journal article·2023-03-25Open access

Aquatic Macrophyte Biomass Periodically Harvested Form Shipping Routes and Drainage Systems in a Selected Region of Poland as a Substrate for Biogas Production

Marcin Dębowski, Marcin Zieliński, Joanna Kazimierowicz, Maria Walery

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 7

Abstract

One of the identified obstacles to the development of biogas plants is the limited sources of organic substrates. Hydrophytes varying in morphology, chemical composition, and origin proved to be viable alternatives. This study’s aim was to determine the feasibility of deploying biomass from the cleansing of water reservoirs for anaerobic digestion. A mass and energy balance was estimated for Warmia–Mazury Province (Poland), the so-called Thousand Lake District. The effectiveness of anaerobic digestion was determined in anaerobic batch respirometric reactors. The biomass of hydrophytes harvested from this area approximated 38,070 Mg FM/year. The biogas yield from emergent plants approximated 350 m3/MgVS, and the average CH4 content of biogas reached 55%, whereas the respective values obtained from submerged biomass reached 270 m3/MgVS and 58% CH4. The total CH4 volume achievable from the facility fed with waste biomass of this type allows producing ca. 1,654,560 m3CH4/year, which enables reaching 866 kW theoretical thermal power and 636 kWe net electrical power with the facility. The contribution of biomass from mowing in this energy effect was about 84%, whereas that of the submerged vegetation obtained by hacking the bottom was 16%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment · Algal biology and biofuel production · Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland

Department of Water Supply and Sewage Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

