journal article·2010-04

Importance of the atom-pair bond in metallic alloying

T. Rajasekharan, V. Seshubai

Intermetallics· Volume 18· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Rajasekharan and Girgis reported that binary systems with intermetallic compounds of a particular crystal structure form a straight line on a map using Miedema parameters. In this paper, the universality of that observation is examined. Observations from a study of 143 binary systems that crystallize in six different crystal structures at AB3 composition are discussed. Prediction of concomitant and mutually exclusive structure types in binary metallic phase diagrams, and of phase transitions among different structure types, has been demonstrated. This behavior is unexpected because Miedema parameters are isotropic in nature and structural energies are generally assumed to be small. We argue in this paper that each point on the map stands for the energy of an unlike atom-pair (A-B) bond, with the bond energy remaining nearly the same at all compositions in the phase diagram. This argument is confirmed by comparing the nearest-neighbour (A-B) bond lengths for the compounds of the structure types CaCu5 and CsCl, when concomitant with MgCu2 structure type. This fact leads to an important conclusion that one can define a bond energy for the metallic unlike-atom-pair bond as is usually done for a conventional chemical bond.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical and Alloy Processes · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Miedema · Physica · 1980 · 100B · 1
2. Miedema · J Less-Common Met · 1975 · 41 · 28310.1016/0022-5088(75)90034-X ↗
3. Boom · J Less-Common Met · 1976 · 45 · 23710.1016/0022-5088(76)90270-8 ↗
4. Miedema · Physica B · 1992 · 182 · 110.1016/0921-4526(92)90565-A ↗
5. St John · Phys Rev Lett · 1974 · 33 · 109510.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1095 ↗
6. Zunger · Phys Rev Lett · 1980 · 44 · 58210.1103/PhysRevLett.44.582 ↗
7. Zunger · 1981 · vol. 1
8. Villars · J Less-Common Met · 1986 · 119 · 17510.1016/0022-5088(86)90208-0 ↗
9. Pettifor · Solid State Commun · 1984 · 49
10. Machlin · 1986 · vol. 1 · 389
11. Massalski · 1986 · vol. 1 · 131
12. Thomson · 1997 · vol. 1 · 479
13. Rajasekharan · Phys Rev B · 1983 · 27 · 91010.1103/PhysRevB.27.910 ↗
14. Rajasekharan · J Less Common Met · 1983 · 92 · 16310.1016/0022-5088(83)90238-2 ↗
15. Zunger · 1981 · vol. 1 · 129
16. Savitskii · Dokl Acad Nauk SSSR · 1975 · 223 · 1383
17. Sov. Phys.-Dokl · 1975 · 223 · 414
18. Jolly · 1991
19. Axon · Nature · 1948 · 162 · 99710.1038/162997a0 ↗
20. Mott · Philos Mag · 1957 · 2 · 25910.1080/14786435708243814 ↗
21. Chen · Intermetallics · 2004 · 12 · 5910.1016/j.intermet.2003.07.003 ↗
22. Ghosh · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 322510.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.028 ↗
23. V. Seshubai, V.L. Kameswari and T. Rajasekharan (unpublished).
24. Pearson · 1967
25. Villars · 1985
26. 1990
27. Pearson · 1972
28. Pearson · 1972
29. Massalski · 1961 · vol. 10 · 3
30. Robinson · 1966 · 49
31. Pauling · Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. · 1987 · 84 · 475410.1073/pnas.84.14.4754 ↗
32. Laves · 1966 · 129
33. Pearson · 1972
34. Machlin · 1986 · vol. 1 · 395
35. Pearson · 1972