. Techno-economic evaluation of different operating scenarios for indigenous and imported coal blends and biomass co-firing on supercritical coal-fired power plant performance10.1016/j.energy.2020.118721 ↗
20. Tzelepi, V., Zeneli, M., Kourkoumpas, D.S., Karampinis, E., Gypakis, A., Nikolopoulos, N., and Grammelis, P. (2020). Biomass Availability in Europe as an Alternative Fuel for Full Conversion of Lignite Power Plants: A Critical Review. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13133390 ↗
21. Analysis of coal conversion to biomass as a transitional technology10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.045 ↗
22. Coal-to-biomass retrofit in Alberta–value of forest residue bioenergy in the electricity system10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.128 ↗
23. De Meulenaere, R., Maertens, T., Sikkema, A., Brusletto, R., Barth, T., and Blondeau, J. (2021). Energetic and Exergetic Performances of a Retrofitted, Large-Scale, Biomass-Fired CHP Coupled to a Steam-Explosion Biomass Upgrading Plant, a Biorefinery Process and a High-Temperature Heat Network. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14227720 ↗
24. Rubinstein, R.Y., and Kroese, D.P. (2016). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118631980 ↗
25. Sudret, B. (2014). Risk and Reliability in Geotechnical Engineering, CRC Press. Chapter 6.
26. Data-driven state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery packs based on Gaussian process regression10.1016/j.energy.2020.118000 ↗
27. A response surface method based on support vector machines trained with an adaptive experimental design10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.05.001 ↗
28. General foundations of high-dimensional model representations10.1023/A:1019188517934 ↗
29. Robust design optimization of a photovoltaic-battery-heat pump system with thermal storage under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty10.1016/j.energy.2021.120692 ↗
30. Quantifying the impact of furnace heat transfer parameter uncertainties on the thermodynamic simulations of a biomass retrofit10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101592 ↗
31. Montgomery, D.C. (2014). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons.
32. Blatman, G. (2009). Adaptive Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions for Uncertainty Propagation and Sensitivity Analysis. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Blaise Pascal].
33. Sparse polynomial chaos expansions: Literature survey and benchmark10.1137/20M1315774 ↗
34. Compressed sensing10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 ↗
35. Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression10.1016/j.jcp.2010.12.021 ↗
36. A robust and efficient stepwise regression method for building sparse polynomial chaos expansions10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.015 ↗
37. (2023, April 30). THERMOFLEX, Available online: www.thermoflow.com.
38. Evaluation of steam-exploded wood pellets storage and handling safety in a coal-designed power plant10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04246 ↗
39. Fosnacht, D.R., and Hendrickson, D.W. (2016). Use of Biomass Fuels in Global Power Generation with a Focus on Biomass Pre-Treatment, Natural resources research institute, University of Minnesota Duluth. Technical Report.
40. Lam, P.S. (2011). Steam Explosion of Biomass to Produce Durable Wood Pellets. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of British Columbia].
41. A Workup Protocol Combined with Direct Application of Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Aqueous Samples from Large-Scale Steam Explosion of Biomass10.1021/acsomega.0c05642 ↗
42. Online adjustment of Furnace Exit Gas Temperature field using advanced infrared pyrometry: Case study of a 1500 MWth utility boiler10.1016/j.csite.2020.100649 ↗
43. Wang, T., and Stiegel, G. (2017). Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Technologies, Woodhead Publishing.
44. Miller, B.G. (2017). Clean Coal Engineering Technology, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.].
45. RHEIA: Robust design optimization of renewable Hydrogen and dErIved energy cArrier systems10.21105/joss.04370 ↗
46. Robust design optimization and stochastic performance analysis of a grid-connected photovoltaic system with battery storage and hydrogen storage10.1016/j.energy.2020.118798 ↗
47. How does a resilient, flexible ammonia process look? Robust design optimization of a Haber-Bosch process with optimal dynamic control powered by wind10.1016/j.proci.2022.06.027 ↗
48. Stochastic Optimal Energy Storage Management for Energy Routers via Compressive Sensing10.1109/TII.2021.3095141 ↗