Funding

Minister of Education and Science

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Intensification of Biogas Production Using Various Technologies: A Review10.1002/er.5338 ↗
2. Comparative Analysis of Methods and Models for Predicting Biochemical Methane Potential of Various Organic Substrates10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.270 ↗
3. Aishwarya, S., Sruthi, G., Aditya, M.N., Sivagami, K., and Chakraborty, S. (2022). Sustainable and Clean Energy Production Technologies, Springer.
4. Organic Waste Used In Agricultural Biogas Plants
5. Optimisation of Methane Fermentation as a Valorisation Method for Food Waste Products10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105913 ↗
6. A Model-Based Analysis of the Future Capacity Expansion for German Biogas Plants under Different Legal Frameworks10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.041 ↗
7. Production of Bioethanol and Biogas from Spirodela Polyrhiza in a Biorefinery Concept and Output Energy Analysis of the Process
8. Martínez-Soto, D., Ponce-Hernández, A., Maldonado-Miranda, J.J., and Carranza-Álvarez, C. (2021). Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Springer.
9. Algal Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production and Carbon Sequestration: A Review10.1007/s10311-022-01458-1 ↗
10. Riaz, F., Ali, M., Khan, S., Shah, A.A., and Badshah, M. (2022). Process Development and Optimization of Wastewater Derived Integrated Biorenery for Production of Bio-Based Energy Carriers Employing Spirodela Polyrhiza. Res. Sq., 1–14.10.21203/rs.3.rs-1841101/v1 ↗
11. Production of Biogas with Aquatic Weed Water Hyacinth and Development of Briquette Making Machine
12. Biomethane Potential of Invasive Aquatic Weed Water Primrose
13. Sustainability Assessment of Water Hyacinth with Swine Dung for Biogas Production, Methane Enhancement, and Biofertilizer10.1007/s13399-020-00850-7 ↗
14. Dębowski, M., Zieliński, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Kujawska, N., and Talbierz, S. (2020). Microalgae Cultivation Technologies as an Opportunity for Bioenergetic System Development—Advantages and Limitations. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12239980 ↗
15. Biodiesel Production through Algal Cultivation in Urban Wastewater Using Algal Floway10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.031 ↗
16. Noori, R., Ghiasi, B., Salehi, S., Esmaeili Bidhendi, M., Raeisi, A., Partani, S., Meysami, R., Mahdian, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., and Abolfathi, S. (2022). An Efficient Data Driven-Based Model for Prediction of the Total Sediment Load in Rivers. Hydrology, 9.10.3390/hydrology9020036 ↗
17. Akpasi, S.O., Anekwe, I.M.S., Adedeji, J., Kiambi, S.L., Akpasi, S.O., Anekwe, I.M.S., Adedeji, J., and Kiambi, S.L. Biochar-Productive Technologies, Properties and Application, IntechOpen.
18. Auma, E.O. (2020). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes) with Ruminal Slaughterhouse Waste under Mesophilic Conditions. [Ph. D. Thesis, University of Nairobi].
19. Aquatic Plants during Decomposition as an Environment-Forming Factor for Zooplankton: An Experiment in Microcosms10.1134/S1995425522020068 ↗
20. Pereira, S.I.A., Castro, P.M.L., and Calheiros, C.S.C. (2022). Bioenergy Crops, CRC Press.
21. Capodaglio, A.G., Bolognesi, S., and Cecconet, D. (2021). Sustainable, Decentralized Sanitation and Reuse with Hybrid Nature-Based Systems. Water, 13.10.3390/w13111583 ↗
22. Economic Assessment of Eucalyptus Globulus Short Rotation Energy Crops under Contrasting Silvicultural Intensities on Marginal Agricultural Land10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.028 ↗
23. Investigation of Macrophyte for Bioproduct Potential
24. Macrophytes Enhance Reach-Scale Metabolism on a Daily, Seasonal and Annual Basis in Agricultural Lowland Streams
25. Aquatic Plants–Based Risk Model for Assessment of Ecological Safety of Rivers10.1080/10807039.2015.1138088 ↗
26. Accuracy Validation of Point Clouds of UAV Photogrammetry and Its Application for River Management10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-195-2017 ↗
27. Hill, M.P., Coetzee, J.A., Martin, G.D., Smith, R., and Strange, E.F. (2020). Biological Invasions in South Africa, Springer.
28. Study of River Harvesting & Trash Cleaning Machine
29. Dębowski, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Zieliński, M., and Bartkowska, I. (2022). Co-Fermentation of Microalgae Biomass and Miscanthus × Giganteus Silage—Assessment of the Substrate, Biogas Production and Digestate Characteristics. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12147291 ↗
30. Mahmoud, A.E.D., Umachandran, K., Sawicka, B., and Mtewa, T.K. (2021). Water Resources Security and Management for Sustainable Communities. Phytochem. Mil. Health Phytotoxins Nat. Def., 509–522.10.1016/B978-0-12-821556-2.00011-6 ↗
31. Impact of Anthropogenic Activities on Water Quality Parameters of Glacial Lakes from Rodnei Mountains, Romania10.1016/j.envres.2020.109136 ↗
32. Walczak, N. (2018). Operational Evaluation of a Small Hydropower Plant in the Context of Sustainable Development. Water, 10.10.3390/w10091114 ↗
33. Moeller, L., Bauer, A., Wedwitschka, H., Stinner, W., and Zehnsdorf, A. (2018). Crop Characteristics of Aquatic Macrophytes for Use as a Substrate in Anaerobic Digestion Plants—A Study from Germany. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11113016 ↗
34. Biomass Potential Analysis of Aquatic Biomass and Challenges for Its Use as a Nonconventional Substrate in Anaerobic Digestion Plants10.1002/elsc.201800032 ↗
35. Research on the Use of Selected Macrophytes in the Process of Methane Fermentation
36. Mixed Silage of Elodea and Wheat Straw as a Substrate for Energy Production in Anaerobic Digestion Plants10.1186/s13705-018-0148-1 ↗
37. Biogas Production from Boreal Herbaceous Grasses--Specific Methane Yield and Methane Yield per Hectare10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.044 ↗
38. Anaerobic Digestion of Cattail by Rumen Cultures10.1016/j.wasman.2005.08.003 ↗
39. Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Water Hyacinth: Effects of Particle Size, Plant Nitrogen Content, and Inoculum Volume10.1016/0960-8524(93)90211-S ↗
40. Schmalblättrige Wasserpest (Elodea Nuttallii) Als Cosubstrat Für Biogasanlagen
41. Biogas Production from Reed Biomass: Effect of Pretreatment Using Different Steam Explosion Conditions10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.021 ↗
42. An Assessment of Duckweed as a Potential Lignocellulosic Feedstock for Biogas Production10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.007 ↗
43. Effect of Thermal Pre-Treatment on Co-Digestion of Duckweed (Lemna Gibba) and Waste Activated Sludge on Biogas Production10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.133 ↗
44. Evaluation of Marine Algae as a Source of Biogas in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Reactor System10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.005 ↗
45. Cyanobacteria and Microalgae: A Positive Prospect for Biofuels10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.030 ↗
46. Efficiency of the Methane Fermentation Process of Macroalgae Biomass Originating from Puck Bay